Made: 24 June 2024

Effective: 15 December 2024

Code of Ethics
New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants

charteredaccountantsanz © 2024
This New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants (NZICA) Code of Ethics (this document) is based on
the Final Pronouncement International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International
Independence Standards) and associated amending pronouncements – see New Zealand Preface for
complete list of publications and publication dates (see page 12) – of the International Ethics Standards
Board for Accountants (IESBA), published by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) and are
used with the permission of IFAC (IFAC Material). NZICA has supplemented and amended the IFAC
material to make it suitable for its requirements including adding its own publication title; NZICA and
Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CA ANZ) trademarks and related logos; the sections
titled “Changes of Substance”, “Notice of Legal Status”, “New Zealand Preface” and “New Zealand Scope
and Application”; references to applicable pronouncements of NZICA and/or the External Reporting Board;
NZ specific paragraphs including NZ R100.9 – NZ100.13A1, NZ113.1 A3.1, NZ114.1A1.1, NZ R115.3,
NZ120.17A1 – NZ120.19A, NZ210.8A4, NZ R310.9.1 – NZ R310.9.2 and NZ310.14A1 (in substitution of
deleted IFAC material), NZ R320.7.1 – NZ R320.7.2, NZ R330.4.1, and NZ R330.5.1 - NZ330.5.2A1; NZ
specific terms and definitions that are prefaced with ‘NZ’ in the Glossary; and the “Conformity Statements”
(NZICA Material).

IFAC Material Copyright © 2024 International Federation of Accountants. All rights reserved. IFAC Material
is protected by copyright and under international copyright conventions. Contact [email protected] for
permission to reproduce, store or transmit, or to make other similar uses of the IFAC Material.

NZICA Material Copyright © 2024 New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants. All rights reserved. The
NZICA material is protected by copyright and under international copyright conventions. Contact NZ
Regulation Lead, Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand at
[email protected] for permission to reproduce, store or transmit, or to make
other similar uses of the NZICA Material.

NZICA, CA ANZ, IFAC and IESBA do not warrant, represent or guarantee that this document ,the IFAC
Material or the NZICA Material are in all respects accurate, complete and current. To the extent permitted by
law, NZICA, CA ANZ, IFAC and IESBA exclude any liability, including any liability for negligence, for any
loss or damage arising from reliance on this document, the IFAC Material and/or the NZICA Material.

Standards set by the NZICA Regulatory Board are publicly available in electronic format in the Members’
Handbook on the CA ANZ website www.charteredaccountantsanz.com.

Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand

Chartered Accountants House, Level 7, 50 Customhouse Quay,
PO Box 11342, Wellington 6142, New Zealand
T 0800 469 422 +64 4 474 7840

2
 Changes of Substance From the 12/2022 Extant Code
The text in this document replaces the extant Code of Ethics (application 15 December 2022)
Overview of Changes
The primary changes to the extant Code comprise:
• Revisions to sections 110, 120, 200, 220, 260, 300, 320, 360 and the Glossary to align the Code with
Final Pronouncement: Technology-related Provisions of the Code, developed under the under the
International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) Technology project [Revisions to
paragraphs R360.26 – 360.27 and Parts 4A & 4B of the Code have been automatically aligned by virtue
of the NZAuASB updating paragraphs R360.26 – 360.27 and Parts 4A & 4B of Professional and Ethical
Standard 1, International Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (including International
Independence Standards)(New Zealand) (PES 1) for amendments arising from that project]
• Revisions to paragraphs 300.8A2, 310.8A3, and 320.3A3 and the Glossary to align the Code with PES 1
for updates to align that pronouncement with Final Pronouncement: Revisions to the Code Relating to
the Definition of Engagement Team and Group Audits, developed under the IESBA “Engagement Team
and Group Audits” project [Revisions to paragraphs R360.16 – 360.18A1 and Parts 4A & 4B of the Code
have been automatically aligned by virtue of the NZAuASB updating paragraphs R360.16 – 360.18A1
and Parts 4A & 4B of PES 1 for amendments arising from that project];
• Revisions to the Glossary to align the Code with PES 1 for updates to align that pronouncement with
Final Pronouncement: Revisions to the Definitions of Listed Entity and Public Interest Entity, developed
under the IESBA “Definitions of Listed Entity and Public Interest Entity” project [Revisions to Parts 4A &
4B of the Code have been automatically aligned by virtue of the NZAuASB updating Parts 4A & 4B of
PES 1 for amendments arising from that project];
• Conforming and editorial amendments.
Effective Dates
Revised Code
• Parts 1, 2 and 3 of the revised Code (excluding paragraphs R360.10 – 360.28A1) will be effective from
15 December 2024 (early adoption permitted).
• Paragraphs R360.10 – 360.28A1 and Parts 4A and 4B – refer to the effective dates in PES 1.

