0% found this document useful (0 votes)
75 views46 pages

Thumb Reconstruction

The document discusses the importance of thumb reconstruction, outlining factors influencing surgical options, goals of reconstruction, and classifications of thumb defects and amputations. It details various reconstructive techniques, including flaps and transfers, emphasizing the need for restoring function and aesthetics. Additionally, it addresses complications and considerations for different surgical approaches to thumb reconstruction.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
75 views46 pages

Thumb Reconstruction

The document discusses the importance of thumb reconstruction, outlining factors influencing surgical options, goals of reconstruction, and classifications of thumb defects and amputations. It details various reconstructive techniques, including flaps and transfers, emphasizing the need for restoring function and aesthetics. Additionally, it addresses complications and considerations for different surgical approaches to thumb reconstruction.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

THUMB

RECONSTR
UCTION
- [Link] S
2ND YEAR RESIDENT
GANDHI MEDICAL COLLEGE
INTRODUCTION
• The thumb is the shortest but the most important of all

finger.

• It is responsible for 40% of the hand function.

• An ideal reconstruction of the thumb would replace “like

with like,” restoring both function and appearance


 Factors that affect the choice of option include patient's age,

dominant hand, sex, occupation, and desire where the


donor site is.

 Surgeon's familiarity with a specific flap is also an

important factor in flap choice


Additional assessment for the following needs to be done

 Status of first web

 Whether the complaints match the deficit

 Are there Problems with other digits

 Dysfunctional use

 Patient expectations
GOALS OF
RECONSTRUCTION
1. Sensate and non tender thumb cover

2. Stability

3. Adequate length

4. Strength

5. Correct posture and positioning

6. Mobility
CLASSIFICATION OF
THUMB DEFECT
 Thumb defect is classified into four groups by Lister:

1. acceptable length but poor soft tissue coverage,

2. subtotal amputation with uncertainty in length,

3. total amputation with basal joint, and

4. total amputation without basal joint.


CAMPBELL-REID
CLASSIFICATION OF THUMB
AMPUTATION
1. Amputation distal to the MCP joint, leaving an adequate
length

2. Amputation distal to or through the MCP joint ,leaving an


inadequate length

3. Amputation through the metacarpal, with preservaation of


some functioning thenar muscles

4. Amputation at or near the carpo-metacarpal joint


SOFT TISSUE
COVERAGE
Acceptable length with poor soft tissue coverage

 The choice of reconstructive procedure for soft tissue

deficits over the distal thumb depends primarily on the


size of the defect.

 When the loss of skin and subcutaneous tissue from the

terminal aspect of the distal phalanx is small (typically <1


cm2) and no exposed bone is present, reasonable
treatment options include
OPTIONS include

 allowing spontaneous healing by secondary intention,

 skin grafts,

 lateral triangular advancement flaps

 “V-Y” advancement flaps


M0BERG FLAP
 Palmar advancement flap is based on both neurovascular

bundles in the thumb. It permits coverage for defects as


large as 1.5 cm in longitudinal diameter.

 It provides immediate sensibility and glabrous skin while

preserving thumb length.

 Palmar advancement flap may result in complication such

as flexion contracture of interphalangeal joint and limiting


thumb extension.
 The palmar flap is elevated superficial to the flexor

tendon sheath including both neurovascular bundles with


subcutaneous tissue within the flap.

 After flap elevation, any tension is checked by advancing

the flap tip over the defect site.

 If there is difficulty in advancing the flap, one can

[Link] the mid-lateral incision proximally onto the


thenar eminence,
[Link] the interphalangeal joint, or

[Link] the flap as island by transverse incision at the flap


base with a full thickness skin graft to the secondary
defect.

The distal edge of the flap is trimmed to give a rounded tip.


CROSS FINGER FLAP
 Loss of the entire palmar surface of the thumb distal to

the IP joint

 With the thumb adducted,levelof flap is determined on

dorsal radial aspect of index finger

 flap is raised in an ulnar-to-radial direction in the plane

just superficial to the extensor paratenon.


 The flap can be safely divided after 14 to 21 days.

 Disadvantages and complications include a potentially

unsightly defect over the dorsum of the index finger, with


digital joint stiffness or thumb web contracture
FDMA ISLAND FLAP
 It is transferred as a pure island flap carrying the FDMA,

subcutaneous veins, and branches of the radial sensory


nerve in a single stage, thus eliminating the need for
prolonged immobilization and potential long-term
stiffness.
 The FDMA island flap can reach the volar and dorsal

aspects of the distal thumb and is considered a


versatile workhorse flap for innervated distal thumb soft
tissue coverage

 To avoid scar contracture, the proximal limit of the flap is

the MP joint, and the distal limit is the proximal IP joint


 The flap is elevated in the loose areolar plane above

the extensor tendon paratenon.

