EAPP: CRITICAL

WRITING THEORIES
 FF E
EMM II N
N II S
STT THEORY
THEORY
DEFINITION
H
MR
HI
EIS
ES
AT
FTO
E
NOR
IRE
R
NIN
IC
G
OF
CA
CA
:
TERMS:
L
E
• Feminism – belief in Feminist Theory
LSBB:AACCKKGGRROOUUNNDD :

1. social
F i r s t, economic,
W
L •
I t i s a n eso
o oh kt s t p h x: w/t/aepvantses.pisF eci d
oel n tm soeifo snh ffieasomrm
uear(.l 1
ec 7uec0ltrt/0iuM
n tsri eq
o– udaeeS
raeaar lb
l iyoku1/tf9e0m 0 ’is ) :
political,
tnrma i aasrlrtyec- thW equalityolalrinsnydta-o7naof
tp h aeM dhaoe lom n9ci mee0 .c7sr9at9of2te1 xh / 8pi go shel im g ihsto gt hy n e yi n e q u a l i t i e s
sexes.
I it•nibsh wettrttoiw pt iiesn
n:etg/n e/ oar trbw oolgeu.ap
h tst ueewrxtod ehmusee.ern.oe. lde uo/ fo w g eln/ sdu e rb ji en c t _ s p e c
•l2.i t Misogyny
eSirefacirco y_nw w drriW – hatred,
ittiiannvgge, /rw Fe ear m idtiiinn nggi sa_m ni nd (_celoai m trelpyr rae1t hu9e6rne0s/’ lisoi t–ne rl aa t e 1 9 7 0 ’ s )
et remyxi_tn.tihs e ot eh ror yse t_oprejudice
o fF aversion
W r i t e rtsto, aar byn d
lei m _s h secerhgdo ed
tohlfesr_ogom rfo_tuchn reidt w i c oi sr mk /ffoerm
irdsiuingcsig
I st t against ossln
e
tec_women
m efcirornnri aetw idcoiwm
t i o
sim
n
et n h. f’hh
o
stom
f
rw
e
ig
m
l hl ittse, r ba teug ri en n i n g
i nairsyt t h e o r i e s .
oiv •ne h ltoet op1ks8s:t/h
tr h a/ w ncdw e npw tru.ep rjyu o dewit icrteyhsf oM th u en de caot inoonm. iocragl /, l e a r n
3.W oT/lh i r d W a v e F e m i n i s m ioo(ilesoatgo-ritflchya“elA1o9r 9y 0 ’ s - p r e s e n t )
s o c i agllsl, too psnos elaicrtry iac-fattle’ sram np du s /bpflesi ym c ac ih
tn n
oVp ipC nro de n
iscstaiitonino u nao tfoi fw o ntohmaeenR nd.i grhe tasc o t ifoW n otm o atnh. e” s e c o n d w a v e o f
feminism
 MA
M AR
RXX II S
STT THEORY
THEORY
DEFINITION
H
MHEIEIA
R SSTT
FN Marxist
EOO
IR
NRER ICC
GIN A
:CA OF
ELL
S Theory
BB
• Politics –study about the
TERMS:
: AACCKKG
GRRO
OUUN
NDD: :

FO •1.cnuhM
o gst otaopirnnsx:ih
g/s/otcof
w so b p oef llliiiteci v
npower, ct seb,de p ttoh wwaeetre,ln imt etohrnae
etyu ra en d
location
s o c iocow - eu
o lc.lsopdnuw osr m
tdlauircet .saet a adrtu the
eu/vstoooawlfualf /et sircu
oten th
bv joeelcu tth_esm pn ee c. oi rf i c _ w r
c l a
c o2.nstate
s s e i l l e d t i o
tiM et inant rgand
ox/fw faer lilgovernment.
