0% found this document useful (0 votes)
106 views98 pages

Evolution of Dental Composites

The document discusses the history and composition of dental composites. In the late 1940s-1950s, acrylic resins replaced silicates as dental restorative materials due to their tooth-like appearance, insolubility, and ease of use. However, they exhibited poor wear resistance and excessive thermal expansion/contraction. In the 1960s, Dr. Ray Bowen developed the first resin-based composite containing inorganic filler particles and a coupling agent to reduce shrinkage and improve properties. Modern composites consist of a resin matrix, inorganic filler, coupling agent, and other additives. Light curing and chemical curing methods are described.

Uploaded by

Shameena Kn
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
106 views98 pages

Evolution of Dental Composites

The document discusses the history and composition of dental composites. In the late 1940s-1950s, acrylic resins replaced silicates as dental restorative materials due to their tooth-like appearance, insolubility, and ease of use. However, they exhibited poor wear resistance and excessive thermal expansion/contraction. In the 1960s, Dr. Ray Bowen developed the first resin-based composite containing inorganic filler particles and a coupling agent to reduce shrinkage and improve properties. Modern composites consist of a resin matrix, inorganic filler, coupling agent, and other additives. Light curing and chemical curing methods are described.

Uploaded by

Shameena Kn
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

1st half of 20th century -Silicates

 Release fluoride
 Get severely eroded
Late 1940s an early 50s- Acrylic resins replaced
silicates
Tooth like appearance
Insoluble in oral fluid
Ease of manipulation
Low cost
Poor wear resistance
Excessive thermal expansion and contraction
Severe shrinkage
• Inertfiller particle reducing curing and thermal
contraction.
• Early composites –filler particle were not bonded
• Dr Ray L Bowen- Bowens resin(1962)

Bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate


Di methacrylate resin
Organic silane coupling agent.
 Matrix
 Filler
 Coupling agent
 Activator initiator system
 Pigments
 Uv absorbers
 Polymerization inhibitors
 Dental composites are highly crosslinked
polymeric materials reinforced by a
dispersion of glass,crystalline or resin filler
and/or short fibres bound to the matrix by
silane coupling agents.

 CRAIG proposes the material science


terminology for composites as ‘particulate
reinforced polymer matrix composite’.
 Aromatic dimethacrylate monomer
 Aliphatic dimethacrylate monomer
 oligomers
 Bis GMA,TEGDMA,UDMA

 Van der waal’s forces to covalent bond


 Potential energy spacing
 They have reduced polymerization shrinkage.
 Bis GMA an UDMA have 5 times molwt of
methylmethacrylate. So density of methacrylate double
bond groups is approx 1/5th as high as these monomers;
thus reducing polymerization shrinkage.
 High molwt monomer has high viscosity. To lower
viscosity low molwt high fluid monomer are
added(TEGDMA).
 They also produces extensive cross linking---resistance to
softening and degradation by solvents like water and
alcohol
 Improves material properties, reinforcement of matrix
resin; resulting in increased hardness & decreased wear
 Reduction in polymerization shrinkage.
 Reduction in thermal expansion and contraction
 Improved workability by increasing viscosity
 Reduction in water sorption, softening and staining
 Increased r/o and diagnostic sensitivity through Sr and Ba
glass and other heavy metal compounds that absorbs X-
rays
 Usually fillers are produced by grinding or milling
quartz(0.1µ to 100µ).

 Microfillers sub micron particles of colloidal silica

H2+O2
Pyrolytic or Precipitation process

 SiCl4 SiO2(Chains)

 Inorganic filler particles


 Size
 Volume
 Filler distribution
 Refractive index
 R/O
 Hardness
 Amount of filler α Total filler surface area
α-1 Particle size
 Continuous distribution of particles Max. Filler
loading.
 Silica surface can form polar bonds with monomer
molecule and can increase viscosity.
 Marzouk
 Filler – interrupted phase

 Macro ceramics – silica based eg:quartz,fused

silica,silicate glasses,AlSiO4 etc


 Micro ceramics – colloidal silica in the form of

silicic acid
 Fabricated macro reinforcing phases with

colloidal micro ceramic component bases


Index of refraction
 Should closely match with that of Resin

 Bis GMA 1.55


 TEGDMA
Mixture 1.5
1.46

Radio Opacity(R/O)
 International standards r/o = 2mm Al

 Ba, Sr, Zr(Glasses and ceramics)

