DES Lecture | PDF | Encryption | Cipher
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views

DES Lecture

Block ciphers like DES encrypt data in blocks, rather than bit-by-bit like stream ciphers. DES was adopted as a standard in 1977 and uses a Feistel network structure with a 56-bit key to encrypt 64-bit blocks through multiple rounds. Each DES round uses subkeys generated from the main key to substitute and permute the block halves based on the round function and key. Modern block ciphers aim to provide strong diffusion and confusion through optimized round structures and complex key schedules.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views

DES Lecture

Block ciphers like DES encrypt data in blocks, rather than bit-by-bit like stream ciphers. DES was adopted as a standard in 1977 and uses a Feistel network structure with a 56-bit key to encrypt 64-bit blocks through multiple rounds. Each DES round uses subkeys generated from the main key to substitute and permute the block halves based on the round function and key. Modern block ciphers aim to provide strong diffusion and confusion through optimized round structures and complex key schedules.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 52

Block Ciphers (DES)

1
Block Ciphers and the Data
Encryption Standard

All the afternoon Mungo had been working on


Stern's code, principally with the aid of the
latest messages which he had copied down at
the Nevin Square drop. Stern was very
confident. He must be well aware London
Central knew about that drop. It was obvious
that they didn't care how often Mungo read
their messages, so confident were they in the
impenetrability of the code.
—Talking to Strange Men, Ruth Rendell

2
Modern Block Ciphers
• will now look at modern block ciphers
• one of the most widely used types of
cryptographic algorithms
• provide secrecy and/or authentication
services
• in particular will introduce DES (Data
Encryption Standard)

3
Block vs Stream Ciphers
• block ciphers process messages into
blocks, each of which is then
en/decrypted
• like a substitution on very big characters
– 64-bits or more
• stream ciphers process messages a bit or
byte at a time when en/decrypting
• many current ciphers are block ciphers

4
Block Cipher Principles
• most symmetric block ciphers are based on a
Feistel Cipher Structure
• needed since must be able to decrypt ciphertext
to recover messages efficiently
• block ciphers look like an extremely large
substitution
• would need table of 264 entries for a 64-bit block
• instead create from smaller building blocks
• using idea of a product cipher

5
Claude Shannon and Substitution-
Permutation Ciphers
• in 1949 Claude Shannon introduced idea of
substitution-permutation (S-P) networks
– modern substitution-transposition product cipher
• these form the basis of modern block ciphers
• S-P networks are based on the two primitive
cryptographic operations we have seen before:
– substitution (S-box)
– permutation (P-box)
• provide confusion and diffusion of message

6
Confusion and Diffusion
• cipher needs to completely obscure
statistical properties of original message
• a one-time pad does this
• more practically Shannon suggested
combining elements to obtain:
• diffusion – dissipates statistical structure
of plaintext over bulk of ciphertext
• confusion – makes relationship between
ciphertext and key as complex as possible

7
Feistel Cipher Structure
• Horst Feistel devised the feistel cipher
– based on concept of invertible product cipher
• partitions input block into two halves
– process through multiple rounds which
– perform a substitution on left data half
– based on round function of right half & subkey
– then have permutation swapping halves
• implements Shannon’s substitution-
permutation network concept

8
Feistel Cipher Structure

9
Feistel Cipher Design
Principles
• block size
– increasing size improves security, but slows cipher
• key size
– increasing size improves security, makes exhaustive key searching
harder, but may slow cipher
• number of rounds
– increasing number improves security, but slows cipher
• subkey generation
– greater complexity can make analysis harder, but slows cipher
• round function
– greater complexity can make analysis harder, but slows cipher
• fast software en/decryption & ease of analysis
– are more recent concerns for practical use and testing

10
Feistel Cipher Decryption

11
Data Encryption Standard (DES)
• most widely used block cipher in world
• adopted in 1977 by NBS (now NIST)
– as FIPS PUB 46
• encrypts 64-bit data using 56-bit key
• has widespread use
• has been considerable controversy over
its security

12
DES History
• IBM developed Lucifer cipher
– by team led by Feistel
– used 64-bit data blocks with 128-bit key
• then redeveloped as a commercial cipher
with input from NSA and others
• in 1973 NBS issued request for proposals
for a national cipher standard
• IBM submitted their revised Lucifer
which was eventually accepted as the DES
13
DES Design Controversy
• although DES standard is public
• was considerable controversy over design
– in choice of 56-bit key (vs Lucifer 128-bit)
– and because design criteria were classified
• subsequent events and public analysis
show in fact design was appropriate
• DES has become widely used, especially in
financial applications

