Social Work

There is one change in our physical world that we still don't understand: gravitational force. What causes the feeling of gravity, the feeling of weight? What is the real foundation of this force that we experience every second of our life? We still don't know. At this moment, there is no theory about Gravity that clearly explains what Gravitation is and that is broadly accepted as scientifically valid. Probably we need some elements of different theories to put together. Some parts to combine, some parts to throw away, some parts to change. There must be something that we have overlooked until now.

Einstein Field Equations seem to be extremely difficult to understand and consist of many different tensors. The LHS and RHS of the equation are governed by the "Einstein Coupling Constant "Kappa". In this paper I present a much more easy to understand interpretation of the EFE. My point of view is, that all these tensors together are summarized and compressed in a clear equation with just 3 parameters

The knowledge regarding the biological basis of human behaviour has grown explosively in recent years. We know that feelings and emotions are based on biochemical substances, and we know that our behaviour is largely controlled by neurotransmitters in our brain and limbic system.
It is time to translate the update of the modern life sciences into social interventions. “How to Change our Human Nature” shows that biological intervention, and these methods give more insight into human behaviour and offer new solutions for behavioural problems.

Part 1 discusses how biochemical processes work and how they are the foundation of human behaviour. You see how easily the delicate biochemical balance can be disrupted and can lead to uninhibited behaviour and behavioural problems.
Part 2 examines the possibilities that we have to intervene in behaviour by regulating our biochemical housekeeping: our neurotransmitters and hormones.

Ruud Loeffen was a lecturer at Zuyd University as part of the Social Studies faculty until 2009.

In our solar system and in the universe exists a Root Mean Square Velocity (VRMS) This velocity is the basis for all motions of the planets around the sun. The value of VRMS equals: 1.2278E+04 m/s or about 12.3 km/sec. The Root Mean Square Velocity in our solar system is also 12.3 km/sec. We calculated and recognized this VRMS in:
* the Gravitational Constant
* the Hubble Constant
* the Einsteinian Coupling Constant “kappa”
* the Temperature of CMB.

The equation for the Lorentz Transformation of Mass-Energy (LTME) can be directly related to the expansion of the universe as seen by Hubble. The LTME is based on the change in Mass-Energy if a Mass is accelerated or if it is moving in orbit around a central Mass. What " velocity " must be used in the β factor v 2 /c 2 if we want to apply the LTME in our solar system? Tufail Abbas and Ruud Loeffen found that the velocity " v " in the LTME is NOT equal to the different velocities of the planets. Instead they applied the Root Mean Square Velocity (V RMS) of all planets in our solar system. Detailed calculations showed clearly that the acceleration at the surface of the planets can be calculated by the " gamma-f actor " based on the VRMS.

In Einstein Field Equations we find the Coupling Constant "kappa". This constant is very complicated and consists of many parameters. The explanations that I found are extremely difficult. If you follow the traces of the EFE in Wiki, you find connections with Jacobi field, with co-variant derivatives with respect to the Levi-Civita connection, Newton-Euler equations, and the Riemann curvature tensor.
However: My point of view is, that all these tensors together are summarized and compressed in a clear equation with just 3 parameters. Attached to the paper are equations and calculations. In invite you to read my paper "Around kappa". I like to know:
1.  Is my interpretation valid? If no: why not?
2. Is my interpretation too simple?
3. If my interpretation is right, does it just mean "So what?"

Perhaps you are interested in my paper "Why the stone is falling". “If we pick up a stone and then let it go, why does it fall to the ground?” Albert Einstein, The Special and General Theory.
I split the Gravitational Constant in two parts: One part based on light-speed squared and one part on the Coupling Constant "kappa" I wrote a few months ago About "kappa" (Around KAPPA PDF ) If you were not interested, you will not be interested in this paper "Why the stone is falling"    (saying to save your time) I am not a physicist nor a mathematician. I just want to know the answer on that question from Einstein.

The equation for the Lorentz Transformation of Mass-Energy  (LTME) can be directly related to the expansion of the universe as seen by Hubble. The LTME is based on the change in Mass-Energy if a Mass is accelerated or if it is moving in orbit around a central Mass. What “velocity” must be used in the  β factor v2/c2 if we want to apply the LTME in our solar system? Tufail Abbas and Ruud Loeffen found that the velocity “v” in the LTME is NOT equal to the different velocities of the planets. Instead they applied the Root Mean Square Velocity (VRMS) of all planets in our solar system.  Detailed calculations showed clearly that the acceleration at the surface of the planets can be calculated by the “gamma-factor” based on the VRMS. This velocity equals 12.278 km/sec  This VRMS is applied  in the Lorentz Transformation of Mass-Energy to calculate the acceleration at the surface of a planet. Also, the Coupling Constant “kappa” in the Einsteinian Field Equations, the Hubble Constant, the Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave background and the Gravitational Constant of Newton are directly related to the VRMS of 12.278 m/s.