 Are slowly leached and weakened in oral fluids


 Bonding between filler and resin
 Allows more flexible polymer matrix to transfer stresses to a higher modulus filler particle
 examples: titanates and zirconates
organosilanes(gamma methacryloxypropyl trimethoxy
silane)

 Methoxy silanol

 Silanol forms bonds with the silanols on filler surfaces


 Organosilane methacrylate groups form covalent bonds with the resin.

hydrolysis
Chemically activated
 Initiator - benzoyl peroxide

 Activator -aromatic tertiary amine

Light activated
 Photo sensitizer - camphoroquinone free radical
468nm blue light

 Amine initiator – dimethyl amino ethylmethacrylate


ADDITION
 INDUCTION
 PROPOGATION
 CHAIN TRANSFER
 TERMINATION
 CONDENSATION/STEP GROWTH

 COPOLYMERISATION

EXOTHERMIC
 To minimize or prevent spontaneous or accidental
polymerization
 Have a strong reactivity potential with free radicals
 They react with free radicals faster than monomers
 Chain propagation begins once the inhibitor is consumed
Eg. Butylated-hydroxy toluene (0.01 wt percentage)
Hydroquinone compounds
 Extent shelf life
 Ensure sufficient working time
 Shading is achieved with the help of various pigments
 Less opacifier → More light will be transmitted and less
light will be reflected; perceived as dark
 More opacifier →Less light will be transmitted and more
light will be reflected; perceived as
white
 Darker shade or greater opacity require increased
exposure time or application of thinner layer when cured.
Chemical activation/Cold curing or self curing
 During mixing of two pastes, air incorporation will occurs

and so pores formed will weaken the structure


 Oxygen incorporated inhibits polymerization

 Large build ups which are not readily light cured

 Once two components are mixed there is no control on

working time
 Avoiding porosity
 Not sensitive to oxygen inhibition

 Command polymerization is possible

 Exposure time 40 sec or less for 2mm thickness

Disadvantages
 Limited depth of penetration

 More time for large restoration

 Cost

 Poor accessibility in posterior and inter proximal location

 Variable exposure time for varying shades

 Sensitivity to room illumination


 Mixing is not required.
 Less porosity
 Less staining
 Increased strength
 Enhanced color stability (aromatic amine)
 Command polymerization
 Hand held devices
 Contain a light source

 Equipped with a relatively short rigid light guide made up

of fused optical fiber


Types of lamps
1. LED lamps
 Emit light only in the part of visible spectrum (b/w 440 to

480nm)
 Do not requires filter

 Required low voltage

 Can be battery powered

 Generate no heat and quite

 Produce only low intensity radiation(D/A)


2. QTH lamps
 Quartz bulb with tungsten filament

 Radiate UV and White light

 Must be filtered to remove heat and other wavelength than

violet-blue range
 Intensity diminishes with use-calibration meter required

[Link] lamps
 Plasma arc curing lamps use xenon gas that is ionized to

produce plasma
 High intensity white light is filtered to allow blue light to

be emitted
[Link] laser lamps
 Highest intensity
 Emit light at single wavelength (~ 490nm)

 QTH is cheaper,
 LED and laser do not require filters
 Polymerization is initiated when a critical

concentration of free radical is formed.


