Log inSign up
Thom Lambert
2,047 posts
user avatar
Thom Lambert
@profthomlambert
Author of “How to Regulate.” Mizzou Law prof (antitrust, corporations, contracts, regulatory economics). Recipient of much grace.✝️
Columbia, MO / Chicago
amazon.com/How-Regulate-P…
Joined February 2018
1,107
Following
3,315
Followers

New to X?

Sign up now to get your own personalized timeline!

Create account

By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, including Cookie Use.

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accessibility·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
Don't miss what's happening
People on X are the first to know.
Log inSign up
  • user avatar
    Thom Lambert
    @profthomlambert
    Jan 18, 2025
    If my law school posted this, I would hide my head in a bag.
    user avatar
    Georgetown Law
    @GeorgetownLaw
    Jan 17, 2025
    Congratulations to #GeorgetownLaw Professor @vicnourse on her decades of hard work advocating on behalf of women's rights and the Equal Rights Amendment #ERA, which Pres. Biden this morning said should be considered the law of the land. Read more: cnn.it/3CdaV5A
    Readers added context
    The National Archivist has stated the amendment cannot be certified without action from Congress or the courts: abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden… Biden's January 17, 2025 statement is purely symbolic and lacks legal authority: npr.org/2025/01/17/nx-… The original ratification deadline of 1979 (extended to 1982) was missed: apnews.com/article/joe-bi…
    162K
  • user avatar
    Thom Lambert
    @profthomlambert
    May 28, 2020
    I do wish my friend would stop embarrassing himself. As he knows, S230 doesn’t insulate platforms from liability based on their own speech. When twitter fact-checked POTUS, it spoke. S230 protects it from liability for HIS speech. Without 230, it could hardly let him post.
    user avatar
    Josh Hawley
    @HawleyMO
    May 28, 2020
    Replying to @HawleyMO
    As currently interpreted by courts, Section 230 treats #BigTech companies as passive distributors even when they substantially transform third-party content, like @Twitter did to @realDonaldTrump. They get to act like publishers, but without the accountability. That’s a problem!
  • user avatar
    Thom Lambert
    @profthomlambert
    Feb 4, 2021
    My former colleague @HawleyMO, whom I recruited to Mizzou Law and consider a friend, penned this @firstthingsmag piece. He argues that Robinhood’s restriction on GameStop trading was a Big Tech conspiracy to hold down the little guy. A few thoughts. 1/x
    firstthings.com
    Calling Wall Street’s Bluff - First Things
    There’s a popular theory about how our financial markets work that goes like this: The markets are efficient mechanisms for “price discovery”—as in, the ideal price. The true price,...
  • user avatar
    Thom Lambert
    @profthomlambert
    Feb 4, 2021
    Replying to @profthomlambert
    The problem is that the end doesn’t justify the means, at least not for Christians. Jesus clearly taught that his followers are to *be* certain sorts of people, not to achieve certain ends. And a smart person who misleads others to gain power isn’t who we’re to be. 7/x
  • user avatar
    Thom Lambert
    @profthomlambert
    Feb 4, 2021
    Replying to @profthomlambert
    @HawleyMO is lying. I hate to say that of a friend, but it’s true. He’s saying things he knows are false. As many have explained, Robinhood halted certain trading to deal with a liquidity crisis. He knows there was no conspiracy to protect hedge funds. 2/x
    Why Brokers Had to Restrain Trading in GameStop Shares
    Opinion | Why Brokers Had to Restrain Trading in GameStop Shares
    From wsj.com
  • user avatar
    Thom Lambert
    @profthomlambert
    Feb 4, 2021
    Replying to @profthomlambert
    This new breed of Christian nationalist may retort, “Yeah, that’s a recipe for continued electoral defeat and ultimately anti-Christian policies.” To which Jesus responds, “What doth it profit a man to gain the whole world and yet lose his soul?”12/x
  • user avatar
    Thom Lambert
    @profthomlambert
    Feb 4, 2021
    Replying to @profthomlambert
    But that fact doesn’t support @HawleyMO’s campaign to rail against the sort of coastal elites that, like him, went to schools such as Stanford and Yale and now, like him, have amassed power. This campaign, he hopes, will endear him to regular folks. 3/x
  • user avatar
    Thom Lambert
    @profthomlambert
    Feb 4, 2021
    Replying to @profthomlambert
    So he’s said stuff he knows isn’t true. Just like he’s done when discussing Section 230. And the First Amendment. And the antitrust laws. And the validity of election challenges. 4/x
  • user avatar
    Thom Lambert
    @profthomlambert
    Feb 4, 2021
    Replying to @profthomlambert
    Come home @HawleyMO. I personally miss the old you, and we Missourians want you to lead us with integrity. My hunch is that if you do so, you’ll advance politically. But even if you don’t, you will have put first things first. END
  • user avatar
    Thom Lambert
    @profthomlambert
    Feb 4, 2021
    Replying to @profthomlambert
    For the Christian politician, electoral success and advancement is a second thing. Christian virtue—truthfulness, kindness, humility, peacemaking—must come first. “Seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added unto you.” 11/x
  • user avatar
    Thom Lambert
    @profthomlambert
    Feb 4, 2021
    Replying to @profthomlambert
    The sort of “muscular” Christian who views political success as paramount for protecting religion, and thus as an objective to be achieved however necessary, puts second things first. As Lewis warned, we’re likely to lose both first things (virtue) & second (elections). 14/x
  • user avatar
    Thom Lambert
    @profthomlambert
    Feb 4, 2021
    Replying to @profthomlambert
    I believe he does so because he thinks it will help him win elections, which will empower him to make constructive changes that he thinks (and I often agree) would make our society more just. It’s an “end justifies the means” thing. 6/x
  • user avatar
    Thom Lambert
    @profthomlambert
    Feb 4, 2021
    Replying to @profthomlambert
    As Lewis elsewhere put it, “Put first things first and we get second things thrown in: put second things first and we lose *both* first and second things.” 10/x
  • user avatar
    Thom Lambert
    @profthomlambert
    Jun 24, 2025
    A “modern-day” monopoly is apparently when four highly efficient firms, none of which holds a majority market share nor has the ability to control market prices on its own, collectively possess a high market share.
    user avatar
    Josh Hawley
    @HawleyMO
    Jun 24, 2025
    A total of 4 companies control a whopping 80% of the entire beef-processing industry. That's a modern-day monopoly. The winners here? The monopolists - like Tyson Foods. The losers? Farmers & grocery shoppers. We need more industry competition in America
    00:00
    38K