0% found this document useful (0 votes)
66 views16 pages

Lecture 7 - Rationalism

The document contrasts empiricism and rationalism, highlighting that empiricism views the mind as passive while rationalism sees it as active, transforming sensory data into meaningful knowledge. Immanuel Kant's contributions include the idea of a priori categories of thought that shape our experiences and the concept of the categorical imperative as a rational basis for moral behavior. Kant's influence extended to psychology, emphasizing the importance of innate factors and the introspective analysis of the mind.

Uploaded by

channahhaniya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
66 views16 pages

Lecture 7 - Rationalism

The document contrasts empiricism and rationalism, highlighting that empiricism views the mind as passive while rationalism sees it as active, transforming sensory data into meaningful knowledge. Immanuel Kant's contributions include the idea of a priori categories of thought that shape our experiences and the concept of the categorical imperative as a rational basis for moral behavior. Kant's influence extended to psychology, emphasizing the importance of innate factors and the introspective analysis of the mind.

Uploaded by

channahhaniya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

RATIONALISM

mpiricism vs
Rationalism
• The type of mind
• Empiricism: Passive mind – acts on sensations and ideas in an automatic,
mechanical way
• Rationalism: Active mind – acts on information from the senses and gives it meaning
that it otherwise would not have. Transforms the sensory data
• Rationalism – mind adds to sensory data rather than passively organizing and
storing it in memory
• Innate rational system – mental structures, principles, operations, abilities, logical
processes
• A belief in existence of truths that could not be discovered through sensory data
alone
• Empiricism – causes of behavior (focus on experience,
association, hedonism)
• Rationalism – reasons for behavior
• Reasons are freely chosen – free will
• Examples??
• Empiricism – induction
• Rationalism – deduction
• However, a clear distinction cannot be found every time
• The distinction between empiricism and rationalism is a matter
of emphasis
IMMANUEL
KANT
(1724–1804)
Categories of
Thought
• Demonstrated that some truths were certain and were not based on subjective
experience alone
• The notion of causation does not come from experience
• Then where does it come from??
• A priori – independent of experience
• He did not deny the importance of sensory data
• However, he thought that the mind must add something to that data before
knowledge could be attained
• Something is provided by the a priori (innate) categories of thought
• What We experience subjectively has been modified by the pure
concepts of the mind and is therefore more meaningful than it would
otherwise have been
• Categories of thought (a priori pure concepts) – unity, totality, time,
space, cause and effect, possibility-impossibility, etc.
• We could never make statements beginning with ‘all’ without the
influence of categories because we never experience ‘all’ of anything
• For Kant, ‘a mind without concepts would have no capacity to think;
equally, a mind armed with concepts, but with no sensory data to which
they could be applied, would have nothing to think about.’
• Faculty psychologist
• Postulated a single, unified mind that possessed various attributes or
abilities
Causes of Mental
Experience
• Our sensory impressions are always structured by the categories of
thought
• Phenomenological experience – result of the interaction between
sensations and categories of thought
• Human mind is the center of the universe
• Human mind creates the universe – at least as we experience it
• Noumena or things-in-themselves – the objects that constitute physical
reality
• We are forever ignorant about noumena
• We can know only appearances – phenomena
• Appearances are regulated by categories of thought
Perception of Time

• Concept of time is creation of the mind


• We experience a series of separate events on sensory level
• We conclude that one sensation occurred before or after another
• Since there is nothing in the sensations themselves to suggest the
concept of time, the concept must exist a priori
• Similarly, all there is in memory (e.g., childhood experiences) are
ideas that can vary only in intensity or vividness
• The mind superimposes a sense of time over these experiences
Perception of
Space
• He agreed with other philosophers that we do not simply
experience sensations on the retina or in the brain, rather they
seem to be distributed in the space
• These sensations vary in size, distance and intensity
• Sensations are all internal but we experience objects as distributed
in space as external to the mind and body
• We experience a display of sensations that seem to reflect the
physical world
• Reason?
• Experience of space – provided by an a priori category of thought
• Categories of time and space are basic as they provide
context to all mental phenomena

• Kant did not propose specific innate ideas like Descartes


• Kant proposed innate categories of thought that organized
all sensory experience
• Kant – nativist
The Categorical
Imperative
• Kant attempted to rescue moral philosophy
• He asked what rule or principle was being applied to good and bad
feelings that made certain experiences desirable or undesirable?
• Categorical imperative – the rational principle that governs moral
behavior
• Categorical imperative – ‘I should never act except in such a way
that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law.’
• Maxim of ‘Lying under certain circumstances is justified’ – distrust
and social disorganization
• Maxim of ‘Always tell the truth’ – social trust and harmony
• He suggested that if everyone made their moral decisions according
to the categorical imperative, the result would be a community of
free and equal members

• Empiricists’ analysis of moral behavior emphasized hedonism


• Whereas, Kant’s was based on a rational principle and a belief in free
will
Distinction between reasons and causes:
• Empiricism – behavior is caused by feelings of pleasure or pain
(hedonism)
• Kant’s rationalism – there is a reason for acting morally and if that
reason is freely chosen, moral behavior results.
Kant’s Influence
• Kant has had a considerable influence on psychology as he set the tone of
German rationalist philosophy and psychology for generations
• His work initiated a debate on the importance of innate factors which led to
the study and role of genetically determined brain structures or operations in
modern psychology
• He defined psychology as the introspective analysis of the mind and thus he
said, it could not be a science
• Ironically, psychology emerged as an experimental science of the mind and
used introspection as its primary research tool
• Anthropology
• Influence on contemporary psychology – Gestalt psychology
THANK YOU

You might also like