Basic Text

Processing

Regular Expressions
Dan Jurafsky

Regular expressions
• A formal language for specifying text strings
• How can we search for any of these?
• woodchuck
• woodchucks
• Woodchuck
• Woodchucks
Dan Jurafsky

Regular Expressions: Disjunctions

• Letters inside square brackets []
Pattern Matches
[wW]oodchuck Woodchuck, woodchuck
[1234567890] Any digit

• Ranges [A-Z]
Pattern Matches
[A-Z] An upper case letter Drenched Blossoms
[a-z] A lower case letter my beans were impatient
[0-9] A single digit Chapter 1: Down the Rabbit Hole
Dan Jurafsky

Regular Expressions: Negation in Disjunction

• Negations [^Ss]
• Carat means negation only when first in []

Pattern Matches
[^A-Z] Not an upper case letter Oyfn pripetchik
[^Ss] Neither ‘S’ nor ‘s’ I have no exquisite reason”
[^e^] Neither e nor ^ Look here
a^b The pattern a carat b Look up a^b now
Dan Jurafsky

Regular Expressions: More Disjunction

• Woodchucks is another name for groundhog!
• The pipe | for disjunction
Pattern Matches
groundhog|woodchuck
yours|mine yours
mine
a|b|c = [abc]
[gG]roundhog|[Ww]oodchuck
Photo D. Fletcher
Dan Jurafsky

Regular Expressions: ? * + .

Pattern Matches
colou?r Optional color colour
previous char
oo*h! 0 or more of oh! ooh! oooh! ooooh!
previous char
o+h! 1 or more of oh! ooh! oooh! ooooh!
previous char
Stephen C Kleene
baa+ baa baaa baaaa baaaaa
beg.n begin begun begun beg3n Kleene *, Kleene +
Dan Jurafsky

Regular Expressions: Anchors ^ $

Pattern Matches
^[A-Z] Palo Alto
^[^A-Za-z] 1 “Hello”
\.$ The end.
.$ The end? The end!
Dan Jurafsky

Example
• Find me all instances of the word “the” in a text.
the
Misses capitalized examples
[tT]he
Incorrectly returns other or theology
[^a-zA-Z][tT]he[^a-zA-Z]
Dan Jurafsky

Errors
• The process we just went through was based on fixing
two kinds of errors
• Matching strings that we should not have matched (there,
then, other)
• False positives (Type I)
• Not matching things that we should have matched (The)
• False negatives (Type II)
Dan Jurafsky

Errors cont.
• In NLP we are always dealing with these kinds of
errors.
• Reducing the error rate for an application often
involves two antagonistic efforts:
• Increasing accuracy or precision (minimizing false positives)
• Increasing coverage or recall (minimizing false negatives).
Dan Jurafsky

Summary
• Regular expressions play a surprisingly large role
• Sophisticated sequences of regular expressions are often the first model
for any text processing text
• For many hard tasks, we use machine learning classifiers
• But regular expressions are used as features in the classifiers
• Can be very useful in capturing generalizations

11
 Basic Text
Processing

Regular Expressions
 Basic Text
Processing

Word tokenization
Dan Jurafsky

Text Normalization
• Every NLP task needs to do text
normalization:
1. Segmenting/tokenizing words in running text
2. Normalizing word formats
3. Segmenting sentences in running text
Dan Jurafsky

How many words?

• I do uh main- mainly business data processing
• Fragments, filled pauses
• Seuss’s cat in the hat is different from other cats!
• Lemma: same stem, part of speech, rough word sense
• cat and cats = same lemma
• Wordform: the full inflected surface form
• cat and cats = different wordforms
Dan Jurafsky

How many words?

they lay back on the San Francisco grass and looked at the stars and their

• Type: an element of the vocabulary.

• Token: an instance of that type in running text.
• How many?
• 15 tokens (or 14)
• 13 types (or 12) (or 11?)
Dan Jurafsky

How many words?

