This is definitely slick, but I see two main uses:
1) to sell people more stuff (via ads)
2) to make non-consensual/misleading content to manipulate or harass people online.
Genuine question - why is everyone so excited? π€
Prompt: βA stylish woman walks down a Tokyo street filled with warm glowing neon and animated city signage. she wears a black leather jacket, a long red dress, and black boots, and carries a black purse. she wears sunglasses and red lipstick. she walks confidently and casually.
I'm glad to see that OpenAI decided that the true problem wasn't any of the issues with their products (copyright, bias, hallucinations), it was having two women on the Board... and that's what they decided to fix.
In an ideal world, both #machinelearning researchers and reviewers would use their critical thinking to decide that using #GANs for essentially undressing women is an ethically dubious task:
By hiding the true costs of AI (data, energy, human labor), it's really easy to make AI seem magic.
Can you imagine if Open AI had to disclose exactly how many millions of hours of human feedback they gathered? ChatGPT would seem a lot less *magical* then π¦
Introducing Claude 3.5 Sonnetβour most intelligent model yet.
This is the first release in our 3.5 model family.
Sonnet now outperforms competitor models on key evaluations, at twice the speed of Claude 3 Opus and one-fifth the cost.
Try it for free: claude.ai
Having studied cognitive science, I am regularly appalled by the way many AI folks see cognition/intelligence.
Literally ignoring centuries of research in everything from psychology to education and neuroscience..
This echoes the observation that, among mostly AI folks, there is serious lack of understanding & appreciation of human, or generally biological, cognition.
x.com/ChombaBupe/staβ¦
