0% found this document useful (0 votes)
209 views33 pages

1 Theories of International Relations

This document discusses different perspectives and theories in international politics. It outlines a traditional realist view that focuses on national interests and competition between states, versus an alternative liberal view emphasizing global cooperation and mutual interests. Key theories covered include realism, liberalism, constructivism, and contemporary approaches like feminism and economic structuralism. Levels of analysis in international relations are also defined, including the individual, state, and systematic levels.

Uploaded by

Ana Paola Pepi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
209 views33 pages

1 Theories of International Relations

This document discusses different perspectives and theories in international politics. It outlines a traditional realist view that focuses on national interests and competition between states, versus an alternative liberal view emphasizing global cooperation and mutual interests. Key theories covered include realism, liberalism, constructivism, and contemporary approaches like feminism and economic structuralism. Levels of analysis in international relations are also defined, including the individual, state, and systematic levels.

Uploaded by

Ana Paola Pepi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Common actors in the international

stage.

ONG’s
OIG's
CMN
Estados
International Politics
Perspectives

Traditional Vision Alternative Vision

• National societies • Global society


• National interests • Mutual interests
• Competition • Cooperation
• Protectionism • Colective security
• Self-help • Mutual help
• Sovereign States • International
• Remaining in power organizations
• International Law
Why should I be interested in
international politics?
General culture
• Don’t be ignorant!
Finances
• Repercutions “butterfly effect”: whatever
happens in the past or in another place in the
world can impact us directly.
‣ Employment, debt, security, money
exchange rates, etc…

Environment
• We all live under the same sky
‣ Climate change/global warming/natural disasters
Health
• Transnational illnesses and medical discoveries.
‣ Mortal viruses or vaccines that save millions of lives.
Why should I be interested in
international politics?
My surroundings
• Regional conflicts could interfere in the local community
‣ Threats, political violence, war.
‣ Terrorism committed by foreign agents…
Trampoline for political activism
• Be involved with big actors
‣ Get out to the streets! Manifest! Wake up and do something for
your own good!
Democratic participation
• Your vote could have positive or negative repercussions
‣ Foreign politics are managed by those we vote for public office
‣ Technically you can become a candidate for one of this
positions
Realism
• Classic realism
• Neo-realism

Liberalism

• Classic liberalism
Main Theories of • Neo-liberalism
international
relations
Constructivism
• Agents + structures

Contemporary theories
• Post-modernism
• Feminism
• Economic structuralism
Realism
Main points
• Life in general and political activities are involved in the neverending
fight for power and domination
• “Win-Lose” “All or nothing” : An actor wins and the other looses
‣ Sun Tzu, The art of war
‣ Tucídides, The history of the War of the Peloponnesus
‣ Otto von Bismarck (Prusia).
‣ Hans Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations.
Realism

Classic Neo-realism (modern)

• Human beings are violent • The fight for power is the


by nature. center of everything, but
• Pessimistic regarding not because of human
behavior/facts nature, but because we
• Tendency to dominate or live in an international
control others “anarchic” system.
‣ Thomas Hobes, The • No superior authority.
Leviathan. • Survival is everything.
‣ Hans Morgenthau, ‣ Fareed Zakaria.
Politics Among Nations.
Liberalism

Classic Neo-liberalism (modern)

• Humanity benefits from • The System is not really


living in community. “anarchic”. Complex
• Cooperation instead of interdependence.
competition. • Commerce promotes
• Altruism. colaboration and
‣ Jean-Jacques strenghtens diplomatic
Rousseau, Du Contrat relationships.
Social. ‣ Milton Freedman,
‣ Woodrow Wilson. Homo Economicus.
Realism Liberalism (idealism)

• Traditional • Alternative
• Self-interested States • Cooperative-globalist
• Anarchy in the international approach
system • Community in the
• Nationalist/conservative international system
• Pessimists about human • Internationalist/liberal
nature (selfish) • Optimists about human
• Power nature (altruistic)
• Competitive future among • Justice
Sovereign States • Cooperative future through
• Realpolitik: Secure your international organizations.
country’s interest first. • Classic idealism: don’t
surrender Independence.
Constructivism
• The way you in which you see the world, is
the way in which that same image is built in
your own mind.
• Right now, there are people who accept to
live in States and pay taxes: therefore, they
accept the reality.
‣ The case of the Soviet Union: first it built
its reality in the minds of their subjects,
and then they had to erase it after its
collapse in 1991: new nationalities rise.
• Analyzes the whole context of a situation.
• If there’s a change in the social values, there
can be a transformation in the global order.
Contemporary
theories

