0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views22 pages

TriCore Innovations

The document presents an analysis of a G+13 earthquake-resistant building using ETABS software, focusing on structural modeling, seismic load analysis, and performance evaluation. It outlines the importance of earthquake-resistant structures, methodologies for design optimization, and compliance with building codes. The study emphasizes the impact of seismic zones in India and includes detailed specifications of the building's design and materials.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views22 pages

TriCore Innovations

The document presents an analysis of a G+13 earthquake-resistant building using ETABS software, focusing on structural modeling, seismic load analysis, and performance evaluation. It outlines the importance of earthquake-resistant structures, methodologies for design optimization, and compliance with building codes. The study emphasizes the impact of seismic zones in India and includes detailed specifications of the building's design and materials.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE

STRUCTURE –
ANALYSIS OF G+13 EARTHQUAKE
RESISTANTE BUILDING IN ETABS

From : Walchand College of Engineering, Sangli


( Polytechnic Wing )

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL
ENGINEERING
Presented By : Ms. Patil Dhanashri B.
Ms. Dudhal Vaishnavi H.
OVERVIEW
01 02 03
Introduction Objectives Theoretical Background

04 05 06
About our Project Project Results
INTRODUCTION
• Structural Modeling and Material Selection: Accurate 3D
modeling of the G+13 building with appropriate material
properties and load conditions.

• Seismic Load Analysis: Application of response spectrum and


time-history analysis to assess the building’s response to
earthquake forces.

• Performance Evaluation: Analysis of structural stability, lateral


displacement, and base shear to identify potential vulnerabilities.

• Design Optimization and Reinforcement Strategies:


Implementation of structural enhancements to improve resilience
and minimize damage during seismic events.

• Compliance with Building Codes and Standards: Ensuring


adherence to international seismic design guidelines for safety
WHAT IS EARTHQUAKE?

An earthquake is a sudden and violent shaking of the


Earth’s surface caused by the release of energy from
within the Earth’s crust. This energy is typically
generated by the movement of tectonic plates,
volcanic activity, or human actions like mining and
drilling. The point where the earthquake originates
beneath the Earth’s surface is called the focus or
hypocenter, while the point directly above it on the
surface is known as the epicenter. Earthquakes are
measured using instruments called seismographs, and
their magnitude is often quantified using the Richter
scale or the Moment Magnitude Scale (Mw).
HOW EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS
STRUCTURE?
[Link] cause ground shaking, which can lead to
cracks, tilting, or the collapse of structures.

2. Soil liquefaction can make the ground behave like a


liquid, causing buildings to sink or topple.

3. Resonance between the earthquake’s frequency and a


building’s natural frequency can amplify vibrations and
cause severe damage.

4. Weak foundations and poor construction materials


increase the risk of structural failure.

5. Earthquakes can damage utilities like gas lines and


electrical systems, leading to fires and other hazards.
WHAT ARE EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE
STRUCTURE?

An earthquake-resistant structure is a building or infrastructure


designed and constructed to withstand the forces and vibrations
generated by seismic activity. These structures aim to minimize
damage, protect occupants, and maintain functionality during and
after an earthquake. They incorporate specialized design principles,
materials, and technologies to absorb and dissipate seismic energy,
ensuring structural integrity and safety.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Literature Review: Seismic
Analysis of RC Frames
Source: Jyothi D. N. et al., IJIRSET, August
2020
• Focus: Seismic performance of RC
frames with bracing and shear walls.
• Key Findings:
⚬ X-type bracing reduces displacement.
⚬ Shear walls enhance stability and
stiffness.
• Conclusion: Shear walls are more
ABOUT
ETAB’S
ETABS (Extended 3D Analysis of Building Systems) is a leading software developed
by Computers and Structures, Inc. (CSI) for the analysis and design of building
structures. Widely used by engineers, it supports the design of complex multi-
story buildings with features like 3D modeling, automated seismic and wind load
generation, and dynamic analysis.

Key Objectives of ETABS for Earthquake-Resistant Design

Accurate Seismic Analysis: Sophisticated tools like response spectrum and time-
history analysis help assess building behavior under seismic loads.
Optimization of Structural Elements: Helps optimize dimensions and reinforcement
of beams, columns, and shear walls.
Code Compliance: Supports various international codes to ensure seismic safety
standards.
Efficiency & Safety: Simulates earthquake impacts to design energy-efficient
structures, reducing collapse risks.
METHODOLOGY

1 Preliminary Planning

2 Modeling in
ETABS
3 Load Definition and
5 Run the Analysis
Application

4 Analysis Settings 6 Post – Analysis Review

7 Comparative study

8 Documentation and
SESMIC ZONES
India is divided into four seismic zones based on the intensity and frequency of
earthquakes. These zones are classified by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) in IS
1893:2016 (Part 1).

