0% found this document useful (0 votes)
71 views26 pages

Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma Guide

Primary angle closure glaucoma is characterized by the occlusion of the trabecular meshwork by the peripheral iris, leading to increased intraocular pressure and potential damage to retinal ganglion cells. Risk factors include age, gender, race, and certain medications, with management strategies varying based on the classification of the condition. A case study illustrates the acute management of a 78-year-old female patient presenting with symptoms of acute angle closure glaucoma, highlighting the importance of timely intervention and follow-up care.

Uploaded by

g9qpryfqqz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
71 views26 pages

Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma Guide

Primary angle closure glaucoma is characterized by the occlusion of the trabecular meshwork by the peripheral iris, leading to increased intraocular pressure and potential damage to retinal ganglion cells. Risk factors include age, gender, race, and certain medications, with management strategies varying based on the classification of the condition. A case study illustrates the acute management of a 78-year-old female patient presenting with symptoms of acute angle closure glaucoma, highlighting the importance of timely intervention and follow-up care.

Uploaded by

g9qpryfqqz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Primary Angle Closure

Glaucoma
Definition
• Defining factor of angle closure is occlusion of TM by
peripheral iris
• Irido-trabecular touch
• Reduced aqeous drainage
• Leads to increase in fluid and damage to retinal
ganglion cells and glaucoma
Mechanism
• 2 mechanisms
responsible • Iris pulled forward
• Iris pushed forward from • Inflammatory membrane
behind • Fibrovascular tissue at angle
• Pupillary block • ICE syndrome
• Ant subluxated lens
• Plateau iris configuration
• CB inflammation / cyst /
tumor
• Choroidal effusion /
detachment
Pathophysiology
• Relative pupillar block
• Contact between the posterior iris and ant lens surface
• Resistance to aqeuos flow from PC to AC
• Pressure difference leads to bowing of peripheral iris forward (iris
bombe)
• If the angle is predisposed then ITC may occur leading to blockade
of drainage and high IOP

• Without Pupil block


• Angle crowding
• Presence of thick iris folds
• Plateau iris configuration
Prevalence

• European population - 0.4%


• Higher prevalence in Eskimo/inuit and Chinese
population
• Worldwide prevalence is 0.7%
Risk factors
• Patient factors
• Increase Age
• Pupil block in elderly due to thickened forward movement of lens
• Female gender
• Race
• Eskimos / Chinese, very rare in black population
• Positive family Hx
• Use of topical or systemic medication associated with angle closure
• Muscle relaxants
• Bronchodilators
• Sympathomimetics
• Topiramate - MCQ
Risk factors and examination
• Ocular risk factors • Examination
• Narrow angle • VA
• Hypermetropia • GAT
• Thickened lens • CCT
• Gonioscopy both eyes
• Physiological risk factors • Dilated exam shouldn’t be
done
• Mid dilated pupil in semi
dark light
Classification of Primary angle
closure
PACS PAC PACG
• Acute
• Subacute
• chronic
Gonio Gonio Gonio
• ITC >= 2 quadrants • ITC >= 2 quadrants • ITC >= 2 quadrants
• No PAS • PAS
IOP Normal Raised IOP Episodes of severe IOP rise
Glaucomatous optic Glaucomatous optic Glaucomatous optic
neuropathy neuropathy neuropathy
• No evidence • No evidence • Present
Management
PACS

• Zhongshan angle closure prevention trial – conversion to AAC


is 8 per 1000 eyes / year
• 1 in 4 PACS develop high IOP or PAS in 5 years
• ZAP trial suggests low risk of disease progression without laser
PI
Management
PACS
• Laser PI considered in high risk individuals with any of
the following risk factors
• High hyperopia
• Only eye
• Requirement of repeated dilation e.g diabetes
• Use of antidepressants or anticholinergic meds
• Limited healthcare access
• Family hx of significant angle closure
Management
PAC
• 1 in 3 chance of conversion to PACG within 5 years
• EAGLE study
• Age > 50 years and IOP > 30 mmhg
• Reasonable to consider primary lens extraction
• EAGLE study didn’t study younger population and
people with low risk of progression i.e IOP < 30 mmhg
• For such patients LPI is the treatment of choice
Management
PACG
• Intervention to widen the angle
• > 50 years CLE – EAGLE study
• Younger patients LPI

