When Sony makes a game that is remotely on the same scale of Starfield, then PS fans can talk about frames.
While you play in the same map 3 times over the last 5 years, I’ll be exploring planets :)
Take a seat guys
If you could suddenly get the same product for $17 instead of $70, would you take that deal?
Most rational, normal people agree.
PS fans…don’t.
Xbox with Act/Blz benefits consumers
It’s funny how each brand is looking now:
“Big bad” Microsoft is spending untold billions to provide value for their gamers and wants to clean up Activision
“For the players” Sony is charging $70 games, no day 1 1st party titles, and $10 upgrade fees.
Huh 🤔
“Series S is holding back gaming, why won’t Xbox remove parity clause?!”
***Xbox removes parity clause
“Series S owners getting inferior games and missing features lol”
🤨🤨🤔🤔
Interesting that a 3rd party publisher (Square) is allowed to lock major games off Xbox.
But a 1st party publisher (Bethesda) isn’t allowed to make a Xbox exclusive.
My honest reactions:
Roundhouse - No output, absorbed into Zenimax Online, np
Alpha Dog - Mobile dev (Mighty Doom). Nbd, Xbox has plenty mobile devs now
Arkane Austin - After Redfall, I’m surprised they lasted this long. Still have Lyon.
Tango - This one hurts. Wtf Xbox.
Think ppl really sleeping on how big Halo Infinite will be.
Halo 3 sold 13 million, only on 360.
Halo Infinite on XB1, Series S/X, Win Store, Steam, Game Pass, Xcloud. F2P multiplayer.
Extremely low barrier to entry. Infinite will bring in more players then Halo 3 ever could.
Remember Xbox got full credit for Redfall even though they were hands off
But if Starfield reviews well, it isn’t Xbox despite well known knowledge they were heavily involved for 2 years 🙄
Get ready to see this in one week
