0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views59 pages

Crimes Against the Person Explained

This document discusses crimes against the person, including assault, battery, aggravated assault, robbery, rape, and sodomy. It defines these crimes and outlines their common law elements. Assault involves threatening or attempting to cause physical harm, while battery refers to unauthorized physical contact. Aggravated assault is a more serious form involving intent to cause severe injury. Robbery involves taking property through force or intimidation. Rape and sodomy statutes have expanded over time to include nonconsensual acts beyond vaginal penetration and additional victims and perpetrators.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views59 pages

Crimes Against the Person Explained

This document discusses crimes against the person, including assault, battery, aggravated assault, robbery, rape, and sodomy. It defines these crimes and outlines their common law elements. Assault involves threatening or attempting to cause physical harm, while battery refers to unauthorized physical contact. Aggravated assault is a more serious form involving intent to cause severe injury. Robbery involves taking property through force or intimidation. Rape and sodomy statutes have expanded over time to include nonconsensual acts beyond vaginal penetration and additional victims and perpetrators.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ASSAULT, ROBBERY,

RAPE, AND OTHER Chapter 6


CRIMES AGAINST THE
PERSON
ASSAULT

 Terms assault and battery used interchangeably


 Are technically different crimes; each can occur without the other
 Assault
 Unlawful attempt or threat to inflict immediate harm or death
 Battery
 Unauthorized harmful or offensive touching of another
 Under common law, both were misdemeanors
 May be categorized as misdemeanors or felonies in most
modern statutes
 Can also be further divided by degrees or types
 Some jurisdictions merge both into one crime; assault
SIMPLE ASSAULT

 Some jurisdictions require that for an assault there must be


threat of immediate or imminent harm
 Most statutes require present ability to succeed in carrying
out threat
 Simple assaults and batteries include acts that do not involve
aggravation
 Law recognizes some unauthorized touchings are offensive
even if not dangerous
 Can constitute a crime as well as a tort
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT

 A more serious assault


 Unlawful attack on another for purpose of inflicting severe or
aggravated bodily injury
 Most frequently committed of the four serious violent crimes
reported by the FBI’s UCR
 Accounted for approximately 63.6% of those crimes in 2014
 Preliminary data for January-June 2015 show they increased by 2.3%
compared to that period in 2014
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT

 May involve acts performed with intention of committing


another crime or acts accompanied by particularly outrageous
or atrocious circumstances
 In some cases, charges can be brought in conjunction with
attempt crimes
 Some jurisdictions list crimes that might refer to an assault
with intent to…and name specific crimes
RECKLESS ASSAULT

 Defined by Model Penal Code as:


 When person recklessly engages in conduct which places or may
place another person in danger of death or serious bodily injury
 Some jurisdictions who divide assault into degrees include
this as lowest of those degrees
MAYHEM

 Permanent injury inflicted on a victim with intent to injure


and which may disable or disfigure that person
 May also be stated as separate crime or included within
assault statutes
 Under common law referred to rendering a person less able to
fight
 Could occur by disfigurement or disablement
 Later extended to include disfigurement that did not disable the
victim
MAYHEM

 Today some jurisdictions separate without reference to ability


to fight but with reference to disfigurement
 Some statutes require prosecution to prove intent to injure or
intent to disable or disfigure
 Some list body parts that are included
 Some include crime within another category
 Under early common law was felony
 Punishable by causing perpetrator to lose same body part lost by
victim
 Modern punishment not as severe
ROBBERY

 Categorized by FBI as one of four serious violent crimes


 Involves taking or attempting to take anything of value from
care, custody, or control of a person or persons by force or
threat of force or violence or by putting victim in fear
 Trend today is to consider it both a violent and property crime
 Estimated robberies accounted for 28% of serious violent
crimes reported to police in 2014
ROBBERY: ELEMENTS

1. A trespassory taking
2. A carrying away
3. Of the personal property
4. Of another
5. With the intent to steal

 First element
 Required property be taken from person or presence of victim by
force or intimidation
 Possessor of property must be close enough he or she could exercise
control over property and prevent robbery except for presence of
force or intimidation
 Requirement not retained in all jurisdictions
ROBBERY: ELEMENTS