 A particular no of photons should be absorbed by the
initiator system( α wavelength ,intensity and time of
exposure)
 Maximum curing = 50-60% monomer conversion
 QTH—300-1200 mW/cm2
 Energy influx = 16000mJ/cm2
= 40 Sec X 400mW/cm2
= 20 Sec X 800mW/cm2
= 13 sec X 1200mw/cm2
 To reduce exposure time and increase dc → Increased
intensities
 Light absorption and scattering in resin composites reduce
power density and dc exponentially with depth of
penetrations
 Intensity reduced by a factor of 10-100 in a 2mm thick
layer of composites
 At depths greater than 2mm monomer conversion is
reduced to unacceptable levels
 So short curing time for a given DC or increased dc for a
given et
 Light attenuation vary considerably from one composite to
another depending on opacity, filler size, filler
concentration and pigment shade
 Light is also absorbed and scattered as it passes through
tooth structure especially dentine
 So ET should be increased by a factor of 2 to 3 to
compensate for reduction in light intensity.
 When using QTH ,light should be placed as closed to the
restoration as possible
 It can not be used for curing luting agent under metallic
restoration
 Combining chemical curing and visible light curing
components in the same resin
 Can be used under bulky ceramic inlays.
 air inhibition and porosity
 e/o light or heat can be used to promote a higher level of
cure
 Chemical or light cure can be used to produce an inlay on a
tooth or a die
 It can be cured directly within tooth or on a die and then
transferred to an oven for extra curing
 On completion it is cemented with a resin based composite
 Is a measure of the % C=C converted to C-C
 Conversion depends on several factors
[Link] composition
[Link] transmission through the material
[Link] of sensitizer, initiator & inhibiter
 Degree of conversion 50-70% are achieved at room
temperature for both types of curing system
 In light cured, curing shrinkage leads to substantially greater
stress buildup and leakage at the margin
 Shrinkage create stresses as high as 13MPa –can exceed tensile
strength of enamel and result in cracking and enamel fracture
along interface
 Leakage staining, sensitivity, 20 caries
 Due to polymerization shrinkage
 Internal pores in chemically cured resin act to release
residual stresses that buildup during curing
 Pores enlarge during hardening and decrease
concentration of stress at margins
 Slower curing rate in chemical activation allows larger
portion of shrinkage to be compensated by internal flow
among developing polymer chains before formation of
cross linking(Gelation)
 After gel point Stresses increase and concentrate
within the resin and tooth structure adjacent to bonded
interface
 To overcome problem of stress concentration
and marginal failure with light activated
resins
in volume contraction by
altering chemistry of resin system
clinical techniques to offset
effects of polymerization shrinkage
 Cavity preparation geometry represented by ratio of
bonded to non bonded surface area
 During curing, shrinkage leaves the bonded cavity surfaces
in a state of stress and free surfaces relax some of the
stress by contracting inwards towards the bulk to reduce C
factor
 Layering technique
◦ Restoration build up in increments
◦ Curing 1 layer at a time will reduce bonded surface and increase
non bonded surface
 Adv Over come limited depth of cure
 Disadv time and difficulty of placing a restoration
 Soft start technique : curing begins with a low
intensity and finishes with a high intensity.
This allows for a slow initial rate of
polymerization & a high initial level of stress
relaxation. so it ends at the max intensity once
the gel point has reached. so conversion
peaks only after stresses has been relieved.

 Ramped curing: intensity is gradually


increased or ramped up during the exposure
 Delayed curing : restoration is initially
incompletely cured at low intensity. The
restoration is contoured and carved and later a
second exposure is applied for final cure.
Delayed curing and exponential ramp
curing appear to provide greater reduction in
curing stress.

 High intensity curing: High intensity ,short


exposure time cause accelerated rates of
curing & there may be substantial stress build
up ‘coz insufficient time is allowed for stress
relaxation.
Retinal damage : direct vision of beam for
extended period or short period for lasers
 Protective eye wear
 Shields
Traditional composites: conventional or macro filled(1970)
 Finely ground amorphous silica and quartz

 1-50 µm ( Avg: 8-12µm)

 Filler loading 70-80 wt %

60-70 Vol %
Compressive Strength 250-300Mpa(70 for unfilled)
Tensile strength 50-65Mpa( 24 for unfilled)
Elastic modulus 8-15Gpa(2.4 for unfilled )
Thermal expansion 25-35ppm/ 0C(92.8 for unfilled)
coefficient
Water sorption 0.5-0.7mg/cm 2(11.7 for un filled )
Knoop hardness no 55(15 for un filled )
Curing shrinkage - (8-10 for un filled)
Radiopacity 2-3(0.1 for unfilled )
Traditional composites: conventional or macro filled
 They suffer from surface roughening as a result of selective abrasion

of the softer resin matrix surrounding the harder filler particle


 Finishing, tooth brushing, masticatory wear all produces roughened

surface which tend to get discolored

Small particle filled composites


 Inorganic fillers were ground to a size range of 0.5-3µ a broad size

range distribution
 Colloidal silica 5 wt %

 Size : 0.5-3µm

 Filler loading : 80-90 wt %

65-77 Vol %
Compressive Strength 350-400Mpa
Tensile strength 75-90Mpa
Elastic modulus 15-20Gpa
Thermal expansion coefficient 19-26ppm/ 0C
Water sorption 0.5-0.6 mg/cm 2
Knorp hardness no 50-60
Curing shrinkage 2-3 Vol%
Radiopacity 2-3

