0% found this document useful (0 votes)
152 views28 pages

Behaviorism Theory

1. The document discusses classical and operant conditioning theories proposed by Pavlov and Skinner respectively. Classical conditioning involves pairing a neutral stimulus with an unconditioned stimulus to elicit a conditioned response, while operant conditioning uses reinforcement and punishment to modify voluntary behaviors. 2. Examples of how these theories can be applied in education include using practical experiences and examples to produce learning responses in students through classical conditioning, and using rewards, punishments, and intermittent reinforcement to strengthen skills and influence study behaviors with operant conditioning. 3. The implications of these theories for teaching are to initially use continuous reinforcement when teaching new skills, followed by intermittent reinforcement, and to employ positive reinforcement through rewards which is generally more effective than punishment at

Uploaded by

Guru Khb Pbl
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
152 views28 pages

Behaviorism Theory

1. The document discusses classical and operant conditioning theories proposed by Pavlov and Skinner respectively. Classical conditioning involves pairing a neutral stimulus with an unconditioned stimulus to elicit a conditioned response, while operant conditioning uses reinforcement and punishment to modify voluntary behaviors. 2. Examples of how these theories can be applied in education include using practical experiences and examples to produce learning responses in students through classical conditioning, and using rewards, punishments, and intermittent reinforcement to strengthen skills and influence study behaviors with operant conditioning. 3. The implications of these theories for teaching are to initially use continuous reinforcement when teaching new skills, followed by intermittent reinforcement, and to employ positive reinforcement through rewards which is generally more effective than punishment at

Uploaded by

Guru Khb Pbl
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Behaviorism Theory

References

 Mok Soon Sang (2006). Education


Psychology, Selangor; Multimedia-ES
Resources Sdn. Bhd.
 [Link]
ehsys/[Link]
 [Link]

 [Link]
/nru/[Link]
References
 [Link]
erant_Conditioning
 [Link]
_abbott/[Link]
 [Link]
History/2003/[Link]
m
 [Link]
[Link]/[Link]
References

 [Link]
[Link]
 [Link]
on/Classical_conditioning.jsp
 [Link]
classical-conditioning-theory/
Classical conditioning

Pavlovian conditioning –
who worked out its fundamental
principles through his
studies of salivation in dogs, which he
found could be elicited by
neutral stimuli, such as a tone, that
had been repeatedly
presented before the presentation of
food.
classical conditioning
 In classical conditioning you are trying to increase the
probability
of a response (the conditioned response, CR)) to
some neutral stimulus (the conditioned stimulus, CS)
by pairing that stimulus
with a following stimulus (the unconditioned stimulus,
US) that already produces the response (the
unconditioned response, UR):
Initially US - - ->UR, then CS, US - - ->UR, finally CS -
- -> CR
operant conditioning
 you are trying to increase the probability
of a response (the conditioned response, CR) in the
presence of
some stimulus (the discriminative stimulus, DS, which
is like a conditioned stimulus, CS) by following the
desired response with
a reinforcing stimulus (R, which is like an
unconditioned stimulus).
Alternatively, you might be trying to decrease the
probability of a response (CR) in the presence of some
stimulus (DS/CS) by
following the undesired response with a punishing
stimulus (P):
DS/CS - - - -> CR -----> R or P
operant conditioning

 unlike classical conditioning,


there are response consequences,
i.e., there are reinforcement or
punishment contingencies--the
reinforcement or punishment (R or
P) being dependent/contingent upon
the response (CR) occurring.
classical conditioning
 the unconditioned stimulus
(US, which is like a reinforcement or
punishment) follows the
conditioned stimulus (CS) during training
regardless of whether or
not the conditioned response (CR) occurs.
Here the CR, which is
usually reflexive, is brought under the
control of a stimulus event
(CS) that precedes the response, rather
than one that follows it.
Classical Conditioning
Classical Conditioning
Classical (Respondent) Conditoning
Operant Conditioning
Implication of Pavlov’s Conditioning Theory
in Teaching-Learning

 Conditioned responses can be


fostered through the process of
teaching learning activities
Before Conditioning

 Science Teacher (UCS) teaching in


the class for the first time
 Unconditioned response (pupils’
attention) towards the teaching
activities only
During Conditioning

 Teacher (CS) teaching in an


interesting manner
 Pupils pay attention to teacher’s
teaching (CR)
After Conditioning

 Teacher’s presence (CS)


 Pupils pay attention to teacher’s
teaching (CR)
Classical Conditioning

1. The teacher relate practical


experience (conditioned stimulus)
with the learning task (unconditioned
stimulus) so as to produce
satisfactory conditioned learning
response (satisfactory learning
activities)
Classical Conditioning

2. Guide pupils to apply skill to make accurate


generalization by using various related
examples.
3. Guide pupils to use skill to make
discrimination. Example, to different specific
characteristics.
4. Allocate sufficient exercises for pupils to
strengthen the application of conditioned
stimulus and conditioned response.
Classical Conditioning

5. Use secondary reinforcement to


sustain conditioned response. Use
new, similar stimulus as conditioned
stimulus to motivate pupils for learning
activities.
Skinner’s Operant
Conditioning
 Organisms normally operate on the
environment instead of reacting to the
stimulus presented to them.
 Operant conditioning is a form of
learning in which voluntary responses
are influenced by consequences.
Example of Operant
Conditioning
 Responses (Behavior)
Lesson revision
 Stimulus (Reinforcement)

Reward with good grades


 Effect on behavior

Motivation to study increases


Operant Conditioning

 Learning is active as learning


(response) that occurs is based on its
own initiative without waiting for any
related stimulus to appear
Operant Conditioning

 Skinner classified this type of


reinforcement into negative
(punishment) and positive
reinforcement (rewards).
 Reinforcement is a technique or
process which uses the reinforcer to
strengthen and sustain the relevant
response.
Operant Conditioning

 Positive reinforcement occurs when a


response is strengthened because of
a rewarding stimulus that follows.
 Negative reinforcement occurs when
a response is strengthened because
of the removal of an unpleasant
stimulus.
Operant Conditioning

 Continuous reinforcement occurs


every time when an expected
response is explicitly given.
 Intermittent reinforcement occurs
when repeated is reinforced only at
some of the time.
Implication of Skinner’s Operant Conditioning
Theory in Teaching and Learning

1. A newly learned skill/technique


ought to be given continuous
reinforcement, followed by
intermittent reinforcement to
strengthen the skill
2. Use positive reinforcement which give
pleasant result is more effective.
3. Can be used to modify pupil’s
undesirable behavior.
4. Negative reinforcement is suitable to
achieve the desirable behavior

You might also like