0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views18 pages

Which Guidelines For Heart Failure

The management of heart failure in India faces challenges due to the lack of specific guidelines tailored to the Indian population, which has significant epidemiological and ethnic differences compared to Western societies. Current reliance on AHA and ESC guidelines highlights the need for adaptation to local contexts, with AHA being more relevant for categorization and prevention strategies. Both guidelines are complementary, with AHA incorporating the latest trial data and emphasizing early-stage management, making it particularly applicable to Indian healthcare settings.

Uploaded by

wasim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views18 pages

Which Guidelines For Heart Failure

The management of heart failure in India faces challenges due to the lack of specific guidelines tailored to the Indian population, which has significant epidemiological and ethnic differences compared to Western societies. Current reliance on AHA and ESC guidelines highlights the need for adaptation to local contexts, with AHA being more relevant for categorization and prevention strategies. Both guidelines are complementary, with AHA incorporating the latest trial data and emphasizing early-stage management, making it particularly applicable to Indian healthcare settings.

Uploaded by

wasim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

Management of Heart Failure.

• Guideline Directed Medical Therapy is the Cornerstone of Management.

• In recent years, many new modalities have revolutionised the management.

• Challenge lies in giving proper order and priority to available resources


Issues in Choosing appropriate Guidelines for Indian population:

• No specific guidelines for Indian Population.

• Significant Epidemiological and Ethnic differences of Indian Heart Failure Population


compared to Western Societies.

• Different Healthcare delivery systems.


Data on Indian Heart Failure Management Recommendations:

• Mostly consensus documents of adapting Western Guidelines for Indian Population

• Old Literature, not taking into consideration latest developments

• Pressing need for Specific Guidelines suited to Indian Population.

 In absence of above, currently reliance on Western Guidelines with


Global Appeal.
Most Updated, Globally Accepted and Practical Recommendations:

1. AHA/ACC Guidelines , Latest Updated in 2022

2. ESC Guidelines, Last update in 2021


Which Guidelines to choose?
• Different Guidelines are COMPLEMENTARY, and not exclusive.

• Consensus on Management across broad categories, but subtle


differences.

• Important to understand the differences, and reasons thereof, for


harmonious use of all available guidelines.
AHA vs ESC Guidelines
A. Definition and Categorisation of Heart Failure:
• ESC Guidelines (2021) updated earlier and do not take into consideration the Latest Universal Definition of
Heart Failure.

• AHA Guidelines (2022) take into consideration latest Universal Definition of HF

Common Categories in 2 Guidelines Additional Category in AHA


1. HFrEF
2. HFpEF HFimpEF
3. HFmrEF
Heart Failure with Improved EF
• Additional Category in AHA
HFimpEF. (Heart Failure with Improved EF)

• This category is prognostically important and takes into account updated


Universal HF definition.

 For categorisation of HF, AHA more relevant than ESC.


AHA vs ESC Guidelines
B. Stage A of Heart Failure and Prevention:

• AHA = Detailed explanation and management of Stage A Heart Failure


and management of Risk Factors.
• Very Important from Indian Perspective.
• ESC only gives passing reference to Stage A and risk factors for HF.

 For Stage A and Prevention of HF : AHA more informative


than ESC.
AHA vs ESC Guidelines
C. Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

• ESC gives no specific management guidlines except


treatment of Etiological Risk factors.

• AHA incorporates latest evidence based drug therapy

 For HFpEF = AHA more informative than ESC.


AHA vs ESC Guidelines
D. Newer Pharmacotherapy in Heart Failure:

• Both Guidelines emphasise Quadruple therapy for HF.

• Some differences pertinent to ARNi and New Modalities


like Omecativ.

• Differences Primarily due to timing of Issuance of


Guidelines

 ESC issued earlier than AHA, the later incorporating more


1. ARNi in ESC guidelines.

• ESC guidelines, updated in 2021

• Take only PARADIGM study into consideration

• Advocate ARNi only as replacement for ACE


inhibitors.
2. ARNi in AHA guidelines.

• More updated data than ESC.


• Broad usage of ARNI
o De Novo Heart Failure
o Acute Heart Failure

Use of ARNi = AHA more detailed than ESC.


• New Medications like Omecamtiv
mecarbil
only in ESC guidelines as not
available in US
AHA vs ESC Guidelines
E. Cardio-Oncology:

• Incidence of HF in Cancer patients on the rise.

• Importance of early detection, prevention and management.

• ESC Guidelines have specific recommendations in this susbset.

 Cardio-Oncology = ESC more informative than AHA.


SUMMARY:
• Pressing Need for Specific Guidelines for Heart Failure in Indian Population

• In absence of Specific Guidelines, Globally recognised Recommendations to be tailored in Indian


Setting.

• AHA / ESC guidelines incorporate most recent recommendations, relevant for current practice.

• AHA and ESC should be viewed as complimentary

• Subtle differences between the two are mostly due to timing of the issuance of guidelines

• AHA incorporates most recent trial data, and more emphasis on Early Stages and at Risk
population, that makes it more relevant to Indian Setting.

You might also like