0% found this document useful (0 votes)
92 views78 pages

Hydrograph Analysis

The document covers hydrograph analysis in engineering hydrology, focusing on unit hydrographs (UH) and their applications in determining direct runoff hydrographs. It outlines the principles of superposition and lagging for deriving UHs from storm hydrographs, as well as the assumptions and limitations of the UH method. Additionally, it provides examples and learning outcomes for students to understand and apply these concepts effectively.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
92 views78 pages

Hydrograph Analysis

The document covers hydrograph analysis in engineering hydrology, focusing on unit hydrographs (UH) and their applications in determining direct runoff hydrographs. It outlines the principles of superposition and lagging for deriving UHs from storm hydrographs, as well as the assumptions and limitations of the UH method. Additionally, it provides examples and learning outcomes for students to understand and apply these concepts effectively.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ECW 557:

ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY

HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS
By:
MADAM IRMA NOORAZURAH MOHAMAD
T1-A13-2C
[email protected]
Ext: 6409/ 012-219 0315
WEEK 6 – HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
At the end of the week, students should
be able to:
1) apply unit hydrograph to determine direct runoff hydrograph
2) derive unit hydrograph from a storm hydrograph by principle of
superposition and lagging (CO2);
3) derive unit hydrographs of other durations from a unit
hydrograph (CO2);
4) derive synthetic unit hydrograph for a meteorologically similar
watershed (CO2).
Total runoff Direct runoff
hydrograph, TRH - Baseflow = hydrograph, DRH

Q Q Q

t t t

Area below graph = Runoff volume


Unit Hydrograph (UH) pg 205
Introduced by Sherman (1932) – predicting the
flood hydrograph from known storm.
Definition: UH is the “hydrograph of direct runoff
resulting from one unit depth (1cm) of rainfall
excess’’ occurring uniformly over the basin and at a
uniform rate for a specific duration (D, hours).
D-hr UH

Q (m3/s)
D
1cm RE * Volume of water in UH = RE
* Average Intensity of RE

D-hr UH = 1/D (cm/h)


D = duration of RE
t
* Distribution of storm considered
tb
uniform all over catchment
Assumptions in UH
• Time Invariance: The direct-runoff response to a
given effective rainfall in a catchment is time-
invariant, implying that the DRH for a given ER in a
catchment is always the same irrespective of when it
occurs.
• Linear Response: Principle of proportionality ~
(effective rainfall proportional to direct runoff in
diff t, same D) – enable superposition to derive
DRHs

(UH Ordinate) x ER depth = DRH

HENCE, UH can be used to predict runoff from a storm event


Effect of Storm Duration, D (hours)
2-hr UH 6-hr UH 12-hr UH
2 hr 1cm RE 6 hr 1cm RE 12 hr 1cm RE
Q Q Q

Unit RE
Unit RE Unit RE

A1 A2 A3
t t t

Area under the graph: A1 = A2 = A3;


Volume of effective rainfall: V1 = V2 = V3 = 1 unit of
Effective Rainfall
Differences: Time to peak, time base, peak value
Principle of Proportionality
DRH due to
D-hr UH P cm RE (P>1) in D hr

1cm RE P cm RE
Q Q

t t
tb tb

Time to peak, tp & time base, tb remain the same


Ordinates & peak value changed
Principle of Proportionality
DRH due to
D-hr UH P cm RE (P<1) In D hr

1cm RE P cm RE
Q Q

t t
tb tb

Time to peak, tp & time base, tb remain the same


Ordinates & peak value changed
Method of Superposition & Lagging
DRH for two events of D-hr rain of 1 cm each
D-hr UH occurs consecutive

Q Q
D hr D hr D hr

1 cm 1 cm
1 cm
Total DRH:2 cm
1 cm RE
RE
1 cm RE
1 cm RE

t t
tb tb for 1st rainfall
Total DRH = Sum(DRHi) tb for 2
nd
rainfall

Time base for Total DRH, Lag time tb’


tb’ = tb + (n-1)D
D hr

n = number of rainfall

If dif. storms occurred successively, hence, D-hr UH can be used


to derive DRH for storms which has a duration of nD, n=integer
Method of Superposition & Lagging
DRH for a complex storm event

