0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views2 pages

Effectiveness of Organic Farming Practices

IRF TECHNOLOGY

Uploaded by

ranjanantara
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views2 pages

Effectiveness of Organic Farming Practices

IRF TECHNOLOGY

Uploaded by

ranjanantara
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Evaluation of the Effectivity of different Package of Practice in Mature Tea

under FAO-CFC-TH Project (2008-13)


Cost/kg Soil
Yield Over Target Cost / ha
Rank Package of Practice (Made tea) Development
(kg/ha) (1220 kg/ha) (Rs. )
(Rs.) Index (SDI)
IRF Technology for soil and plant
1. management (IRF)
1374 113.3 % 13,796/- 10.04/- 97.9
Vermi Compost & Bio-fertilizer
combination for soil management
2. + Bio-pesticide for plant 1299 103.5 % 66,257/- 51.01/- 79.7
management (VMI)
Vermi Compost for soil
3. management + Bio-pesticide for 1235 98.9 % 46,832/- 37.92/- 63.47
plant management (VMIP)
Vermi compost for soil
4. management + Conventional 1158 92.8 % 40,184/- 34.70/- 72.9
organic Pest Management (VCO)
Convention organic soil and plant
5. management (CO) 1109 89.2 % 12,954/- 11.68/- 80.5
Biodynamic Farming soil and plant
6. management (BD)
1075 87.4 % 14,914/- 13.87/- 63.12
Bio-fertilizer and Bio-pesticide for
7. soil & pest management (MI)
1065 86.2 % 28,657/- 26.91/- 53.39
Comparative study of crop cultivation under IRF Organic and Chemical Farming
(compiled from different organic projects done during 2008 -23)
Crop Soil Health Indices
Yield FI3
MAP4 SQI5
NUE1 EUE2
(Kgha-1)

Experimental Stations (hot moist sub-humid ecological sub region with deep loamy to clayey alluvium-derived soils,
medium to high AWC and LGP 210-240 days)
Paddy (Oryza sativa)# 3194* 11.8 2.55* 24.1 15.40** 0.54*
[Variety : Gobindobhog ] (2977) (24.8**) (2.07) (23.6) (11.20) (0.47)
Baby Corn (Zea mays) 1700** 8.1* 1.29* 20.2 13.43* 0.46*
[Variety : HM 4] (1333) (6.7) (0.80) (20.7) (10.12) (0.41)
Green Gram (Vigna radiata) 933* 6.95 2.12* 26.5 18.12* 0.59
[Variety : PDM 84-139] (819) (8.19*) (1.77) (26.2) (16.24) (0.56)
Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) 35000** 129.6* 2.07** 25.9 20.13* 0.64*
[Variety : Rituraj] (31000) (110.7) (0.98) (26.3) (17.22) (0.58)
Farmers Field
Paddy (Oryza sativa)## 6098** 25.5* 3.06** 23.2* 16.04** 0.57
[Variety : IET4786] (4707) (19.6) (1.98) (21.8) (13.21) (0.54)
Potato (Solanum tuberosum) 30000* 111.1** 4.56** 28.7 22.04* 0.63
[Variety : Jyoti] (27750) (79.2) (2.07) (29.4) (19.06) (0.59)
Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) 7793* 36.59* 2.02* 23.4 14.43* 0.51**
[Variety : hybrid Shakti (F1)] (6860) (27.55) (1.72) (23.9) (10.27) (0.43)
Green Gram (Vigna radiata) 699* 3.28* 2.05* 26.5 14.56 0.48
[Variety : PDM
Note : Figure 84-139]
in the parenthesis represents data from chemical
(665) farming; (2.67) (1.74) (25.8) (12.34) (0.45)
T – test (* significant at P<0.05 and ** significant at P<0.01); Rain fed; Irrigated; 1NUE : Nutrient Use Efficiency (kg/kg produce);
# ##

2
EUE : Energy Use Efficiency; 3FI : Fertility Index; 4MAP : Microbial Activity Potential; 5SQI : Soil Quality Index (Bera et al, 2015)

You might also like