14
DES Encryption

15
General structure of DES

32 bits 32 bits
LI–1 RI–1
Mixer

f ( RI–1, KI ) KI
Swapper

LI RI
32 bits 32 bits
Each round

16
DES function

17
Key generation

18
We choose a random plaintext block, a random key, and a
computer program to determine what the ciphertext block would
be (all in hexadecimal):

19
To check the effectiveness of DES, when a single bit is changed in
the input, let us use two different plaintexts with only one single
bit difference. The two ciphertexts are completely different
without even changing the key:

Although the two plaintext blocks differ only in the rightmost bit,
the ciphertext blocks differ in 29 bits.

20
Initial Permutation IP
• first step of the data computation
• IP reorders the input data bits
• even bits to LH half, odd bits to RH half
• quite regular in structure (easy in h/w)
• see text Table 3.2
• example:
IP(675a6967 5e5a6b5a) = (ffb2194d 004df6fb)

21
DES Round Structure
• uses two 32-bit L & R halves
• as for any Feistel cipher can describe as:
Li = Ri–1
Ri = Li–1 xor F(Ri–1, Ki)
• takes 32-bit R half and 48-bit subkey and:
– expands R to 48-bits using perm E
– adds to subkey
– passes through 8 S-boxes to get 32-bit result
– finally permutes this using 32-bit perm P

22
DES Round Structure

23
Substitution Boxes S
• have eight S-boxes which map 6 to 4 bits
• each S-box is actually 4 little 4 bit boxes
– outer bits 1 & 6 (row bits) select one rows
– inner bits 2-5 (col bits) are substituted
– result is 8 lots of 4 bits, or 32 bits
• row selection depends on both data & key
– feature known as autoclaving (autokeying)
• example:
S(18 09 12 3d 11 17 38 39) = 5fd25e03

24
DES Key Schedule
• forms subkeys used in each round
• consists of:
– initial permutation of the key (PC1) which
selects 56-bits in two 28-bit halves
– 16 stages consisting of:
• selecting 24-bits from each half
• permuting them by PC2 for use in function f,
• rotating each half separately either 1 or 2 places
depending on the key rotation schedule K

25
DES Decryption
• decrypt must unwind steps of data computation
• with Feistel design, do encryption steps again
• using subkeys in reverse order (SK16 … SK1)
• note that IP undoes final FP step of encryption
• 1st round with SK16 undoes 16th encrypt round
• ….
• 16th round with SK1 undoes 1st encrypt round
• then final FP undoes initial encryption IP
• thus recovering original data value

26
Avalanche Effect
• key desirable property of encryption
algorithm
• where a change of one input or key bit
results in changing approx half output
bits
• making attempts to “home-in” by
guessing keys impossible
• Completeness Effect- each bit of CT
needs to depend on many bits of PT
27
DES Weakness
• Design in S Box
• Design in D Box
• Design in Key
• Six pair of Semi weak key, 48 possible
weak key

28
Strength of DES – Key Size
• 56-bit keys have 256 = 7.2 x 1016 values
• brute force search looks hard
• recent advances have shown is possible
– in 1997 on Internet in a few months
– in 1998 on dedicated h/w (EFF) in a few days
– in 1999 above combined in 22hrs!
• still must be able to recognize plaintext
• now considering alternatives to DES
29
Strength of DES – Timing
Attacks
• attacks actual implementation of cipher
• use knowledge of consequences of
implementation to derive knowledge of
some/all subkey bits
• specifically use fact that calculations
can take varying times depending on the
value of the inputs to it
• particularly problematic on smartcards
30
Differential analysis
• Propagation ratio is the probability that
output diff. is y given that input diff. is
x
• Rp = Nd (x, y)/ 2m
• In the class example
ND( 0100, 0110)= 1/2
Rp = 1/2 1/81/81/81/8

31
Block Cipher Design Principles
• basic principles still like Feistel in 1970’s
• number of rounds
– more is better, exhaustive search best attack
• function f:
– provides “confusion”, is nonlinear, avalanche
• key schedule
– complex subkey creation, key avalanche

