VISUAL OUTCOMES OF SMART SICS
Principal Investigator: (with designation)
• Dr. Hemant Sonawane,
Medical Consultant, Cataract & IOL Services, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai
Co-investigators (with designation)
• Dr. Zervin R. Baam,
Medical Consultant, Cataract & IOL Services, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai
• Dr. Madhu Shekhar,
Head of Department, Cataract & IOL Services, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai
• Dr. Shivkumar,
Medical Officer, Cataract & IOL Services, Aravind Eye Hospital, Tirunelveli
• Dr. Swati Singh,
Fellow, Cataract & IOL Services, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai
• Project Duration: 6 months
• Budget: Nil
• Major Objective: To analyze visual and refractive
outcome of SMART SICS in comparison to Conventional
SICS
Background
• Despite continuous advancements in modern cataract
surgery, correction of the postoperative loss of
accommodation remains a challenge.
• Various approaches to the correction of induced iatrogenic
presbyopia exist
1. Accommodating and multifocal iols
2. Pseudophakic monovision techniques achieved by monofocal
IOL implantation.
Background
• The ultimate target following cataract surgery remains spectacle
independence for near and distance activities without compromising the
patients' visual function and visual performance.
• Multifocal IOLs has given us good results for both near and distance
vision in terms of spectacle independence
• Multifocal IOLs are frequently associated with
1. Dysphotopsia,
2. Visual disturbances at night,
3. Halos, and glare, mainly due to changes in pupil diameter,
4. Costly which plays a significant role in developing country like India
SMART SICS
• A relatively newer technique called SMART SICS has been
recently proposed which has showed to improve patient
reported unaided near vision.
• The procedure of SMART SICS is similar to conventional SICS,
with one exception.
• The entry into the anterior chamber is a controlled one, while
monitoring the regularity of corneal mires reflected from the
anterior corneal surface using a hand-held keratoscope.
SMART SICS
• Our aim through this study is to analyze and
understand the hypothesis which is contributing to
the changes happening at corneal level.
Methodology
• 50 eyes conventional SICS and 50 eyes SMART SICS, which will
be evaluated on pre-op day; post-op 1 day; 1 month; 3months.
• Investigations to be done (BE):
Vision: unaided and best-corrected, for distance and near
A-scan (only during pre-op visit).
Itrace
Corneal topography
Methodology
Inclusion criteria :
• Age 40 – 70 years
• Immature cataract (< NS III )
• Axial length 21-24 mm
• Astigmatism < 1.5 D
Methodology
• Exclusion criteria:
corneal pathology/ectasia/opacity
posterior segment pathology
glaucoma /shallow AC
intraoperative complications
• Risk & benefits:
• no risk involved as procedure is similar to conventional
SICS. Benefits involve improved unaided near vision.
• Possible outcome: improved patient reported unaided
near vision