RESORCINOL
Uploaded by
ScribdTranslationsRESORCINOL
Uploaded by
ScribdTranslationsNATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNIVERSITY OF MEXICO Date:
Zaragoza Faculty of Higher Studies 17/05/18
EVALUATION OF RESORCINOL Batch: ND
Lab: L-402 Grupo: 2453 Modulo: AFM I Expiration: ND
Objective:
Determine the purity percentage of a resorcinol sample
through a REDOX titration.
Specific Objectives:
By means of a back titration, determine the purity of
a sample of resorcinol.
Chemical Reaction:
C 6H 6O2+ 3Br2 → C 6H 6O2 3Br2 +3HBr
−¿→2Br−¿ ¿ ¿ −¿¿ −¿+ I ¿
−¿ →2I −¿¿ ¿
Br2 +2 e 2I −¿I +2 e ¿
Br2 +2I −¿2Br ¿
I 2+ 2e 2¿¿
2
2
I 2+ 2¿ ¿ ¿
Methodology and Theoretical Calculations:
STANDARDIZATION
5mL of SV was added for each aliquot of Br2 (0.1213N), 5mL of
injectable water, 5mL of HCl, 5mL of KI, left to rest for 5
minutes. 2mL of sodium thiosulfate SV was added.
(0.10714N), 3 mL of soluble starch SI was added and the process continued.
the titration with sodium thiosulfate, until the solution
dark blue became colorless.
TABLE 1. STANDARDIZATION
Br2 ( mL) SpentVolume ( mL) N
Na2S203
1 5 7.4 0.1585
2 5 7.5 0.1628
ON AVERAGE 0.1606
C.V. 1.89%
I elaborate Review Approved
NATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNIVERSITY OF MEXICO Date:
Zaragoza Faculty of Higher Studies 17/05/18
EVALUATION OF RESORCINOL Batch: ND
Lab: L-402 Grupo: 2453 Modulo: AFM I Expiry: ND
Experimental calculations
N 1V 1=N 2 V 2
Br2Na2S2O 3
0.10714eq
N 1=
( 0.0074L )
(L
=
0.1585eq )
0.005L L
0.10714 eq
N 2=
( 0.0075L )
(L
=0.1628eq/L
)
0.005L
VALUATION
Calculation for valuation
m resorcinol0.1N0.010L
=( )( ) ¿
0.01835g of resorcinol was weighed for each aliquot, then it was added
20mL of SV of Br2 5mL of HCl was left to rest for 2
minutes, KI 5mL was added, it was shaken vigorously, it was left
rest in darkness for 5 minutes, SI starch was added and
titled with sodium thiosulfate until the solution is colorless.
TABLE 2. RESORCINOL VALUATION.
Resorcinol weight ( g ) SpentVolume ( mL) Purity
Na2S203
I elaborate Review Approved
NATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNIVERSITY OF MEXICO Date:
Zaragoza Faculty of Higher Studies 17/05/18
EVALUATION OF RESORCINOL Batch: ND
Lab: L-402 Grupo: 2453 Modulo: AFM I Expiration: ND
1 0.0186 11.5 117.78
2 0.0187 10.5 127.66
%P. AVERAGE 122.72
C.V. 5.96%
Br2 No2 S2O 3
%P=¿
Resorcinol
Experimental calculations
%P=¿
%P=¿
Results Analysis
The analyzed samples of Resorcinol could not be evaluated.
adequately, due to the lack of reagent "SR of iodide"
potassium,” for this reason only two samples I and were evaluated.
II since sample III showed very low values from the range with
regarding the previous samples, for this reason such sample was
discarded. Another cause of the variation may have been the agitation
unequal of the flasks and that they were not exposed to light, it
What could have modified the normality of bromine in the analysis.
Conclusion (expressed in concrete form)
According to the result obtained in the percentage calculations
of content, the sample experimentally obtained 122%
content of resorcinol. Comparing with the data
expected; contains no less than 99.0 percent of C6H6O2 and not
I elaborate Review Approved
NATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNIVERSITY OF MEXICO Date:
ZARAGOZA HIGHER STUDIES FACULTY 17/05/18
EVALUATION OF RESORCINOL Batch: ND
Lab: L-402 Grupo: 2453 Modulo: AFM I Expiration: ND
more than 101.0 percent calculated with respect to the substance
anhydrous. We can conclude that the evaluated samples
they probably weren't the right ones, as a batch was used
different from the sample that is regularly used in
laboratory for the analysis of its content, which exceeded by
more than 20 units the percentage, it is concluded that it was not met
with the expected content.
Bibliography
-Health Secretary. (2008). Pharmacopoeia of the United States
Mexicans. Mexico, Permanent Commission of the Pharmacopoeia of the
United Mexican States.
-D.A. Skog. (1995). Química Analítica. México DF: Mc Graw Hill.
-R.A Day. (1995). Quantitative Analytical Chemistry. Mexico City:
Prentice Hall.
