0% found this document useful (0 votes)
0 views7 pages

QALOGBOOK[1][1]

Uploaded by

shubhambabutale
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
0 views7 pages

QALOGBOOK[1][1]

Uploaded by

shubhambabutale
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

MINIPROJECT LOGBOOK

GROUP MEMBERS

1. Sarthak Agrawal

2. Ahmed Ansari

3. Shubham Bahutale

Supervisor

Prof. Anagha Durugkar

Computer Engineering Department


Thadomal Shahani Engineering College

Bandra(w), Mumbai - 400 050

University of Mumbai
(AY 2025-26)
STUDENT INFORMATION

Project Title: Quantum-Assisted Machine Learning: A Comparative Study

Student 1 Student 2 Student 3


Roll No 2303002 2303009 2303015

Name Sarthak Agrawal Ahmed Ansari Shubham Bahutale

Class with
Division C11 C11 C11

Contact No. 84466 34207 73854 94050 85917 43115

E-mail sarthakagrawal3105@gmail [email protected] shubhambahutale612006@g


.com mail.com
Address
JBBH, Sunder Nagar Rd 486, Firdaus Manzil, Om Sai Chawl

Behind Asmita Sand Dunes Noor Bagh,Chavindra Tanjaiwadi, T.P Road


Om Nagar, Sunder
Nagar, Malad (W) Bhiwandi Bhandup (W)

Mumbai - 400064 Mumbai - 421302 Mumbai- 400078


DECLARATION

I declare that this project represents my ideas in my own words and


wherever others' ideas or words have been included, I have adequately cited
and referenced the original sources. I also declare that I have adhered to all
principles of academic honesty and integrity and have not misrepresented or
fabricated or falsified any idea/data/fact/source in my project work. I promise
to maintain minimum 75% attendance, as per the University of Mumbai
norms. I understand that any violation of the above will be cause for
disciplinary action by the Institute.

Yours Faithfully

1. Sarthak Agrawal

2. Ahmed Ansari

3. Shubham Bahutale

(Signature of Students)
Letter of Acceptance

I undersigned, Prof. Anagha Durugkar working in Computer

Engineering department, willing to guide the project titled Quantum – Assited Machine

Learning: A Comparative Study

for the mini project 2A Semester V respectively for the academic year 2025 – 26.

The names of the students are:

1. Sarthak Agrawal

2. Ahmed Ansari

3. Shubham Bahutale

(Project Guide) (Mini Project Coordinator) (HOD Computer)

.
SCHEDULE FOR MINI PROJECT

Date Week Contents Remark Guide Sign

1 Project finalized and title chosen Guide approved


09/07/2025 (Quantum Assisted Machine topic.
Learning: A Comparative
Study).
2 Conducted literature review on Suggested to include
16/07/2025 classical vs quantum machine key studies like
learning models and studied Schuld et al. and
related research papers. Havlíček et al.
3 Finalized project workflow and Prof. approved
23/07/2025 decided to build a comparative proposed workflow.
Streamlit application using
PennyLane.
4 Began implementation of classical Advised to display
30/07/2025 SVM model using Scikit-learn and accuracy and
tested with sample datasets. confusion matrix.
5 Implemented quantum kernel Suggested
06/08/2025 computation using PennyLane and optimization for
integrated quantum SVM. large datasets.
6 Added preprocessing features: Recommended
13/08/2025 encoding, scaling, PCA, and improving user input
dataset upload functionality. flexibility.
7 Integrated both models into the Prof. approved the
20/08/2025 Streamlit interface with side-by- comparative
side comparison output. interface.
8 Tested application on multiple Advised to record
03/09/2025 datasets; verified accuracy and comparative results
performance of both models. for documentation.
9 Added visualization charts Suggested including
10/09/2025 (accuracy bar chart and confusion sample prediction
matrix table). comparison table.
10 Conducted performance analysis Prof. advised adding
17/09/2025 between classical and quantum observations and
SVM on different PCA interpretations.
components.
11 Completed final testing, error Approved for demo
24/09/2025 handling, and UI polishing for preparation.
Streamlit app.
12 Project demonstration, Prof. provided final
01/10/2025 documentation, and final approval.
submission preparation.
PROGRESS/ATTENDANCE REPORT

Title of the Project: QUANTUM-ASSITED MACHINE LEARNING: A COMPARATIVE


STUDY

Name of Student 1:Sarthak Agrawal

Name of Student 2:Ahmed Ansari

Name of Student 3:Shubham Bahutale

Name of the Supervisor: Prof. Anagha Durugkar

Sr. No Date Attendance Progress/Suggestion

1 2 3

P P P Project topic finalized as Quantum Assisted


1 09/07/25 Machine Learning: A Comparative Study.
Initial discussion held on comparison between
classical and quantum SVM approaches.
P P P Conducted literature review on classical and
2 quantum ML models. Research papers on
16/07/25 quantum kernel methods discussed. Prof.
suggested including theoretical background of
both methods.
P P P Workflow and project design finalized.
3 23/07/25 Decided to use Streamlit for UI, Scikit-learn
for classical SVM, and PennyLane for quantum
SVM implementation.
P P P Implemented classical SVM using Scikit-learn.
4 30/07/25 Tested with small datasets and verified
accuracy metrics. Advised to include confusion
matrix display.
P P P Quantum kernel developed using PennyLane.
5 06/08/25 Integration with SVM classifier started. Prof.
suggested optimizing computation for limited
samples.
P P P Added data preprocessing functionalities
6 13/08/25 such as scaling, encoding, and PCA. Verified
preprocessing pipeline with different
datasets.
P P P Integrated classical and quantum models
7 20/08/25 into one Streamlit interface for direct
comparison. Interface approved by Prof.

P P P Performed testing on multiple datasets to


8 03/09/25 compare accuracy, runtime, and efficiency.
Suggested saving results for documentation.

P P P Added graphical visualizations like bar


9 10/09/25 charts and confusion matrices. Discussed
inclusion of sample prediction tables for
report.
P P P Conducted experiments by varying PCA
10 17/09/25 components and dataset sizes. Analyzed
accuracy variation and performance impact.

P P P Completed debugging and UI improvements.


11 24/09/25 Prof. reviewed the working model and
provided final suggestions.

P P P Final demonstration conducted successfully.


12 01/10/25 Documentation and report writing
completed. Project approved for submission.

Sign of the Supervisor

You might also like