3
 CONTENTS

Page

GUIDE TO THE CODE ......................................................................................................... 5

CODE OF ETHICS ................................................................................................................ 9

NOTICE OF LEGAL STATUS OF THE CODE OF ETHICS ................................................. 11

NEW ZEALAND PREFACE .................................................................................................. 12

Interaction between NZAuASB's Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners and the Code 13
NEW ZEALAND SCOPE AND APPLICATION ...................................................................... 14

PART 1 – COMPLYING WITH THE CODE, FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND CONCEPTUAL

FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................. 16

PART 2 – MEMBERS IN BUSINESS .................................................................................... 35

PART 3 – MEMBERS IN PUBLIC PRACTICE ...................................................................... 69

INTERNATIONAL INDEPENDENCE STANDARDS (PARTS 4A AND 4B)

PART 4A – INDEPENDENCE FOR AUDIT AND REVIEW ENGAGEMENTS ...................... 106

PART 4B – INDEPENDENCE FOR ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS OTHER THAN AUDIT AND

REVIEW ENGAGEMENTS .............................................................................. 106

GLOSSARY, INCLUDING LISTS OF ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................... 107

EFFECTIVE DATE ................................................................................................................ 120

WITHDRAWAL OF EXTANT CODE ...................................................................................... 120

CONFORMITY WITH INTERNATIONAL PRONOUNCEMENTS ......................................... 121

CONFORMITY WITH NATIONAL PRONOUNCEMENTS .................................................... 123

CONFORMITY WITH AUSTRALIAN PRONOUNCEMENTS ............................................... 125

____________________________________________________________________________________

4
 GUIDE TO THE CODE

GUIDE TO THE CODE

(This Guide is a non-authoritative aid to using the Code.)

Purpose of the Code

1. The Code of Ethics (“the Code”) sets out fundamental principles of ethics for members, reflecting the
profession’s recognition of its public interest responsibility. These principles establish the standard of
behaviour expected of a member. The fundamental principles are: integrity, objectivity, professional
competence and due care, confidentiality, and professional behaviour.

2. The Code provides a conceptual framework that members are to apply in order to identify, evaluate
and address threats to compliance with the fundamental principles. The Code sets out requirements
and application material on various topics to help members apply the conceptual framework to those
topics.

3. In the case of audits, reviews and other assurance engagements, the Code directs members to the
International independence Standards (New Zealand) (refer to the NZAuASB's Professional and
Ethical Standard 1, International Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (including International
independence Standards) (New Zealand) (PES 1)), established by the application of the conceptual
framework to threats to independence in relation to these engagements.

How the Code is Structured

4. The Code contains the following material:

• Part 1 – Complying with the Code, Fundamental Principles and Conceptual Framework, which
includes the fundamental principles and the conceptual framework and is applicable to all
members.

• Part 2 – Members in Business, which sets out additional material that applies to members in
business when performing professional activities. Members in business include members
employed, engaged or contracted in an executive or non-executive capacity in, for example:

o Commerce, industry or service.

o The public sector.

o Education.

o The not-for-profit sector.

o Regulatory or professional bodies.

Part 2 is also applicable to individuals who are members in public practice when performing
professional activities pursuant to their relationship with the firm, whether as a contractor,
employee or owner.

• Part 3 – Members in Public Practice, which sets out additional material that applies to members
in public practice when providing professional services.