Feminism Economic Structuralism

• If women were in charge, • Everything is centered on


there’d be no wars. commerce and economic
• Politics are excessively development. Pure gain.
male.
‣ Betty Reardon, Women
& Peace.

Postmodernism
• Same as constructivism:
reality = mental state.
Individual level 1
• Human factor
• Organizational behaviour
• Personal characteristics.
• Logical and irrational factors.
Levels of analysis
of International
relations State Level 2
• Type of government, situation and
politics.
• Political culture, and foreign policy
actors.

Systematic level 3
• Structural characteristics.
• Power relationships.
• Economic realities.
• Rules.
Individual Level 1

HUMAN FACTOR
• Knowledge factors
(external limitations vs. internal)
‣ Search for cognitive consistency: information that
“matches” perceptions.
1 ‣ Fantastic thinking: self-convincement.
‣ Employment of heuristic mechanisms:
stereotupes and analogies.
• Emotional factors: feelings (rage, hate, depression)
• Psychological factors: the passive-agressive theory
(frustration proyection).
Individual level 1

• Biological factors:
‣ Etology: animal and human behavior. Territoril,
fierce competition.
‣ Gender/sex: substancial differences between men
and women with regards to strategic thinking
and decision making.
1 • Perception: how do we see others
‣ Exagerated vision of competition/rivalry.
‣ We feel less prepared than the enemy.
‣ Inability to comprehend why other people don’t
like us…
‣ “Mirror-perception:” points of view are usually
similar.
Individual level 1
• Human factor
• Organizational behaviour
• Personal characteristics.
• Logical and irrational factors.
Levels of analysis
of International
relations State Level 2
• Type of government, situation and
politics.
• Political culture, and foreign policy
actors.

Systematic level 3
• Structural characteristics.
• Power relationships.
• Economic realities.
• Rules.
Individual level 1

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR
2 • Expected role
‣ Self expectations vs external expectations
• “Group thinking:” intimate circle of counselors
Individual level 1
• Human factor
• Organizational behaviour
• Personal characteristics.
• Logical and irrational factors.
Levels of analysis
of International
relations State Level 2
• Type of government, situation and
politics.
• Political culture, and foreign policy
actors.

Systematic level 3
• Structural characteristics.
• Power relationships.
• Economic realities.
• Rules.
Individual Level 1

PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS (IDIOSINCRACY ANALYSIS)


• Personality: scales on active-pasive, and positive-
negative.
‣ Kennedy/Clinton vs. Nixon/Johnson
• Physical and mental health
‣ Deformities or congenital defects, substance
3 abuse, addictions, etc.
• Ambition and ego
• Political history and personal experiences
• Perceptions and operational reality
‣ Correct and wrongful perceptions
‣ Operational code (how does a leader see the
world surrounding them).
Individual level 1
• Human factor
• Organizational behaviour
• Personal characteristics.
• Logical and irrational factors.
Levels of analysis
of International
relations State Level 2
• Type of government, situation and
politics.
• Political culture, and foreign policy
actors.

Systematic level 3
• Structural characteristics.
• Power relationships.
• Economic realities.
• Rules.
Individual level 1

LOGICAL AND IRRATIONAL FACTORS


• Poli-heuristic theory: the elimination of
unacceptable options first, then the análisis of
4 strategic decisions (functional thinking, cold
thinking). Diminish risks and increase posible
benefits…
Individual level 1
• Human factor
• Organizational behaviour
• Personal characteristics.
• Logical and irrational factors.
Levels of analysis
of International
relations State Level 2
• Type of government, situation and
politics.
• Political culture, and foreign policy
actors.