N = number of tokens
Church and Gale (1990): |V| > O(N½)
V = vocabulary = set of types
|V| is the size of the vocabulary

Tokens = N Types = |V|

Switchboard phone 2.4 million 20 thousand
conversations
Shakespeare 884,000 31 thousand
Google N-grams 1 trillion 13 million
Dan Jurafsky

Simple Tokenization in UNIX

• (Inspired by Ken Church’s UNIX for Poets.)
• Given a text file, output the word tokens and their frequencies
tr -sc ’A-Za-z’ ’\n’ < shakes.txt Change all non-alpha to newlines
| sort Sort in alphabetical order
| uniq –c Merge and count each type

1945 A 25 Aaron
72 AARON 6 Abate
1 Abates
19 ABBESS
5 Abbess
5 ABBOT 6 Abbey
... ... 3 Abbot
.... …
Dan Jurafsky

The first step: tokenizing

tr -sc ’A-Za-z’ ’\n’ < shakes.txt | head

THE
SONNETS
by
William
Shakespeare
From
fairest
creatures
We
...
Dan Jurafsky

The second step: sorting

tr -sc ’A-Za-z’ ’\n’ < shakes.txt | sort | head

A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
...
Dan Jurafsky

More counting
• Merging upper and lower case
tr ‘A-Z’ ‘a-z’ < shakes.txt | tr –sc ‘A-Za-z’ ‘\n’ | sort | uniq –c

• Sorting the counts

tr ‘A-Z’ ‘a-z’ < shakes.txt | tr –sc ‘A-Za-z’ ‘\n’ | sort | uniq –c | sort –n –r
23243 the
22225 i
18618 and
16339 to
15687 of
12780 a
12163 you
10839 my What happened here?
10005 in
8954 d
Dan Jurafsky

Issues in Tokenization
• Finland’s capital  Finland Finlands Finland’s ?
• what’re, I’m, isn’t  What are, I am, is not
• Hewlett-Packard  Hewlett Packard ?
• state-of-the-art  state of the art ?
• Lowercase  lower-case lowercase lower case ?
• San Francisco  one token or two?
• m.p.h., PhD.  ??
Dan Jurafsky

Tokenization: language issues

• French
• L'ensemble  one token or two?
• L ? L’ ? Le ?
• Want l’ensemble to match with un ensemble

• German noun compounds are not segmented

• Lebensversicherungsgesellschaftsangestellter
• ‘life insurance company employee’
• German information retrieval needs compound splitter
Dan Jurafsky

Tokenization: language issues

• Chinese and Japanese no spaces between words:
• 莎拉波娃现在居住在美国东南部的佛罗里达。
• 莎拉波娃 现在 居住 在 美国 东南部 的 佛罗里达
• Sharapova now lives in US southeastern Florida
• Further complicated in Japanese, with multiple alphabets
intermingled
• Dates/amounts in multiple formats

フォーチュン500社は情報不足のため時間あた$500K(約6,000万円)

Katakana Hiragana Kanji Romaji

End-user can express query entirely in hiragana!
Dan Jurafsky

Word Tokenization in Chinese

• Also called Word Segmentation
• Chinese words are composed of characters
• Characters are generally 1 syllable and 1 morpheme.
• Average word is 2.4 characters long.
• Standard baseline segmentation algorithm:
• Maximum Matching (also called Greedy)
Dan Jurafsky

Maximum Matching
Word Segmentation Algorithm
• Given a wordlist of Chinese, and a string.
1) Start a pointer at the beginning of the string
2) Find the longest word in dictionary that matches the string
starting at pointer
3) Move the pointer over the word in string
4) Go to 2
Dan Jurafsky

Max-match segmentation illustration

• Thecatinthehat the cat in the hat

• Thetabledownthere the table down there

theta bled own there

• Doesn’t generally work in English!

• But works astonishingly well in Chinese

• 莎拉波娃现在居住在美国东南部的佛罗里达。
• 莎拉波娃 现在 居住 在 美国 东南部 的 佛罗里达
• Modern probabilistic segmentation algorithms even better
 Basic Text
Processing

Word tokenization
 Basic Text
Processing

Word Normalization and

Stemming
Dan Jurafsky

Normalization

• Need to “normalize” terms

• Information Retrieval: indexed text & query terms must have same form.
• We want to match U.S.A. and USA
• We implicitly define equivalence classes of terms
• e.g., deleting periods in a term
• Alternative: asymmetric expansion:
• Enter: window Search: window, windows
• Enter: windows Search: Windows, windows, window
• Enter: Windows Search: Windows

• Potentially more powerful, but less efficient

Dan Jurafsky

Case folding
• Applications like IR: reduce all letters to lower case
• Since users tend to use lower case
• Possible exception: upper case in mid-sentence?
• e.g., General Motors
• Fed vs. fed
• SAIL vs. sail
• For sentiment analysis, MT, Information extraction
• Case is helpful (US versus us is important)
 Dan Jurafsky

