0% found this document useful (0 votes)
87 views25 pages

Construction Dispute Resolution Methods

The document discusses various dispute resolution techniques for construction projects. It describes traditional techniques like litigation and arbitration, as well as alternative dispute resolution techniques including negotiation, dispute review boards, mediation, and conciliation. It provides details on how each technique works and its advantages and disadvantages.

Uploaded by

Mm
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
87 views25 pages

Construction Dispute Resolution Methods

The document discusses various dispute resolution techniques for construction projects. It describes traditional techniques like litigation and arbitration, as well as alternative dispute resolution techniques including negotiation, dispute review boards, mediation, and conciliation. It provides details on how each technique works and its advantages and disadvantages.

Uploaded by

Mm
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Dispute Resolution in

Construction

LOGO
Dispute Resolution

 Engineering Projects are described as:-


 Adversarial,
 Claim-orientated,
 Claim contentious,
 Fertile setting for dispute and conflict mushrooming
Dispute Resolution

 Adversarial nature of engineering projects

 Example - UK construction industry


 1990’s – witnessed highest level of dispute

 1995 – top 10 law firms specialized in construction cases made


higher profits than top 10 construction firms!

 80% of the Official Referee Court was construction related.

 In 500 settled claims, for every £1 recovered in compensation, £5


was spent on legal costs!
Common reasons for adversarial nature

Poor handling of claims Contract document

Adversarial Dispute Technical issue


mind-set

Poor project Project delays


management
Dispute Resolution

Alternative DR
Conventional Techniques
DR Techniques
• Negotiation
• Litigation DR Techniques • DRB
• Arbitration • Mediation
• Conciliation
• Mini-trial
• Adjudication
Dispute Resolution

Litigation

 Litigation is a dispute resolution method that is


inquisitorial and adversarial, where by the
disputant initiates legal action against the other
party by going to court.

 It is used when all other dispute resolution


techniques failed.

 It has a win/lose outcome and rarely satisfies


both parties.
Dispute Resolution

Litigation

 It is costly and results into much delay for the


disputants and may not do justice to the parties.

 However, the benefit of litigation is that the court


has authority to find out the “truth” from the
parties and the enforcement of the order or
judgment is supported by other law enforcement
agencies.
Dispute Resolution

Arbitration

 Arbitration is the settlement of a dispute by one


or more persons chosen by parties themselves
who are called arbitrators.

 The decision is given by a regular and ordinary


court of law

 Thus, arbitration is out-of-court settlement


where the arbitrator acts as a judge.
Dispute Resolution

Arbitration

 The arbitrator(s) may be selected by the


disputing parties and the Award is binding
and can be enforced by courts.

 The outcome is one of a win/lose situation


and is not based on any precedent(s).
Dispute Resolution

Arbitration

 The decision of the arbitrator is legally


binding and, often, there is no provision
for appeal to a court of law.

 There are exceptions, such as misconduct


of the arbitrator.
Dispute Resolution

Arbitration

 It may take a long time, same as for a


litigation process, and may even be more
costly.

 What makes it attractive is the mutual


agreement by the parties, appointment of
arbitrator, privacy and confidentiality.
Alternative Dispute Resolution

 “ADR” is an alternative to the formal procedures


of dispute resolution… which ranges from
negotiation and mediation to more formalised
procedures such as adjudication.

 ADR techniques originated in the U.S in 1970.

 Before the coming of ADR techniques,


arbitration and litigation were widely used for
resolving disputes.
Evolution of ADR

 The arbitration and litigation methods became


unpopular due to:
 Increasing costs
 Delays (time consuming)
 Uncertainty
 Promotion of adversarial nature
 Parties were represented by counsel whose skills and abilities lie
in the art of arguing and scoring points over each other.
 High increase in the volume of construction dispute

 ADR acts as a response to the high cost and


lengthy process associated with traditional
arbitration and litigation.
Philosophy of ADR

 To empower the disputants, putting them


back in control of their own disputes

 To Place the disputants at the center of


the process and seek to help them to find
their own way out of an impasse.
Construction Dispute Resolution Methods