• International Independence Standards (New Zealand) (refer PES 1), which sets out additional
material that applies to members in public practice when providing assurance services, as
follows:

5
 GUIDE TO THE CODE

o Part 4A – Independence for Audit and Review Engagements, which applies when
performing audit or review engagements.

o Part 4B – Independence for Assurance Engagements Other than Audit and Review
Engagements, which applies when performing assurance engagements that are not
audit or review engagements.
• Glossary, which contains defined terms (together with additional explanations where
appropriate) and described terms which have a specific meaning in certain parts of the Code.

5. The Code contains sections which address specific topics. Some sections contain subsections
dealing with specific aspects of those topics. Each section of the Code is structured, where
appropriate, as follows:

• Introduction – sets out the subject matter addressed within the section, and introduces the
requirements and application material in the context of the conceptual framework. Introductory
material contains information, including an explanation of terms used, which is important to the
understanding and application of each Part and its sections.

• Requirements – establish general and specific obligations with respect to the subject matter
addressed.

• Application material – provides context, explanations, suggestions for actions or matters to

consider, illustrations and other guidance to assist in complying with the requirements.

How to Use the Code

The Fundamental Principles, Independence and Conceptual Framework

6. The Code requires members to comply with the fundamental principles of ethics. The Code also
requires them to apply the conceptual framework to identify, evaluate and address threats to
compliance with the fundamental principles. Applying the conceptual framework requires having an
inquiring mind, exercising professional judgment, and using the reasonable and informed third party
test.

7. The conceptual framework recognises that the existence of conditions, policies and procedures
established by the profession, legislation, regulation, the firm, or the employing organisation might
impact the identification of threats. Those conditions, policies and procedures might also be a relevant
factor in the member’s evaluation of whether a threat is at an acceptable level. When threats are not
at an acceptable level, the conceptual framework requires the member to address those threats.
Applying safeguards is one way that threats might be addressed. Safeguards are actions individually
or in combination that the member takes that effectively reduce threats to an acceptable level.
8. In addition, the Code requires members to be independent when performing audit, review and other
assurance engagements. The conceptual framework applies in the same way to identifying,
evaluating and addressing threats to independence as to threats to compliance with the fundamental
principles.

9. Complying with the Code requires knowing, understanding and applying:

• All of the relevant provisions of a particular section in the context of Part 1, together with the
additional material set out in Sections 200, 300, 400 (refer Part 4A of PES 1) and 900 (refer
Part 4B of PES 1), as applicable.

6
 GUIDE TO THE CODE

• All of the relevant provisions of a particular section, for example, applying the provisions that
are set out under the subheadings titled “General” and “All Audit or Review Clients” together
with additional specific provisions, including those set out under the subheadings titled “Audit
or Review Clients that are not Public Interest Entities” or “Audit or Review Clients that are
Public Interest Entities.”
• All of the relevant provisions set out in a particular section together with any additional
provisions set out in any relevant subsection.

Requirements and Application Material

10. Requirements and application material are to be read and applied with the objective of complying
with the fundamental principles, applying the conceptual framework and, when performing audit,
review and other assurance engagements, being independent.

Requirements

11. Requirements are designated with the letter “R”, denoted in bold-type and, in most cases, include
the word “shall.” The word “shall” in the Code imposes an obligation on a member or firm to comply
with the specific provision in which “shall” has been used.

12. In some situations, the Code provides a specific exception to a requirement. In such a situation, the
provision is designated with the letter “R” but uses “may” or conditional wording.

13. When the word “may” is used in the Code, it denotes permission to take a particular action in certain
circumstances, including as an exception to a requirement. It is not used to denote possibility.

14. When the word “might” is used in the Code, it denotes the possibility of a matter arising, an event
occurring or a course of action being taken. The term does not ascribe any particular level of
possibility or likelihood when used in conjunction with a threat, as the evaluation of the level of a
threat depends on the facts and circumstances of any particular matter, event or course of action.

Application Material

15. In addition to requirements, the Code contains application material that provides context relevant to
a proper understanding of the Code. In particular, the application material is intended to help a
member to understand how to apply the conceptual framework to a particular set of circumstances
and to understand and comply with a specific requirement. While such application material does not
of itself impose a requirement, consideration of the material is necessary to the proper application of
the requirements of the Code, including application of the conceptual framework. Application material
is designated with the letter “A.”