ti ittn
ehrgaa_rtiyn th w
_ eloirtbkea.rsaitsu o r ef / l i t e r a r y _ t h e o
CToh nre cpyeo_orw n p s
a ne d p i rt e
s es ls f e wd i twh itl hl
_sshcohuolodl sb_eo fw_ ictrhi t ti he b d e i f l
f e
e c ieed
a
r snm b/ y
ta m at rhxei s t _ c r i
•cil naClass
sttse ieclsil seam n
r
–td.Hierarchal
c uh ta
thmlesl ctoom tph l ircstatus
oaew t i o tnh
l
s eo fu p p e r
r g e
m
paccording
a s s e s a n d b e l i e v d t h at social
caa• n ih t
dh imta tlpi s:
ehriiad
m
/ /
rk to wealth
dc hl ea sl sctlaatsuss oaur et . t o o l s o f
T h eb i rn tv hd n
se m iondgufloelsl .ocwo smt/hwe pm -’casot ew
nrtireainlt it /nugpsl o a d s /
S t a o r pt ep r f
s r
s
d i a l2e0c2t .0 /T1h0i/sE sAt aPtPe -sM o
i om n K a r l M a r x
t hoadt utlhee- 5c .opndf lf i c t o f
the economic reality will be shown in
literature.
 PPOST-COLONIALISM
PPOO SO S- -T
STT CC-OC
OLO LN
LOO O
NIN
IAAILA
LIILSSTHEORY
MTHEORY
M THEORY
THEORY
DEFINITION
H
M RH E
II
E SS F
A T T
E NOO
RPost
Post -Colonialism
IRE-Colonialism Theory
R
N N
I I
G COF
CC ATheory
A
:E TERMS:
LLS BB : AACCKKG GRRO OUUN ND D ::
• Colonial Hegemony-
Western colonizers
M •P oohskttts-lpcyasot: s/l /io
L ocontrolling nsriutaelsdi soim
t sathe fn pitoshweaellrsa,oteerc e o1ln9ao7tm 0e’disc st ,o t h e s l a v e r y
aan
p nlodd
iw
ocolonized t eislca.tspr,lu
uyrrgedg 1luil9gee8i.s0eod’nosuf.a/ n
oi nw
S odm
d lc/iusg
euletfbn
uijcroeetu
ci. tso_nsppaeelocpi fl iec _aw
r or u n d t h e
P
w worosiritytrti-i_lncn
do
g. / w
gl U
o
s n
rKi t ibnegf_oirne_ lhi taesr a at uh
c ia a ml i es m
and_schools_of_criticism/post_coloni ut ht e o
a fr ty e l
r o to
r ei s/ ltiot er y
k es Wa t Wh
rao
o
I I
r yf _m
w .
t hieloi t a r y
tTihm haipls_ecsrartiriaaetrli triceesi sld
e s e mamtd.eh mudteam tkotloionntghe etahnm eom itlhiaet arl m riyno s t c o n t r o l h a l f o f
ti•temhrhpm
e testwrpoiosaf:r/llc/idos .lmo ntihaal th h e ga epm p oe n n ye .d Fionc u s e s
o n wl iwt ewr .asrlyi dwe o sh r ka sr ew . nrei tt t/ n
en i a fj roonm es1/post-colo
history.
c o lnoinailzi se m d -c1o0u5n7 t8r2i7e6s .
• https://
www.britannica.com/topic/postcoloniali
 P
PP S
SYS
Y C Y
HHOOAANNAA
PSYCHOANALYTIC
PSYCHOANALYTICAL
C
C H O A N A L
LL Y
ITY IITC
T CI A
C LLTHEORY
THEORY
ATHEORY
THEORY
THEORY
DEFINITION
H
M H
R I E
EI S S
F
A T T
EN
• • Psychodynamics-
ORO IREPsychoanalytical
Psychoanalytical Theory
NR N
I IGCOF
C C A A
:Theory
E TERMS:
LLS BB : AACCKKG GRRO OUUN ND D: :
h t t p s : / / w w w .psychic s c i e n cenergy edirect.com/topics/ne
could
Fisrgyu r uodns dbe turned
cdiiFevrnied into
cueed/dpi sst y behaviour.