 Higher filler loading ,greater strength & physical properties


 Indicated for high stress and abrasion prone applications
(Class IV)
 Possible to attain reasonably smooth surfaces
Micro filled composites
 Colloidal silica particles are used as inorganic filler

 Individual particle sized 40nm

 The pyrogenic silica used in micro filled composites has a

very large total surface area because of its extremely


small average particle size 0.04µm.
 These particle agglomerate and form long [Link]

chains acts similarly to resin polymer chain and


dramatically increase the viscosity of the monomer
 During mixing some of these agglomerates are broken up.

Thus size range 0.04 – 0.4µm


Micro filled composites(cont..)
 Produce undue thickening even with very small addition

of micro filler
 To increase filler loading several approaches has been

introduced
 Sinter colloidal silica of such that several tenths of a micro

meter in size are obtained.


 This large agglomerate result in a reduced surface area of

alloy so more filler to be incorporated before


compromising rheology
 To make new filler particles by grounding pre polymerized

composite which is highly loaded with colloidal silica


particles. These microfilled materials are then
incorporated in to the resin pastes to produce a filling
material with acceptable handling characteristics
Micro filled composites(cont..)
60-70wt % of silane treated colloidal silica + monomer
( Elevated temp to reduce viscosity )
Composite paste(Heat cured)(80% curing)

Ground

Particles(Size higher than Quartz in traditional)

Called as organic filler


Particles+ Silane treated Colloidal silica + Monomer

Micro filled Composite paste


Micro filled composites(cont…)
 Inorganic filler content = 50wt %

 If composite particle are also counted as filler 80 wt%

 The composite particles do not shrink when composite is

cured
 So despite having a lower volume fraction of inorganic

filler than a traditional or SPF composite it will not shrink


as much as expected based on total resin volume.
 Major dis ad: bond between composite particle and

clinically cured matrix is relatively weak, facilitating wear


by a chipping mechanism
 They have generally properties inferior to traditional

composites; since 40-80vol% is made up of resin


Micro filled composites(cont…)
 Size 0.4 to 0.04 µm

 Filler loading 20-59 vol%

35-67 wt %

Compressive Strength 250-350Mpa


Tensile strength 30-50Mpa
Elastic modulus 3-6 Gpa
Thermal expansion coefficient 50-60 ppm/ 0C
Water sorption 1.4-1.7mg/cm 2
Knorp hardness no 25-35
Curing shrinkage 2-3 vol %
Radiopacity 0.5 to 2
Micro filled composites(cont…)
 In long term if micro filled composites are placed in wear

prone areas they eventually breakdown & wear out at a


rate too fast for acceptable clinical performance.
 If in proximal contact areas: anterior tooth drifting may

occur
 Near propagation: Fracture propagation around poorly

bonded organic filler particles


 Provide smoothest surface finish available

 So preferred in class III and V

 The inorganic filler particles are smaller than the abrasive

particle used for finishing, so silica filler is removed along


with embedded resin.
Micro filled composites(cont…)
Clinical consideration
 Not used in stress bearing areas(II and IV)

 Diamond burs are recommended to minimize risk of

chipping
 Resin of choice for aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth

in non stress bearing situation and sub gingival areas


Hybrid composites
 Contain two kinds of filler particle

 Colloidal silica :10-20wt %

 Ground particles of glasses with heavy metals (0.4 to

1µm)
 Smaller size of particles and increased amount of micro

fillers increase surface area .So over all filler loading is not
high as SPF
Clinical considerations

 Surface smoothness and good strength; widely used for the


anterior restration( III and IV)
 Also used for stress bearing posterior restorations
Flowable composites
 Modification of SPF and hybrid composites