 Second element
 Known as asportation
 Moving things or people from one place to another
 Third element
 Requires items taken must constitute personal property
 Things that can be moved
 Different from real property
 Fourth element
 Personal property carried away belongs to another person
ROBBERY: ELEMENTS

 Fifth element
 Perpetrator had required intent to steal the property
 Some statutes do not enumerate all five elements
 May be covered by jurisdiction’s theft statutes
 Requirement of force or intimidation causes difficulty in
distinguishing robbery from theft
 Use of intimidation to commit theft may constitute robbery
 Actual violence not required; threat will suffice
ROBBERY: ELEMENTS

 Most robbery statutes do not distinguish acts by value of what


is taken
 They may grade crime in terms of aggravating factors
 Simple robbery may be distinguished from aggravated robbery
HOME INVASION ROBBERY

 Special statutes enacted to cover crime of robbery that occurs


within a home
 Statutes generally refer to entering dwelling with intent to
commit robbery and then committing that robbery
 Crime distinguished from burglary
 Crime is usually a first-degree felony
 See Focus 6.1
RAPE AND SODOMY: DEFINITIONAL
ISSUES
 Could be included within crime of assault, but both serious
enough to be defined as separate crimes
 Under common law, rape defined as unlawful carnal
knowledge of female without her consent
 Unlawful meant act not authorized by law
 Carnal knowledge synonymous with sexual intercourse
 Limited to acts involving penis and vagina
 Crime required penetration
 Act must have occurred without consent of victim
 Proving it was a factual problem
RAPE AND SODOMY: DEFINITIONAL
ISSUES
 Most jurisdictions have passed rape shield statutes
 Prohibit prosecution from presenting evidence of alleged victim’s
prior sexual experiences
 Some exceptions exist
 Frequently media will not report names of alleged sex crime
victims
RAPE AND SODOMY: DEFINITIONAL
ISSUES
 For 80 years, FBI used term forcible rape
 Definition followed common law
 More strict than many state statutes
 Includes males as potential victims and females as potential
perpetrators
 Modern statutes also define penetration more broadly
 Include oral and anal as well as vaginal cavities and penetration by
use of foreign object as well as by penis
 Definition changed in 2012 and name changed to rape
 FBI distinguishes collected data under legacy definition and revised
definition
RAPE AND SODOMY: DEFINITIONAL
ISSUES
 Some jurisdictions do not use term rape in statutes
 Refer to such crimes as sexual assault or criminal sexual assault
 Rapes (legacy definition) constituted approximately 7.2% of
the four serious violent crimes reported in 2014
 2016 preliminary data for first six months of 2015, compared
to same period for 2014
 Data for revised rape definition increased by 1.2%
 Data for legacy definition increased by 9.6%
RAPE AND SODOMY: DEFINITIONAL
ISSUES
 Sodomy
 Not a crime under common law in England, but later defined by
statute
 Was American common law crime, later defined by statute
 Generally included both ancient and religious crimes of bestiality and
buggery
 Later defined to include oral sex
 Acts involved in these offenses considered to be unnatural and “against
nature”
RAPE AND SODOMY: DEFINITIONAL
ISSUES

• A few current statutes retain definition of


sodomy in terms of “that abominable crime
against nature”
 Some include oral stimulation of penis either within statute or
interpretation
 Some include oral stimulation of a woman
 Doubtful these statutes will be upheld since cases of:
 Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
 U.S. Supreme Court struck down Texas anti-sodomy statute
 Obergefell et al. v. Hodges et al. (2015)
 U.S. Supreme Court upheld right of same-sex marriages
RAPE AND SODOMY: DEFINITIONAL
ISSUES
 Some statutes have introduced term such as deviant sexual
behavior
 Within criminal law only when persons use force, fraud, or duress or
engage in acts with persons unable to give consent
 Eliminates acts between consenting adults in private
 Some jurisdictions have also established degrees of criminal
sexual conduct
RAPE AND SODOMY: ELEMENTS