D-hr UH
Q D D D

D Q cm R cm
1cm P cm
Q

= (P+Q+R) DRH

Q-DRH

P-DRH R-DRH
t
tb

tb for P t

Total DRH =  DRHi


tb for Q
Time base for Total DRH, tb for R
tb’ = tb + (n-1)D tb’
n = number of rainfall
Example: 6.4, pg 207
t(h) Ordinates Ordinates
x RE depth: linear response
6 h-UH DRH
x3.5
0 0 0
x3.5
3 25 87.5
x3.5
6 50 175 3.5 cm DRH
x3.5
9 85 297.5
x3.5
12 125 437.5
6-hr UH

x3.5
60 8 28
x3.5
69 0 0
tb
Example: A catchment has a constant loss rate of 1.5 cm/h.
In a particular storm event, the catchment receive 6 cm
rainfall in 2 hours and 5 cm rainfall in the next 2 hours.
Determine the resulting runoff hydrograph if the average
baseflow is 20 m3/s and the 2 h UH is given.

t (h) 2h UH (m3/s)
t(h) P (cm) L (cm)ER (cm)
0.0 0
1.0 25 0 0
2.0 40 2 6 3 3
3.0 25 4 5 3 2
4.0 13 For UH, tb = 8h
5.0 6 Time base for Total DRH,
6.0 3
tb’ = tb + (n-1)D
7.0 1
8.0 0
x RE depth: linear response
t (h) 2h UH (m3/s) DRH (3cm) DRH (2cm) TOTAL DRH
0.0 0 0 Lag time 0
1.0 25 75 75
= 2 hr
2.0 40 120 0 120
3.0 25 75 50 125
4.0 13 39 80 119
5.0 6 18 50 66.5
6.0 3 9 26 35
7.0 1 3 12 15
8.0 0 0 6 6
9.0 0 2 2
10.0 0 0
?????
160
DRH (3cm)
140
DRH (2cm)
120
TOTAL DRH
100 Flood Hydrograph
80
60
40
20
0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
Example 6.5, pg208
t(h) 6hr-UH DRH2cm

0 0
3 25 x2
t = 3h 6 50 0
9 85 50
12 125 100 t = 3h t = 6h t = 9h
15 160 170
18 185 250
24 160 320
t = 6h 30 110 370
36 60 320
. . .
. . .
. . .
Example 6.5, pg208
t(h) 6hr-UH DRH2cm t(h) UH DRH2

0 +3 0 . . .

3 +3 25 x2 . . .
. . .

6 +3 50 0 48 +6 25 x2 ??
9 +3 85 50 54 +6 16 50
12 125 100
15 +3 160 170 60 +6 8 32
69 +6 0 ??
18 +3 185 250 75 0
21 320
24 +6 160 370
30 +6 110 320 For UH, tb = 69h
36 60 220
42
.
.
36
.
.
120
.
.
Time base for Total DRH,
. . .
tb’ = tb + (n-1)D
DIY:
Example 6.6, pg 210
For 6hr-UH (same ordinates as EX 6.4), where tb = 69 h

For Total DRH,


tb’ = tb + (n-1)D
tb’ = 69 + 2x6 = 81h
6
WEEK 6 – HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
At the end of the week, students should
be able to:
1) apply unit hydrograph to determine direct runoff hydrograph
2) derive unit hydrograph from a storm hydrograph by principle of
superposition and lagging (CO2);
3) derive unit hydrographs of other durations from a unit
hydrograph (CO2);
4) derive synthetic unit hydrograph for a meteorologically similar
watershed (CO2).
DERIVATION OF
UH
Derivation of UH pg 212
Requires at least five (5) QUALIFIED storm events
with the following characteristics:
• Storm must be isolated/ independent
• Storm must be uniform over entire duration
• Storm must be uniform over entire watershed
• Storm duration must be ±20%D (preferably less)
• Storm duration must be 1/5 to 1/3 of basin lag
• Storm magnitude must be significant, preferably
between 1 to 4cm
Limitations of UH
• Storm are rarely uniform over entire catchment,
hence, UH method is only applicable for
2 km2< A < 5000 km2
• Large storage in catchment which will affect the
assumption of linear response is not considered.
• Precipitation must be rainfall only, snow fall
cannot be considered.
• Method invalid if the storm is nonuniform in time.
Accuracy: typically ±20% tb , ±10% Qp
Derivation of UH
• 5nos UH from qualified storm events
Q -Qp are different
- tpk are different
- tb are different