16. Where application material includes lists of examples, these lists are not intended to be exhaustive.

Appendix to Guide to the Code

17. The Appendix to this Guide provides an overview of the Code.

7
 GUIDE TO THE CODE

Appendix to Guide to the Code

OVERVIEW OF THE CODE

PART 1
COMPLYING WITH THE CODE, FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
(ALL MEMBERS - SECTIONS 100 TO 199)

PART 2 PART 3
MEMBERS IN BUSINESS MEMBERS IN PUBLIC PRACTICE
(SECTIONS 300 TO 399)
(SECTIONS 200 TO 299)
(PART 2 IS ALSO APPLICABLE TO INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS IN PUBLIC PRACTICE
WHEN PERFORMING PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
PURSUANT TO THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE FIRM)
INTERNATIONAL INDEPENDENCE STANDARDS
(NEW ZEALAND) [REFER PES 1]
(PARTS 4A AND 4B)
PART 4A – INDEPENDENCE FOR AUDIT AND REVIEW
ENGAGEMENTS
(SECTIONS 400 TO 899)
PART 4B – INDEPENDENCE FOR ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS
OTHER THAN AUDIT AND REVIEW ENGAGEMENTS
(SECTIONS 900 TO 999)

GLOSSARY
(ALL MEMBERS)

8
 THECODE
THE CODE

CODE OF ETHICS
New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants
TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTICE OF LEGAL STATUS OF THE CODE OF ETHICS ................................................. 11

NEW ZEALAND PREFACE .................................................................................................. 12

Interaction between NZAuASB’s Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners and the Code 13
NEW ZEALAND SCOPE AND APPLICATION ...................................................................... 14

PART 1 – COMPLYING WITH THE CODE, FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND CONCEPTUAL

FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................. 16

100 COMPLYING WITH THE CODE ...................................................................... 16

110 THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES ................................................................ 19

111 – INTEGRITY.................................................................................................................. 20

112 – OBJECTIVITY ............................................................................................................. 20

113 – PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE AND DUE CARE .................................................. 21

114 – CONFIDENTIALITY .................................................................................................... 21

115 – PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIOUR .................................................................................. 24

120 THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................ 25

PART 2 – MEMBERS IN BUSINESS ................................................................................... 35

200 APPLYING THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK – MEMBERS IN BUSINESS 35

210 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ............................................................................ 40

220 PREPARATION AND PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION ........................... 43

230 ACTING WITH SUFFICIENT EXPERTISE ...................................................... 48

240 FINANCIAL INTERESTS, COMPENSATION AND INCENTIVES LINKED TO FINANCIAL

REPORTING AND DECISION MAKING .......................................................... 49
250 INDUCEMENTS, INCLUDING GIFTS AND HOSPITALITY ............................. 51

260 RESPONDING TO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS . 56

270 PRESSURE TO BREACH THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES ..................... 64

PART 3 – MEMBERS IN PUBLIC PRACTICE ..................................................................... 69

300 APPLYING THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK – MEMBERS IN PUBLIC PRACTICE 69

310 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ............................................................................ 76

320 PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS ................................................................ 81

321 SECOND OPINIONS ........................................................................................ 86

9
 THE CODE

325 OBJECTIVITY OF AN ENGAGEMENT QUALITY REVIEWER AND OTHER APPROPRIATE

REVIEWERS .................................................................................................... 87

330 FEES AND OTHER TYPES OF REMUNERATION ......................................... 90

340 INDUCEMENTS, INCLUDING GIFTS AND HOSPITALITY ............................. 93

350 CUSTODY OF CLIENT ASSETS ..................................................................... 98

360 RESPONDING TO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS . 99

INTERNATIONAL INDEPENDENCE STANDARDS (NEW ZEALAND) (PARTS 4A AND 4B)

PART 4A – INDEPENDENCE FOR AUDIT AND REVIEW ENGAGEMENTS (REFER PES 1) 106
PART 4B – INDEPENDENCE FOR ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS OTHER THAN AUDIT AND REVIEW
ENGAGEMENTS (REFER PES 1)................................................................... 106

GLOSSARY, INCLUDING LISTS OF ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................... 107

10
 THE CODE

NOTICE OF LEGAL STATUS OF THE CODE OF ETHICS

The Code of Ethics of the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants (NZICA) was made by the
New Zealand Regulatory Board of NZICA on 24 June 2024 pursuant to section 7 of the New Zealand
Institute of Chartered Accountants Act 1996. The Act states, in section 7, that the Code of Ethics is
secondary legislation for the purposes of the Legislation Act 2019. This means that the Code of Ethics
must be tabled in Parliament and can be disallowed by Parliament.