S
P
emc
uh o a n a l y t i c t h
h
e tocehrheypofsafoyonuccanh u
ldeyetriincot-fo
s e s o
t htehorreye# f: ~o :r m s :
n
•p1.sCondensation i–sstocseveralndouarpsl Fyrthoughts
a p ypticled yx-iotna=ugnPnaasclyo
h ymcsneh h. aioFo sort oeipcuuo%drs ce,2e 0 to
dw ebhfyaerp
oeirgiy
S dm%
r iu
m iv2tne0i dv
ndei vsiedxeu a l ,
b orsudperson
F rye u
% 2 0 t hrepresented
de c.poFenrnsed
n eied
cu %onu2 0 p, psiaoysnshcby
pcsryow dh ean , r e a l isntseiyievaslrei%
eedsattghhgaartteaw et ie2m0of%20the
r apr yu l s e s .
% 2ua0prm o m e n t % 2c 0acu a nedssc oi ou u
u enimage.
t 2. xatSw s a ree roaefng. oeT-xhpsi rsueb s s ioosnn o f t rh seclhayouiitcn hetoser rt’ o
sj e c t s s o c i e t a l
•b • h t t
iDisplacement p s : / / p u
reey– b l i c . w s u . e d u /at rsoeft oot fhletihvees d
~ d e l a h o y eb/yp.s y c h
he dlm di em onir tedesed,s. isB tstanxiety
bian encgdo m sa tnlocated
iann egfdfaaew rc d
u nontooo.on
tch
cranother
rs’icsti .ophustsymcimage l# ies.: h~eby : s , means
a3. u E g o - r e p r e s e n t s awsee innscer eoafs es et lhfe a n d m e d i a t e s
w h
oet iecaxeutst=haPovsray
cThhassociation. ’iscl arh
oe bowalan entdaoillyuetsm i. cm%a 2i0s c irni d t iicr iesc m %20ado
t lt y
b e t w e e n l i t i e s o f t h e %,2 0 t h e %a2n0 d
m o m e n a upt shy c h i c a n d
r e ppr tess % e n2t0e tdh teh% r o2 u0 gmhe st y hm od b so ,l oi sf m
ocro' n s% f l 2i c0 tosw
condensation and displacement.
. n%20neuroses
 RREEEA
R AAD
DDEEER
RRR
RREEESSSPPPO
OON
NNSSSEEET
TTHEORY
H
H EE O
ORRY
Y
M
R EEA
F N
E IN
R E G
N : ES :
C
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND : Reader
Reader Response
Response Theory
Theory
https://
Reader
o w l . p u rresponsed u e . e d u / theory
o w l / s u bfocuses
ing_in_literature/literary_theory_and_schools_of_
j e c t _ s p onecific_writing/writ
R
c r ietreaders
the ai cdi semr / rreinterpretation,
ea sd p
e ro_ rne ss peo n c saen _ c rbi tei c d
response i sam,t. e
hd t m la s f a r
h tat pc sk: / /tc o
b o u1 r s9e3s .8l .u mI et n al elalr nsrole
itnag r. ct oemd/ i wn t ir ot lhi t e r a t u r e
reactions
/ c h a p t e r / to r e aliterature.
d e r - r e s p o nThe s e - c r i t i c of
ism the
/#:~:
L
t eo
reader x tu = iI n
sis%R 2 0or s
importante aedne b r%l to
a2 Dt the
tr e as pn od n sh
meaning e% e2rCof b
%o 2 0ot hke % 2 0 r e a d
er,other%20adults%20or%20fellow%20scholars
“h tLt ptext.
the i st :e/ /rwThe
awt wu .purpose
rseh maoso pE. of x preader
com
l/os truadtyi- o n”. Soon in
guides/literary-sc
th
h o oel s l- a
response
o ft-et h 1 e o9r6y 0/ r’esa dae n r -dr e s1p9o 7 n0 s e’ -st hre eoar yd/ bears i c s # : ~ :
t e x t = O f f iis c i to
a l lexplaining,
y%2C%20Reader%2DResponse%20the
ro reys%p2o0 gnost e, a and
interpreting cbt ueacl laym % 2e0 cpr eoap
defending t eus l%a2 r0 t d
your h aut %e 2 t0 ol i t e r a r y
%20text
c. r i t i c stol the
reaction i k etext. Stanley Fish, Wolfgang
Iser and Norman Holland.