1. Female gender (extended to males in increasing number of


jurisdictions, including federal)
2. Penetration
3. Lack of consent

 Common law limited rape to male perpetrators and female


victims
 Retained in some jurisdictions
 Some have adopted gender-neutral language for both victims and
perpetrators
RAPE AND SODOMY: ELEMENTS

 Requirement of penetration
 Under common law usually interpreted to mean any penetration of
vagina by penis
 Approach followed by most U.S. jurisdictions
 More recent statutes include penetration of any body opening by
foreign object for purpose of sexual gratification or humiliation
 Been one of most difficult and frequently litigated elements of rape
and sodomy
 State v. Moppin (Kan. 1989) and Norton v. State (Kan.Ct.App. 1991)
RAPE AND SODOMY: ELEMENTS

 Lack of consent
 Conviction requires victim did not consent
 Another element difficult to prove
 Most cases there are no witnesses
 Consent not legal if obtained by duress, threats of harm if one
refuses, fraud, or f given by one who cannot consent legally
 Evidence of struggle was common requirement in past
 Not necessary in many jurisdictions today
 Modern trend is victim testimony is sufficient on consent issue
 As with any witness, testimony can be rejected by jury
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

 Not considered crime under common law and early U.S. law
 Assumed husbands had legal control of wives
 Could beat or even rape them
 Parents had legal control of children
 Could discipline them as they chose
 Even after U.S. jurisdictions forbade such acts by statute,
little, if any attention was paid to violations
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

 In 1983, Task Force on Family Violence formed


 In 1994, Congress passed Violence Against Women Act
 Part of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act
 Under this statute, domestic violence constitutes civil rights
violations
 Victims could be granted civil damages and attorney fees
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

 Is not part of FBI crime data


 Thought crimes that constitute that violence are included
 Problem is lack of acceptable definition and separate category of
crimes
 Reluctance or refusal of victims to report crimes exacerbates
problem
 Greater attention paid to these crimes in recent years
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

 In latest report on victimization, BJS reported no significant


statistical difference in rates of violence committed by
strangers (Durose et al., 2015)
 BJS also reported rate of domestic violence remained stable
from 2013 to 2014 (Truman & Langton, 2015)
 Today, concept used to refer to variety of types of harm on
members of the family
 Some jurisdictions have special statutes
 Others attach term to various crimes that occur within domestic
setting
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE:
INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE (IPV)
 Generally refers to violence toward current or former spouse,
girlfriend, or boyfriend
 Data difficult to obtain
 Most recent official data published by BJS in 2013
 Shows decline in rate of serious IPV against females and decline of 64%
against male victims
 Between 2002 and 2011, estimated two-thirds of serious attacks on men
and women involved physical attack; rest involved attempts or verbal
threats
 Among women, estimated 8% involved sexual attacks
 The most violent attacks occurring in families and other
intimate personal situations often result in deaths of victims
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: MARITAL RAPE

 Under common law man could not be charged with raping


his spouse
 Law assumed implicit in marriage contract was willingness on part
of wife to participate in sexual intercourse at husband’s desire
 Today, many jurisdictions have statutes that define marital
rape as a crime
 Others include spousal victims under rape statutes
 Warren v. State (Ga. 1985)
 In some jurisdiction both husband and wife may be
considered as spousal victims
 Statutes may place restrictions on prosecutions and penalties
 See Focus 6.2
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: DATE RAPE

 Forced sexual acts that occur during a consensual social


occasion
 Victim may have agreed to some sexual intimacy, but not
activities defined in statute
 Prosecutions can be difficult
 Issue is whether complainant consented to sexual intercourse
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: DATE RAPE

 No legal concept of date rape versus rape


 If elements are present, crime is rape
 Studies show alcohol and other drugs play major role
 Concern led drug Rohypnol, the “date rape drug” as a Schedule I drug
 Also known as “roofies”
CHILD ABUSE

 Physical (including sexual abuse) or psychological abuse of


a child
 May also include involving children in pornography or
showing them pornography
 In recent years, trend has been toward processing some
forms through special statutes
 Some have aimed at preventing continued abuse of children
CHILD ABUSE