 Dissection generally moves from distal to proximal and

from the ulnar to the radial side.

 Extreme care must be taken at the radial border of the

MP joint because this is where the FDMA enters the


flap’s subcutaneous network.
 Potential complications include flap vascular compromise

and index finger donor site morbidity, such as stiffness,


cold intolerance, hypertrophic scarring, and neuroma.
HETERODIGITAL
NEUROVASCULAR ISLAND
FLAP
 The Littler flap is a flap transferred from the ulnar aspect

of the middle finger or radial aspect of the ring finger to


the thumb tip.

 The flap is harvested from the hemipulp of the respective

finger and transferred on the neurovascular pedicle after


dissection through the palm
SUBTOTAL AMPUTATION WITH
QUESTIONABLE REMAINING
LENGTH
 Phalangization

Small web space deepening:-


1. Skin grafting
2. Z plasty

Large web space deepening:-


3. dorsal hand flap,
4. RAFF, PIA
DORSAL HAND FLAP
OSTEOPLASTIC
RECONSTRUCTION
 Osteoplastic reconstruction, or thumb reconstruction by

means of a bone graft covered with a pedicled flap, was


first attempted by Nicoladoni.

 Osteoplastic reconstruction consists of three

components.
1. skeletal reconstruction,
2. soft tissue covering, and
3. sensory flap for the pulp

For skeletal reconstruction, one of iliac bone, ulna, or


radius can be selected depending on the size of bone
defects.
STAGE 1

STAGE
2
COMPOSITE RADIAL
FOREARM ISLAND
FLAP
 This procedure has the advantage of providing a well-

vascularized skin and bone flap and, with the addition of


an extended neurovascular island pedicle flap, avoiding
the staging necessitated by conventional osteoplastic
methods.
DISTRACTION
OSTEOGENESIS
 Distraction osteogenesis is an option when the toe- to-finger

procedure is likely to be difficult or the donor toe is limited.

 The main advantage of using this method is to maintain

native innervation.

 Before distraction osteogenesis, it is necessary to predict the

condition of the soft tissue on the bone stump after


lengthening.
 This procedure can extend length by about 3 cm, but at

least two thirds of the metacarpal bone must remain


ON TOP PLASTY
 If the defect on the thumb occurs with the damage of

other fingers, on-top plasty can be performed using the


remaining amputated index, in the form of pollicization or
spare-part surgery
POLLICIZATION
 Consists of surgically migrating the index finger to the

position of the thumb

 This procedure is the only satisfactory means of basal

joint reconstruction and results in extensive physiologic


sensory restoration
TOTAL LOSS WITH
DESTRUCTION OF
BASAL JOINT
 Second-Toe Transfer

Second-toe transfer has been used as an alternative to


reconstruct these proximal thumb amputations when
pollicization is not an option due to injury to the index finger.
As much as 5 cm of thesecond metatarsal may be required to
provide adequate length but this has limited donor site
morbidity
TOE-TO-THUMB
RECONSTRUCTION
 Great-Toe Transfer

Great-toe transfer involves isolating the great toe on the


FDMTA. Flap harvest is limited to the proximal phalanx of
the hallux, preserving at least the entire head of the first
metatarsal to avoid uneven plantar weight distribution and
unsteady gait
 MODIFICATIONS

Wrap-Around Great-Toe Transfer

 The wrap-around toe-transfer is a modification of the

great toe flap to preserve all or most of the hallux to


avoid donor site morbidity and create a more normal size
and contour to the reconstructed thumb.

 The flap is harvested as an onychocutaneous flap and can

include a portion of the distal phalanx


 Trimmed Great-Toe Transfer

• Designed to improve the appearance of the reconstructed

thumb
The medial skin and dissected off the trimmed-toe flap
and a longitudinal osteotomy were performed to remove
2 to 4 mm of the medial phalanges and 4 to 6 mm of the
medial prominence at the IP joint
TRIMMED TOE
TRANSFER
 Toe Pulp and Distal Trimmed Toe-Transfer

 Sensate cutaneous flaps can be harvested

from the great and second toes to reconstruct


isolated thumb pulp defects. Most often the
lateral great toe pulp and medial second toe
are selected.
TOE PULP TRANSFER
THANK YOU

You might also like