• find the average UH ordinate

t
Average UH
• determine average Qp, tpk and tb
Q Qp Average UH

• adjust curve – must be smooth


• check area below UH - must
represent unit depth

tpk tb t
Example
Time UH (m3/s) ≡ DRH (m3/s) UH (avg)
h storm 1 storm 2 storm 3 storm 4 storm 5 (m3/s)
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 1.9 1.2 1.5 1.4 1.6 1.5
4 9.4 6.0 8.5 5.5 9.1 7.7
6 9.3 9.9 8.0 10.1 8.5 9.2
8 7.0 8.2 6.1 8.3 6.5 7.2
10 5.2 6.1 4.5 5.9 5.0 5.3
12 3.3 4.3 2.8 4.3 3.5 3.7
14 2.1 2.9 1.8 3.0 2.4 2.5
16 1.2 1.9 0.8 1.9 1.4 1.5
18 0.6 1.0 0.0 1.2 0.6 0.7
20 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.2
22 0.0 0.0 0.0
Catchment area = 28.4 km2 RE (cm) = 1.00

Average tpk = 4.8 h Sum UH average ordinates = 39.5 m3/s


Average Qp = 9.4 m3/s
Average tb = 20.4 h
12.0
UH1
10.0 UH2
UH3
8.0
UH4
6.0 UH5
Average
4.0

2.0

0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time UH (avg) UH (avg)
Time, h corrected
h (m3/s)
0 0.0
0 0.0
2 1.5
2 1.5
4 7.7
4 7.7
5 9.4
6 9.2
6 9.2
8 7.2
8 7.2
10 5.3
10 5.3
12 3.7
12 3.7
14 2.5
14 2.5
16 1.5
16 1.5
18 0.7
18 0.7
20 0.2
20 0.0
22 0.0
22 0.0
1.0
1.00
10.0
Qp = 9.4 9.0
8.0
Qp average UH = 9.2
7.0 Average
6.0 tp average UH = 6 h corrected
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25

tpk = 4.8 (5.0) tb = 20.4 (20)


Derivation of UH when D is same
DRH for D-hr rain D-hr UH

D hr D hr

Q Q

P units RE
1 unit RE

V=PxA V=1xA

t t
tb tb

(Ordinates DRH) / ER = ordinates UH


Example 6.7, pg 213
Example 6.8, pg 215
92
DERIVATION OF UH FROM
COMPLEX STORM EVENT;
D DIFFERENT SITUATION
Analysis
Input Transfer Function Output

Rainfall Data
?
Unit Hydrograph Streamflow Data

Synthesis
Input Transfer Function Output

Rainfall Data Unit Hydrograph


?
Streamflow
1D 2D 3D
UH of Complex
R1 R2 R3 Storm :different rainfall
Q
duration, Dtwo D-hr rainfall
Total DRH due to
R1U4+ R2U3
R1U5+ R2U4

DRH due to D-hr effective rain of R1 unit


R1U3+ R2U2 R1U6+ R2U5

R1U7+ R2U6 DRH due to D-hr effective rain of R2 unit

R1U2+ R2U1 R1U8+ R2U7

R1U9+ R2U8

R1U1 R1U10+ R2U9


R2U10 t

D-hr
Convolution Computation
Time Rainfall UH Runoff due to Runoff due to Runoff due to Total direct runoff
(hr) excess Un 1st 2nd 4th Qi
Rm X-hr rain X-hr rain X-hr rain
0 - 0 0 0 0 0