[Link] II (Low Risk Zone):


Least active zone with minimal seismic activity.
Includes areas like southern Karnataka and parts of central India
2. Zone III (Moderate Risk Zone):
Experiences moderate seismic activity.
Includes regions like Kerala, Goa, and parts of the Deccan Plateau.
3. Zone IV (High Risk Zone):
High probability of damaging earthquakes.
Covers areas like Delhi, Jammu and Kashmir, and parts of Bihar and West Bengal.
4. Zone V (Very High Risk Zone):
Most seismically active region.
Includes northeastern states, parts of Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh,
Uttarakhand, and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
SESMIC ZONE MAP OF INDIA FROM IS 1893:216
(PART I)
ABOUT BUILDING
Type of Building: Multistoried, framed building.
Height of Each Storey: 3.3 meters.
Size of Beams:
0.25 x 0.3 meters
0.25 x 0.4 meters
0.25 x 0.5 meters
Size of Columns:
0.25 x 0.35 meters
0.25 x 0.5 meters
0.25 x 0.6 meters
0.25 x 0.8 meters
0.25 x 1 meter
Total Height of Building: 42.9
meters.
Seismic Zone: Zone III.
Zone Factor: 0.16.
Importance Factor: 1.
Thickness of Slab: 150 mm
Support Conditions: Fixed
Concrete Grade: M25
Load on Beam: DL, LL, WL, EqL.
Load on Column: DL, LL, WL, EqL.
Dead Load on Slab: 3.75 kN/m
Live Load on Slab: 3 kN/m.
Earthquake Load on Structure: 1.5 kN/m
Wind Pressure Coefficient: 0.8 on
windward direction, 0.5 on Liveward
Wind Speed: 34.65 m/sec.
Beam: Fe415.
Column: Fe415.
Soil Type: Medium
Soil.
OUR MODEL
RESULTS
References: -
1. Babar Khan and [Link] Kumar, “Experimental Study on the Seismic Analysis of Multistoried
Building With Floating Column,” International Journal of Engineering Inventions e-ISSN: 2278-
7461, p-ISSN: 2319-6491 Volume 11, Issue 3 [May.-June. 2022] PP: 105-109.
2. Parul Rastogi, Vipin Tiwari, “A Review Paper on Seismic Analysis of Multi Storey Building with
Floating Columns at Different Locations of Shear Wall,” International Journal for Research in
Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN: 2321-9653, Volume 9 Issue IV Apr
2021, PP: 934 – 937.
3. Sreekanth Gandla Nanabala, Pradeep Kumar Ramancharla, Arunakanthi E, “Seismic Analysis
of A Normal Building and Floating Column Building,” International Journal of Engineering
Research & Technology (IJERT) ISSN: 2278-0181 [Link] IJERTV3IS090685 (This work is
licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.) Vol. 3 Issue 9,
September- 2014, PP: 981 - 987.
4. Prof. Sarita Singla and Er. Ashfi Rahman, “Effect of Floating Columns on Seismic Response of
Multi-Storeyed RC Framed Buildings,” International Journal of Engineering Research &
Technology (IJERT) ISSN: 2278-0181 Vol. 4 Issue 06, June-2015, PP: 1131 – 1136.
5. Sreadha A R and [Link], “Seismic Study of Multistorey Building using Floating Column,”
International Journal of Emerging Science and Engineering (IJESE) ISSN: 2319–6378, Volume-6
Issue-9, April 2020, PP: 6 – 11
6. Mr. Gaurav Pandey and Mr. Sagar Jamle, “Optimum Location Of Floating Column In Multistorey
Building With Seismic Loading,” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology
(IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056, p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Volume: 05 Issue: 10 | Oct 2018, PP: 971 – 976.
7. Kishalay Maitra and N. H. M. Kamrujjaman Serker, “Evaluation of Seismic Performance of
Floating Column Building,” American Journal of Civil Engineering 2018; 6(2): doi:
10.11648/[Link].20180602.11 ISSN: 2330-8729 (Print); ISSN: 2330-8737 (Online), PP: 55 – 59.

You might also like