Combustible Dust Training Program (C-DuST)

1
 Combustible Dust Training Program (C-DuST)

 Grantee: Kirkwood Community College, Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52406-

2068

 Grantor: U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety &

Health Administration, Susan Harwood Training Grant Program
Award Number: SH-17797-08-60-F-19

 Project Title: Combustible Dust Training Program

(C-DuST)

 Project Period: September 30, 2008 to September 30, 2009

2
 Disclaimer
This material was produced under grant number SH-17797-08-60-F-19
from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) of the
U.S. Department of Labor. It does not necessarily reflect the view or
policies of the U.S. Department of Labor, nor does mention of trade names,
commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S.
Government. This training manual was produced by Kirkwood Community
College, Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
The information in this power point presentation has been compiled from a
variety of sources believed to be reliable and to represent the best current
opinion on the subject. However, neither Kirkwood Community College
nor its authors guarantee accuracy or completeness of any information
contained in this publication, and neither Kirkwood Community College or
its authors shall be responsible for any errors, omissions, or damages arising
out of the use of this information. Additional safety measures may be
3
required under particular circumstances.
 Overview
 According to a study by the Chemical Safety Board,
Dust explosions are a serious problem in American
industry. Over the last 28 years there have been
approximately 3,500 combustible dust explosions, 281
of these have been major incidents resulting in the
deaths of 119 workers and another 718 workers
sustained injuries.
 There were 13 reported agricultural dust explosions in
the United States in 2005 resulting in 2 fatalities and 11
injuries.
4
 Goal

 To improve the safety of workers in environments where

combustible dusts may be encountered by increasing
employee awareness of this hazard and by demonstrating how
the hazard can be recognized and addressed in their
workplace.

5
 Enabling Learning Objectives

 Identify the elements necessary for dust to explode.

 Explain how to prevent dust from reaching combustible levels.

 Describe the difference between primary and secondary dust

explosions.

6
 Terminal Learning Objective

Program participants will understand:

 Combustible dust danger in their industry.
 The Dust, Fire, and Explosive Pentagon.
 The methods to prevent or mitigate the effects of
combustible dust explosion and resulting fire.

7
 Introduction

 The first documented dust

explosion occurred in a Turin,
Italy, bakery in 1785.
 The explosion was caused by the
ignition of flour dust by a lamp in a
bakery storeroom.
 It lead to the realization that grain
dust is a highly explosive substance
that must be handled carefully.

8
 Introduction
A Chemical Safety Board Study Shows:

 From 1996 to 2005, a total of 106 explosions resulted in 16

fatalities and 126 injuries, at an estimated cost of $162.8 million in
damages to the facilities.

 In 2005, there were 13 grain dust explosions reported in the US.

A RARE EVENT
But catastrophic when it happens!
9
 Background
Organic Dust Fires and Explosions:
 Massachusetts
(3 killed, 9 injured)
 North Carolina
(6 killed, 38 injured)
 Kentucky
(7 killed, 37 injured

Metal Dust Fire and Explosion: Indiana

(1 killed,1 injured)

10
 Organic Dust Fire and Explosion
Massachusetts
Fire in a foundry shell molding machine:
 Caused a primary
explosion in ducts
containing heavy
deposits of Phenol
formaldehyde resin
dust.
 Resulted in
– a dust cloud from ledge dust deposits outside the ducts
and
11
– an explosion in the plant area.
 Organic Dust Fire and Explosion
Massachusetts
Causal factors
 Housekeeping to
control dust
accumulations;
• Ventilation system
design;
• Maintenance of ovens;
and,
• Equipment safety
devices.
12
 Organic Dust Fire and Explosion: North Carolina

Combustible polyethylene dust accumulated above

suspended ceilings at pharmaceutical plant
 A fire at the plant caused
dust to be dispersed and
explode in the ceiling space

 6 were killed, 38 injured

 Plant and nearby buildings

were severely damaged
13
 Experience in the Grain Handling Industry

In the late 1970s, grain dust explosions left 59 people dead

and 49 injured.

14
 Experience in the Grain Handling Industry

In 1987, OSHA promulgated the Grain Handling Facilities

standard (29 CFR 1910.272) still in effect.

15
 Imperial Sugar Company, Port Wentworth GA.
Explosion and Fire
Feb. 7, 2008
13 Dead and Numerous serious injuries

16
17 Dawson Creek Elevator Fire
 Dawson Creek Dust Explosion Williamsburg Iowa

18
 Dust Explosions

An initial (primary) explosion in

processing equipment or in an area
where fugitive dust has accumulated may
shake loose more accumulated dust,
Or damage a containment system
(such as a duct, vessel, or collector).

 The additional dust dispersed into the air may cause one
or more secondary explosions.