 QU
Q U EEER
QUEER
E R THEORY
TH
T HE
EOOR
RYY
DEFINITION OF TERMS:
HIE
R
H
M EISS
ATT
F EN
• • Queer
OOIR
R RIN
EN IG
CC
CAA
:ELL
S BB
h t t p– sword
Queer Theory
: AACCKKG
GRRO
OUUN
NDD: :
: / / usually to describe sexual
Tandh e etired retm eln“ioqbhruryoaewrecyrag.mitelhnleeidnof ro yi ”sm
. ecead m el tu from Teresa de
Q
F oucgeuugender
s e d sho.identities. erro id mnutu/i qt y i, epelret h e o r y /
abuarcekt igsr’o 1u9n9d1attractions
• LSexuality work in the feminist cultural studies.
sc eoxnut aelxi tt .–y sexual
M i soasdt ldyr eas cs teitowards dv iasntd g r o u p s
•Sother
hhet tspeople.
pasi :d/ / t h a t t h e r e a r e t h r e e m a i n p o i n t s i n h e r
•d w ihs cou lsas iedd . dCorw i t i c s a r e i n tuenr edsw
w:l . p u r d u e .- end tuh/ oe wglr/ o
t Heteronormativity
e rom s u b j e c to
t e dr ki nf o r
_specific_wr
t h
• t1hhe e m a l e , f e m a l e a n d i n - b eiynr ae1s/ l9ibn
t w e e 8tae0ssr.’iassr yf _o trhgeeon d e r
. eirtinstitutions,
eit n
fhuges/ow
i rnrygi tstructures
phi nu
eg tse_hrieond _el b
sof xi tuaeacrlkaittu
A lso faonrcm u s e slhyoon eo slhst o_a ow _si cserh
xiuet iadcl iiistny
ai nd rdeyn_ft o
understanding,
i t yd _aslcand practical bflorientations m /t gheen d e r _ s t u
s hthatadpimakee s _aaheterosexuality
nndd _ iqsu se he ar _pseem tehde onot mr ayonly
n. hyt m f alc t o r s .
129coherent—that
. 9C9h0 a’ sl l e n gis, e organized
t h a t l e as s baisexuality
an and gay study are one
Its goal is to break down the binary
3—butalso
. F o c u sprivilegedes on the multiple ways race shapes sexual
no rm to destroy inequality.
bias.
 N
NEEW
W H
H II S
STTO
ORR II C
C II S
SMM T
THHE
EOOR
RYY
w I.New
cNew n o Historicism
tHistoricism / s Theory
Theory
RH
E FI ESRTEONRCIECS A: L B A C K G R O U N D :
• H
h tItE
M pSA
sT /O
: /N
DEFINITION wR
wI N GCl i A sL
f :fOF Be sA
. cC
TERM: o mK
/ cG
l i fR
f sO
noU
t e sN D
u b j: e c t s / l i t e r a t u r e
T /%
hwe2h0 akt-is-new-historicism#:~:text=New%20Historicism%20is
a%n 2o0wl int e ar aurtyh, tohres% a2 n
0 hdi stt h
oer yi %
r 2w0 oofr%k 2s0 tuhne d
% e2 r0 c tr h
i tii sc . t&h e o r y a r e :
D t eex v t =eTl hoep%e2 d 0 Nien w% teh 2 0eH i1s 9t o8r0i c’ iss tt% hr2r0aorteuu cgoh g n it zhe e s%20that,out%
M 2 0 a
b i
y n
1 .• MContemporary
% 2l y
0 s t f
u o
d c
y i u
i c h e l F o u c a u l t –- belonging
n gs % 2s 0 t t
h hT h e O r d e r o f T h i n g so: u
e %a t
2 0 tl eixt t e r e s h A lndA r c h e o l o g y o f t h e
• wh tom
Hboue
t rp k
i
a
s : s/ / o f M i c h e l F o c a u l t a n d S t e p h e n
nnor trSedcoccurring
ri pe nr ceetse, d1 9w 7 0i ;tj h L a tnh gu e a ag u e ,t C h oourn’ tse ro- w m enm o r y , P r a c t i c e , 1 9 7 7
w lto .pu u e . e d u / o w l / in s u bthe ect_specific_writing/writing_in_li
G r e e
2h.t eiCrsalttio n b
uf rfreoy l a
ia t
t ent .
r ad I n
er ey tr_ h t h
tt zhee -o he 1
rTyih 9 8
_saetn o 0 ’ s a
Idn_rtsyec hr o n
o of d
r lestt_h1 9 9 0 ’ s , t hmue/lnteuwr _e hs i, s 1 9 7 3 ; " D e e p
aotfei_ occrnri tioi tcf ii sC
r present.