Lemmatization
• Reduce inflections or variant forms to base form
• am, are, is  be
• car, cars, car's, cars'  car
• the boy's cars are different colors  the boy car be different color
• Lemmatization: have to find correct dictionary headword form
• Machine translation
• Spanish quiero (‘I want’), quieres (‘you want’) same lemma as querer
‘want’
Dan Jurafsky

Morphology
• Morphemes:
• The small meaningful units that make up words
• Stems: The core meaning-bearing units
• Affixes: Bits and pieces that adhere to stems
• Often with grammatical functions
Dan Jurafsky

Stemming
• Reduce terms to their stems in information retrieval
• Stemming is crude chopping of affixes
• language dependent
• e.g., automate(s), automatic, automation all reduced to automat.

for example compressed for exampl compress and

and compression are both compress ar both accept
accepted as equivalent to as equival to compress
compress.
 Dan Jurafsky

Porter’s algorithm
The most common English stemmer
Step 1a Step 2 (for long stems)
sses  ss caresses  caress ational ate relational relate
ies  i ponies  poni izer ize digitizer  digitize
ss  ss caress  caress ator ate operator  operate
s  ø cats  cat …
Step 1b Step 3 (for longer stems)
(*v*)ing  ø walking  walk al  ø revival  reviv
sing  sing able  ø adjustable  adjust
(*v*)ed  ø plastered  plaster ate  ø activate  activ
… …
Dan Jurafsky

Viewing morphology in a corpus

Why only strip –ing if there is a vowel?

(*v*)ing  ø walking  walk

sing  sing

36
 Dan Jurafsky

Viewing morphology in a corpus

Why only strip –ing if there is a vowel?
(*v*)ing  ø walking  walk
sing  sing

tr -sc 'A-Za-z' '\n' < shakes.txt | grep ’ing$' | sort | uniq -c | sort –nr
1312 King 548 being
548 being 541 nothing
541 nothing 152 something
388 king 145 coming
375 bring 130 morning
358 thing 122 having
307 ring 120 living
152 something 117 loving
145 coming 116 Being
130 morning 102 going

tr -sc 'A-Za-z' '\n' < shakes.txt | grep '[aeiou].*ing$' | sort | uniq -c | sort –nr

37
Dan Jurafsky

Dealing with complex morphology is

sometimes necessary
• Some languages requires complex morpheme segmentation
• Turkish
• Uygarlastiramadiklarimizdanmissinizcasina
• `(behaving) as if you are among those whom we could not civilize’
• Uygar `civilized’ + las `become’
+ tir `cause’ + ama `not able’
+ dik `past’ + lar ‘plural’
+ imiz ‘p1pl’ + dan ‘abl’
+ mis ‘past’ + siniz ‘2pl’ + casina ‘as if’
 Basic Text
Processing

Word Normalization and

Stemming
 Basic Text
Processing

Sentence Segmentation
and Decision Trees
Dan Jurafsky

Sentence Segmentation
• !, ? are relatively unambiguous
• Period “.” is quite ambiguous
• Sentence boundary
• Abbreviations like Inc. or Dr.
• Numbers like .02% or 4.3
• Build a binary classifier
• Looks at a “.”
• Decides EndOfSentence/NotEndOfSentence
• Classifiers: hand-written rules, regular expressions, or machine-learning
Dan Jurafsky
Determining if a word is end-of-sentence:
a Decision Tree
Dan Jurafsky

More sophisticated decision tree features

• Case of word with “.”: Upper, Lower, Cap, Number
• Case of word after “.”: Upper, Lower, Cap, Number

• Numeric features
• Length of word with “.”
• Probability(word with “.” occurs at end-of-s)
• Probability(word after “.” occurs at beginning-of-s)
Dan Jurafsky

Implementing Decision Trees

• A decision tree is just an if-then-else statement
• The interesting research is choosing the features
• Setting up the structure is often too hard to do by hand
• Hand-building only possible for very simple features, domains
• For numeric features, it’s too hard to pick each threshold
• Instead, structure usually learned by machine learning from a training
corpus
Dan Jurafsky

Decision Trees and other classifiers

• We can think of the questions in a decision tree
• As features that could be exploited by any kind of
classifier
• Logistic regression
• SVM
• Neural Nets
• etc.
 Basic Text
Processing

Sentence Segmentation
and Decision Trees