Log inSign up
Wei Ji Ma
1,553 posts
user avatar
Wei Ji Ma
@weijima01
Prof of neuroscience and psychology at NYU | Co-Founder, ruralchina.org | Founder, growingupinscience.org | Founding member, @ScientistAction.
New York, NY
weijima.com
Joined April 2016
259
Following
10.4K
Followers
  • Pinned
    user avatar
    Wei Ji Ma
    @weijima01
    Feb 2, 2025
    5.1K
  • user avatar
    Wei Ji Ma
    @weijima01
    Oct 15, 2020
    Many chess players believe that women play worse chess than men. Here is how to respond. 1/
  • user avatar
    Wei Ji Ma
    @weijima01
    May 9, 2022
    New book draft of "Bayesian modeling of perception and action", with @KordingLab @dangoldreich, now available at bayesianmodeling.com. We incorporated 100s of comments from the community - thanks so much everyone! To be published by @mitpress but e-book will remain free.
  • user avatar
    Wei Ji Ma
    @weijima01
    Oct 15, 2020
    Replying to @weijima01
    Anyway.. next time someone tells you that women are inferior to men because @MagnusCarlsen is much higher rated than Hou Yifan, tell them to do a permutation test and then try again. (Matlab code in the Chessbase article). 9/9
  • user avatar
    Wei Ji Ma
    @weijima01
    Oct 15, 2020
    Replying to @weijima01
    In this article on @ChessBase, I show that on average, Indian women play as well as men, and that the gap between the top female and the top male Indian player can easily be due to the participation gap only. en.chessbase.com/post/what-gend… 6/
    What gender gap in chess?
    From en.chessbase.com
  • user avatar
    Wei Ji Ma
    @weijima01
    Nov 14, 2021
    Bayesian modeling of perception and action: draft of book with Konrad Kording (@KordingLab) and Daniel Goldreich (@dangoldreich) done after 10 years... To be published by @mitpress but already freely available on bayesianmodeling.com. Comments are welcome (link there)!! 1/2
  • user avatar
    Wei Ji Ma
    @weijima01
    Oct 15, 2020
    Replying to @weijima01
    But... the proportion of rated female players is very low (most likely due to many systemic disadvantages and biases that they face). If you want to compare groups of unequal sizes, it's a really bad idea to use the top individuals as a metric. 3/
  • user avatar
    Wei Ji Ma
    @weijima01
    Oct 8, 2023
    Bayesian models of perception and action, with @KordingLab and @dangoldreich, published by @mitpress. Hardcover is $65 but free e-book should be available soon, as will be solutions to selected problems. Comments and corrections are now welcome on bayesianmodeling.com.
    109K
  • user avatar
    Wei Ji Ma
    @weijima01
    Oct 15, 2020
    Replying to @weijima01
    On average, Group A will score 91.4 and Group B 67.2. The only difference between Groups A and B is the number of people. The larger group has more shots at a high score, so will on average get a higher score. 5/
  • user avatar
    Wei Ji Ma
    @weijima01
    Oct 15, 2020
    Replying to @weijima01
    If you take into account how chauvinist and actively oppressive the chess world is towards women (see also this: en.chessbase.com/post/women-in-…), it's safe to say that the top female chess players are actually OVERperforming. 8/
    Women in chess: role of innate-ability beliefs
    From en.chessbase.com
  • user avatar
    Wei Ji Ma
    @weijima01
    May 31, 2023
    Finally out! This paper took approximately 10 years. Work by @basvanopheusden with @Ikuperwajs, @zahybnaya, Gianni Galbiati, and Yunqi Li. nature.com/articles/s4158… Happy to answer questions. Brief history of the project on cns.nyu.edu/malab/publicat…
    76K
  • user avatar
    Wei Ji Ma
    @weijima01
    Jul 23, 2021
    As part of an amazing mentorship course for faculty by @yael_niv and @CollegeInMind, I drafted a "Statement on lab culture and expectations". Higher-level than a lab manual. docs.google.com/document/d/1f6… Would love comments (here or in the document). And feel free to use anything!
  • user avatar
    Wei Ji Ma
    @weijima01
    Oct 15, 2020
    Replying to @weijima01
    Let’s say group A has 10 people, group B has 2. Each of the 12 people randomly gets assigned a number between 1 and 100. Then I use the highest number in Group A as the score for Group A and the highest number in Group B as the score for Group B. 4/
  • user avatar
    Wei Ji Ma
    @weijima01
    Oct 15, 2020
    Replying to @weijima01
    Essentially the same argument was made back in 2009 by Merim Bilalić, Kieran Smallbone, Peter McLeod, and @FernandGobet, but chess players don't know this article or choose to ignore it. 7/

New to X?

Sign up now to get your own personalized timeline!

Create account

By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, including Cookie Use.

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accessibility·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
Don't miss what's happening
People on X are the first to know.
Log inSign up