0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views29 pages

Medical Informatics

Uploaded by

phdbme0
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views29 pages

Medical Informatics

Uploaded by

phdbme0
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

IRB’s and Ethical

Issue

M E D I C A L I N F O R M AT I C S

BY

GAV IS HNA R

3122213003009
WHAT IS AN IRB?
A committee at an institution applies
research ethics by reviewing the methods
proposed for research done at that institution
to ensure that the projects are ethical.

?
B
WHAT DO THEY DO?
To protect human subjects by reviewing research protocols and related
materials

Ensures the research meets the Ethical standards and Federal requirements

Checks whether it follows the principles of Belmont report- Respect,


Beneficence, Justice

To conduct a risk-benefiting analysis to determine the conduction of the


research

?
Monitor the implementation and follow upon the result of the research
B
AT LEAST 5 MEMBERS

INDEPENDENT IRBs DO
DIFFERENT BACKGROUND
EXIST

1-NOT AFFILIATED TO
1-NOT A SCIENTIST
INSTITUTION
?
B
AT LEAST 5 MEMBERS

INDEPENDENT IRBs DO DIFFERENT BACKGROUND


EXIST

1-NOT AFFILIATED TO
1-NOT A SCIENTIST
INSTITUTION
?
B
AT LEAST 5 MEMBERS

INDEPENDENT IRBs DO
DIFFERENT BACKGROUND
EXIST

1-NOT AFFILIATED TO 1-NOT A SCIENTIST


INSTITUTION
?
B
AT LEAST 5 MEMBERS

INDEPENDENT IRBs DO
DIFFERENT BACKGROUND
EXIST

1-NOT AFFILIATED TO
INSTITUTION 1-NOT A SCIENTIST
?
B
AT LEAST 5 MEMBERS

INDEPENDENT IRBs DO
EXIST DIFFERENT BACKGROUND

1-NOT AFFILIATED TO
INSTITUTION 1-NOT A SCIENTIST
?
B
IRB
verifies
IRB verifies

Potential participants have the necessary


information to make the decisions about
volunteering for the study.

Whether the participants understand


the risks

Informed Consent Process


IRB verifies

Potential participants have the necessary


information to make the decisions about
volunteering for the study.

Whether the participants understand


the risks

Informed Consent Process


IRB verifies

Potential participants have the necessary


information to make the decisions about
volunteering for the study.

Whether the participants understand


the risks

Informed Consent Process


ETHICAL ISSUES
ETHICAL ISSUES
can occur

STUDY DESIGN
AND ETHICS
DATA ANALYSIS AUTHORSHIP
APPROVAL

REDUNDANT
CONFLICTS OF PUBLICATION
INTEREST AND
PLAGIARISM
ETHICAL ISSUES
can occur

STUDY DESIGN
AND ETHICS DATA ANALYSIS AUTHORSHIP
APPROVAL

REDUNDANT
CONFLICTS OF PUBLICATION
INTEREST AND
PLAGIARISM
ETHICAL ISSUES
can occur

STUDY DESIGN
AUTHORSHIP
AND ETHICS DATA ANALYSIS
APPROVAL

REDUNDANT
CONFLICTS OF PUBLICATION
INTEREST AND
PLAGIARISM
ETHICAL ISSUES
can occur

STUDY DESIGN
AND ETHICS DATA ANALYSIS AUTHORSHIP
APPROVAL

REDUNDANT
PUBLICATION
CONFLICTS OF
AND
INTEREST
PLAGIARISM
ETHICAL ISSUES
can occur

STUDY DESIGN
AND ETHICS DATA ANALYSIS AUTHORSHIP
APPROVAL

REDUNDANT
CONFLICTS OF
PUBLICATION
INTEREST
AND
PLAGIARISM
The researchers should pay special attention to
vulnerable subjects to avoid breech of ethical codes

It is essential to obtain approval from the Institutional


Review Board, or Ethics Committee, of the respective
organisations for studies involving people, medical
records, and anonymised human tissues.
STUDY DESIGN
AND ETHICS
APPROVAL Consent should be explained and obtained from the
subjects or guardians, and steps should be taken to
ensure confidentiality of information provided by the
subjects.

Patient information sheet should be given to the


subjects
The discussion section of a paper should mention any
issues of bias, and explain how they have been dealt
with in the design and interpretation of the study

Fabrication and falsification of data constitute to


misconduct

DATA ANALYSIS

all sources and methods used to obtain and analyse


data should be fully disclosed..

The discussion section of a paper should mention any


issues of bias and explain how they have been dealt
with in the design and interpretation of the study.
The author should take responsibility to certify that the
manuscript represents valid work and take public
responsibility for the work

Responsible and ethical authorship requires that the


work be trustworthy, truthful and fair.

AUTHORSHIP

Ghost authorship is a problem, especially seen in


clinical trials or with new technology

Fairness in the public disclosure of the affiliations of


those who participated in the study and its preparation.
An Individual has interests in the outcome of the
research that may lead to personal advantage

Conflicts include personal, commercial, political,


academic or financial interest.

CONFLICTS OF
INTEREST
When publishing, conflicts of interest should be
declared to editors, and readers will judge for
themselves whether the research findings are
trustworthy.

Conflicts of interest can potentially clash with


the purpose of scientific work itself.
Redundant publication occurs when two or more
papers, without full cross reference, share the same
hypothesis, data, discussion points, or conclusions.

plagiarism ranges from unreferenced use of others


published and unpublished ideas, including research
grant applications to submission under “new”
REDUNDANT authorship of a complete paper, sometimes in different
PUBLICATION language.
AND
PLAGIARISM

A large amount of other people’s writing or illustrative


materials is to be used, permission must be sought.

violation of intellectual property rights (plagiarism) is


happening both inadvertently as well as with
knowledge. Cases of fraud and deceit have been
documented in even the most esteemed journals.
UNETHICAL RESEARCHES
EXAMPLES
THE PILTDOWN MAN

The apparently fossilized skull


found at Piltdown Common near
Lewes, Eng., was first proposed
as a new species of prehistoric
man (“Piltdown man”) in 1912.
Only in 1954 was the skull
shown to consist of a human
cranium skilfully joined to the
jaw of an orangutan.
THE TUSKEGEE EXPERIMENT

• The project, which was conducted by


the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS)
from 1932 to 1972, examined the
natural course of untreated syphilis in
African American men.
• Treatment was initially part of the
study, and some patients were
administered arsenic, bismuth, and
mercury. But after the original study
failed to produce any useful data, it
was decided to follow the subjects
until their deaths, and all treatment
was halted. Penicillin was denied to
the infected men after that drug
became available .
REFERENCE

• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/
PMC4453117/
• https://h2020integrity.eu/conflict-of-interest-in-research-what-is-it-and-why-it-
matters/
• https://www.britannica.com/summary/Piltdown-man

• https://www.britannica.com/event/Tuskegee-syphilis-study

You might also like