NZICA has prescribed the following Code of Ethics to be binding on all members of NZICA.

Members of NZICA are also members of Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CA ANZ)
and are subject to all applicable by-laws, rules, regulations, standards and guidance of CA ANZ.

This Code of Ethics replaces all previous Codes of Ethics issued by the New Zealand Regulatory Board
of NZICA.

This Code of Ethics is effective from 15 December 2024.

11
 THE CODE

NEW ZEALAND PREFACE

The Code of Ethics ("the Code"), amended by NZICA in June 2024, is based on the Final Pronouncement
International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence
Standards) of the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA), published by the
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) in April 2018 1. It also includes the Final Pronouncement
Revisions to the Code Pertaining to the Offering and Accepting of Inducements of the IESBA, published
by IFAC in July 20182, the Final Pronouncement Revisions to Part 4B of the Code to Reflect Terms and
Concepts Used in International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (Revised) of the IESBA,
published by IFAC in January 20203, the Final Pronouncement Revisions to the Code to Promote the
Role and Mindset Expected of Professional Accountants of the IESBA, published by IFAC in October
20204, the Final Pronouncement Revisions to the Code Addressing the Objectivity of an Engagement
Quality Reviewer and Other Appropriate Reviewers, published by IFAC in January 20215, the Final
Pronouncement Revisions to the Non-Assurance Services Provisions of the Code, published by IFAC in
April 20216, the Final Pronouncement Revisions to the Fee-related Provisions of the Code, published by
IFAC in April 20217, the Final Pronouncement Quality Management-related Conforming Amendments to
the Code, published by IFAC in April 20228, the Final Pronouncement Revisions to the Definitions of
Listed Entity and Public Interest Entity, published by IFAC in April 20229, the Final Pronouncement
Revisions to the Code Relating to the Definition of Engagement Team and Group Audits, published by

1 International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence

Standards) Copyright © April 2018 by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). All rights
reserved. Used with permission of IFAC. Contact [email protected] for permission to reproduce,
store or transmit, or to make other similar uses of this document.
2 Revisions to the Code Pertaining to the Offering and Accepting of Inducements Copyright © July 2018

by the International Federation of Accountants(IFAC). All rights reserved. Used with permission of IFAC.
Contact [email protected] for permission to reproduce, store or transmit, or to make other similar
uses of this document.
3 Revisions to Part 4B of the Code to Reflect Terms and Concepts Used in International Standard on

Assurance Engagements 3000 (Revised) Copyright © January 2020 by the International Federation of
Accountants(IFAC). All rights reserved. Used with permission of IFAC. Contact [email protected] for
permission to reproduce, store or transmit, or to make other similar uses of this document.
4 Revisions to the Code to Promote the Role and Mindset Expected of Professional Accountants

Copyright © October 2020 by the International Federation of Accountants(IFAC). All rights reserved. Used
with permission of IFAC. Contact [email protected] for permission to reproduce, store or transmit, or
to make other similar uses of this document.
5 Revisions to the Code Addressing the Objectivity of an Engagement Quality Reviewer and Other

Appropriate Reviewers Copyright © January 2021 by the International Federation of Accountants(IFAC).

All rights reserved. Used with permission of IFAC. Contact [email protected] for permission to
reproduce, store or transmit, or to make other similar uses of this document.
6 Revisions to the Non-Assurance Services Provisions of the Code Copyright © April 2021 by the

International Federation of Accountants(IFAC). All rights reserved. Used with permission of IFAC. Contact
[email protected] for permission to reproduce, store or transmit, or to make other similar uses of this
document.
7 Revisions to the Fee-related Provisions of the Code Copyright © April 2021 by the International

Federation of Accountants(IFAC). All rights reserved. Used with permission of IFAC. Contact
[email protected] for permission to reproduce, store or transmit, or to make other similar uses of this
document.
8 Quality Management-related Conforming Amendments to the Code Copyright © April 2022 by the

