0% found this document useful (0 votes)
989 views18 pages

Decision Modelling Case Study - Production Strategy

- Better Fitness Inc manufactures two new exercise machines, BodyPlus 100 and BodyPlus 200, and wants to make a production strategy to maximize profits - It has production hours and costs for each machine. BodyPlus 100 costs $1309 per unit while BodyPlus 200 costs $1989 per unit - The optimal solution with no constraints is 48 units of BodyPlus 100 and 18 units of BodyPlus 200, earning $26,106 in profits - With the constraint that BodyPlus 200 units must be at least 25% of total production, the optimal solution is 60 units of BodyPlus 100 and 10 units of BodyPlus 200, earning $26,870 in profits

Uploaded by

Anas Akbarali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
989 views18 pages

Decision Modelling Case Study - Production Strategy

- Better Fitness Inc manufactures two new exercise machines, BodyPlus 100 and BodyPlus 200, and wants to make a production strategy to maximize profits - It has production hours and costs for each machine. BodyPlus 100 costs $1309 per unit while BodyPlus 200 costs $1989 per unit - The optimal solution with no constraints is 48 units of BodyPlus 100 and 18 units of BodyPlus 200, earning $26,106 in profits - With the constraint that BodyPlus 200 units must be at least 25% of total production, the optimal solution is 60 units of BodyPlus 100 and 10 units of BodyPlus 200, earning $26,870 in profits

Uploaded by

Anas Akbarali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

Decision Modelling Case Study -

Production Strategy

Group 11
Anas A (PGP18098)
Anas Ali Jafri (PGP18099)
Arka Roy (PGP18102)
Aswin N (PGP18107)
Ch Tarun Kumar (PGP18112)
Deeppan KS (PGP18115)
Better Fitness, Inc. (BFI)

• Manufactures exercise equipments at its plant in Freeport, Long


Island
• BFI patented technology for two machines recently named
BodyPlus 100 and BodyPlus 200
• Demonstration of machines resulted in significant dealer interest
on both the machines
• Number of orders received at the trade show exceeded their
manufacturing capability
• Management decided to produce both the machines immediately
and wanted to make a production strategy so that they can
maximize their profits
Production hours of two machines

BodyPlus100 BodyPlus200
Stations Hours Stations Hours
Machining and
Machining and Welding 4 5
Welding
Frame Unit Station
Frame Unit Station
Painting and finishing 4
Painting and finishing 2
Machining and
3
Welding
Machining and Welding 2 Press Station
Painting and finishing 2
Press Station
Painting and finishing 1 Machining and
2
Welding
Pec-Dec Station
Painting and finishing 2
Machining and Welding 2
Pec-Dec Station Machining and
2
Welding
Painting and finishing 2 Leg Press Station
Painting and finishing 2
Assembling Testing and
2 Assembling Testing and
Packaging 2
Packaging
Labour cost and Available machine hours

Cost per
Labour Cost Activity Hours
hour in $

Machining and Welding 20 Machining and Welding 600

Painting and finishing 15 Painting and finishing 450

Assembling Testing and


12 Assembling Testing and Packaging 140
Packaging
Production costs of two machines
BodyPlus100 BodyPlus200
Hours Cost per unit Hours Cost per unit

Material : Material :
Frame 650
Frame Cost 450
Press station 400
Press station Cost 300
Pec-dec station 250
Pec-dec station Cost 250
Leg Press station 200
Packaging costs 50
Packaging costs 75
Labour :
Labour :
Machining and Welding 8 160
Machining and Welding 12 240
Painting and finishing 5 75 Painting and finishing 10 150
Assembling Testing and Assembling Testing and
2 24 2 24
Packaging Packaging
Total Cost $ 1309 Total Cost $ 1989
Profit of both the machines

BFI sells it to dealers the machines of 70% to the retail price

Retail price per Dealer price per Total cost per Profit per unit in
Machines
unit in $ unit in $ unit in $ $

BodyPlus100 2400 1680 1309 371

BodyPlus200 3500 2450 1989 461


Qn 1: What is the recommended number of
BodyPlus 100 and BodyPlus 200 machines to produce?
Linear programming model for Qn 1

Let,
BodyPlus 100 units to be produced -> X1
BodyPlus 200 units to be produced -> X2

Objective function
Maximize profits, Z = 371*X1 + 461*X2
subject to,
8*X1 + 12*X2 <= 600 (Machining and Welding Hours)
5*X1 + 10*X2 <= 450 (Painting and finishing Hours)
2*X1 + 2*X2 <= 140 (Assembling, Testing and Packaging Hours)
X2 >= 0.25*(X1 + X2) (BodyPlus 200 units should be at least 25%
of total production)
X1, X2 >= 0
Graphical representation For Qn 1
X2

