0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views27 pages

Capm

Chapter_9_ Capital_ assets

Uploaded by

Shuaib Khan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views27 pages

Capm

Chapter_9_ Capital_ assets

Uploaded by

Shuaib Khan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 27

CAPM

Assumptions
 Individuals are risk averse
 Maximize utility over a single period time
horizon
 Homogeneous expectations
 Borrow and lend freely at same rate
 Perfect market
Requirement of CAPM
 Leveraged portfolio: Borrowing and
investing

 Unleveraged portfolio : riskless investment


KEY ISSUES

Essentially, the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is


concerned with two questions:

• What is the relationship between risk and return for an

efficient portfolio?

• What is the relationship between risk and return for an

individual security?
CAPITAL MARKET LINE
EXPECTED
RETURN, E(Rp) Z


L
M •

• K

Rf

STANDARD DEVIATION, p
Lending and borrowing
 Lending: Investment in risk free asset

 Borrowing : Increase in total fund invested


through trading on equity
 If X is the % of fund invested in risky asset
 X=1 Total equity investment
 X<1 only fraction in risky asset
 X> 1 risky asset is more than riskless asset
SECURITY MARKET LINE
E(RM) - Rf
E(Ri ) = Rf + CiM
M
iM
βi =
M
E (R i ) = R f + [ E (R M) - R f ] β i
EXPECTED •P
RETURN SML
14%

8% •0

ALPHA = EXPECTED - FAIR


RETURN RETURN
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SML AND CML
SML
E(RM ) - Rf
E(Ri) = Rf + σiM
σM 2
SINCE σiM = iM σi σM

E(RM ) - Rf
E(Ri) = Rf + iM σi
σM

IF i AND M ARE PERFECTLY CORRELATED iM = 1. SO

E(RM ) - Rf
E(Ri) = Rf + σi
σM
INPUTS REQUIRED FOR
APPLYING CAPM

RISK-FREE RETURN
• RATE ON A SHORT-TERM GOVT SECURITY
• RATE ON A LONG TERM GOVT BOND

MARKET RISK PREMIUM


• HISTORICAL
• DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE AVERAGE RETURN ON
STOCKS AND THE AVERAGE RISK - FREE RETURN

PERIOD : AS LONG AS POSSIBLE


AVERAGE : A.M VS. G.M.
DETERMINANTS OF RISK PREMIUM
• VARIANCE IN THE UNDERLYING ECONOMY
• POLITICAL RISK
• MARKET STRUCTURE

FINANCIAL MARKET EXAMPLES PREMIUM OVER THE


CHARACTERISTICS GOVT BOND RATE (%)

EMERGING MARKET, WITH SOUTH AMERICAN MARKETS, 7.5 - 9.5


POLITICAL RISK CHINA, RUSSIA
EMERGING MARKETS WITH SINGAPORE, MALAYSIA, 7.5
LIMITED POLITICAL RISK THAILAND, INDIA, SOME EAST
EUROPEAN MARKETS
DEVELOPED MARKETS WITH UNITED STATES, JAPAN, U.K., 5.5
WIDE STOCK LISTINGS FRANCE, ITALY
DEVELOPED MARKETS WITH GERMANY, SWITZERLAND 3.5 - 4.5
LIMITED LISTINGS AND
STABLE ECONOMIES

* Source : Aswath Damodaran Corporate Finance Theory and Practice, John Wiley.
TRIUMPH OF OPTIMISTS

ELROY DIMSON, PAUL MARCH, AND MICHAEL


STANTON … TRIUMPH OF THE OPTIMISTS, (2001)

• EQUITY RETURNS … 16 RICH COUNTRIES …


DATA … 1900

• GLOBAL HISTORICAL RISK PREMIUM … 20TH


CENTURY .. 4.6%

• BEST ESTIMATE OF EQUITY PREMIUM


WORLDWIDE IN FUTURE IS 4 TO 5 PERCENT
CALCULATION OF BETA

Rit = i + i RMt + eit

iM
i =
M 2
CALCULATION OF BETA

Square of the
Return on Deviation of Deviation of Product of the
Return on deviation of
Period market return on stock A return on market deviation,
stock A, RA return on market
portfolio, RM from its mean portfolio from its (RA - RA)
portfolio from its
(RA - RA) mean (RM - RM) (RM - RM)
mean
(RM - RM)2
1 10 12 0 3 0 9
2 15 14 5 5 25 25
3 18 13 8 4 32 16
4 14 10 4 1 4 1
5 16 9 6 0 0 0
6 16 13 6 4 24 16
7 18 14 8 5 40 25
8 4 7 -6 -2 12 4
9 -9 1 -19 -8 152 64
10 14 12 4 3 12 9
11 15 -11 5 -20 -100 400
12 14 16 4 7 28 49
13 6 8 -4 -1 4 1
14 7 7 -3 -2 6 4
15 -8 10 -18 1 -18 1
RA = 150 RM = 135 (RA - RA) (RM - RM) 2
RA =10 RM = 9 (RM - RM) = 221 = 624
ESTIMATION ISSUES
• ESTIMATION PERIOD
• A LONGER ESTIMATION PERIOD PROVIDES MORE
DATA BUT THE RISK PROFILE .. FIRM MAY CHANGE
• 5 YEARS
• RETURN INTERVAL
DAILY, WEEKLY, MONTHLY
• MARKET INDEX
STANDARD PRACTICE
ADJUSTING HISTORICAL BETA