X R1 U1 R1U1 0 0 R1U1

2X R2 U2 R1U2 R2U1 0 R1U2 + R2U1

3X 0 U3 R1U3 R2U2 0 R1U3 + R2U2

4X R4 U4 R1U4 R2U3 R4U1 R1U4 + R2U3 + R4U1

5X … U5 R1U5 R2U4 R4U2 R1U5 + R2U4 + R4U2

6X U6 R1U6 R2U5 R4U3 R1U6 + R2U5 + R4U3

7X U7 R1U7 R2U6 R4U4 R1U7 + R2U6 + R4U4

8X U8 R1U8 R2U7 R4U5 R1U8 + R2U7 + R4U5

9X U9 R1U9 R2U8 R4U6 R1U9 + R2U8 + R4U6

10X U10 R1U10 R2U9 R4U7 R1U10 + R2U9 + R4U7

11X 0 0 R2U10 R4U8 R2U10 + R4U8

12X 0 R4U9 R4U9

13X R4U10 R4U10

14X 0 0
Deconvolution Computation
Q1 = R1 U 1
Q2 = R2 U 1 + R 1 U 2
Q3 = R3 U 1 + R2 U 2 + R1 U 3

QM = RMU1 + RM-1U2 + … + R1UM
QM+1 = 0 + RMU2 + … + R2UM + R1UM+1

QN+M-2 = 0 + 0 + … + RMUN-1 + RM-1UN
QN+M-1 = 0 + 0 + … + 0 + RM U N
Q=RxU

Unit hydrograph U can be solved using matrix method.


UH of different durations, D

Previously, UH from simple isolated storms can be


grouped under average D-hour. Practically, UH in
different D. Can use following methods:
• Method of Superposition
• S-hydrograph Method
Method of Superposition
DRH for 2D-hr rain
D-hr UH
Q
2D hr
D hr

Q 1cm RE 2cm RE

t t
tb
tb
tb
Intensity = 1/D cm/h
Lag time

(UH Ordinate) x ER depth = DRH


(DRH Ordinate) / RE depth = UH Ordinate
'
D = duration of UH t tb  (n  1) D
b

n = number of D-hr rainfall


Intensity = 1/nD cm/h

Limitation: For an UH of duration D, other UH


derived has duration which is multiple of the
original UH only, i.e. nD, where n is an integer.

Example 6.9, pg 216


Given 4-h UH, find the 12-h UH???
S-hydrograph Method

• Overcome the limitation of Method of Superposition.


• Can derive UH with ANY DURATION.
S-hydrograph
Q
S-hydrograph, a.k.a S-curve,
hydrograph produced by
continuous ER at constant
D hr
Maximum
rate & is the summation of
infinite series of D-hr UH,
S-hydrograph spaced D-hr apart.
D hr UH
Maximum equilibrium
discharge at a time
equal to the time base of
t the first UH
D hr D hrtb1
tb2 *Approach constant at tb – D
tb3
S-hydrograph
Intensity = 1/D cm/h Q T hr

Duration = T h (Duration for required UH) Storm B


Depth = Intensity x Duration Storm A
= T/D cm D hr
S-hydrograph A

S
S-hydrograph B

S S
T/D cm
S x D/T

1 cm
t
lagged T hr

tb’ = tb + (T-D)
(DRH Ordinate) / RE depth = UH Ordinate
Example 6.10 pg:219
Derive S-curve for the 4-hr UH?
Hint: use Eq 6.8; S(t) = U(t) + S(t-D)
t = time, D = rainfall duration
D -hr Hint: use Eq 6.8; S(t) = U(t) + S(t-
Derive 12-h UH from 4-h UH???? D)
t = time, D = rainfall duration
T-hr SA SB (SA – SB)/Depth
Example 6.11; pg221
Approach constant at tb – D = 44 – 4 = 40h For S-curve
Q (m3/s)