 Have a reduced filler level which provides a consistency

that enables the material to flow readily, spread uniformly


and intimately adapt to a cavity form to produce desired
anatomy
 Reduced filler : More susceptible to wear

 Greater ease of adaptation and greater flexibility

 Class I restoration in gingival areas

 Prevent caries – similar to fissure sealants(Minimal Class I

restoration)
 Poor accessibility, little or no exposure to wear
Packable composites
 Compared with amalgam , the technique of composite

placement is for more time consuming and demanding


 Because of highly plastic paste like consistency in the pre

cured stage , cannot be packed vertically in to a cavity in such a


way that the material flows laterally as well as vertically to
ensure intimate contact with cavity walls
CURING LAMPS(Cont..)
 A solution to this – composite with filler that increases
strength and stiffness of the uncured material and that provide
a consistency similar to lathe cut amalgams.
 Packable and condensable are to categories of hybrid

composites introduced in late 1990s


 Derived from inclusion of elongated fibrous filler particles of

about 100µ and /or textured surfaces that tend to inter lock
and resist flow .so resin become stiff and resistant to slumping,
yet moldable under force of condensers.
 Type 1 : polymer based materials suitable for restorations
involving occlusal surfaces
 Type 2 :other polymer based materials
◦ class 1 :self cured materials
◦ class 2 : light cured materials
 group 1:energy applied intraorally
 group 2:energy applied extraorally
◦ class 3 : dual-cured materials
 1ST generation: macro ceramic reinforcing phases in resin
matrix
 2nd generation: colloidal and micro ceramic phases in resin
phase.
 3rd generation: hybrid composite
 4th generation: heat cured irregularly shaped, highly
reinforced composite macro particles with a reinforcing
phase of colloidal ceramics
 5th generation : hybrid system in which continuous resin
phase is reinforced with micro ceramics & macro spherical
, highly reinforced heat cured composite particles
 6th generation :hybrid types in which continuous phase is
reinforced with a combination of micro ceramics and
agglomerates of sintered micro ceramics
CLASSIFICATION BY STURDEVANT

 Conventional
 Microfilled
 Hybrid
 Packable
 Nanofilled
 In class III and V greatest problem encountered
 When gingival margin is located in dentine cementum or
both resin is firmly anchored to the etched enamel at outer
margin, material tend to pull away from gingival margin
during curing, because of polymerization shrinkage.
 This leads to the formation of gap at interfaces
 Marginal staining and secondary caries enhanced.
 Required for vision in radio graphs
 To detect leaking margin 20 caries poor proximal
contacts ,wear of proximal surfaces
 Imparted by certain glass filler particles
 Optimum diagnostic contrast- r/o approximately equal to
that of enamel
 Increased r/o – obscure r/l areas caused by gap formation
or secondary caries
 Before clinical usage –abrasion and wear resistance can be
measured by lab test
 Controlled clinical evaluation is the only reliable means of
evaluating durability and longevity
 Posterior composites wear 0.1 to 0.2mm more than
enamel over 10 years

Mechanisms of composite wear

 Two body wear


 Three body wear
 Two body wear > three body wear
 Indirect composites reduce wear and leakage associated
with resin restoration they are fabricated and polymerized
out side the oral environment , luted with compatible
cements

Approaches to resin inlay construction

 Use of both direct and indirect fabrication methods


 Application of light, heat ,pressure or a combination of
curing system
 Combined use of hybrid and micro filled composites
 Application of separation medium to prepared tooth
 Formation of restorative pattern
 Light curing
 Pattern removed
 Exposure to additional light for 4-6 mts/Heat activated at
1000C for 7 minutes
 Etching of preparation
 Inlay is cemented with a dual cure resin
 Polishing
 Composites systems are available as indirect products
 Impression
Laboratory fabrication of patterns
 Light ,heat curing +heat(1400C) & pressure( 0.6Mpa for 10