 These can be far more destructive than a primary

explosion

19
 CASCADING EXPLOSIONS

20
 Dust explosion in a work area

Dust Dust settles on flat

surfaces

Some event
disturbs the
settled dust
into a cloud

Dust cloud is
Adapted from CSB ignited and
21
explodes
 Dust explosion in
equipment

Dust
collector
venting
flame jet

22
 Dustexplosion
Dust explosioninin
equipment
equipment
Dust
Collector

With dispersal
and ignition of 2 kg dust
by the flame jet
23
 A timeline
The following nine slides depict a timeline for a dust explosion
and the results of that explosion.

Slides prepared by Joseph P. Howicz CSP, CFPS

Accident Prevention Corporation
W.W.W. safetyman.com

24
 Primary deflagration inside process equipment

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

Time, msec.
(Timing of actual events may vary)
25
 Shock wave caused
by primary deflagration

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

Time, msec.

26
 Shock waves reflected by surfaces within
the building cause accumulated dust to go
into suspension

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

27 Time, msec.
 Dust clouds thrown in the air by the shock waves

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

Time, msec.

28
 Primary deflagration breaks out of the equipment
enclosure - creating a source of ignition

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

Time, msec.
29
 Secondary deflagration ignited

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

Time, msec.

30
 Secondary Deflagration is propagated
through the dust clouds

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

31 Time, msec.
 Secondary
deflagration bursts
from the building

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

32 Time, msec.
 Collapsed building with remaining fires

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 300 325

Time, msec.
33
 Types of Dusts Involved in Explosions

34
 Required Conditions for an Explosion
 The dust must be combustible and fine enough to be airborne.
 The dust cloud must beat the Minimum Explosive Concentration
(MEC) for that Particular dust.
 There must be sufficient oxygen in the atmosphere to support and
sustain combustion.
 There must be a source of ignition.
 The dust must be confined.
 The dust must be dry.

Dust Particle

35
 Ignition Sources

36
 Explosive Limits
 The Minimum Explosive Concentration (MEC) for grain
dust, grain flour, or ground feed ingredients varies
according to the particle size and energy:
• Smaller particles are more powerful
• Caloric value of the product
 Corn starch is considered one of the more volatile and
powerful grain products.
 As the size of the particle decreases the risk of a
deflagration or explosion increases.

37
 Dust Combustibility

Combustible dust per NFPA 654

 Prior to 2006 - “Any finely divided solid material that is
420 microns or smaller in diameter (material passing a U.S.
No. 40 Standard Sieve) and presents a fire or explosion hazard
when dispersed and ignited in air.”
 2006 Edition – A combustible particulate solid that presents a
fire or deflagration hazard when suspended in air or some
other oxidizing medium over a range of concentrations,
regardless of particle size or shape.
38
 Facility Dust Hazard Assessment
Combustible dust explosion hazard may exist in a variety of
industries

• Food (e.g., candy, • Dyes

starch, flour, feed) • Coal
• Plastics • Metals (e.g.,
• Wood aluminum,
• Rubber chromium, iron,
• Furniture magnesium, and
• Textiles zinc)
• Pesticides • Fossil fuel power
• Pharmaceuticals generation
39
 The Prevalence of Dust
 Examples of materials that have historically caused dust
explosions include:
 Cosmetics
 Coal
 Dyes
 Grain and other dry foods
 Metal
 Pharmaceuticals
 Plastic and rubber
 Printer toner
 Soaps
 Textiles
 Wood and paper
40
 Housekeeping
 NFPA 654 and FM Global
Data Sheet 7-76 are
referenced.
 Clean immediately whenever
a dust layer of 1/32-inch
thickness accumulates
• over a surface area of at least 5% of
the floor area of the facility or any
given room.
2
• not to exceed 1,000 ft

41
Sampling coal dust
 Housekeeping
An idealized approach based on:
 Uniformity of the dust layer
3
 Bulk density of 75 lb/ ft ,
3
 Dust concentration of 0.35oz/ ft , and
 Dust cloud height of 10 ft.

