Harmonizing Chaos: The Power of ADR in Resolving
Labor Disputes in Unstructured Sectors
Introduction
• Economic Reforms & FDI (1991): Increased business activities led to a surge in disputes, requiring an
alternative to the already overburdened judiciary.
• Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Replaced outdated laws to streamline arbitration, inspired by
UNCITRAL Model Law.
• Judicial Intervention: Excessive court involvement slows arbitration, making it similar to litigation.
• Enforcement Challenges: "Public policy" interpretation varies, leading to delays in arbitral award
implementation
•
What is ADR
Introduction to ADR
• ADR refers to resolving disputes outside traditional court litigation.
• Cost-effective, faster, and more flexible than litigation.
• Involves a neutral third party to facilitate dispute resolution.
• Non-adversarial—focuses on cooperation and mutual agreement.
Types of ADR and Their Key Features
1. Arbitration
• Used in commercial, employment, and international disputes.
• Involves a neutral arbitrator or panel of arbitrators.
• Decision (arbitral award) is binding and enforceable.
• Parties voluntarily agree to arbitration through a contract clause.
• Suitable for disputes requiring expert judgment.
.
. . Conciliation
• Used in employment, consumer, and industrial disputes.
• Involves a conciliator who facilitates settlement.
• Unlike arbitration, the decision is not binding unless accepted.
• Helps maintain relationships by fostering amicable settlements
Mediation
• Less formal and highly flexible process.
• Mediator facilitates discussions but does not impose a decision.
• Focuses on a win-win outcome for both parties.
• Effective for family, business, and commercial disputes.
4. Negotiation
• The simplest form of ADR; involves direct discussion.
• Can be conducted with or without a third party.
• Voluntary and non-binding unless a formal agreement is signed.
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Alternative Dispute
Resolution (ADR):
• Section 4 – Appointment of Conciliation Officers: The government appoints Conciliation Officers to investigate and
mediate disputes between employers and employees.
• Section 5 – Board of Conciliation: A Board of Conciliation may be established to enhance the reconciliation process
in complex disputes.
• Section 12 – Duties of Conciliation Officers: Officers investigate disputes, identify key factors affecting resolution,
and take necessary steps for peaceful settlement, with a defined process for successful and failed conciliation
attempts.
• Section 18 – Binding Nature of Settlement: Settlements reached through conciliation hold the same legal status as
a court decree, making them enforceable on all parties, including their heirs, thereby reducing judicial workload
and ensuring industrial peace.
Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Labour
Disputes in UN:
• UN Internal Justice System (Since 2009): Encourages UN employees to resolve workplace disputes through
ADR techniques, minimizing litigation costs and delays.
• Role of UN Ombudsman and Mediation Services: Facilitates settlements, ensuring a fair and efficient
resolution process.
• Challenges Faced by Indian Workers: Lack of access to structured ADR mechanisms, high legal expenses, and
procedural complexities hinder dispute resolution.
• Impact of Litigation Costs: Many laborers cannot afford expensive legal representation, making court-based
redress impractical.
• Delays in Case Resolution: Prolonged legal proceedings, multiple appeals, and procedural hurdles lead to
financial losses and economic instability.
• Urgency for ADR in Labor Disputes: Strengthening ADR mechanisms is essential to provide workers with
timely access to justice and maintain industrial peace
Legislative and Judicial Developments in ADR
• Commercial Courts Act, 2015: Introduced mediation and arbitration for faster commercial dispute
resolution.
• Mediation Bill, 2021: Aims to institutionalize mediation with dedicated centers
• Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): Tech-driven ADR for consumer and commercial disputes.
• Judicial Support: Supreme Court and High Courts established ADR centers and mandated mediation
• Future Needs: Legal reforms, education, and institutional strengthening for wider ADR adoption. .
Novel strategies
• Dispute System Design (DSD) – Systematic, interest-based resolution approach.
• Integrated Conflict Management Systems (ICMS) – Industry-specific multi-level ADR (mediation, arbitration,
ombudsman).
• Ombudsman Programs – Neutral third-party for industry disputes, beyond grievance redressal.
• Multi-Door Courthouse (MDC) System – Court-connected ADR model, diverts cases before trial.
• Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) – AI-based digital platforms for faster, cost-effective dispute resolution.
Global Examples –
• USA: Uniform Mediation Act (2001) allows online mediation.
• EU: Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 mandates ODR for consumer disputes .
8-Step Conflict Resolution Process
SIP (Select, Identify, Prepare)
• Choose a neutral venue for fair negotiations.
• Identify key issues, negotiators, and protocol.
• Draft a preliminary statement with clear objectives.
• Ensure logical, respectful, and culturally aware discussions.
DINE (Determine and Narrow)
• Identify core issues and eliminate unnecessary arguments.
• Build trust and transparency for effective dialogue.
• Focus on common interests and explore alternatives.
DANCE (Direct, Confirm, Implement)
• Negotiate for a balanced, win-win solution.
• Ensure legal compliance and proper documentation.
• Implement with flexibility for modifications if needed.
Challenges in the Implementation of ADR in India
1. Limited Awareness & Accessibility – Lack of knowledge, especially in rural areas, and
inadequate ADR infrastructure
2. Delays in Arbitration – Frequent adjournments, lack of strict timelines, and inefficiencies
3. Judicial Intervention – Courts interfere in appointments, interim relief, and award reviews,
reducing ADR independence.
4. Enforcement Issues – Arbitral awards often challenged, especially by government entities,
leading to delays
5. Lack of Skilled Professionals – Shortage of trained arbitrators and mediators, affecting
quality and fairness.
6. High Costs – Institutional arbitration fees deter individuals and small businesses.
7. Cultural Resistance – Preference for litigation; lack of trust in non-adversarial methods.
8. Inadequate Infrastructure – ADR facilities mainly in metro cities; rural areas lack access.
9. Slow Tech Adoption – Limited ODR use due to low digital literacy and weak regulations.
10.Resistance from Lawyers – Some discourage ADR to retain litigation-based income.
Conclusion
Need for ADR in Labour Disputes – MSMEs & unorganized sectors require cost-effective, efficient dispute
resolution over traditional litigation.
- Existing Legal Framework – Industrial Disputes Act (1947), Arbitration & Conciliation Act (1996), Mediation Bill
(2021) – but challenges persist.
- Key Constraints – Judicial interference, arbitration delays, untrained ADR professionals, and cultural resistance.
- Proposed Strategies – Dispute System Design, Integrated Conflict Management, Multi-Door Courthouse Model.
- Tech-Driven ODR – Enhancing accessibility, reducing costs, and expediting resolutions, particularly for low-value
disputes.
- Institutional Reforms – Independent labour dispute resolution bodies inspired by UN & UK models.
- Legal & Policy Reforms – Reducing court intervention, strengthening enforcement of mediated settlements,
and procedural fairness.
- Cultural Shift & Awareness – Training, legal literacy, ADR integration in legal education, and government-
industry initiatives.
- Holistic Approach for Success – Combining legal, institutional, technological, and cultural efforts for a fair,
efficient, and collaborative dispute resolution system.
