Pinned
Capitalism without sound money is not capitalism.
Chris Guida | ⚡🪢 BIP110
59.2K posts
Chris Guida | ⚡🪢 BIP110
@cguida6
Music, philosophy, fitness, bitcoin
✝️
Toxic Lightning Maximalist
Joined February 2016
- Replying to @ronin21btcBecause it's guaranteed to be temporary
- "If I wanted to destroy bitcoin, I would just fund infinite developers who are very talented and tell them to make it better"Every Bitcoiner should watch this.
- What is going on with Bitcoin Core? Core devs used to be dedicated to remaining neutral. Now if you point out a conflict of interest, your comments are marked as abusive. This is a really, really bad look :(
Someone pushing for a major change to Bitcoin is affiliated with a company whose current exploit of Bitcoin was the motivation for the change. Pointing this out on the github discussion has resulted in me being banned. - DO NOT UPGRADE to bitcoin core v30I would encourage anyone running Bitcoin Core to do their own research on this one before upgrading when released. The horrible precedent it sets and the combined risk of a centralized Core + centralized mining pools creates an untenable situation (Op_Return is a distraction!).
- I will not run Core v30I will not be running Bitcoin Core v30.
- Very telling that the anti-filter camp is also anti-fork It was never about filters They just like spam
- Satoshi's biggest mistake was making the block size limit 1MB. He should have made it much smaller.
- Say it with me: Taproot Wizards are scammers.Replying to @giacomozucco @coinjoined and 19 others
- Replying to @agraybeeIt isn't though. The sizes at the edges are not nearly distorted enough.
- If a dev "fixes" a bug by changing the documentation to redefine a feature's purpose, he or she probably won't have an issue "fixing" damage to bitcoin by redefining bitcoin's purpose.
- Several core supporters have pointed me to Pieter Wuille’s recent StackExchange post[0] explaining core’s rationale for raising the default opreturn limit 1250x from 80 bytes to 100,000 bytes in the upcoming bitcoin core v30. I don’t know where else to publish this response,Replying to @murchandamus @Dennis_Porter_ and 3 others1) is PR 32406 trying to solve a problem? 2) On a scale from 1 to 10, how bad is the problem PR 32406 is attempting to solve? 3) how much of a problem is the current mutiny against core on a scale from 1 to 10? If your answer to (2) is much lower than your answer to (3), thenbitcoincore.orgBitcoinBitcoin
- Replying to @BatmansParlay and @crust29015Congratulations internet, you've just hit a new low