• HISTORICAL ALIGNMENT … CHANCE FACTOR


• A COMPANY’S BETA MAY CHANGE OVER TIME
MERILL LYNCH … 0.66 … HISTORICAL BETA
O.34 … MARKET BETA
BETAS BASED ON
FUNDAMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY FACTORS EMPLOYED ARE

• INDUSTRY AFFILIATION

• CORPORATE GROWTH

• EARNINGS VARIABILITY

• FINANCIAL LEVERAGE

• SIZE
BETAS BASED ON
ACCOUNTING EARNINGS
REGRESS THE CHANGES IN COMPANY EARNINGS
(ON A QUARTERLY OR ANNUAL BASIS) AGAINST
CHANGES IN THE AGGREGATE EARNINGS OF ALL
THE COMPANIES INCLUDED IN A MARKET INDEX.
LIMITATIONS
• ACCOUNTING EARNINGS .. GENERALLY SMOOTHED

OUT .. RELATIVE .. VALUE OF THE COMPANY


• ACCOUNTING EARNINGS … INFLUENCED BY NON -
OPERATING FACTORS
BETAS FROM CROSS
SECTIONAL REGRESSIONS

1. ESTIMATE A CROSS - SECTIONAL REGRESSION


RELATIONSHIP FOR PUBLICLY TRADED FIRMS:
BETA = 0.6507 + 0.27 COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION

IN OPERATING INCOME + 0.09 D/E + 0.54


EARNINGS - .00009 TOTAL ASSETS
(MILLION $)

2. PLUG THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROJECT,


DIVISION, OR UNLISTED COMPANY IN THE
REGR’N REL’N TO ARRIVE AT AN ESTIMATE OF
BETA
BETA = 0.6507 + 0.27 (1.85) + 0.09 (0.90) + 0.54 (0.12) -
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
ON CAPM

1. SET UP THE SAMPLE DATA


Rit , RMt , Rft

2. ESTIMATE THE SECURITY CHARACTER-


-ISTIC LINES
Rit - Rft = ai + bi (RMt - Rft) + eit

3. ESTIMATE THE SECURITY MARKET LINE


Ri = 0 + 1 bi + ei , i = 1, … 75
EVIDENCE

IF CAPM HOLDS
• THE RELATION … LINEAR .. TERMS LIKE bi2 .. NO
EXPLANATORY POWER
•  0 ≃ Rf

•  1 ≃ RM - Rf

• NO OTHER FACTORS, SUCH AS COMPANY SIZE


OR TOTAL VARIANCE, SHOULD AFFECT Ri

• THE MODEL SHOULD EXPLAIN A SIGNIFICANT


PORTION OF VARIATION IN RETURNS AMONG
SECURITIES
GENERAL FINDINGS

• THE RELATION … APPEARS .. LINEAR


•  0 > Rf
•  1 < RM - Rf
• IN ADDITION TO BETA, SOME OTHER FACTORS,
SUCH AS STANDARD DEVIATION OF RETURNS
AND COMPANY SIZE, TOO HAVE A BEARING ON
RETURN
• BETA DOES NOT EXPLAIN A VERY HIGH
PERCENTAGE OF THE VARIANCE IN RETURN
CONCLUSIONS

PROBLEMS
• STUDIES USE HISTORICAL RETURNS AS PROXIES
FOR EXPECTATIONS
• STUDIES USE A MARKET INDEX AS A PROXY

POPULARITY
• SOME OBJECTIVE ESTIMATE OF RISK PREMIUM
.. BETTER THAN A COMPLETELY SUBJECTIVE
ESTIMATE
• BASIC MESSAGE .. ACCEPTED BY ALL
• NO CONSENSUS ON ALTERNATIVE
ARBITRAGE - PRICING THEORY

RETURN GENERATING PROCESS


Ri = ai + bi 1 I1 + bi2 I2 …+ bij I1 + ei

EQUILIBRIUM RISK - RETURN


RELATIONSHIP
E(Ri) = 0 + bi1 1 + bi2 2 + … bij j
j = RISK PREMIUM FOR THE TYPE OF
RISK ASSOCIATED WITH FACTOR j
SUMMING UP
• The relationship between risk and expected return for efficient portfolios, as given by the
capital market line, is:
E (Ri) = Rf +  i
• The relationship between risk and expected return for an inefficient portfolio or a single
security as given by the security market line is :
iM
E (Ri) = Rf + E (RM) – Rf x M2
• The beta of a security is the slope of the following regression relationship:
Rit = i + i RMt + eit
• The commonly followed procedure for testing CAPM involves two steps. In the first step,
the security betas are estimated. In the second step, the relationship between security
beta and return is examined.
• Empirical evidence is favour of CAPM is mixed. Notwithstanding this, the CAPM is the
most widely used risk-return model because it is simple and intuitively appealing and its
basic message that diversifiable risk does not matter is generally accepted.
• The APT is much more general in that asset prices can be influenced by factors beyond
means and variances. The APT assumes that the return on any security is linearly related
to a set of systematic factors.

You might also like