 Latest available data reported 679,000 abuse and neglect


cases in 2013
 Down 3.8% since 2009
 27.3% of the children were under three years old
 19.7% between ages three and five
 In some cases, children are alleged to have consented
 They cannot consent
STATUTORY RAPE

 Sexual intercourse (and in some jurisdictions, other sexual


acts) with an underage person even though they consented
 Was not a crime under early common law
 In 1275, English common law criminalized it, setting age at
12
 Lowered age to ten in 1576
 In 1700s and 1800s, statutory rape laws in United States set
age of consent at 10 or 12
 Between 1885 and 1900 ages raised to 16 or even higher in most
states
STATUTORY RAPE

 Philosophy behind statutes is that minors may be taken


advantage of sexually and are not old enough to know how to
avoid sexual predators
 Ages under which minors can give legal consent varies among
jurisdictions
 Historically only could be committed with an underage girl
 Today gender neutral statutes are norm
 Is a strict liability crime in most jurisdictions
 Some consider a reasonable mistake of fact concerning minor’s age
to constitute a defense
STATUTORY RAPE

 Those that do not have statutes as such but may have others
to cover the behavior
 May have degrees of the crime
 Some statutes have been successfully challenged when they
involve young people as perpetrators
 In re D.B. (Ohio 2011)
 In a few states, a victim has been ordered to pay child
support for a child resulting from the illicit sex
INCEST

 Sexual relations between children and family members or


relatives who are legally too close to marry
 May be classified as separate crime
 May also be prosecuted as, or along with, other sex crimes
 Victims are not all children
 Most are under legal age of consent
 New Mexico and Minnesota statutes
 Two ways of dealing with crime
ELDER ABUSE

 Problem has gained attention in recent years


 Takes many forms, ranging from emotional abuse by family
and caretakers to sexual and other forms of physical abuse
and including financial scams
 Some statutes have specific statutes regarding this abuse
 Another approach is to define elder abuse along with abuse of
other so-called protected categories of persons
ELDER ABUSE

 Elderly are also victims of sexual abuse


 This type often hidden
 Virginia research study
 Most common type involved women as victims of sexualized kissing
and fondling followed by abuse of unwelcome sexual interest in older
person’s body
 Some family and other caretakers target elderly for financial
gain
 Also fall victim to property scams on their own
 In 2010, Congress passed the Elder Justice Act
 See Focus 6.3
CAMPUS ISSUES: ACTIVE SHOOTINGS

 Worst shooting spree occurred on April 16, 2007


 Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
 Mass shootings not limited to colleges and universities
 Columbine High School, Littleton, CO
 Sandy Hook Elementary, Newtown, CT
 Mass shootings do not minimize individual killings
 Yale University
 Florida State University
CAMPUS ISSUES: ACTIVE SHOOTINGS

 Numerous other campus shootings, along with knifings and


fistfights have marred peace and tranquility normally
expected of a campus
 Threat of violence leads to unease among all
 Act of violence and threats of violence are serious
CAMPUS ISSUES: SEXUAL ASSAULTS

 Penn State scandal and numerous other rape and sexual


assault allegations on campuses have led to close scrutiny of
those cultures and policies governing administrative reaction
to allegations
 Some cases have brought up issues with polices
 There is evidence such attacks do occur and are not reported
or are reported and not properly processed
CAMPUS ISSUES: SEXUAL ASSAULTS

 California
 Became first state to enact statute requiring colleges and
universities to develop affirmative consent to sex policies or risk
losing state funds
 See Focus 6.4
 Connecticut
 Enacted statute requiring colleges and universities provide certain
services and protections to alleged sexual assault victims
CAMPUS ISSUES: SEXUAL ASSAULTS

 White House
 Announced public awareness campaign “It’s on Us”
 New York
 Governor signed extension to earlier law requiring colleges and
universities to have a uniform consent to sex policy
 Concern with issue has led some schools to ban sexual
relationships between faculty and students
 Brought objections from law faculty and others
CAMPUS ISSUES: RACIAL CONCERNS