32
Modes of Operation
• block ciphers encrypt fixed size blocks
• e.g. DES encrypts 64-bit blocks, with 56-bit
key
• need way to use in practice, given usually have
arbitrary amount of information to encrypt
• four were defined for DES in ANSI standard
ANSI X3.106-1983 Modes of Use
• subsequently now have 5 for DES and AES
• have block and stream modes
33
Electronic Codebook Book (ECB)
• message is broken into independent
blocks which are encrypted
• each block is a value which is
substituted, like a codebook, hence name
• each block is encoded independently of
the other blocks
Ci = DESK1 (Pi)
• uses: secure transmission of single values
34
Electronic Codebook Book (ECB)

35
Electronic Codebook Book (ECB)

36
Electronic Codebook Book (ECB)

37
Advantages and Limitations of
ECB
• repetitions in message may show in
ciphertext
– if aligned with message block
– particularly with data such as graphics
– or with messages that change very little,
which become a code-book analysis problem
• weakness due to encrypted message
blocks being independent
• main use is sending a few blocks of data
38
Cipher Block Chaining (CBC)
• message is broken into blocks
• but these are linked together in the
encryption operation
• each previous cipher blocks is chained
with current plaintext block, hence name
• use Initial Vector (IV) to start process
Ci = DESK1(Pi XOR Ci-1)
C-1 = IV
• uses: bulk data encryption, authentication

39
Cipher Block Chaining (CBC)

40
Cipher Block Chaining (CBC)

Original image Encrypted image

41
Advantages and Limitations of
CBC
• each ciphertext block depends on all message blocks
• thus a change in the message affects all ciphertext
blocks after the change as well as the original block
• need Initial Value (IV) known to sender & receiver
– however if IV is sent in the clear, an attacker can change
bits of the first block, and change IV to compensate
– hence either IV must be a fixed value or it must be sent
encrypted in ECB mode before rest of message
• at end of message, handle possible last short block
– by padding either with known non-data value (eg nulls)
– or pad last block with count of pad size
• eg. [ b1 b2 b3 0 0 0 0 5] <- 3 data bytes, then 5 bytes pad+count

42
Cipher FeedBack (CFB)
• message is treated as a stream of bits
• added to the output of the block cipher
• result is feed back for next stage (hence name)
• standard allows any number of bit (1,8 or 64 or
whatever) to be feed back
– denoted CFB-1, CFB-8, CFB-64 etc
• is most efficient to use all 64 bits (CFB-64)
Ci = Pi XOR DESK1(Ci-1)
C-1 = IV
• uses: stream data encryption, authentication
43
Cipher FeedBack (CFB)

44
Advantages and Limitations of
CFB
• appropriate when data arrives in bits/bytes
• most common stream mode
• limitation is need to stall while do block
encryption after every n-bits
• note that the block cipher is used in
encryption mode at both ends
• errors propagate for several blocks after
the error

45
Output FeedBack (OFB)
• message is treated as a stream of bits
• output of cipher is added to message
• output is then feed back (hence name)
• feedback is independent of message
• can be computed in advance
Ci = Pi XOR Oi
Oi = DESK1(Oi-1)
O-1 = IV
• uses: stream encryption over noisy channels
46
Output FeedBack (OFB)

47
Advantages and Limitations of
OFB
• used when error feedback a problem or where need to
encryptions before message is available
• superficially similar to CFB
• but feedback is from the output of cipher and is
independent of message
• a variation of a Vernam cipher
– hence must never reuse the same sequence (key+IV)
• sender and receiver must remain in sync, and some
recovery method is needed to ensure this occurs
• originally specified with m-bit feedback in the standards
• subsequent research has shown that only OFB-64 should
ever be used

48
Counter (CTR)
• a “new” mode, though proposed early on
• similar to OFB but encrypts counter value
rather than any feedback value
• must have a different key & counter value
for every plaintext block (never reused)
Ci = Pi XOR Oi
Oi = DESK1(i)
• uses: high-speed network encryptions
49
Counter (CTR)

50
Advantages and Limitations of
CTR
• efficiency
– can do parallel encryptions
– in advance of need
– good for bursty high speed links
• random access to encrypted data blocks
• provable security (good as other modes)
• but must ensure never reuse key/counter
values, otherwise could break (cf OFB)

51
Summary
• have considered:
– block cipher design principles
– DES
• details
• strength
– Modes of Operation
• ECB, CBC, CFB, OFB, CTR

52

You might also like