Systematic level 3
• Structural characteristics.
• Power relationships.
• Economic realities.
• Rules.
State Level 2

TYPE OF GOVERNMENT, SITUATION AND POLITICS


• Democratic States vs Authoritarian States: Margin
for decisión making.
• Type of situation:
‣ Crisis: surprise, threatening scenarios, brief time
to react/act.
1 ‣ Normality: “support for the leader,” acceptance
of the head of the Executive power by the
population.
• Type of politics
‣ Nature of the topic could have no impact.
‣ Intermestic Politic or global-national: the
immediate effect inside of the country.
“Fastrack” authority or express…
Individual level 1
• Human factor
• Organizational behaviour
• Personal characteristics.
• Logical and irrational factors.
Levels of analysis
of International
relations State Level 2
• Type of government, situation and
politics.
• Political culture, and foreign policy
actors.

Systematic level 3
• Structural characteristics.
• Power relationships.
• Economic realities.
• Rules.
National Level 2

POLITICAL CULTURE AND FOREIGN RELATIONS ACTORS


• Representatives of governments / Executive heads:
usually Presidents or Prime Ministers.
‣ Formal Powers: Those conceded by a legal
2 foundation or the Constitution.
‣ Informal Powers: leadership, Prestige and image.
‣ Capabilities: Legislative abilities and/or
administrative, political persuation, intelligence,
confort in the national and global arena.
National Level 2

POLITICAL CULTURE AND FOREIGN RELATIONS ACTORS


• Bureaucracies
‣ Filtered information.
‣ Recommendations (reports from Congress)
‣ Implementation (research made by Congress,
coordination between agencies or State
2
departments).
• Legislatures
‣ Simulated legislative power vs strong Legislative
Branch: maintain the balance in power.
‣ Representatives and senators normally focus on
internal affairs: they owe their job to the local
populations.
National level 2

POLITICAL CULTURE AND FOREIGN RELATIONS ACTORS


• Groups of interest
‣ Cultural circles: people who gather with a
general goal, regarding immigration or religious.
2 ‣ Economic asociations: the big industry and its
commercial interests, labour unions.
‣ Groups oriented by specific topics: ideological,
human rights, environment.
‣ Multinational interest circles: come from abroad.
• Normal citizens: public opinion.
Individual level 1
• Human factor
• Organizational behaviour
• Personal characteristics.
• Logical and irrational factors.
Levels of analysis
of International
relations State Level 2
• Type of government, situation and
politics.
• Political culture, and foreign policy
actors.

Systematic level 3
• Structural characteristics.
• Power relationships.
• Economic realities.
• Rules.
Systematic level 3

STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS
• Organization of authority
1 ‣ Vertical vs horizontal: the current system is
considered anarchic.
• Level, Depth and intensity of interactions.
Individual level 1
• Human factor
• Organizational behaviour
• Personal characteristics.
• Logical and irrational factors.
Levels of analysis
of International
relations State Level 2
• Type of government, situation and
politics.
• Political culture, and foreign policy
actors.

Systematic level 3
• Structural characteristics.
• Power relationships.
• Economic realities.
• Rules.
Sytematic level 3

POWER RELATIONS
2 • Number of powerful actors: polarity of the
international system.
• Context of power.
Unipolar
• A single dominant country
‣ Unlimited power and unrivaled

Bipolar
• Two great powers
Polarity of the ‣ Little space for neutrality
system
Tripolar
• Changing aliances
‣ Unstable

Multipolar
• Multiple actors/States
‣ Unpredictable, but balanced
Individual level 1
• Human factor
• Organizational behaviour
• Personal characteristics.
• Logical and irrational factors.
Levels of analysis
of International
relations State Level 2
• Type of government, situation and
politics.
• Political culture, and foreign policy
actors.

Systematic level 3
• Structural characteristics.
• Power relationships.
• Economic realities.
• Rules.
Systematic level 3

ECONOMIC REALITIES
• Current economic and financial situation of any
country: money = power.
3
• Interdependency
‣ China’s ascent
‣ Hydrocarbons: intervention in Iraq and Libya.

RULES
• Proper and tolerated conduct in the international
4 stage.
‣ Nuclear weapons and military ocupation.
‣ Tolerance on the loss of life in war.

You might also like