0% found this document useful (0 votes)
86 views46 pages

Stock Market Efficiency Insights

The document discusses stocks, stock markets, and the efficient market hypothesis. It provides information on common stock, stock market indexes like the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite. It also discusses how stocks are valued using the dividend discount model and factors that influence stock prices. The efficient market hypothesis states that stock prices reflect all publicly available information. While some evidence supports market efficiency, anomalies exist that challenge the hypothesis' assumption of perfect efficiency.

Uploaded by

Deepak Benagi
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
86 views46 pages

Stock Market Efficiency Insights

The document discusses stocks, stock markets, and the efficient market hypothesis. It provides information on common stock, stock market indexes like the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite. It also discusses how stocks are valued using the dividend discount model and factors that influence stock prices. The efficient market hypothesis states that stock prices reflect all publicly available information. While some evidence supports market efficiency, anomalies exist that challenge the hypothesis' assumption of perfect efficiency.

Uploaded by

Deepak Benagi
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

8.

Stocks, Stock Markets, and


Market Efficiency

• Common stock
• Stock market indexes
• Stock valuation
• Efficient Markets Theory
About common stock

• Share of firm’s ownship


• A residual claimant
• Paid after all other creditors
• “last in line”
• Limited liability
• Shareholders cannot be liable
beyond stock investment
Measuring the Stock Market

• Stock market indexes


• Average price level in part/all of
market
• Benchmark for performance for
money managers
Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA)

• Stock prices of 30 of the largest U.S.


companies
• Return to holding a portfolio of a single
share of each stock
• Adjusted for splits, firm changes
• Price-weighted average
• Greater wt. to higher priced stocks
• http://
www.djindexes.com/mdsidx/index.cfm?event =
showAvgStats
The S&P 500
• Value of 500 of the largest firms in U.S.
economy
• At least $5 billion in market capitalization
• At least 50% stock held by public
• Valued-weighted
• Weight to each stock price based on firms
total market value
• Share price x (shares outstanding)
• Larger firms get more wt.
• http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/500factsheet.pd
f
Correlation: 95%
Nasdaq Composite

• Over 3000 OTC traded companies


• Value-weighted
• Smaller, newer firms
• $500 billion total market value
DJ Wilshire 5000

• “Total market index”


• All publicly traded stocks in U.S.
with readily available price data
• Value-weighted
• Over $15 trillion in total market
capitalization
Correlation across indices: .8 - .99
Stock Valuation

• Recall:
• We value an asset based on the
present value of the expected
future cash flows
• For stocks these are dividend
payments, resale price
• D0 = dividend today
• g = annual dividend growth rate
• Pn= future resale price in year n
• P = price today
• i = discount rate
value of a stock today

D0 (1  g ) D0 (1  g ) 2
D0 (1  g ) n
Pn
P   ...  
(1  i ) (1  i ) 2
(1  i ) n
(1  i ) n
• but we do not know the future P….
• assume stock is held indefinitely,
just paying dividends….
Dividend-discount model

D0
P
ig
• interest rate = risk
free rate + risk
premium
• i = rf + rp
• then
D0
P
rf  rp  g
D0
P
rf  rp  g

• higher risk free rate, lower stock


price
• higher risk premium, lower stock
price
• higher dividends, higher stock price
• higher dividend growth, higher stock
price
example

• D = $2, g = 2%, rf = 3%, rp = 5%


• P= $2/(.03+.05-.02)
• P = $2/.06 = $33.33
• what if risk premium rises to 7%?
• P = $2/(.03+.07-.02) = $2/.08 =
$12.50
• what if risk premium falls to 3%?
• P = $2/(.03+.03-.02) = $2/.04 = $50
• Dividend discount model shows us
why stock prices are volatile
Theory of Efficient Markets

• efficient market hypothesis (EMH)


• asset prices (stock prices) reflect all
available information
• markets adjust immediately to new
information
• prices incorporate expectations
about future
example
• XYZ stock, $25
• value of $25 based on
--past prices, profits, trading,
litigation
--forecasts about future profits,
litigation, market share
--relevant economic conditions
• not ALL buyers and sellers must act
rationally for markets to be efficient
• just most of them
implications

• IF stock market is efficient,


• THEN stock prices already reflect
all relevant, available information
• SO, using the same info to predict
future prices will not work
• if future stock prices were predictable…
• Expect price to rise tomorrow,
• Then you buy it today,
• Price rises TODAY
• Stock price today reflects our
expectations about future price
movements
• Stock prices are close to a “random
walk”
Are markets efficient?

• a lot of research on efficiency of U.S.


stock market
• to “test” efficiency, must understand
implications of efficiency
• it should be almost impossible to
“beat the market”
(to earn above-average stock market
returns over time)
Is this true?
-- most evidence says yes
-- some evidence suggests that
some price inefficiencies do
exist
Evidence for efficiency
• do professionally managed mutual
funds beat the market?
• no, on average
• S&P 500 outperformed 72% of all
actively managed large-cap funds in
the past 5 years
• funds that do well in one year do not
do well in subsequent year
• 1973-98, Wilshire 5000 outperformed
67% of equity funds
• so if professionals have difficulty
earning superior returns
• then prices likely reflect public
information
Technical analysis

• Chartists
• using past price patterns to predict
future price patterns
• no evidence this technique beats
the market
Fundamental Analysis

• Use available data to determine


proper value of stock
• Which may or may not match price
• Again, we see no evidence that this
earns above-average return in the
long run
WSJ Dartboard contest

• 1988-2001
• Over 6-month period
• 4 professionals pick 1 stock each
• 4 dartboard stocks
• Price appreciation of each portfolio
• Dartboard won about 40% of the time
• Even the deck stacked in favor of
professionals
Evidence against efficient markets

• certain return patterns out there


• “anomalies”
• should not exist if markets are fully
efficient
• small-firm effect
• risk-adjusted returns of smaller
firms higher over time
• Risk measure?
• Survivorship bias
• effect has become smaller over
time
• January effect
• stocks post larger returns in
January
• (December sell-offs for taxes)
• should disappear as tax-exempt
pension funds attempt to profit,
• but still exists (but smaller)
• P/E effect
• Stocks with low P/E do better over
time
• Not consistent over time
• Price-to-book value
• Value investing (Buffet)
• Not consistent, survivorship
• “Dogs of the Dow”
• Portfolio of 10 DJIA stocks with
highest dividend yield (D/P)
• Once strategy became widespread,
it no longer worked.
• other effects
• day-of-the-week
• weather
• most anomalies are too small to
allow a profit after trading costs
• stock price over-reaction
• prices fall/rise too much with bad/good
news
• A “contrarian” strategy might produce
superior returns
• excess volatility
• stock prices fluctuate more than their
fundamentals
• Bubbles
• Large gaps between actual asset
price and fundamental value
• Internet stock bubble of late 1990s
• Housing bubble?
• Eventually the bubble bursts!
weight of evidence

• so efficiency is not perfect,


• but earning above-average returns is
very difficult
Implications of efficiency evidence

• very difficult for average person to


beat the market
• trying to do so generates trading
costs
• the alternative
• buy-and-hold diversified portfolio
• indexing
conclusion

• stock market price behavior


combines
• fundamentals
• investor psychology
• markets are not perfectly efficient
• field of behavioral economics,
finance

You might also like