minutes)
 High degree of curing -- Improved physical properties +

resistance to wear
 Polymerization shrinkage does not occur →No induced

stress or bond fractures and decreased leakage


 Repairable in the mouth

 Not as abrasive as ceramic inlays

 But long term clinical studies needed to verify the

longevity of these restoration in the oral cavity


 Technique Sensitive
 The first resin veneer were mechanically bonded to metal
substrate using wire loops or retention beads
 Micromechanical retention created by acid etching the base
metal alloy and use of chemical bonding system such as 4
META ,phosphorylated methacrylate ,epoxy resin or SiO2 that
is spread to the metal surface followed by application of a
silane coupling agent(Silicoating)
 Adv(Over ceramic)
◦ Ease of fabrication
◦ Predictable i/o reparability
◦ Less wear of opposing teeth
 Dis adv
◦ Low Proportional limit
◦ Pronounced plastic deformation
 So resin should be protected with metal, occlusal surface
where ever possible .Leakage of oral fluid --staining below
veneers are caused by dimensional changes from water
sorption heating and cooling
 Surface staining and intrinsic discoloration tend to occur
 Susceptible to wear during tooth brushing (soft tooth brush
and mild abrasive tooth pastes]
 Not suitable for RPD abutment retainers where clasps
engages an undercut on the veneered surface
 Conservative alternative to conventional veneers.
 Resin are used as preformed laminate veneers in which resin
shells are adjusted by grinding and the contoured facing is
bonded using acid etch technique with luting resin cements
Packaging of composites
 Spill syringes and compule

 The syringes are made of opaque plastic to protect material

from exposure to light and thus prolongs shelf life


 The compule is placed the end of a syringe and the paste is

extruded after removal of the protective tip


 Adv: decreased cross infection, protection from light
WT and ST
 Light cured – curing is considered to be on demand

 Stiffening takes place with in seconds after light exposure by a

high intensity curing light source


 The curing reaction continues for a period of 24 hrs

 About 25% remain un reacted at bulk of the restoration

 Surface of the restoration should be protected with a

transparent matrix to prevent air contact and thus


polymerization inhibition
 The restoration is finished and is in function after 10 minutes;

optimum physical properties are reached only after 24 hrs


 WT =60 to 90 sec

 After 60 to90 sec of dispensing composite may loose its

capability to flow readily against tooth structure


 For chemically cured composite setting time is 3 to 5 minutes
Manipulation of composites
 Composites can be contaminated with debris and moisture
 Rubber dam isolation
 Pulpal protection
 Etching and bonding
 Dispensing- only mass composite needed to fill large quantity
should be dispensed to the paper pads
 Composites are visco elastic so will continue to flow off once the
plunger is twisted .
 Plunger is reversed once sufficient composites has been extruded
 Cap should be cleaned
 Self cure- two pastes
 Equal amounts of universal and catalyst pastes are mixed
thoroughly for 20 to 30 Sec
 Plastic or coated metal spatula should be used.
Placement
 A plastic or coated metal instrument is used
 It is not advised to dip the instrument in alcohol
 May also be placed with plastic tip of syringe
 Pre packed in syringe tips –compules
 Facilitates precise placement of the material and avoid void
incorporation
 Heating units –increase the temp of composite to improve flow and
adaptation
Polymerization
 ET- type,depth,shade of composites
 20 to 60 sec for 2mmthick restoration
 Micro filled-longer ET
 Intensity ,wavelength and penetration of light from the source
 A material with low absorption coefficient cure s to greater depth
 Excessive initiator ,uv absorber ,flourescent dies –detrimental to
cure
Self and dual cure
 Wt =1 to2.5 minutes
 ST=4 minutes
 Curing rate is lower so shrinkage stresses tend to relax
 Used in gingival margin of proximal areas to minimize gap
formation
 Polymerization initiated by light ,continued by self cure
 Finishing refers to the process of adapting restorative
material to the tooth.
 Polishing refers to removal of surface irregularities to achieve
smoothest possible surface.
 Residual surface roughness can encourage bacterial
growth,which can lead to a myriad of problems including 2 0
caries,gingival inflammation and surface staining.
 The smoothest surface of a restoration can be obtained by
curing the composite against a smooth matrix strip
 This minimizes porosity as well as oxygen inhibited layer.
 As it is difficult to adapt the plastic strip to the different
convex and concave surfaces of the tooth,some amount of
finishing is required.
 3 significant factors
1 .Environment
 Dry vs wet

 Heat generation disturbs marginal sealing ability of the

adhesive resin
 Structural and chemical changes on the surface

 Smearing of the surface and depolymerization.

