Log inSign up
Louis.Saillans
4,193 posts
user avatar
Louis.Saillans
@LSaillans
Composite Warfare enthusiast / Founder Askalon Industries 🏴‍☠️
askalonindustries.com
Joined January 2021
553
Following
13.9K
Followers

New to X?

Sign up now to get your own personalized timeline!

Create account

By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, including Cookie Use.

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accessibility·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
Don't miss what's happening
People on X are the first to know.
Log inSign up
  • user avatar
    Louis.Saillans
    @LSaillans
    Jun 6, 2025
    I spent over 100 hours compiling and analyzing over 5,000 videos of soldiers trying to escape UAV drones — pulling material from Telegram, Reddit, and other sources. Here is what i found out.
    4.8M
  • user avatar
    Louis.Saillans
    @LSaillans
    Sep 28, 2024
    Vous avez dit camouflage?
    169K
  • user avatar
    Louis.Saillans
    @LSaillans
    Jun 6, 2025
    Replying to @LSaillans
    But here’s the biggest discovery I made: => Smoke increases survival rates by 32%.
    419K
  • user avatar
    Louis.Saillans
    @LSaillans
    Jun 6, 2025
    Replying to @LSaillans
    No matter the escape method — running on foot, driving, riding a motorbike, or sitting on top of an armored vehicle — the drones outpace and outmaneuver almost every attempt to flee in open terrain.
    434K
  • user avatar
    Louis.Saillans
    @LSaillans
    Jun 6, 2025
    Replying to @LSaillans
    B/ 92% death rate in open fields.
    437K
  • user avatar
    Louis.Saillans
    @LSaillans
    Jun 6, 2025
    Replying to @LSaillans
    Whether it’s using the smoke from a burning vehicle or deploying a smoke grenade to obscure a forest entrance, smoke acts as a critical cover. It confuses visual tracking systems and gives soldiers a vital edge when escaping drone pursuit.
    373K
  • user avatar
    Louis.Saillans
    @LSaillans
    Jun 6, 2025
    Replying to @LSaillans
    There are more videos available. But I had to stop at that stage because of the psychological toll. I wanted to understand what factors affect survival when soldiers are targeted by drones. Here’s what the data revealed:
    444K
  • user avatar
    Louis.Saillans
    @LSaillans
    Jun 6, 2025
    Replying to @LSaillans
    A/ 67% survival rate in obstructed environments (buildings, dense forests).
    448K
  • user avatar
    Louis.Saillans
    @LSaillans
    Jun 6, 2025
    Replying to @LSaillans
    Why? Drones are designed for speed and detonation, not collision avoidance. Many simply smash into walls, doors, windows, or get tangled in branches and detonate before hitting their target.
    441K
  • user avatar
    Louis.Saillans
    @LSaillans
    Jun 6, 2025
    Replying to @LSaillans
    This analysis isn’t just academic — it’s a reminder of the terrifying efficiency of modern drone warfare and the importance of environmental and tactical adaptation on the battlefield.
    348K
  • user avatar
    Louis.Saillans
    @LSaillans
    Jun 6, 2025
    Replying to @LSaillans
    C/ Armed vehicles provide some protection, but it’s limited.
    394K
  • user avatar
    Louis.Saillans
    @LSaillans
    Jun 6, 2025
    Replying to @LSaillans
    If a vehicle withstands the initial attack and the crew dismounts, the soldiers’ survival rates revert to the numbers above (depending on the environment).
    389K
  • user avatar
    Louis.Saillans
    @LSaillans
    Jun 6, 2025
    Replying to @LSaillans
    We’re building systems to detect and track drones before they strike — even in environments where visual detection or radar struggles.
    335K
  • user avatar
    Louis.Saillans
    @LSaillans
    Jun 6, 2025
    Replying to @LSaillans
    We’re currently piloting projects in Europe and actively engaging with partners and investors who want to help scale Europe’s counter-drone capabilities. If you want to connect or collaborate, DMs are open!
    313K