Scribd
Upload
98 views38 pages

Calibration: Thanks To Ramani Duraiswami and Zhengyou Zhang For The Use of Some Slides

This document discusses camera calibration techniques. It describes using precisely known 3D points as the traditional approach but notes it is expensive. An alternative method is proposed that uses a single planar surface with a printed pattern. Images of the pattern from different orientations allow solving for the camera intrinsics and extrinsics. With multiple images, there are more constraints than unknowns, leading to an analytic solution followed by maximum likelihood estimation refinement.

Uploaded by

David Lichaa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
98 views38 pages

Calibration: Thanks To Ramani Duraiswami and Zhengyou Zhang For The Use of Some Slides

This document discusses camera calibration techniques. It describes using precisely known 3D points as the traditional approach but notes it is expensive. An alternative method is proposed that uses a single planar surface with a printed pattern. Images of the pattern from different orientations allow solving for the camera intrinsics and extrinsics. With multiple images, there are more constraints than unknowns, leading to an analytic solution followed by maximum likelihood estimation refinement.

Uploaded by

David Lichaa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 38

CALIBRATION

Thanks to Ramani Duraiswami and


Zhengyou Zhang for the use of some
slides
Shortcomings
Use precisely known 3D points

Shortcomings: Not flexible


very expensive to make such a calibration
apparatus.
Zhangs approach
Use only one plane
Print a pattern on a paper
Attach the paper on a planar surface
Show the plane freely a few times to the camera
Camera Model

x
M y
z
(u0 , v0 )

m
C
(R, t )

x
u u0 y
s v 0 v0 r1 r2 r3 t
z
1 0 0 1 R t


1
~
m A ~
M
Plane projection
For convenience, assume the plane at z = 0.
x
u M
v y
(u0 , v0 )
z0
m
C

The relation between image points and


model points is then given by:
~ ~ with H Ar r t
sm HM 1 2
What do we get from one image?
We can obtain two equations in 6
intermediate homogeneous parameters.

Given H, which is defined up to a scale factor,


And let H h1 h 2 h3 , we have
h1 h2 h3 Ar1 r2 t
This yields
T T 1
h1 A A h 2 0
T T 1 T T 1
h1 A A h1 h 2 A A h 2
Linear Equations
B11 B12 B13
Let B A T A 1 B21 B22 B23

symmetric
B31 B32 B33
Define
b B11 B12 B22 B13 B23 B33
up to a scale factor
Rewrite
h1T A T A 1h 2 0
h1T A T A 1h1 hT2 A T A 1h 2
as linear equations:
Mb 0
What do we get from 2 images?
If we impose = 0, which is usually the case
with modern cameras, we can solve all the
other camera intrinsic parameters.

How about more images?


Better! More constraints than unknowns.
Solution
Show the plane under n different orientations
(n > 1)
Estimate the n homography matrices
(analytic solution followed by MLE)
Solve analytically the 6 intermediate
parameters (defined up to a scale factor)
Extract the five intrinsic parameters
Compute the extrinsic parameters
Refine all parameters with MLE

You might also like