Bow Tie
Uploaded by
baaziz2015Bow Tie
Uploaded by
baaziz2015Process Safety KPIs
Determination based on the
Bow Tie methodology
Arthur Groot
04 februari 2014
From HAZARD to HARM
04 februari 2014
Methodology and key-elements
Identification and monitoring KPIs
C-level
BU-level
Plant en site management
04 februari 2014
Bottom-up approach
Direct connection between
safety management
system and risks
Compliance with
legislation (Seveso II),
HSG 254 methodology
and CCPS
Identification of relevant
KPI-s process safety by
using BowTiemethodology
Dedicated Bow-Tie
software
Mandate and commitment
Training programs
ISO 31000
Approach in 4 phases
Approach in 4 phases to
determine the KPIs for process safety
1.
2.
3.
4.
Identification and scoping (setting up
BowTies)
Analysis of barriers and selection of KPIs
(leading and lagging)
Set-up criteria and reporting of KPIs
Evaluation and review
04 februari 2014
Phase 1: identification
Setting-up BowTies in 12 steps at operational installation
level by using the following reports:
HAZOP/HAZIDs
Safety reports (Seveso II)
SIL/LOPA assesments
FMECA analysis
Result: a set of barriers including escalation factor control
04 februari 2014
Phase 2, Key Performance Indicators
Starting point:
You dont improve what you dont measure
Indicators:
Leading indicators: performance of barriers before the
consequence
Lagging indicators: number of near misses or the
consequences itself
04 februari 2014
Phase 2, analysis of barriers and
selection of KPIs
Selection of KPIs, leading (barriers), max. 1 per threat
or consequence line and lagging (consequences)
Connecting barriers (KPIs) to business model (safety management
system)
04 februari 2014
Phase 3, Set-up criteria and reporting of KPIs
Setting up PR (performance requirements) for the KPIs,. the
FISM (Functionality, Integrity, Survivability and Management)
methodology
Setting-up PS (performance standards) for (KPIs) defining
grades, scoring and assessment criteria
04 februari 2014
Performance requirements
Functionality
definition the expected task(s)
Integrity
definition of the reliability of the barrier
Survivability
describes the barrier during an incident
Management
description of the processes, activities, procedures, competences
to control the barrier
04 februari 2014
Performance standard
Grades, scoring methods & assessment criteria
Effectiveness of barrier
Condition of barrier is very bad
Condition of barrier is bad
Performance criteria
Design
i.e procedure not
updated last 4 years
i.e. procedure not
updated last 2 years
Condition of barrier is moderate
i.e.producedure
Condition of barrier is good
Etc.
Condition of barrier is very good
Etc.
Very Good
04 februari 2014
Good
Moderate
Integrity
Not audited on
performance
Not audited in
the last year
Not audited this
year
Operational
Etc.
Etc.
Etc.
Etc.
Not trained operators
Operator trained not in
last 2 years
Operators trained last
year
Bad
Very Bad
Phase 3, integration of
Key Performance Indicators
Generic KPIs related to management systems
Percentage of completed HSE audits
Implementation of lesson learned TRIPOD investigations
(progress)
Validation of procedures for operational and maintenance tasks
(progress is parameter)
Percentage of underperforming operational documents noticed
during (HSE) audits
Job-specific trained personal (percentage)
Etc.
04 februari 2014
Phase 3, integration Performance
Indicators process safety
Related to technical integrity
Percentage of completed tests according to schedule (software,
safety relief valves, pressurized tanks, fire fighting equipment,
etc.)
Combination of completed test and percentage of tested
equipment that pass/fail the test
Status of follow-up actions from risk analyses such as HAZOPs;
Number of risk analyses executed according to schedule
(HAZOP, SIL, LOPA, etc.)
Number of (un)controled releases/emissions/spills
Etc.
04 februari 2014
Phase 4, Start reporting, evaluation
and review
Starting with risk optimization
Starting improvement cycle (Plan, Do, Check, Act cycle)
Transparency check
Integrating incident data for risk management
04 februari 2014
Phase 4, live data of the (HSE) management
system into the Bow-Tie
Management System
04 februari 2014
Phase 4: reporting levels process
safety
Summary of CCPS
standard (based on
information form
BowTie level)
Summary level from
BowTie level, e.g.
CCPS examples
(based on
information form
BowTie level)
BowTie Level
C-level
BU-level
Plant en site management
04 februari 2014
Conclusions KPIs
Bottom-up approach
Identification of relevant KPI-s (process) safety by using
BowTie- methodology
Compliance with (HSE) legislation. i.e. (Seveso II), HSG
254 methodology (HSE) and meets criteria set by CCPS
04 februari 2014
Services Royal HaskoningDHV
Policy and strategy
Culture
Development of Environment &
Safety Policy
Corporate Environment Plan
Stakeholder Analysis
Carbon Capture and Storage
REACH and GHS
Corporate Social Responsibility
Carbon Trading
Policy on the Prevention of Serious
Accidents
Energy
SHWE growth model (based Safety Case
on Hearts and Minds)
HAZID and HAZOP
Safety culture scan
ENVID
Incident analysis (TRIPOD) Fire Protection Analyses
Management system audits QRA, IRPA
Technical Safety Review
Compliance Audits
Process Hazard Analysis
Hazard Consequence
Modeling
Compliance
Asset integrity studies
Environmental impact
(SIL, IPF
assessment (EIA)
and LOPA)
Environmental permitting Reliability, Availability &
Maintainability Studies
Safety Report
(RAMS)
Fire Report
FME(C)A studies
QRA/external Safety
BowTie Risk Analyses
EIA
Escape, Evacuation &
Emission studies
Rescue Analysis (EERA)
Noise/odor dispersion studies
IPPC studies
Organization and processes
Environmental Management
Systems
Safety Management Systems
Occupational Health Management
Systems
HSE Risk Management
Interim HSE Management
Training and Coaching
Environmental and Sustainability
Reporting
04 februari 2014
Process safety management
HSE engineering