/ rl d G p c
Pt tlhoae yioc: irN sym _dco
o t eusm l t ui rna a
o n tl _ht se et d u d ti ehse. h s
B a l i n et sm teul C d oy c o k ff i ge hatr,l"y 1 9 9 2
• i
3m
h n
.t eo
t t m
p s :i / n
/ w d w . w I
. p t o i
e tsr y af on u n i dd a te i ao nd . oe r gv/ lee la o r np/ gel d o s soa u r yt-
Hr m s / n e w - h i s t o r i c i s m # : ~ : t e x t = A % 2 0 c r i t i c a l % 2 0 sa p
da e
y r
d ne n l iW t eh ri a
t t
e u - r e
M . e Wt a o
h r
i sk t s
o riyn , t
1 h9 e
7 4 1; 9" 8
T 0h ’ e Pporloiatcihc s o f H i s t o r i c a l
o f
Icn%at2m c o n t e
e0rdepervteeotl aovpt ie e m p
od w o r
% :2 0tDihn
n a r y
i es, Sc T t
ti epu h
pl h e o r y
di enoner%a2an0nG .ddr DT h i
e eena-br s
Slluaybt h
t tl% e
Si m o
2t C r y
ua%at 2ri 0ot sni ,m" i l1a9r 8 2
4a
a.%ssS2s0itu
% 2 0 t
ep
n o ms% h
u 2eer s
0 M
n
m at
G
o rhura
x enett nalbbiltlae
i s m . & t ee t rtm
x t a
= - roR
N ey nweanw
%
r acoihsriskeassn .cae r Se e l f -2F0aa st the imopnt i n g : F r o m M o r e
2 0 H i s t o r i c i s t s %
to%20situate,understand%20cultural%20and
tio%n2Sf0hli a u
n te
keelnsl ep cceet audra el a%, n210d 9h8i 0a s t orrsy e u l t o f i t s
• 5 .h tPt ip es r: /r/ e B o u r d i e u - O u t l i n e o f a T h e o r y o f P r a c t i c e , 1 9 7 7 ; H o m o
Aew cnawv dwei. mro xoifcnourm s ,bei1n
d b9l t8i o4a g; rnaTd phheih eFsii.scetol od r/ ovyif .e C
m wu / dl ot cuurm a el nPt /roobdo u- 9c7t8i 0o1n9 ,0 1 9 9 3
221911/obo-9780190221911-0015.xml
 FFFO
OOR
RRM
MAA
ALL
LI S
II S
SMM
MTT
THH
HEE
EOO
ORR
RYY
Y
DEFINITION
HHIEISS
R FTT
EO
MEANING :OR
R ERINOF
IC
C ETERM:
CAALL
S BBFormalism Theory
: AACCKKG
GRRO
OUUN
NDD: :
• BAutonomy
a s e d t h e -i the
r a quality
srustsu m p
O •
F oorr mr hi gt t
ia p
n l s
ai :
l
s /
lm/y fs ot a
c eed s fortnoi om tnhsR e osn
u st sr lu
i iacnntguur ei s t i c t h e o r y b y
state ofe being self-
aaScnatd oiuw vstiesls.u ctphru gnriadoqnuudp ee.sS eod cyfam utl/hlboeeow
dltlieO/ssxtPut n
ObionjYtesAictotZ
e n_a, sdpceoocfni cf iecr_nw i nr g t h e
governing
iattoni ni no gg / wy especially
roiotcfiinet g
m a ue
i t s r cyo_ n t me nS t . T h teiys_x itftno h
_arlnitdtheedr aiSsttu
e o r y i s cuordeny/tliiontfu e ri at yr yb_et h twe oe e n l i t e r a r y
at n d r_dsgucutshoaeogk o lf. s lT
_aohnfig_s u cgrarigtoeiuc. p iFs om i sre/m f oarl mi s at sl i se m
m .p h a s i z e d
dao
P entehdettrim ocm h
L
i n aeen oen o w
l dium of text. It was important in Soviet Union w h a t m a k s a
