
Peter Rudd
Related Authors
Zane L Berge
University of Maryland Baltimore County
Elvynna Leong
Universiti Brunei Darussalam
Edwige Simon
University of Colorado, Boulder
Mark Baron
University of South Dakota
David De Jong
Dakota State University
Juliana Raffaghelli
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
InterestsView All (10)
Uploads
Papers by Peter Rudd
This presentation looks at this shift and asks what coastal towns are doing, in terms of school improvement, in order to address the problem. It also makes recommendations on how local authorities in coastal areas might take this agenda forward.
The findings are published in four reports: an overview report of activity across the three regions, and one report for each area. The reports summarise the benefits and effectiveness of the support, as well as some suggestions for improvements.
Key findings
Leadership provision was viewed positively by interviewees across the three City Challenge areas and elements of the work rated particularly highly were:
the bespoke nature of the support
the creation of a school-to-school support network within each area
making use of existing resources and expertise
opportunities to work across boundaries
the use of mentoring and coaching
the calibre and commitment of the professionals coordinating and delivering the support.
The teaching schools model was viewed positively by all those involved in it, either as providers or as recipients. This was seen to provide high-quality CPD which often re-energised teachers. The training programmes were also viewed as good quality and good value for money.
NLE/LLE provision was also perceived to be highly successful. Recipient schools were enthusiastic about the bespoke, customised nature of this provision and they were pleased that they were active, reciprocal participants in the school improvement process (it was not ‘done to’ them). They particularly appreciated the school-based nature of the provision, which gave it credibility and grounding.
Leadership Strategies were viewed as representing good value for money, largely related to the mode of delivery (e.g. school-to-school support), the quality of the provision and the impacts of the programmes (e.g. improved leadership capacity and whole-school improvements).
With rising tuition fees, pressure on universities to improve access to socially disadvantaged groups (including financial pressures) and the continuing general (and cross-party) concern about social mobility, this issue has generated a great deal of interest.
This paper briefly explores the current landscape of interventions to promote fairer / improved access to higher education. It focuses primarily on recent or current multi-university interventions which have had some kind of evaluation. Particular attention is given to: (1) the characteristics / activities of such interventions which research shows to work well; and (2) indications of the best / most effective research methods to employ in this area.
This presentation looks at this shift and asks what coastal towns are doing, in terms of school improvement, in order to address the problem. It also makes recommendations on how local authorities in coastal areas might take this agenda forward.
The findings are published in four reports: an overview report of activity across the three regions, and one report for each area. The reports summarise the benefits and effectiveness of the support, as well as some suggestions for improvements.
Key findings
Leadership provision was viewed positively by interviewees across the three City Challenge areas and elements of the work rated particularly highly were:
the bespoke nature of the support
the creation of a school-to-school support network within each area
making use of existing resources and expertise
opportunities to work across boundaries
the use of mentoring and coaching
the calibre and commitment of the professionals coordinating and delivering the support.
The teaching schools model was viewed positively by all those involved in it, either as providers or as recipients. This was seen to provide high-quality CPD which often re-energised teachers. The training programmes were also viewed as good quality and good value for money.
NLE/LLE provision was also perceived to be highly successful. Recipient schools were enthusiastic about the bespoke, customised nature of this provision and they were pleased that they were active, reciprocal participants in the school improvement process (it was not ‘done to’ them). They particularly appreciated the school-based nature of the provision, which gave it credibility and grounding.
Leadership Strategies were viewed as representing good value for money, largely related to the mode of delivery (e.g. school-to-school support), the quality of the provision and the impacts of the programmes (e.g. improved leadership capacity and whole-school improvements).
With rising tuition fees, pressure on universities to improve access to socially disadvantaged groups (including financial pressures) and the continuing general (and cross-party) concern about social mobility, this issue has generated a great deal of interest.
This paper briefly explores the current landscape of interventions to promote fairer / improved access to higher education. It focuses primarily on recent or current multi-university interventions which have had some kind of evaluation. Particular attention is given to: (1) the characteristics / activities of such interventions which research shows to work well; and (2) indications of the best / most effective research methods to employ in this area.