NORDSTROM
DISSENSION IN THE RANKS?
GROUP 7
Ayush Maiti – PGP 35 206
Nidhi Soni – PGP 35 222
Ritija Monali – PGP 35 336
Ruchi Choudhary – PGP 35 402
Vazrala Lohitha – PGP 35 097
Vamsi Krishna – PGP 35 095
PROBLEMS WITH COMPENSATION
STRUCTURE
Sales per hour = Weekly sales / Hours reported
SPH to measure
performance This system encourages employees to under report
hours worked to increase commissions.
With inadequate weightage to ‘non-selling activities’,
SPH as the only
improvements etc., this system fails to capture the
KPI
overall employee performance.
PROBLEMS WITH THE CULTURE
Failure to Employees are expected to work beyond the
professionalize prescribed working hours without pay in order, but
the relationship these weren’t explicitly laid out.
between The ones who did, received favour from the top
management management and further improved their promotion
and employees chances.
- Pressure to become an ‘All star’ could result in
sharking
Increased peer
pressure and - Awards for the most multi-item sales
unhealthy - Management’s elaborate goal setting process
competition
- Automation helped in comparing performance to
own targets + peer performance
SO WHAT CAUSED THE 1989 FIASCO?
NATIONAL EXPANSION PLAN STRATEGY MISMATCH
Increase in employee base from 5,000 in 1980 to Company’s philosophy of to offer the customer the
30,000 in 1989 best in service, selection, quality, and value was
The decentralized structure of Nordstrom had not in tandem with the company’s incentive plan
which focused only on sales generated every hour.
compromised top management’s ability to control
local managers’ implementation of sales force This results to less willing employees to perform
management systems. “heroics”.
Customer service value versus employee
satisfaction
WHY SERVICE ORIENTED CULTURE IS IMPORTANT?
• Satisfied employees make for Satisfied customers
• Customer’s perception of service quality are affected by the
customer-oriented behaviour of employees
HUMAN RESOURCE STRATEGIES FOR DELIVERING
SERVICE QUALITY THROUGH PEOPLE
KEY CONSIDERATIONS
Align HR Strategies to balance between competitive
strategy and employee satisfaction
Balance between employee satisfaction and performance
Bring change at both levels – salesforce and managers
Prevent against gamifying the incentive structure
RECOMMENDATIONS
Collaborative Sit with disgruntled employees and understand their
-
concerns and assuage them
approach for De- - Focus on maximizing employee motivation and
escalation satisfaction levels
Customer - Incentive system should be not just based on sales and
oriented hours put in, but on overall customer delight
Incentive system - Employees can be separately rewarded for both
- Team skill rewards beside individual rewards-
Group Incentive Eliminates unhealthy competition amongst employees
Reward - Group recognition in form of appraisal mails can act a
strong motivation factor
Reform across - Managers also need to be trained for new incentive
organization structure and culture
RECOMMENDATIONS
- Promote collaboration, cooperation, interpersonal
Culture understanding
- Balance between centralization and decentralization
- Instead of SPH, standardized shift rotation system can
be followed
Work hours - Working off the clock should not be promoted as
company’s culture
Performance - Track sales and non sales activities well
Tracking - Due credit should be given to the right person
THANK YOU