Pinned
The Supreme Court just blew up one of the corrupt prosecution’s absurd venue arguments in my case.
They tried to argue that venue was universal because of the “effects” of posting a tweet. In other words, if you post a tweet it could be viewed in Brooklyn, so we can try you in
Held, 9-0, venue is where the act is, not the intent. Per Kagan, who often writes on substantive crim issues, here in just 12 pages. supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf…