X1
Solution for Qn 1
• From the graph, we get three extreme points in the feasible region
i.e. A(50,16.67),B(0,45) and C(30,30)
• Profit from the other two points as follows,
Point A Point B Point C
Here the feasible optimal point is Here the feasible optimal point is Here the feasible optimal point
B(50,16.67) C(0,45) is C(30,30)
So X1= 50 ; X2 = 16.67 So X1= 0 ; X2 = 45 So X1= 30 ; X2 = 30
Therefore, (371 * X1) + (461 * X2) Therefore, (371 * X1) + (461 * X2) Therefore, (371 * X1) + (461 *X2)
= (371 * 50) + (461 * 16.67) = (371 * 0) + (461 * 45) = (371 * 30) + (461 * 30)
= (18550 + 7684.87) = (0 + 20745) = (11130 + 13830)
= 26234.87 = 20745 = 24960

• Thus the optimal solution for production is


 BodyPlus 100 - 50 units
 BodyPlus 200 - 16.67 units
Converting it into integer
• Using Solver in Excel

Point A
Here the feasible optimal point is B(48,18)
So X1= 48 ; X2 = 18
Therefore, (371 * X1) + (461 * X2)
= (371 * 48) + (461 * 18)
= (17808 + 8298)
= 26106

• Thus the optimal solution with integer constraint is,


 BodyPlus 100 - 48 units
 BodyPlus 200 - 18 units
Qn 2: How does the requirement that number of units
of the BodyPlus 200 produced be atleast 25% of the total
production affect profits?
Linear programming model for Qn 2

Let,
BodyPlus 100 units to be produced -> X1
BodyPlus 200 units to be produced -> X2

Objective function
Maximize profits, Z = 371*X1 + 461*X2
subject to,
8*X1 + 12*X2 <= 600 (Machining and Welding Hours)
5*X1 + 10*X2 <= 450 (Painting and finishing Hours)
2*X1 + 2*X2 <= 140 (Assembling, Testing and Packaging Hours)

X1, X2 >= 0
Graphical representation for Qn 2
X2

X1
Solution for Qn 2
• From the graph, we get four extreme points in the feasible region
i.e. A(60,10), B(0,45), C(30,30) and D(70,0)
• Point B and C are calculated earlier.
• Profit from the points A & D as follows,
Point D Point A
Here the feasible optimal point is B(70,0) Here the feasible optimal point is C(60,10)
So X1= 70 ; X2 = 0 So X1= 60 ; X2 = 10
Therefore, (371 * X1) + (461 * X2) Therefore, (371 * X1) + (461 * X2)
= (371 * 70) + (461 * 0) = (371 * 60) + (461 * 10)
= (25970 + 0) = (22260 + 4610)
= 25970 = 26870

• Thus the optimal solution for production is


 BodyPlus 100 - 60 units
 BodyPlus 200 - 10 units
• Without the constriant of producing BodyPlus 200 atleast 25% of total, the profit
is increased than the earlier one (i.e $764)
Qn 3. Where should efforts be expended in
order to increase profits
• Without the constraint of BodyPlus 200 producing atleast 25% of the total
production, then the optimal solution and feasible region changes
• New optimal solution with higher profits gives more production number of
BodyPlus 100 and reduces BodyPlus 200
• As stated by the company's President, BodyPlus 200 gives good position in
the market for BFI
• Also BodyPlus 200 has the higher profit margin per unit
• So we recommend BFI to focus more on the process improvement of
BodyPlus 200 in terms of reducing production time or utilising the slack time
available
• Reducing production time increases the number of production which in turn
increases the profit
Slack in production hours
Machining and Welding Hours
8*X1 + 12*X2 <= 600
600 - (8*48 + 12*18) => 600 - (384 + 216) = 0 Slack hours

Painting and finishing Hours


5*X1 + 10*X2 <= 450
450 - (5*48 + 10*18) => 450 - (240 + 180) = 30 Slack hours

Assembling, Testing and Packaging Hours


2*X1 + 2*X2 <= 140
140 - (2*48 + 2*18) => 140 - (96 + 36) = 8 Slack hours

Company can utilise slack hours from Painting and finishing & Assembling, testing and packaging
in Machining and welding hours to increase BodyPlus 200 productions.
Thank You

You might also like