 Water cooling during finishing should ensure surface quality.

2. Delayed Vs Immediate Finish


 Delayed curing is recommended as the polymerization is

completed only in 24 hrs.


 Delayed curing can increase marginal leakage and have no

additional surface effects


[Link] of finishing material
 Trimming: scalpel blade or any thin sharp edged instrument is

used to remove flash on the proximal surface area


 Trimming forces should be parallel to the margins or towards

gingival region
 Course to ultra fine Al O discs can be applied to areas with
2 3
difficult access around proximal surfaces or in embrasures.
 Tungsten carbide burs or fine diamond tips can be used to

adjust occlusal surfaces and blend the composite to tooth


surface
 Aluminium oxide discs produce the best surface and induce

minimal trauma
 Other systems include

 Resin finishing devices with use of fine and extra fine

polishing pastes
 Silicone Based Systems
 SiC impregnated polishing brushes and points

 surface grinding is associated with high stresses.


 Recent studies: micro leakage is not significantly affected by
type of polishing system used.

 Rebonding: application of a surface sealer. Finishing and


polishing introduces micro cracks and removes the most
highly polymerized area of the restoration .Application of a
surface sealer or low viscosity resin with low or no filler
ensures that these defect gets sealed.
 Concerns:
 [Link] Chemical Toxicity Of The Material
 Adequately polymerized composites are relatively
biocompatible ‘coz they exhibit minimal solubility and
unreacted species are leached in very small quantities.
 From a toxicological pt of view-these amounts are too small to
cause toxic reaction
 Immunological pt of view: under extremely rare conditions
some patients and dental personnel can develop an allergic
response to these materials.
 Inadequately cured composites : usually at the floor can act as
reservoir of diffusible components that can induce long term
pulpal [Link] thick layers are cured the uncured
resin can release leachable constituents adjacent to the pulp.

Marginal leakage
 Marginal leakage allow bacterial ingrowth, 2 0 caries and pulp

reaction
 So measures are to be taken to minimize polymerization

shrinkage and marginal leakage


 Bis phenol a –xenoestrogen

anti androgenic
 Repaired by placing new material over the old composite
 Restoration that has been cured and polished may have
50% of unreacted ma groups to copolymerize with the
newly added material
 With ageing the unreacted ma and fresh monomer
reduces. The strength of bond between original material
and the new resin decreases in proportion to time elapsed
between polymerization and addition of new resin
 Strength of repaired composite is usually less than half the
strength of the original material
 [Link] Composite Resins 1996
 [Link] composites1990’s
 [Link]
 Ormocer matrix consists of ceramics poly
siloxane instead of organic dimethacrylate
monomers like Bis GMA.
 It exhibits low shrinkage on

polymerization(1.8) and has high abrasion


resistance
 It is therefore versatile in its application in
both antr and postr areas.
 This material also releases F- and PO 3- that
4
protect the adjoining cavity design
 [Link] RELEASING COMPOSITE RESIN1998
 A new approach was begun with the

development of an ion releasing composite


resin called ariston phc from vivadevt co.
 This novel composite resin has an alkaline
glass filler which releases F-,Ca2+,& OH-ions
based on the ph value immediately adjacent
to the restoration
 Whenever the ph value lowers at the margins

of the restoration due to active plaque


formation the functional ions are released in
large no:s
 Thus there is suppression of bacterial growth

and inhibition of 20 caries around the margin


[Link]
 Contain filler particles that are extremely

small
 They can be easily agglomerated
 High filler levels can be incorporated-good

physical properties and esthetics


6. COMPOMERS / polyacid modified composite
resins 1990’s
 They combine the durability of composite resins
and fluride releasing ability of gic
Composition
 Resin matrix

UDMA
Butane tetracarboxylic acid with HEMA side
chains
 Filler

Strontium flurosilicate glass


 Photoinitiators
 Stabilizers
 Their strength fracture toughness and wear

resistance are similar to composites


 Esthetically superior to gic
 Release F- to a lesser extend than gic
 Does not have F- recharge capacity

7. CEROMER
 Ceramic optimized polymer developed for

indirect composite restorations


 Eg: artglass,belle glass hp
 8. fibre reinforced composites
 9. single crystal modified composite.

You might also like