• Medical intervention
• Consider long term pilocarpine
• Poorly tolerated , should only be used if it successfully opens the
angles
• Antiglaucoma meds as per POAG management
Management
PACG

• Surgical management
• Trabeculectomy
• Should be avoided in very small AL due to risk of
complications such as malignant glaucoma
Acute Angle Closure
Glaucoma
Case presentation
Case
• Received a call from ED doctor

• Patient 78 years old


• Female gender
• Presenting complaints (started at 4 pm)
• BOV , haloes around light
• Nausea and vomiting with 3 x episodes
• Right side eye pressure and headache
• No temporal tenderness, no jaw claudication
• Right sided congested eye with fixed pupils
• POH – nil significant
• Family Hx – NAD for any ocular disease
• PMH – mastectomy, hysterectomy, DM -, HTN - ,
asthma -, cardiac problems
• Was initially triaged and investigated as intracranial
bleed and brain imaging was done which came out to
be normal
• Oral analgesics and antiemetics were given but of no
benefit
• At this point ED doctor was convinced that it is an eye
problem – hence he made the call
• Examination

• VA OD UA 6/60, OS UA 6/9 PH 6/7.5


• Pupils
• OD fixed dilated , OS reactive and reverse RAPD –ve

• SLE
• Conjunctival congestion more pronounced circumcorneally
• Corneal edema ++, epithelial bullae
• Van herick OD grade 0, OS grade 1/2
• Gonio
• OD hazy view grade 0, OS grade 2 – 270 deg, grade 1 – 90 deg

• GAT ??
• Examination

• VA OD UA 6/60, OS UA 6/9 PH 6/7.5


• Pupils
• OD fixed dilated , OS reactive and reverse RAPD –ve

• SLE
• Conjunctival congestion more pronounced circumcorneally
• Corneal edema ++, epithelial bullae
• Van herick OD grade 0, OS grade 1
• Gonio
• OD hazy view grade 0, OS grade 2 – 270 deg, grade 1 – 90 deg

• GAT >80 / 16
• Working diagnosis – Acute angle closure glaucoma

• Management
• 0:00 hours
• Patient in supine position
• IV line secured with 500 mg IV acetazolamide
• 500 mg oral Diamox also given
• Pilocarpine 2% instilled in BE
• G azarga, g Xalatan stat
• G iopidine every 20 mins
• G maxidex stat
• 0:45 hours
• Examination
• IOP 78, cornea still hazy with epithelial bullae
• Patient still complaining of nausea and pain
• Management
• Patient still in supine
• G azarga, G Xalatan stat
• G iopidine every 30 mins
• G maxidex stat
• Corneal massage done in an attempt for indentation
• 1:45 hours
• Examination
• IOP 50,
• Cornea cleared a bit and I thought that I will be able to do laser PI
• Management
• YAG PI done in BE with consent, good gush of fluid noticed
• Dexa BE stat
• Azarga, Xalatan stat RE (now a total of three times)
• G iopidine BE stat
• 3:00 hours
• Examination
• Patent PIs in BE, slightly small but functioning
• IOP still 48
• Cornea became hazy with SPEE’s
• Only reassuring thing was van herick grade 3 in BE and patient feeling
subjectively better

• Management
• Not sure at this point
• LPI already done
• Antiglaucoma drops were maxed out
• Diamox was maxed out
• Thinking about IV mannitol
• Advise – nothing much can be done at this moment just repeat iopidine
and g dexa and review in 90 mins
• 4:30 hours
• Examination
• IOP 16/11
• Cornea cleared up with slight haze
• Patent PI’s
• Pupil constricted in BE

• Patient discharged with next day follow up with following


meds
• Tab Diamox 250 mg QID
• G maxidex RE 2 hrly, LE QDS
• G iopidine TDS RE
• G azarga BD RE
• G pilo BD RE
• Drink plenty of water
• Patient advised to come early if symptoms reoccur before review
appointment
Learning outcomes

• Percentages are important


• Iopidine comes in 2 percentages
• 0.5 and 1% , better to use 1%
• Pilo 2% and 4%

• PF minims as it causes less SPEE


Thankyou

You might also like