Log inSign up
Rachel Thomas
10.2K posts
user avatar
Rachel Thomas
@math_rachel
R&D at answer ai | fast ai co-founder | past: math PhD, immunology MS, early eng at uber, prof at USF Data Institute
Brisbane, Australia
rachel.fast.ai
Joined May 2013
863
Following
92.3K
Followers
  • Pinned
    user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Aug 22, 2020
    Data Ethics course: ethics.fast.ai Deep Learning course: course.fast.ai Data Science blog: fast.ai/topics/ Diversity blog: medium.com/@racheltho NLP: bit.ly/fastai-nlp Talks: bit.ly/rachel-videos Medicine, AI, & Bias: bit.ly/MLmed
  • user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Jan 1, 2022
    “Covid zero is impossible with omicron, so what’s the point in even trying to reduce/slow transmission?” My answer: 🧵 1/
  • user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Jan 26, 2022
    Before 2020, I never wore a mask during flu-season. This is NOT bc I had done an analysis and decided that preventable flu deaths were "acceptable". It is because I didn't know, and if I had known, I would have started wearing a mask during flu season ages ago...
  • user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Jan 1, 2022
    Replying to @math_rachel
    Many seem to be assuming that covid provides lasting immunity, even though we already know it does not. Each covid infection raises the risk of creating a new "pre-existing condition" that will make subsequent infections more dangerous 5/
  • user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Jan 1, 2022
    Replying to @math_rachel
    Even if EVERYONE does get covid, delaying WHEN we do so has benefits. The longer we can wait, the greater the chance of new treatments being developed, more effective vaccines, better anti-virals, scaling production of paxlovid, etc. 7/
  • user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Jan 1, 2022
    Replying to @math_rachel
    (your regular reminder: "mild" covid can still involve damage to the vascular, immune, & central nervous systems) 4/
  • user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Jan 1, 2022
    Replying to @math_rachel
    Not everyone is going to get omicron. And the difference between 80% vs 60% (both still very big) of a population catching it would be a huge difference in absolute numbers of people that wind up permanently disabled. 3/
  • user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Jan 1, 2022
    Replying to @math_rachel
    Due to bad messaging, many people misunderstand: - Severity & prevalence of LongCOVID - Airborne spread Many may voluntarily choose to change their behavior if they better understood (particularly if given options: free N95s, work-from-home when possible, etc) 9/
  • user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Jan 1, 2022
    Replying to @math_rachel
    Adults deserve to be told the truth. Too much public health messaging about covid has been infantilizing, patronizing, & flat-out inaccurate. 8/
    user avatar
    Ryan Hisner
    @LongDesertTrain
    Dec 17, 2021
    1/ Can't put it better than @micah_arsham does here. The CDC treats the public like 1st-graders. Their job is to inform & advise the public, warning of any imminent dangers, & they've utterly failed. People will be blind-sided, with grim consequences. x.com/micah_arsham/s…
  • user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Jan 1, 2022
    Replying to @math_rachel
    Not everyone's immune systems will be able to take the repeated hits. In a population, getting covid 1x (on average) over the next 2 years vs. 3x (on average) over next 2 years is likely to result in significant differences in how many end up permanently disabled. 6/
  • user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Jan 1, 2022
    Replying to @math_rachel
    False binaries are harmful, and don’t lead to good reasoning 2/
    user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Dec 21, 2021
    Harmful false binaries: - covid cases either die OR recover - our only options are lockdowns OR no mitigations at all - covid zero OR there's no point reducing transmission - you think vaccines are *all* we need OR you are anti-vaccine
  • user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Jan 1, 2022
    Replying to @math_rachel
    It is ableist to ignore the many people (including some children) who are high health risk and more likely to die or experience extreme illness if they get covid. Again, any reduction in transmission can save lives. 11/
    user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Jan 1, 2022
    Replying to @math_rachel
    Not everyone is going to get omicron. And the difference between 80% vs 60% (both still very big) of a population catching it would be a huge difference in absolute numbers of people that wind up permanently disabled. 3/
  • user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Jan 1, 2022
    Replying to @math_rachel
    The intervention (vaccines) changed our goal. Vaccines are great at reducing hospitalization & death, but not at reducing transmission. But "mild" cases can still result in long-permanent disability, so reducing transmission remains crucial 10/
    user avatar
    Jennifer Brea🦒
    @jenbrea
    Dec 20, 2021
    Replying to @jenbrea and @mattyglesias
    In fact, we aren’t even talking about transmission reduction anymore! Most of the focus is severe disease prevention, because that is what vaccines do. The intervention has shaped the goal. If vaccines did something different, then that would be the goal.
  • user avatar
    Rachel Thomas
    @math_rachel
    Jan 30, 2022
    I don't want empty reassurances about how omicron is peaking, "it's almost over", just push through. This short-term thinking from leaders is exhausting & deadly. 1/

New to X?

Sign up now to get your own personalized timeline!

Create account

By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, including Cookie Use.

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accessibility·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
Don't miss what's happening
People on X are the first to know.
Log inSign up