Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region II – CAGAYAN VALLEY
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SANTIAGO CITY
NAGGASICAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Naggasican, Santiago City
Revised QAME Analysis Form 1: ANALYSIS OF THE MONITORING/EVALUATION RESULTS
(To be accomplished by Individual Monitors)
Title of the Training Program: IN SERVICE TRAINING PROGRAM FOR TEACHERS Inclusive Dates: MAY 24 – 26,
2025
Learning Service Provider (Division/HEI): NAGGASICAN NHS Class Section: Teachers and Staff Venue: Naggasican National
Highschool
Proponent: MA. CRISTINA [Link] Name of Monitor: JOEL S. DOMINGO Date Monitored: NOV 28-29,
2025
PART I: Analysis of the Session and Facilitation Evaluation
Based on the results of the evaluation of the session and facilitation done by the participants, as well as the validated observations of the
On-Site monitors, answer the following questions:
1. What are the strong points of the session? Of the facilitator? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.
SESSION TITLE Strong Points Factors that helped Areas for Factors that may Recommended
(This may be done through Improvement have contributed Steps to Address
a Focus-Group Discussion)
to the areas for the Issue/s.
improvement (Indicate whether
(This may be done action can be
through a Focus-Group immediate or long-
Discussion) term)
Session/Day 1: Child Child Protection Teachers should be
Address: Purok 1, Naggasican, Santiago City
Telephone No.: (078) 305-2889
Email Address: DHSNE.325204@[Link]
[Link]
What arePolicy
the strong points of the daily operationsable
of the
to betraining
aware ofprogram? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.
Resource
DAY Person:
Overall Rating DepEd(DepEd LRPO) Strong Points Areas for Improvement and Suggestions
Policies Under
ANGELICA B. BESA
those Child Protection
1 3.84
Facilitators
This Session and technical
Focuses Policiesstaff wereto accessible and
and able
on thequick to respond
Different Child toapply
participants’ needs—whether
this learning in for
materials,
Protection technical support,
policies or clarifications.
case of encounter.
underDaily reminders, announcements, and updates were
the Department
2 3.97
Session/Day 2: Crafting
clearly communicated to all participants, ensuring that
of Education
Action Research Proposan
everyone focuses
The discussion was well-informed and aligned with the
Use of Different
Resource Person:
on howprogram
to craftflow.
an Techniques and Ideas
AVERAGE
JONATHAN M. 3.91
RATING action research, this is on how to formulate a
FOR
GUILLERMO
OPERATIO to educate teachers on research proposal
NS
how to formulate a
Session/Day 2: Classroom
good research title.
2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:
Teaching Strategies
Its all about We adopt and use
Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR Identify deviation from Standard/s Proposed Course/s of Action to Address the
Resource Person: DERICK
Classroom Strategies, some of the teaching
form) Deviation
DALE Y. MENDOZA
it focuses on different methods that the
NONE
teaching methods that speakersNONE impart, and NONE
can help us teachers to use it in our Demo
improve our classroom Teaching.
IMPORTANT: Parts I and II shouldmanagement
be used forand Debriefing as Feedback to the Program Management Team for information and immediate
action teaching.
PART III: ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAM EVALUATION (to be accomplished at the end of the training program)
Identify Class Section/s Program Attainment Delivery of Provision Program Training Meals
and batches Manageme of Content of Support Manageme Venue Average
nt Objectives Materials nt Team
Teachers and Staff 3.89 3.89 3.89 3.89 4.00 3.67 3.67 3.84
General Average
4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.89 3.89 3.97
3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 4.00 3.78 3.78 3.91
Address: Purok 1, Naggasican, Santiago City
Telephone No.: (078) 305-2889
Email Address: DHSNE.325204@[Link]
Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback:
SIGNIFICANT LEARNING
1. We learn about the different Child Protection Policies and those will be our basis on how we protect our learners.
2. This training helped us Teachers on how to construct and develop a good Research Proposal, on the other hand it gives us some
techniques and idea on how to create a research title.
3. Learn Different Teaching Strategies that can help us to improve and better our teaching methods.
FURTHER LEARNING
1. My most significant learning today is realizing how action research can help solve real classroom problems and improve my teaching. I
also gained new teaching strategies that make lessons more engaging for students..
2. This training made me realize that as teachers, should make classroom instruction more engaging and student-centered.
3. This session reminded me that Teachers should adopt in different trends to create learning more interesting for the learners.
COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT
[Link] training was informative and engaging.
[Link] flow of the program was well-organized.
[Link] facilitators were knowledgeable and approachable
Submitted by: Submitted to / Received by:
RYAN A. SANTOS MA. CRISTINA A. SUBIA
QAME Team Leader Proponent
Address: Purok 1, Naggasican, Santiago City
Telephone No.: (078) 305-2889
Email Address: DHSNE.325204@[Link]