 Another important issue on college and university campuses


 At time, racial tension can lead to violence
 Can also result in protests
 University of Missouri, Columbia MO
 Can be an individual or group affected by issue
CAMPUS ISSUES: ALCOHOL AND OTHER
DRUGS
 Colleges and universities have placed bans or limits on
presence and use of alcohol and other drugs
 Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
 President announced hard liquor ban on campus
 Not expected for all to follow suit, though some others have
banned hard liquor in some areas of their campuses
CAMPUS ISSUES: GUNS

 Texas
 Passed bill permitting students and faculty to carry concealed
handguns on campus
 So-called campus carry bills are controversial
 Subject of state and national debate
 Institutions permitted to establish rules and regulations concerning
such carry
 May not be able to ban them in dorms and classrooms
FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND KIDNAPPING

 Two are similar in that both require restricting victims’


freedom
 Differ in elements required to establish crimes, seriousness of
offenses, and punishments
 Some jurisdictions do not define two as separate crimes
 Some do not define kidnapping as separate if committed incidental
to another crime
FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Unlawful and knowing restraint of person against his or


her wishes so as to deny freedom
Did not require asportation under common law
Sometimes called false arrest
Only referred to unlawful confinement
KIDNAPPING

 Restricting freedom of victim against his or her will


 Required asportation of victim from his or her own country to
another under common law
 Asportation
 Removal from one place to another
 Remains required element of kidnapping in most jurisdictions
 Some statutes require victims be isolated in secret place
 Others only require proof of intent to isolate victim
 Some statutes define more than one degree of the crime
PARENTAL KIDNAPPING

 Some jurisdictions define separate crime of child stealing or


parental kidnapping
 Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act of 1980
 Permits federal authorities to issue warrants for parents who flee
jurisdiction to avoid prosecution for parental kidnapping
 Obligates states, under specified circumstances, to recognize child
custody determinations of other states
 Problem with cases may be:
 Locating parent who took child illegally
 Prosecuting cases-lower courts disagree on issue
 Ohio
 Interference with custody statute
HATE CRIMES

 Traditional crimes motivated by person’s actions toward


another based on certain characteristics, combination of
characteristics, or other traits
 Jurisdictions vary with regard to which are included in statutes
 Hate Crime Statistics Act of 1990
 Congress called for collection of data on crimes involving bias
against persons
 Amended in 1994 to include physical and mental disabilities and
2009 to add gender and gender identity and include data on crimes
against juveniles
 All categories collected by FBI for its UCR
HATE CRIMES

 Some jurisdictions do not have separate statutes


 Prosecute under other statutes
 Others follow federal statute
 Some include gender
 Statutes have been challenged in courts
 Some have been voided as violating First Amendment right to free
speech
 See Focus 6.5
STALKING

Course of conduct directed at specific person


 Involves repeated visual or physical proximity, nonconsensual
communication, or verbal, written or implied threats, or
combination thereof, that would cause reasonable person fear
May now be covered under statutes
Estimated 3.3 million persons age 18 or older subjected
to one or more stalking acts during 12-month period
STALKING

 Statutes have been challenged in courts with some success


 Florida
 State Supreme Court affirmed appellate court upholding statute
 Bouters v. State (Fla. 1995)
 Ohio
 Appeals court ruled statute is not vague or too broad
 State v. Dario (Ohio App. 1995)
 Kansas
 Kansas Supreme Court held statute void for vagueness
 State v. Bryan (Kan. 1996)
CYBERSTALKING

 Stalking by use of a computer


 Statutes are new and do not yet exist in some jurisdictions
 California
 Statute became effective on January 1, 1999
 Constitutes amendment to state stalking statute
 Data on crime difficult to compile
 Prosecutions even more complicated
CYBERSTALKING

 Reasons for problems


 Some victims do not report
 Agencies do not have resources to investigate and prosecute
 Prosecution generally requires “credible threat”
 Difficult to prove on Internet
 Investigations and prosecutions difficult because of jurisdictional
issues
 Examples of cases
BULLYING

Not a new act


 Enhanced in recent years by Internet
Specific legislation is recent
Has been connected to suicides and other personal
tragedies
Massachusetts statute
See Focus 6.6

You might also like