MS Presentation
MS Presentation
Supervisor Co-supervisor
Dr. S. M. Kamrul Hasan Shampa Sarkar
Professor Assistant Professor
Dept. of Food Processing and Dept. of Food Processing and
Preservation Preservation
Introduction
Conclusion
Introduction
Wild leafy vegetables (WLVs) are non-cultivated edible plants found in forests, fallow
lands, and rural ecosystems.
They have traditionally been used in indigenous diets, especially in Africa, Asia, and
South America (Grivetti & Ogle, 2000).
Wild leafy vegetables contribute significantly to human nutrition and health due to
their rich profile of essential nutrients and bioactive compounds (Patra et al., 2024).
Introduction
Anti_inflammatory
High in Dietary
& Anti Cancer
Fiber
activity
Health benefits of
Wild leafy vegetables
Cardiovascular
Antioxodants
protection
Antibiotic
potential
Background of this
Research
Afolayan, A. J., & Jimoh, F. O. (2009). Nutritional quality of some wild leafy
vegetables in South Africa. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition,
60(5), 424- 431.
Basumatary, S., & Narzary, H. (2017). Nutritional value, phytochemicals and
antioxidant property of six wild edible plants consumed by the Bodos of North-East
India. Mediterranean Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, 10(3), 259-271
Bokelmann, W., Huyskens-Keil, S., Ferenczi, Z., & Stöber, S. (2022). The role of
indigenous vegetables to improve food and nutrition security: experiences from the
project HORTINLEA in Kenya (2014–2018). Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems,
6, 806420
Background of this
Research
Chinedu, S. N., Olasumbo, A. C., Eboji, O. K., Emiloju, O. C., & Arinola, O. K.
(2011). Proximate and phytochemical analysis of some medicinal plants in
Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 10(10), 960–964.
Flyman, M. V., & Afolayan, A. J. (2006). The suitability of wild vegetables for
alleviating human dietary deficiencies. South African Journal of Botany, 72(4),
492–497.
Yimer, A., Forsido, S. F., Addis, G., & Ayelign, A. (2023). Phytochemical profile and
antioxidant capacity of some wild edible plants consumed in Southwest Ethiopia.
Heliyon, 9(4).
However, This kind of research in hardly seen in Bangladesh to the best of my
Objectives of the Research
Wild leafy
vegetable’s
powder
The proximate composition of the wild leafy By using Soxhlet apparatus, AOAC method
vegetable’s formulations—including moisture, (2005) was used, with a few modifications, to
protein, fat, ash, and fiber content—was figure out how much fat was in the fruits
determined using standard AOAC methods
(AOAC, 2005).
Protein was measured by Kjeldahl method
The AOAC method (2005) was used to calculate Moisture was measured by Moisture analyzer
the total ash content by using muffle furnace.
To
. validate the experimental results, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
was conducted for all measured parameters, considering the different samples and
their respective triplicates. Post hoc comparisons among the means were
performed using Least Significant Difference (LSD) and Duncan’s Multiple
Range Test (DMRT) to identify statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). All
statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS software (version 27; IBM Corp.,
Armonk, NY, USA). In addition, Microsoft Excel was employed for basic data
handling and preliminary calculations. For the α-glucosidase inhibitory activity
data, a two-way ANOVA was performed using Origin 2025 software (OriginLab
Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA) to assess the effects of both sample type
and concentration.
Result and
Discussion
Result and
Discussion
Sample
Moisture (%) Protein (%) Fat (%) Ash (%) Fiber (%) Carbohydrate (%)
S1 d
7.90±0.05 a
32.03±0.47 b
3.23±0.07 a
17.52±0.08 e
10.25±0.03 d
29.07±0.50
S2 a
9.20±0.11 e
15.71±0.10 c
2.76±0.04 e
11.97±0.06 a
15.75±0.04 a
44.61±0.23
S3 b
9.03±0.06 b
26.28±0.04 a
3.84±0.07 d
12.30±0.07 c
12.18±0.06 c
36.38±0.08
S4 e
6.63±0.06 c
21.83±0.31 c
2.78±0.05 c
12.50±0.07 b
12.28±0.03 b
43.98±0.32
S5 c
8.27±0.06 d
20.97±0.06 b
3.21±0.04 b
13.49±0.03 d
10.54±0.05 b
43.52±0.05
Here, S1 – Dheki Shak, S2 – Thankuni Shak, S3 – Kochu Shak, S4 – Data Shak, and S5 – Bothua Shak. a-e
Means followed by various superscripts in each column show significant differences between samples.