652 679 694 699 699

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 t (h)
Example 6.11, pg221
Consider two D-h S-curve, displaced by T-h
tb’ = tb + (T-D) = 44 + (12-4) = 52h
Q (m /s)
3

S1 S2

S

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 t (h)
Example 6.12, pg221

Fairing

Hint: use Eq 6.8; S(t) = U(t) + S(t-


Example 6.12, 221

tb’ = tb + (T-D) = 44 + (2-4) = 42h


Q (m /s)
3

20 20 10 10
0 +4

0 12 42 -4 t (h)
Example 6.12, pg221

tb’ = tb + (T-D) = 44 + (2-4) = 42h


Q (m /s)
3

Fairing

0 12 42 t (h)
UH of different durations
Problem solving: 6.18, 6.19
Synthetic UH
Gauged Data UH

Ungauged Data UH but HOW??

A synthetic unit hydrograph is derived from


empirical equations of regional validity when
observed rainfall-runoff data are not available
for unit hydrograph derivation. Its uses are:
• to anticipate post-development conditions,
• to extend the usage of point–specific unit
hydrograph to other locations of similar
characteristics.
Synthetic UH
• Snyder’s method
• SCS method
Both to utilize existing UH from a neighbouring
meteorologically similar watershed.
Watershed A Watershed B
UH available UH not available

Rainfall duration Rainfall duration


Qp

t ? t
tc Storm Hydrograph
D
D = rainfall duration
*L Rainfall
tpk = time to peak
tb = time base
Q

Point of tc = time of concentration


inflection/max
L = lag time, basin lag
storage
* tr * centre of mass
t = recession time
r

tpk

Beginning of rainfalltb
Components of Hydrograph pg 198
Snyder’s Method – popular method
Snyder adopted a standard duration tr hours of effective rainfall
given by
tr = tp / 5.5
tr = rainfall duration for standard (h)
tr
tp = Ct ( L.Lca )0.3

tp = basin tp = basin lag (h)


Qp
lag/lag time L = basin length (km)
Lca = distance from watershed centroid
to outlet (measurement point) along
the main channel (km)
Ct = (Representing
regional constant
watershed(0.3< Ct <6.0)
slope and storage)
Basin lag/lag time = mean time for water travel from
t
all parts of watershed to outlet.
For flood forecasting, the actual storm duration is normally different from t r thus
For any UH, tR = rainfall duration (h), tp’ = modified basin lag (h)

For standard UH For non-standard UH


tp’ = t p tp’  t p
tr = t R
tR t ’ = ttr 
p p
tR
+ 0.25(t –t)
R r
Qps = 2.78 CpA/ tp
tp’ = 21tp /22 + 0.25tR
tp @ tp’

Qp Qp = 2.78 CpA/ tp’

A = watershed area (km2)


Qp = peak flow rate (m3/s)
Cp = regional constant (0.31< Cp< 0.93)
Indicate retention and watershed
t storage capacity
Snyder’s Method
Time base of a unit hydrograph by Snyders
Tb = 72 + 3tp’ (unit in hours)
Sketching UH, width of UH based on W50 & W75

Required UH W75
Qp

0.75Qp W50 = 5.87/ q1.08 q = Qp/A


W75
0.5Qp
W50 W75 = W50 / 1.75

Tp

Tb t
Snyder’s Method

Qp

W75 /3
0.75Qp
2/3 W75

0.5Qp
W50 /3 2/3 W50

tpk
t
Example 6.14, pg227 Snyder’s Method
Step 1: check whether source UH is standard
Step 2: determine regional constants (Ct & Cp) of source
UH
Step 3: check whether required UH is standard
Step 4: determine parameters of required UH
Step 5: determine time base of required UH
Step 6: finalizing required UH using S-curve method

Source UH Required UH

Qp

t
? t
Snyder’s Method
Step 1: check whether source UH is standard

Assume tr = t R
Source UH
tR tr = tp / 5.5  tp

If tp’ = t p standard
tp’

