Pinned
Replying to @michaelfolkson and @stephanlivera
It's clear that a transaction that inscribes only:
- amount,
- signature,
- pubkey
is not spam.
No need for a Greg's database.
Greg Tonoski, BIP-110
2,489 posts
Greg Tonoski, BIP-110
@GregTonoski
#Bitcoin, build, HODL, KIS, YAGNI, WAGMI.
Ceterum censeo "Bitcoin Script" esse delendam.
Joined May 2017
- I am running Bitcoin Knots with the setting "datacarrier=0". Bitcoin Core is obsolete. Furthermore, it's vendor is anti-Bitcoin.
- Bitcoin not cRyPtO, sats not JPEGs, Bitcoin Knots not Core™.
- "The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be." - Satoshi Nakamoto
- Replying to @peterktodd and @ARK28952339Why don't you quit Bitcoin and spam any other blockchain, e.g. Solana?
- Replying to @bitcoincoreorgIt's Sunday, upgrade to Bitcoin Knots and rest well:
- Upgrade to Bitcoin Knots: github.com/bitcoinknots/b…
- 1 BTC = 1 BTC (Bitcoin Knots) vs 1 BTC = 0.63 BTC + JPEG + 1 cBTC + LGBT+!$%# (Core v30)37% of Bitcoin block space is now non-financial data (~0.58MB/block). The tx fees spammers pay are very low for getting their files stored forever on someone else's computer. They're essentially free-riding on a $2T network built and secured for payments. And v30 was just
- Core™: released v30 for Citrea™. @loop (Citrea™) 2 weeks later: "Let's say we are bad actors. What are you gonna do about it? (...) How are you gonna stop us?" rumble.com/v70mlfs-wagmi-…
- Bitcoin Core™ vision is to repurpose Bitcoin as shitcontent delivery network.
- Repel @bitcoincoreorg scams. Run Bitcoin Knots and set the configuration option datacarrier=0 in the bitcoin.conf file.
- BITCOIN COREporation roadmap: '25 - depracate OP_RETURN limit, '26 - depracate block size limit, '27 - depracate 21m BTC supply limit.
- Satoshi who setup policy and prohibited OP_RETURN vs "very talented devs" in Bitcoin Core dismantling the policy feature.