5% of
20,000 ft2 10 Ft
building
25 Ft 40 Ft
42
 Where Do Dust Explosions Occur?
 Dust explosions, for grain, usually occur at transfer points as in
bucket elevators or enclosed conveyors.
 In 1997, 50 percent of primary explosions occurred in elevator
legs.
 Accumulation of dust in suspended ceilings
 Cyclone collectors
 Electrostatic collectors
 Holding bins

43
 Wheels melted
in dust
explosion and
fire

44
 Industry With Dust

Corn Milling, Wet

Establishments primarily engaged in milling
corn or sorghum grain (milo)
Electric Generation
Transmission, and/or distribution of electric
energy
Flour and Other Grain Mill Products
Except rice

For exact description of SICs see:

http://www.osha.gov/pls/imis/sicsearch.html?p_sic=3999&p_search=
45
 Industry with Dust

Reconstituted Wood Products

Hardboard, particleboard, insulation board, (and
many similar products)
Chemicals and Chemical Preparations
NOC fatty acids, essential oils, gelatin (except
vegetable), many other materials
Prepared Foods,
Various food items – dry, powdered foods
Electroplating,
Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring
(polishing and tumbling)
46
 Industry with Dust

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Wood Products,
Sawmills and Planing Mills,
Cane Sugar Refining
Beet Sugar manufacturing
Mechanical Rubber Goods
Molded, Extruded, and Lathe-Cut
Motor Vehicle Parts and Accessories –
Numerous items including wheels and
transmission housings
47
 Industry with Dust

Crop preparation for market except cotton gins

(cleaning, shelling, delinting)
Dry bakery products – cookies, crackers,
pretzels and similar
Flavoring extracts, syrups, powders and
related
Fabric mills, broadwoven manmade fibers and
silk (weaving fabrics >12 inches wide)
Fabric finishers, broadwoven manmade fibers
and silk (includes napping, sueding, teaseling)

48
 Industry with Dust

Textile goods (many materials including waste,

kapok, felt, recovered fiber)
Millwork
Wood kitchen cabinets
Structural wood members
Prefabricated wood buildings and
components
Wood household furniture, except upholstered

49
 Industry with Dust

Window blinds and shades and drapery

hardware
Industrial inorganic chemicals
Plastics, synthetic resins, and
elastomers (nonvulcanizable)
Cellulosic manmade fibers
Soap and detergents, except specialty
cleaners
Paints, varnishes, lacquers, enamels, and
allied products

50
 Industry with Dust

Manufacturing industries NOC (includes

many products e.g.: matches; candles; lamp
shades; feathers; artificial trees and flowers)
Farm product warehousing and storage
Sanitary treatment facilities
Refuse systems
Scrap and waste materials
Plastic materials and basic forms and
shapes

51
 Explosion Safeguards

 Fire prevention and protection

 Housekeeping

 Dust control

52
 Fire Prevention and Control
 Policies, practices and procedures designed to keep the
conditions necessary for a fire from coming together (explosive
pentagon)
Fuel Ignition
 Fuel (dust)
 Dust is dry
 Dust is at MEC
Dispersion Confinement
 Oxygen
 Ignition source
 Confined or enclosed space Oxygen
 Mixing of fuel and oxygen Explosive Pentagon

53
 Fire Prevention and Control
 Hot work permits  Severity reduction policies,
practices and procedures
 Lockout/tagout policies
designed to minimize the
spread of fire

 Design specifications for

storage of flammable materials  Emergency plans

 Alarm systems

54
 Fire Prevention and Control

 Portable fire extinguishers  Recharging portable

extinguishers
 Cleanup policies, practices
and procedures designed to  Removal of debris to an
return the affected area to appropriate waste site
an operational level
 Equipment and facility
 First aid repair

55
 Housekeeping
 A crucial key to the reduction of fires and explosions is
housekeeping.

 Housekeeping relates to hazards in addition to fires and

explosions.

 Research has shown that facilities that are well maintained

experience fewer fires, explosions and other accidents.

56
 Dust Control Spots are
NFPA 654 – contains not
comprehensive guidance raindrops
Some of its recommendations:
 Minimize the escape of
dust from process equipment or
ventilation systems;(fugitive dust).
 Use dust collection
systems and filters.
 Utilize surfaces that
minimize dust
accumulation and facilitate
cleaning.

57
 Dust Control
NFPA 654 –
guidance
 Provide access
to all hidden areas to
permit inspection.
 Inspect for dust
residues in open and
hidden areas, at
regular intervals.
 Clean dust
?
residues at regular
intervals.

58
 Dust Control
NFPA 654
 Use cleaning methods that do
not generate dust
clouds if ignition sources
are present.

 Only use vacuum

cleaners approved
for dust collection.

59 HAZ LOC
 Fugitive Dust Control and Housekeeping

Dust Clouds
Surfaces shall be cleaned in a
manner that minimizes the generation of dust
clouds.
Vigorous sweeping or blowing
down with steam or compressed air produces
dust clouds and shall be permitted only if
the following requirements are
met:

60
 Fugitive Dust Control and Housekeeping

 Area and equipment vacuumed prior to blow down.

 Electrical power and other sources of ignition shut down or removed

from the area.
 Only low gauge pressure
(15 psi) steam or compressed air to be used.
 No hot surfaces capable of igniting a dust cloud or layer.