The knowledge regarding the biological basis of human behavior has grown explosively in recent years. We know that feelings and emotions are based on biochemical substances, and we know that our behavior is largely controlled by neurotransmitters in our brain and limbic system.
It is time to translate the update of the modern life sciences into social interventions. “How to Change our Human Nature” gives more insight into human behavior and offers new solutions for behavioral problems.

Part 1 discusses how biochemical processes work and how they are the foundation of human behavior. You see how easily the delicate biochemical balance can be disrupted and can lead to uninhibited behavior and behavioral problems.
Part 2 examines the possibilities that we have to intervene in behavior by regulating our biochemical housekeeping: our neurotransmitters and hormones.

Here you find the summary of  4 video’s that are related to my book:
CON-FUSING GRAVITATION. Applying the Lorentz Transformation of Mass-Energy
http://bit.ly/2CFGDIh
You can download this book for free. For a quick idea about the content you can view one or more video’s as listed here under. Each about 7.5 minutes.

In this paper “A Fair Tale about Expansion”, I tried to catch the most important ideas from my book Con-fusing Gravitation. It is about my conviction that all matter is expanding. I am a firm supporter of Expansion Tectonics, a geological theory about Earth Expansion. This theory is dismissed by mainstream science for about 6o years. I know many objections against expansion. The scientific world is very huffy about the increase of mass and gets easily angry if they read about it again. I know most of these objections. Now I would like to read some supporting views, ideas, insights, convictions, complementary, similarly and encouraging. Really, I know the dismissing arguments. In the last two years I found an astonishing number of papers, books, videos about Expansion Tectonics, all dismissed. However, there is an increasing number of recent discoveries that plead for a review of all these dismissed papers, books, and videos. Mainstream cannot stop this tsunami.

We find a lot of data about exoplanets in "The Masses and Orbital Dynamics of Exoplanets" One of these properties is: the Orbital Period. This Orbital period is directly correlated with the orbital radius and the orbital velocity. In this paper I want to examen what these properties tell us about the exoplanets. Quote: "Kepler-11 has six small planets with fluffy hydrogen-rich envelopes, all contained within the equivalent orbital distance of Venus." This means that 6 planets are orbiting within the radial distance from Venus to our Sun. Venus is next close to the Sun after Mercury. Is this exceptional in the world of exoplanets? Not at all. I made an overview of exoplanets from which we have trustable, confirmed exact data. Have a look https://bit.ly/exoplanetsNASAdata In exoplanets.org/plots You can make your own overview. You will see that nearly all exoplanets have a radial distance to their central star between 3 days and 100 days. Our earth takes 365 days.

In this paper, I gathered indications and information to determine the properties of the Primordial Elementary Particle (PEP), derived from the VRMS, the Root Mean Square Velocity of the planets in our solar system, and from the primordial CMB.
Some indications are very strong. Some others are educated guesses. Some can be interpreted as coincidental. Some may be not related at all. I think all presented data are worth to be considered as indications.
After the VRMS indications, I present the properties of the PEP. These are inseparable from the original VRMS.
The “Contemplations” are probably a not broadly accepted way to analyze physic phenomena. This method is used as an extension of the method of “Introspection” in psychology. I use this method in this paper because “gravity” is such a common all-day experience. It is inseparable from our daily perceptions. With these “Contemplations” I try to find a way to alter the inseparability. It may lead to a new interpretation from the falling stone, waterfalls, a quiet lake, a camera in space, plates attracting each other, and experiments in space. I am not a physicist. Nor a mathematician. My roots are in psychology and sociology. However, this “psychological method” of contemplation is not a weird method for physicists: Einstein called it “Gedankenexperiment” (thought experiment).

The pictures of the James Web Space telescope are astonishing. Such thrilling progress in technology! We peer into the deep universe by going back in time. We come close to the beginning of the universe, mostly considered to be a “Big Bang”.
Still, there is some warning in my head: We see about the same pictures in any time period, be it 1, 2, 3, ….13 billion years ago. To me, it seems that every period is about the same. Even more important: Every period contains young, middle-aged, and old star systems. It means that the universe could be a kind of “steady state” universe. A continuous process of creation.