0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views21 pages

Fragility Fractures Final

This study investigates the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients over 45 years old with fragility fractures, finding that 44.32% were vitamin D deficient. The research highlights the importance of vitamin D in bone health and suggests that timely diagnosis and supplementation could help prevent fragility fractures. Limitations include a small sample size, prompting the need for further research with a larger cohort.

Uploaded by

jaydevbarapatre
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views21 pages

Fragility Fractures Final

This study investigates the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients over 45 years old with fragility fractures, finding that 44.32% were vitamin D deficient. The research highlights the importance of vitamin D in bone health and suggests that timely diagnosis and supplementation could help prevent fragility fractures. Limitations include a small sample size, prompting the need for further research with a larger cohort.

Uploaded by

jaydevbarapatre
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Association of Vitamin D with fragility fractures: A hospital based

cross-sectional study

Author: Dr Jaydev Barapatre


PGT, Orthopaedics
JMCH.
Fragility fractures

Definition
• Fragility fracture -- low energy fracture.
• Bone structure undergoes biomechanical failure under specific loading conditions.
• WHO defined this low energy trauma as fall from standing height or less, that
normally would not result in fracture.

Demographics
 8.9 million osteoporotic fragility fractures every year
(worldwide)

 4th leading cause of chronic disease morbidity.


Vitamin D

• Important regulator of bone metabolism


• Dietary sources of vitamin D – inadequate sun exposure.
• Main function – calcium homeostasis
Metabolism of Vitamin D

Absorbed by 7-Dehydrocholesterol Forms Pre vitamin D3


UVB radiation
(Skin) (unstable)

Dietary Vit D Absorbed in lymphatics


Via chylomicrons

Binds to Vit D binding Vitamin D3


Drawn into capillaries
protein (DBP) (extracellular space)
Forms Transported to liver

Binds to DBP Released into renal Forms 1,25(OH)2D


25(OH)D tubule cell (Active)
Pathophysiology
Low sunshine exposure

Low serum 25 (OH)D Low vitamin D intake

Low serum 1,25 (OH)2D Decreased renal function

Decreased Ca absorption
Higher PTH
Muscle
weakness
Mineral deficit
Hyperosteoidosis High turnover
0 Bone resorption

Falls Osteomalacia
0
Fractures Osteoporosis
Methodology

• Rationale – To determine the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients


with fragility fractures.

 Study universe: > 45 years of age with fragility fractures


 Study area: Orthopaedics OPD JMCH
 Type of study: Hospital based Cross sectional observational study.
 Sampling frame: Adult patients more than 45 years of age with fragility fractures
attending Orthopaedics OPD, JMCH.
 Sampling technique: Consecutive sampling.
 Sample size: 97
• Inclusion criteria:
 Patients attending Orthopaedics OPD, JMCH
 Consent to participate in study
 Age group 45 years and more
 Fragility fractures

• Exclusion criteria:

 Patient receiving Vit-D supplementation, drug for


osteoporosis, steroids, anti-epileptic drug, diuretics,
heparin, thyroid hormone supplementation, progestins.

 Patient with renal and liver disease.


Investigations

 Estimation of serum Vit-D level


 Serum Calcium, Phosphate, PTH, S. Creatinine and other biochemical tests.
 Plain radiographs
 Assessment of Singh’s index
Fig: Radiograph showing fragility fracture of proximal femur and distal radius
Pattern of trabecular resorption in the femur due to osteoporosis (Singh index)
DISTRIBUTION OF VITAMIN D STATUS AMONGST SUBJECTS WITH FRAGILITY FRACTURES

Distribution of vitamin D status in subjects with


fragility fracture

20.61%

44.32%

35.05%

Deficent Insufficient Sufficient


Distribution of vitamin D status in subjects with fragility fractures according to sex

Distribution of vitamin D status in patients with


fragility fracture according to sex
30
25
Number of patients 25
20
20 18
15 14 14

10
6
5
0
Male Female

Sex

Deficient Insufficient Sufficient


Distribution of vitamin D status in subjects with fragility
Total fractures according to diet :

Vitamin D status No.


according towith
of patients typefragility
of diet
fractures according to diet

Vitamin D status 18
80
Number of patients

60 33

40
37
20 2
1
6
0
Vegetarian Mixed diet
diet

Types of diet

Deficient Insufficient Sufficient


Distribution of vitamin D status in subjects with fragility fractures
according to behavioural risk factors:

Vitamin D status
Risk Factors Distribution of vitamin D status in subjects with fragility fractures Chi square and p-
according to behavioural risk factors value
12
10
10 9 9
Number of patients

8
8 7
6
6
4 3 3
2
2
0
Smoking Alcoholism Inadequate sun
exposure

Risk factors

Deficient Insufficient Sufficient


Distribution of vitamin D status in subjects with fragility fractures
according to comorbidities

Vitaminin
Distribution of vitamin D status D status
patients with fragility
COMORBITIES fracture according to comorbidities TOTAL

10 9
9 8
Number of patients

8
7 6
6
5 4
4
3 2 2 2
2 1 1 1
1 0 0
0
HTN DM CAD CVA

Comorbidities

Deficient Insufficient Sufficient


Discussion

 Out of 97 patients with fragility


Table: Classification of vitamin D fractures,
deficiency(US Endocrine Society classification)  43(44.32%)-- vitamin D deficient,
Vitamin D Status Vitamin D Level  34(35.05%)--vitamin D insufficient
 20(20.61%) – vitamin D sufficient.
Deficiency < 20 ng/dl  The results similar to –

 Suchat Phusunti et al. -- 46.3%


Insufficiency 20-30 ng/dl
vitamin D deficient

 Bogunovic et al. -- 40% vitamin D


Sufficiency >30 ng/dl
deficient
Discussion

 No significant difference among the male and female subjects with fragility fracture.

 The finding similar to -

 Gallacher et al., G.S Maier et al., Qinnan wang et al.


Discussion

 Out of 43 vitamin D deficient patients


 6 out of 9 veg(66.66%) patients -
with fragility fracture –
vitamin D deficiency  7(16.27%)-- smoker,
 37(42.04%)out of 88 patients - mixed
 10(23.25%)-- alcoholic
diet - vitamin D deficiency.  3(6.97%) -- inadequate sun exposure.
 The finding was statistically
insignificant (p-value >0.05)  The results were statistically
 insignificant (p-value >0.05). The
However, the finding contradictory
finding of contradictory to the finding
to the finding of Javed Altaf Baig et al.
of Eva N Kassi et al.
Discussion

 Out of 43 vitamin D deficient patients with fragility fracture,


 8(18.60%) patients had hypertension,
 9(20.93%) had diabetes mellitus,
 1(2.32%) had coronary artery disease
 1(2.23%) patient had cerebrovascular accident.

 The present study shows vitamin D deficiency is more common among patients with
diabetes mellitus.

 Consistent with other studies. Zhao H et al.


Conclusion

• It can be concluded that vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent


in patients with fragility fracture. Timely diagnosis and vitamin D supplementation can
prevent fragility fracture.

• However, the present study was constrained by the limitation of time and a
relatively smaller sample size. So we recommend a study with larger sample size and a
longer period to get more information regarding the topic.
THANK

You might also like