61
 Dust Control
NFPA 654
 Locate relief valves away from dust
hazard areas and
 Develop and implement a hazardous dust
 Inspection,
 Testing,
 Housekeeping, and
 Written control program
(Written with established frequency and
methods).

62
 Dust Control
 Reducing dust accumulations is a major concern for facilities
that produce dust.
 A good housekeeping program depends upon a combination
of methods to control dust.
 The methods used in a given facility will depend upon the
type of facility and the volume of organic material handled or
produced.

63
 Dust Control Methods
 Vacuums especially in areas where dust accumulation is constant
due to the job task being performed.
 Wash down procedures where hoses and water can be used to
remove accumulated dust.
 Choke feeds to control the flow of grain and grain dust.
 Dust control systems such as filters or cyclones.

64
 Recognizing Dust Hazards
 All employees should be trained in hazard recognition:
• Conduct general facility wide appraisals of dust explosion
possibilities on a periodic basis.
• Conduct internal and external audits in order to identify potential
explosion hazards.
• Encourage a preventative attitude among employees for dust
explosions.
• Have employees and supervisors identify explosion hazards through
JHAs.
• Pay particular attention to dust collection systems and other areas
not in plain view during the assessment.
65
 U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board Photo

66
 U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board Photo

67
 Engineering Controls
 Avoid the use of compressed
air (blow down), and dry
sweeping.
 Conduct workforce training
and education courses.
 Limit and control potential
ignition sources.
 Ensure electrical service in
combustible dust areas is
appropriate for hazardous
(Class II) locations.
68
 Engineering Controls
 Follow National Fire
Protection Association
(NFPA) standard 654.
 Ensure operations involving
dusts have proper
engineering design and
controls.
 Maintain an effective
housekeeping program.
 Establish and maintain a
preventative maintenance
program.

69
 Lessons Learned
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
 On January 29, 2003, a massive dust explosion at the West
Pharmaceutical Services facility in Kinston, North Carolina, killed
six workers and destroyed the facility.
 The explosion involved a part of the building used to compound
rubber.
 The compounding process produced a powder that was carried by air currents
to the space above a suspended ceiling.
 Employees not trained on the hazards.

70
 West Pharmaceutical

71
 Lessons Learned
CTA Acoustics, Inc.
• On February 20, 2003, a series of dust explosions at the CTA
Acoustics facility in Corbin, Kentucky, claimed the lives of seven
workers, injured 37, and destroyed the manufacturing facility.
• This facility primarily made acoustic insulation for automobiles.
 A curing oven that had been left open because of a temperature control
problem likely ignited the combustible resin dust stirred up by workers
cleaning the area near the oven.
• Had CTA had adhered to NFPA 654 (2000) standards for
housekeeping and fire/explosion barriers, the explosions could
have been prevented or minimized.

72
 CTA Acoustics Inc.

73
 Lessons Learned
Hayes Lemmerz International.
• On October 29, 2003, aluminum dust exploded at the Hayes
Lemmerz International facility in Huntington, Indiana, killed one
worker and injured several others.
• This explosion involved equipment used to re-melt scrap aluminum
• The scrap aluminum was chopped into small chips, pneumatically conveyed to
the scrap processing area, dried, and fed into a melt furnace .
• Transporting and drying the aluminum chips generated explosive
aluminum dust, which was then pulled into a dust collector.

74
 Hayes Lemmerz International

75
 Lessons Learned
Safety Issues Neglected
• Facility management failed to conform to NFPA standards that
would have prevented or reduced the effects of the explosions.
• Company personnel, government enforcement officials, insurance
underwriters, and health and safety professionals inspecting the
facilities failed to identify dust explosion hazards or recommend
protective measures.
• The facilities contained unsafe accumulations of combustible dust
and housekeeping was inadequate.
• Workers and managers were often unaware of dust explosion
hazards.

76
 Lessons Learned
Safety Issues Neglected
• Procedures and training to eliminate or control combustible
dust hazards were inadequate.
• Previous fires and other warning events were accepted as
normal, and their causes were not identified and resolved.
• Dust collectors were inadequately designed or maintained to
minimize explosions.
• Process changes were made without adequately reviewing them
for potential hazards.

77
 Summary

 Dust explosions are a serious problem in American industry.

 During the past 25 years, at least 281 major combustible dust
incidents were reported, that killed 119 and injured 718
workers, and destroyed many industrial facilities.
 Facilities fail to follow the widely recognized standards of
good engineering practice in the NFPA’s voluntary consensus
standards.

78
 Summary
Facilities do not:
• Implement appropriate engineering controls
• Perform adequate maintenance
• Implement good housekeeping practices
• Follow other measures that could have prevented the
explosions
• Provide adequate hazard recognition training for
employees
• Establish overall safe work practices

79
80