Litigation

Judge

Binding Resolution

Arbitration
Adjudication
Non-binding
Resolution
Mediation
Mini-trial
Conciliation
Standing Neutral

Dispute Review Board


Dispute Resolution Adviser
Negotiation

Direct Negotiation
Step Negotiation
Prevention

Partnering & Risk-Allocation


Construction Dispute Resolution Methods
1. PARTNERING
 It is a process which aims to create a good owner-
contractor relationship from the beginning. It can lay
the foundation for better and more productive
working relationships on the project, by establishing
an atmosphere of trust and frankness in
communications.

 The major objective is to encourage contracting


parties to change from their traditional adversarial
relationships to a more co-operative team-based
approach and to prevent disputes.

Company Logo
Construction Dispute Resolution Methods

Partnering Cont’d
 Partnering involves a workshop meeting, at the
commencement of the contract period, between all those
involved - principal, contractor, subcontractors, engineer,
etc. The meeting is managed by an independent third
party, and might for example take a full day. The
outcome is recorded.
 The parties get to know each other and define common
goals, improve communication and foster a problem-
solving attitude among the group of individuals who must
work together as a team throughout the project.
 After the workshop, project leaders continue to meet
(with or without the assistance of the third party) to
establish performance measures for each of the shared
objectives
Construction Dispute Resolution Methods

2. Negotiation
 It is a common dispute resolution process in
which parties try to resolve the dispute without
involving any neutral third party.
 It is the first resolution option when a dispute occurs

 It is a private, confidential and voluntary process


agreed by both parties

 In negotiations, parties approach each other for


discussions to find a mutually acceptable
outcome to the dispute.
Construction Dispute Resolution Methods

 Negotiation Cont’d
 As negotiation is a consensual process, it requires
willingness by both parties to attempt resolution
by this method.
 If the relationship between the parties has broken
down beyond this point then negotiation will not be
possible.

 The success of negotiation depends on


interpersonal communication skills of the parties
during the entire process.
Construction Dispute Resolution Methods

3. Dispute Review Boards (DRB)


 It involves a panel of neutral expert persons
being set up at the beginning and therefore being
available throughout to provide an independent
assessment of the possible causes of disputes.

 A DRB usually consists of three members,


selected by both the contractor and the owner
soon after the award of the contract.
 With smaller contracts, the panel might be a single person,
which may be regarded as equivalent to appointing an expert
conciliator or mediator for the duration of the contract.
Construction Dispute Resolution Methods

 DRB Cont’d
 The DRB members are provided with the contract plans
and specifications; they become familiar with the project
procedures and the participants, and are kept informed
of job progress and developments.

 The DRB meets with the representatives of the owner


and contractor during regular site visits and encourages
the resolution of disputes at job level.
 The process helps the parties to resolve problems before they
escalate into major disputes.

 The DRB’s recommendation for resolution of a dispute


are non-binding
Construction Dispute Resolution Methods

4. MEDIATION
 Mediation is a mechanism in which a neutral third
party meets with the disputing parties (e.g.
owner & contractor) and simplifies negotiation to
help the parties to resolve their own disputes.
 The mediator assists the disputants to generate
options; helping both, parties understand better
their respective positions and manage emotions.
 Although the mediator controls the process, he
or she does not impose any resolution or opinion
on the merits of the case, promoting a win/win
situation, leaving the disputants themselves to
decide the outcome.
Construction Dispute Resolution Methods

5. CONCILIATION
 Conciliation is a process similar to
mediation except that the conciliator can
express his opinion on the merits of the
case and is required to recommend a
solution if the parties fail to agree.

 In conciliation however, the third party


(conciliator) does not always meet
together with the parties.
Construction Dispute Resolution Methods

6. Adjudication
 In adjudication, the 3rd party makes a
decision and his decision is binding upon
the parties with respect to any matter in
dispute.
 However, the parties may challenge his
judgment (decision) through arbitration or
litigation.

Company Logo
LOGO

You might also like