Result and
Discussion
Sample Phosphorus (P) Calcium (Ca) (mg/kg Magnesium (Mg) Copper (Cu) Zinc (Zn) Iron (Fe) (mg/kg Manganese (Mn)
(mg/kg DM) DM) (mg/kg DM) (mg/kg DM) (mg/kg DM) DM) (mg/kg DM)
S1 b
2572.48±0.04 d
33852.33±8.74 b
12075.00±3.00 e
36.74±0.08 115.33±2.52
c c
754.53±0.09 e
57.37±0.07
S2 e
394.74±1.64 c
34678.67±9.07 c
11915.00±3.00 c
91.27±0.06 b
163.78±0.26 b
1086.73±0.21 d
240.50±0.03
S3 d
887.73±0.78 b
35028.67±11.72 d
10730.33±5.51 b
119.23±0.12 e
71.18±0.20 e
332.77±0.23 b
456.53±0.12
S4 a
2949.67±2.52 e
33316.00±15.10 e
10016.67±9.07 d
67.70±0.56 a
269.31±0.29 a
1359.82±0.54 a
995.88±0.05
S5 2192.48±0.10
c a
43133.33±5.69 a
15402.00±2.00 a
219.63±0.13 d
109.39±0.42 d
533.82±0.06 c
277.49±0.10
Here, S1 – Dheki Shak, S2 – Thankuni Shak, S3 – Kochu Shak, S4 – Data Shak, and S5 – Bothua Shak. a-e
Means followed by various superscripts in each column show significant differences between samples.
Result and
Discussion
Sample
Lead (Pb) (mg/kg DM) Cadmium (Cd) (mg/kg DM) Nickel (Ni) (mg/kg DM) Chromium (Cr) (mg/kg DM)
b
1.48±0.10 d
6.59±0.02 b
31.58±0.05
S1 4.13±0.07
c
0.89±0.06 c
9.34±0.06 e
9.29±0.03
S2 ND
ND e
0.33±0.04 a
10.31±0.04 d
17.30±0.26
S3
ND a
1.71±0.07 b
10.16±0.14 c
28.25±0.06
S4
ND d
0.70±0.03 ab
10.28±0.03 a
38.10±0.11
S5
Here, S1 – Dheki Shak, S2 – Thankuni Shak, S3 – Kochu Shak, S4 – Data Shak, and S5 – Bothua Shak. a-e
Means followed by various superscripts in each column show significant differences between samples.
Result and
Discussion
45.00 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 a
40.00
25.00
20.00 c
a
15.00 d e
b b
10.00 e
c c
5.00
0.00
Chlorophyll a Chlorophyll b Total Chlorophyll
b
4.00
3.00
c
c
2.00 c
1.00
0.00
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5
Sample
40.00
25.00
20.00 c
a
15.00 d e
b b
10.00 e
c c
5.00
0.00
Chlorophyll a Chlorophyll b Total Chlorophyll
25.00
b b
20.00
15.00
c
10.00
5.00 d
0.00
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5
Sample
20.00
b
TFC (µg QE/g DM)
15.00
c
c
10.00
c
5.00
0.00
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5
Sample
A B
Figure 4.5: DPPH assay (A) and FRAP assay (B) of Wild
Leafy Vegetables.
Here, S1 – Dheki Shak, S2 – Thankuni Shak, S3 – Kochu Shak, S4 – Data Shak,
and S5 – Bothua Shak. a-d Means followed by various superscripts show
significant differences between samples.
Result and
Discussion
3.000
2.500 a
2.000
1.500
b
c
d
1.000 e e
f
g
h
j i
0.500 j j
k k
l
m m
n
s rs rs qrs
op pqr op no rs opq
op
0.000
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5
Sample