Qp
If tp’  t p non-standard

Tp = tR/2 + tp’

t
Snyder’s Method
Step 2: determine regional constants of source UH
If not standard

Source UH
tp’ = tp + 0.25(tR – tr)
 tp
tR tp’ = 21tp /22 + 0.25tR

tp’
tp = Ct ( L.Lca )0.3  Ct
Qp
Qp = 2.78 CpA/ tp’  Cp

t
Snyder’s Method
Step 3: check whether required UH is standard

Required UH tp = Ct ( L.Lca )0.3


tR
tr = tp / 5.5

tp’ Assume tp’ = t p


Qp If tr = t R standard

If tr  t R non-standard

t
Snyder’s Method
Step 4: determine parameters of required UH

Required UH
tp’ = tp + 0.25(tR – tr)
 tp’
tR tp’ = 21tp /22 + 0.25tR

tp’
Qp = 2.78 CpA/ tp’  Qp
Qp
tpk = tR/2 + tp’

tpk t
Snyder’s Method
Step 4: determine parameters of required UH

Required UH W50 = 5.87/ q1.08 q = Qp/A

W75
Qp W75 = W50 / 1.75

0.75Qp

0.5Qp
W50

t
Snyder’s Method
Step 5: determine time base of required UH

For large catchment:


Required UH
tb = 72 +3tp’ (h)

Qp
For small catchment:

tb = 5(tp’ +0.5tR) (h)


To the nearest larger integer divisible by tR

tb t

tb is always least accurate


Example 6.14, pg228
Q (m3/s)

62
Select suitable tb

46.5
W75 = 25h

31
W50 = 44h

t (h)
4 8 11.4 33 48 58
Example 6.14, pg228
Q (m3/s)

62 Or use a curve

46.5
W75 = 25 h

31
W50 = 44 h

t (h)
11.4
Snyder’s Method
Step 6: Finalising UH using S-curve method

• Use the synthetic UH derived to plot an S-curve


• Use the S-curve to derive a UH of duration tR
SCS Method
SCS = Soil Conservation Service, US

• Use dimensionless UH derived from large number


of UH on variety of watershed.
t/tpk Q/Qp
0.0 0
0.1
0.2
0.015
0.075
SCS Method
0.3 0.16
0.4 0.28
1
0.5 0.43
0.6 0.6 0.9
0.7 0.77 0.8
0.8 0.89
0.7
0.9 0.97
1.0 1 Q/Qp 0.6
1.1 0.98 0.5
1.2 0.92
0.4
1.3 0.84
1.4 0.75 0.3
1.5 0.66 0.2
1.6 0.56
0.1
1.8 0.42
2.0 0.32 0
2.2 0.24 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
2.4 0.18 t/tpk
2.6 0.13
2.8 0.098
3.0 0.075
3.5 0.036
4.0 0.018
4.5 0.009
5.0 0.004 Table 6.2
6.0 0
SCS Method –Dimensionless UH
• Using Snyder’s method, calc. tpk and Qp
• Multiply t/tpk by tpk =t

• Multiply Q/Qp by Qp =Q
• Plot Q vs t
10
9
8

Example: 7
6
tpk = 20h 5
4
Qp = 10m3/s 3
2
1
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
SCS Method - SCS Triangular UH
• UH in triangular shape (FIGURE 6.21(b)
• where Tb = 2.67xTp where Tp = time to peak@ lag basin = tr/2 + tp
• Qp = 2.08A/Tp where A in km2

•Tp = tr/2 + 0.6tc where tr = duration of ER, tc = time of concentration

•Example 6.15 page 231


REVISION WEEK 6 – HYDROGRAPH
ANALYSIS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
At the end of the week, students should
be able to:
1) apply unit hydrograph to determine direct runoff hydrograph
2) derive unit hydrograph from a storm hydrograph by principle of
superposition and lagging (CO2);
3) derive unit hydrographs of other durations from a unit
hydrograph (CO2);
4) derive synthetic unit hydrograph for a meteorologically similar
watershed (CO2).

You might also like