0% found this document useful (0 votes)
110 views15 pages

BMW's Strategic Challenges and Growth Options

This document discusses BMW's strategic challenges in the late 1990s and its acquisition of Rover Group in 1994. It notes that BMW was a relatively small player in the global car industry. It hoped that acquiring Rover would allow it to grow its business and enter new market segments. However, integrating Rover proved extremely difficult as its factories, products, and culture did not meet BMW's standards. After spending billions, BMW was unable to turn Rover around and sold it in 2000, having damaged its reputation in the UK. The document examines the strategic reasons for and failure of the Rover acquisition.

Uploaded by

Muktesh Mukul
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
110 views15 pages

BMW's Strategic Challenges and Growth Options

This document discusses BMW's strategic challenges in the late 1990s and its acquisition of Rover Group in 1994. It notes that BMW was a relatively small player in the global car industry. It hoped that acquiring Rover would allow it to grow its business and enter new market segments. However, integrating Rover proved extremely difficult as its factories, products, and culture did not meet BMW's standards. After spending billions, BMW was unable to turn Rover around and sold it in 2000, having damaged its reputation in the UK. The document examines the strategic reasons for and failure of the Rover acquisition.

Uploaded by

Muktesh Mukul
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Strategic Management

Macmillan and Tampoe


OUP

1 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001


Case Examples
BMW in 1999

2 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001


The reasons for choosing BMW

 The company is well known to most students in the UK


 The industry structure and challenges quite well understood
 It’s a sizable company but a minnow (table C3.1) in terms of
global car production and sales.
 Strong European and US brand image and customer base but
faces tough decisions on how to move forward
 Faced with many options – merge, get taken over, buy to
grow, move into new segment, become specialist supplier,
stay as now.
 Interesting ownership structure.
 Provides comparison with Japanese companies who have
moved into the UK to spread their wings in Europe

3 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001


Critical Strategic Issues

 Car industry converging into mega-corporations where


size seems to be the determining factor
 BMW very small in comparison to top five (see table
C3.1)
 Can it survive by staying roughly the same size, selling
their extremely successful and sought after high margin
cars to discerning customers?
 If not, how can it grow?
 How can it retain current ownership structure so that
major shareholders do not see their ownership diluted or
lose control of the company?

4 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001


Consequences of a growth strategy
 Can it exploit its core competence in new markets?
 Can it modify its ethos to match new markets?
 Should it abandon its proven competence and approach
to business?
 How does it choose a new approach?
 Should it seek to develop a new customer base with
wider potential sales?
 Should it spread its brand over wider range of products?
 How will it counter threats to its new approach?
 How will it position itself vis-a-vis it chosen competition?

5 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001


Strengths pre-Rover acquisition
 Company ranked among the more admired companies
in the auto industry
 Its chief executive a respected industry and national
figure with the industry in his blood
 Customers are loyal to the brand
 5 series is considered the benchmark for the executive
car market
 Profitable
 Perceived to be invincible
 Company announces expansion plans by buying Rover
from BAe in the UK
6 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001
Possible causes of BMW success

 Its aircraft and motorcycle heritage of quality and


driveability
 Its ability to deliver high value, reliable, consistent
quality
 Its ownership structure (see page 306)
 Its quality of management which was ranked very
high
 Its marketing ability which positioned it as the
epitome of the best and most desirable products in
the industry

7 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001


Post-Rover Acquisition

 Inherited a range of products to exploit a slightly different


market segment and customer
 Required huge ongoing investment to get production
facilities and product to meet BMW standards
 Attempting to improve Rover’s share of its home market
 UK acquisition draining finance and management time
and effort
 What they got was not what they thought they were
buying
 BMW itself had competing products in its pipeline
 UK acquisition sours

8 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001


Untangling its investment

 Chief executive and his second in command


leave the company
 Divided the roles and appointed a chief
executive
 Went in search of a new chairman
 Sold its UK subsidiary for £1
 Returned to its knitting having written-off
£billions of investment in the UK
 Harmed its reputation in the UK for a short time

9 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001


Causes of BMW failure to exploit Rover

 Was it the strategy or the implementation of the


strategy?
 Was it shifts in shape and structure of the industry which
was going through a major reshuffle?
 Was it failure to tackle the structural issues to do with
organisation, management controls, and culture of
Longbridge works?
 Was it because Rover image did not appeal to the
emerging generation – too associated with their parents
and grand parents – ‘uncool’?
 Was it arrogance and complacency?

10 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001


Question 1 – Survival in global car industry

 Obviously the BMW board felt that it had to grow in size and widen
its appeal to survive as a independent producer of quality cars
 Its 3 and 5 series car were selling very well. There were new
models in the offing (MX5, Z3, Z8 new 3 Series)
 Expanding volume in its own products could cause oversupply and
result in diminution of market appeal with knock-on effect on
residuals and exclusivity
 Growth route chosen was one that protects own brand and widens
scope by entering mass market
 It decided to do this by acquisition of an ailing company but one that
sold to a different market
 It felt that it could inject its ‘magic’ to Rover

11 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001


Question 2 – Growing the business

 Choices were organic growth, alliances and/or


acquisitions
 Organic growth too slow to match pace set by
other major players who were buying into niche
markets
 Few partners with whom to form alliance
 Fewer still available for purchase
 Choice meant two things – deciding the route
and then picking the target

12 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001


Question 2 – The way ahead

 By the time BMW took the decision to buy Rover its


choices had diminished because Ford, and GM had
acquired many desirable brands such as Volvo, Jaguar
 VW had acquired lesser brands such as Skoda and SEAT
and then a prestige brand in Bentley and Rolls Royce
 Mergers and alliance opportunities were in France with
Renault or Japan with Nissan, also South Korea
 BMW may not have had the management expertise to
work with non-European manufacturers
 BMW woke up too late and found itself with only Rover as
an acquisition opportunity

13 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001


Question 3 – Making a Success of
Rover
 Point out that the ‘devil is in the detail’
 Implementation should take consideration of survival and
also quality improvement
 Change culture first before throwing money at the
business
 Protect BMW at all costs
 Do not try to make Rover equivalent to BMW as it is a
different product in a different market
 Rationalise product range
 i.e., keep Mini and Range- Rover - Kill the rest

14 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001


Question 4 – Rover In hindsight
 Still a good buy?
 Product range complementary to BMW
 Offered entry to new market
 Opportunity to learn how to emulate VW, Skoda,
Seat as way forward
 Reap before re-investment

15 (c) Macmillan & Tampoe 2001

You might also like