fl•tiohtueenr m d
at p ee
t usdr: /ei/ n“ g1o9 o1 d 6 ”a to rS t“.bPa edt”e. r C s br u i trigc sl e d
h t
iunyntw
b etVirwilpkw r1te9.ob t2rr9aiSntahadnk n
dal o
n niwvcaasal y sk syce.o T
. c o m
n
l /id
ht eee rmo
a r t aFntt o
/
he reder foonr el a c k i n g p o l i t i c a l
u rm aR l ios mm a- lni tJeark o b s o n ,
iw vs ii tteh hwo e . uM Lt aoctsoecnrostw h rL o iun gg h
u itsh t ei c w C o ir rk c lo e f
a r y - c r i t i c i si m dering its outside
fffo
aocurtn m
odrasel.d i s imn t1h9e1o5r. y b e c a m e i n f l u e n t i a l i n t h e W e s t .
 EETTH
HNNIICC O
ORR M
MIIN
NOORRIITTYY TTH
HEEO
ORRYY
H IESFTTEO
DEFINITION
HR
MI S
E A
O
NRR
I
RE
NEthnic
IEthnic
IN
C
G
C
OF
A
C :
LSBB:AAor
AELTERMS: or
C Minority
CKKG
GMinority
RRO
OUUN
NDD :Theory
Theory
• Ethnic – associated with a
DT E•u tparticular
hbh no t iticp s Ts ah/ne/race
: o r tyh
d orhe group
aosr ias trof se lapeople
a ft ti o
ei n rn shh ioim p w ssei toehn
k how the
h i s t h e o r y g i v e s i t s m a f c u
elPxiowith
p
t
sbet u
e r
-r cilaoel unique
a r y
lenotcn
ienioa.crilrk
w
culture
id esssm . udifferent
a. ttaehTcsah t
ei ko /reiynn. tdT
da r e w i ethryxii .tsap
t
tnhhdp
e n
eo rireydyvsebaol /sa ri t s e l f i n
/b
e m teircglethe d/ vimain
infertw h /culture
e2 7 1 92 620/ of ’hst.the mT hmain
is study had a
ceutfromlht n u ircee.g A o - C a r i b b e a ln a n d iA f r ii zc ae n writers like Aime
g e i m praoc u
h• ucountry. t pi ns U wSh oa nadr eB rm i taa ri g n . nDaul b o i sd
Co a etrtshesam titrpe s, : F/ /riaenpt.zu tFm
u b
p o
t er dd i
t n
o a t t
h ee ot ain
o
r
. eodnu, / lCi h
za e d t o
h m
e s
t ei rnauray /A#H
i n
t a a t ne t o f c h7e b e m a d e g r e a t
c•cAoufMinority
nrl titrcuiarbneu-. A tE–i ogroup
mt ehnrn si icicanof people
nostrhum en d ti nh whose e x p l o r i n g t r a d i t i o n a n d
e roe rot ihrty ey wt h h ietoe r y
secuum practices
pl p culture etc. are fewer in
tpuh rreaesstsihezrd e osuotgrhhu e hnride s elcarog t niro
coenupsnthdoi p fe “toh dfon ui cb llei t e r a r y a c t i v i t y
wcc ouhnumber.
ni ls ec i p
l t u roaurl o s nvei sdsi”n g
i d e n t ict oyan ascn i rsit ti inqguoef rdeuparle s e n t a t i o n o f e t h n i c
d individual
iiddeennttiittyy fionu rnadc iwa il t oh pi neprrtieh
i d e n t i t y w h i c h i s “ A m c aen m
ssion
” aa n j. od r c u l t u r e .
“Negro”
THANK YOU
EAPP: AND HAVE
CRITICAL
A NICETHEORIES
WRITING DAY!