0% found this document useful (0 votes)
260 views21 pages

Defining The Competitive Set: Key Question For This Chapter: Who Do We or Will We Compete Against?

Uploaded by

gfcgt
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
260 views21 pages

Defining The Competitive Set: Key Question For This Chapter: Who Do We or Will We Compete Against?

Uploaded by

gfcgt
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

CHAPTER

Defining the Competitive Set


2
Key Question for This Chapter:
Who do we or will we compete against?

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Major Topics for Ch. 2

I. Bases of Competition

II. Levels of Competition*

III. Methods for Determining Competitors**

IV. Right Level of Competition for You

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Bases of Competition

I. Product-oriented Approach
Similar Physical Attributes
Functional Similarity

II. Customer-oriented Approach


Who they are – competition for same budget
When they use the product
Why they use the product - benefits sought

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Bases of Competition (con’t).
III. Marketing oriented: promotion &
distribution
- Media
- Distribution
IV. Resource-oriented Approach (Internal)
- Raw materials
- Employees
- Financial resources
IV. Geographic: Becoming less relevant
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Levels of Competition

Beer

Ice
cream Tea Regular
colas Diet
lemon
limes
Diet-Rite
Wine cola
Diet Product form
Pepsi competition:
Diet Diet colas
Fast food Coke Juices

Fruit
Product
flavore
Lemon category Video
Bottled d colas
limes competition: rentals
water
Soft drinks

Generic
Coffee competition:
Baseball
cards Beverages
Budget
competition:
Food and
entertainment
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Example 1: Energy Bar Competition
Other Snacks

Healthy Snacks

Snack/Health
Bars
Energy
Bars
Odwalla
Power Bar
Balance Bar
Clif
Nutrigrain Bars
Slimfast Bars
Granola Bars
Fruits
Nuts
Juice
Crackers
Chips
Candy
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Example 2: Super-Premium Ice Cream
Level of Definition Competitors
Competition
Product form Super-Premium Haagen-Dazs
Starbuck/Godiva
Ben & Jerry’s
Product category Ice cream Breyer’s
Dreyer’s
Private labels
Generic Snacks Frito Lay
Desserts Nabisco
Nestlé
Novelties Mrs. Fields
Yoplait
Budget Other supermarket, Many
Convenience store products

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Example 3: PDA
Level of Definition Competitors Need Satisfied
Competition
Product form Full-featured PDAs Palm Pilot VII Personal information
Handspring management plus
Compaq Aero integrated
Pocket PC makers communications
Product category PIM (Personal Palm III PIM only
Information Managers) Royal
Casio PV-100
Generic Tablet PC/ Toshiba Other solutions to the
Nokia above
Cell phones
Samsung
Budget Paper-based solutions Rolodex
$100-$1,000 Business items costing Day Timer
$100-$1000 Fax Machines
Personal copiers
Furniture (e.g.
Steelcase)

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Levels of Competition:
Implications for Product Strategy
Competitive Level Product Management Task
Product Convince Customers that the
Form Brand is Better than Others

Product Convince Customers that the


Product Form is Best in the
Category Category

Convince Customers that the


Generic Product Category is the Best
Way to Satisfy Needs

Convince Customers that the


Budget
Generic Benefits are the Most
Appropriate Way to Spend
their Money

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Methods for Determining Competitors*

 Existing categories: ex) IRI; SIC  NAICS


[Link]/epcd/www/[Link]
 Managerial judgment
 Customer-purchase-based measures

 Customer-judgment-based measures

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Managerial Judgment of Competition
Product/Services
Markets Same Different

Same A B

Different
C D

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Customer-purchase-based measures
 Brand Switching Data  The Extent of
Substitutability among Brands
 Cross-Elasticity of Demand:
 Change in Brand B’s Sales/
Change in Brand A’s Price

 Mainly Used for Nondurable Products

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Brand-Switching Matrix

Time t+1
A B C D E

A .6 .2 .2 0 0

Time t B .2 .3 .4 .1 0

C .2 .3 .5 0 0

D 0 .1 .1 .5 .3

E .1 0 0 .4 .5

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Customer-Judgment-Based Measures
 Overall similarity (by Perceptual Mapping)*
 Similarity of consideration sets

 Product deletion (based on product

unavailability)
 Substitution In Use:
 List all the uses of a product
 List other products that provides the same uses

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Perceptual Mapping
 Means graphic description of customers’
perception about different brands/products.
 You can use it to gain
 Better understanding of market structure

 Customer perceptions for a new product

concept
 Direction for R&D efforts to satisfy customers

better

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Developing A Perceptual Map

 Two Alternative ways


 Attribute Rating method (AR)
 Overall Similarity method (OS)
 Attribute Rating Method
 Data Cube (brands*attributes*respondents)
 Statistical Analysis (Factor Analysis)
 Find out two (or three) axes for the perceptual map
 Attribute Analysis
 Limitations
 Suitable for B-to-B products

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Developing A Perceptual Map
 Overall Similarity method (OS)
 Suitable for consumer products and services
 Ask consumers’ perception the extent of similarity
of pairs of items.
 Similarity Data Analysis (Multidimensional Scaling)
 You name the axes and infer the attributes

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Defining Competition with Perceptual Mapping
example: desserts
• Moist
• Needs refrigeration

As a formal dessert
• Bakery pie Custard mix
Bakery cake Pudding mix
• • Tapioca
Homemade cake • • • Homemade pie Local mix •
Takes a long • Layer cake mix pudding mix
time to prepare • • Cheese cake mix D-zer ta •
• Jell-O
Bundt cake mix ••• • Frozen pie
Chocolate torte mix • • Frozen cake • Canned pudding
Boston crème pie mix
“Light Style” cake mix • “Stir’n Frost cake mix
Coffee cake mix • • Individual pie
“Snackin’ Cake” mix •
• Quick bread mix
• Hostess cupcakes
Date bar mix •
Brownie mix •

Homemade cookies
Cookie mix •
• Oatmeal cookies
Bakery cookies • • • Pepperidge Farm cookies
Pillsbury cookie dough • • Between meal snack
Good for a coffee break •

In my school work lunch • • Easy to carry with me


McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Enterprise Competition in Financial Services

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Two Key Things to Remember

I. How would you determine competition?

II. Choose the focal level of competition*

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.


Right Level of Competition for You

I. Your Firm’s Market Position

II. Time Horizon

III. Product Life Cycle and Technology Change

IV. Your Position in the Firm

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

You might also like