"... a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." ~John F. Kennedy, 1962
An absolutely shameful statement by Steven MacKinnon. Every organization with a long track record of expert commentary on the rule of law in Canada condemned the bill.
"Liberals dismiss ‘tinfoil hat’ privacy fears as lawful access bill passes"
.@mgeist breaks down Bill C-22’s amendments – despite the government’s changes, the core surveillance concerns remain intact: michaelgeist.ca/2026/06/midnig…
🚨 BREAKING: Shabana Mahmood and Ed Miliband have told Keir Starmer to set out a timeline for his departure
Other Cabinet Ministers will follow suit this afternoon
[@thetimes]
I have been obsessively/pathologically reading privacy bills and privacy laws for at least 29 years, and this bill does not directly address "surveillance pricing." This statement is based on an expectation of guidelines to be issued by an unknown future privacy regulator.
Your data should not be used against you.
That’s why the Protecting Privacy and Consumer Data Act will help protect Canadians from unfair profiling and surveillance pricing, while giving people more control over their personal information.
🇨🇦
Vos données ne devraient jamais
🚨 BREAKING: Keir Starmer is now considering resigning after Cabinet Ministers called for him to step down
He'll come to a decision with his wife and family over the weekend
[@thetimes]
Michael Geist Weekly Digest #13: This week: new privacy bill delivers reforms but delays them to 2030, the midnight passage of lawful access, the government's terrible privacy track record, the risks of a super-regulator, and Canada's AI strategy.
Great summary of my discussion with Max Fawcett on @ryanjespersen on the case for Canadian LNG.
We are in an era where energy is being securitized - even in Canada. Note the following trends seen here the past two months, which I expect all G20 nations will have a version of: /1
Rather than addressing the lawful access privacy and security concerns, the government rushed Bill C-22 through committee, cut off debate, avoided a recorded vote, and maligned critics. My post on the embarrassing final stage of a deeply troubling bill.
An absolutely shameful statement by Steven MacKinnon. Every organization with a long track record of expert commentary on the rule of law in Canada condemned the bill.
"Liberals dismiss ‘tinfoil hat’ privacy fears as lawful access bill passes"
globalnews.ca/news/11911957/…