Controversial question:
Why are so few women interested in history?
The people in my life who read and discuss history are all men. All of the YouTube history channels are run by -- and watched by - men. What's up, ladies?
I think modern people underestimate how much women worked back in the day too.
Men&women had family work (farm, or a business like brewery or butcher-house or bakery). Women would also sign up to help richer ppl or would sew clothes or smth like that.
Men were home, too
I have sympathy for the abused women, but just bc you would've stayed in this scenario, doesn't mean another woman would want to.
I support those who propose separation in this scenario, though.
when boys were outperforming girls (cuz they had much fewer opportunities to get educated), it was used as an argument "and therefore, women are retarded and shouldn't have rights".
when girls are outperforming boys, it's an issue that should be solved in favour of boys
this is what ED girlies simply don't understand:
There're girls who are just NARROW. They aren't just skinny, they're NARROW. Their shoulders, their rib cage, their hips, their face, the BONE structure are just NARROW.
It's truly mindboggling to me how so many men grow up with an absentee/alcoholic/abusive/cheating dad and their takeaway from that is that their dad was the good guy while their mother had failed them somehow.
something I've noticed:
"Women Posting Ws" have a lot of instances of praising husbands
"Women Posting Ls" and "Men Posting Ws" have a lot of instances of making fun of women being abused by men and praising men for abusing women