International Federation of Accountants(IFAC). All rights reserved. Used with permission of IFAC. Contact
[email protected] for permission to reproduce, store or transmit, or to make other similar uses of this
document.
9 Revisions to the Definitions of Listed Entity and Public Interest Entity Copyright © April 2022 by the

International Federation of Accountants(IFAC). All rights reserved. Used with permission of IFAC. Contact
[email protected] for permission to reproduce, store or transmit, or to make other similar uses of this
document.
12
 THE CODE

IFAC in February 202310, and the Final Pronouncement Technology-related Provisions of the Code,
published by IFAC in April 202311.

All pronouncements are used with the permission of IFAC.

New Zealand additions and definitions are prefixed with NZ in this Code.

Interaction between NZAuASB's Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners and

the Code

The New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (NZAuASB) is New Zealand's independent
standard setting body for audit and assurance standards, including the professional and ethical standards
applying to assurance practitioners.

In September 2011, a pronouncement was approved by the NZICA Council that made it a requirement for
all members providing assurance services to adhere to the standards issued by the NZAuASB. Therefore,
assurance practitioners must comply with both Professional and Ethical Standard 1 (PES 1) International
Code of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (including International Independence Standards) (New
Zealand) issued by the NZAuASB; and the NZICA Code.

In PES 1 the independence requirements relating to assurance engagements are incorporated in two
parts:

• Part 4A – Independence for Audit and Review Engagements; and

• Part 4B – Independence for Assurance Engagements Other than Audit and Review
Engagements.

These two parts are not replicated in the Code, instead members are referred to Parts 4A and 4B of
PES 1 issued by NZAuASB.

In PES 1 the requirements relating to responding to non-compliance with laws and regulations for
assurance engagements are in Paragraphs R360.10 – 360.28 A1.

These paragraphs have not been replicated in the Code instead members are referred to Paragraphs
R360.10 – 360.28 A1 of PES 1 issued by NZAuASB.

10 Revisions to the Code Relating to the Definition of Engagement Team and Group Audits Copyright ©
February 2023 by the International Federation of Accountants(IFAC). All rights reserved. Used with
permission of IFAC. Contact [email protected] for permission to reproduce, store or transmit, or to
make other similar uses of this document.
11 Technology-related Provisions of the Code Copyright © April 2023 by the International Federation of

Accountants(IFAC). All rights reserved. Used with permission of IFAC. Contact [email protected] for
permission to reproduce, store or transmit, or to make other similar uses of this document.
13
 THE CODE

NEW ZEALAND SCOPE AND APPLICATION

NZ 1.1 The amended Code is effective from 15 December 2024. This supersedes the Code
(effective 15 December 2022).
NZ R1.2 Compliance with the Code is mandatory for all members.
NZ 1.2 A1 The requirements are equally applicable to all members, whether they are in public
practice, commerce, industry, service, the public sector, education, the not-for-profit sector,
or in regulatory or professional bodies who might be an employee, contractor, partner,
director (executive or non-executive), owner-manager or volunteer or acting in an
honourary capacity.
NZ R1.3 The Code is based on a number of fundamental principles that express the basic
tenets of professional and ethical behaviour and conduct. Members shall abide by
these fundamental principles in all their business and professional activities. If the
fundamental principles are threatened and the level of the threat cannot be
eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level, the member or firm shall terminate or
decline the activity.
NZ 1.4 The Code is designed to provide members with authoritative guidance on minimum
acceptable standards of professional conduct. Non- compliance with the Code might
expose a member to disciplinary action.
NZ R1.5 The Code focuses on essential matters of principle and is not to be taken as a
definitive statement on all matters. Members shall be able to demonstrate at all times
that their actions, behaviour, and conduct comply with the Code.
NZ1.6 The Code is not intended to detract from responsibilities which might be imposed by law or
regulation.
NZ R1.7 All members outside of New Zealand shall comply with the Code to the extent to
which they are not prevented from so doing by specific requirements of local laws
and/or regulations.
NZ R1.8 All references in the Code to “technical and professional standards” are to the
standards issued by NZICA, the External Reporting Board, the New Zealand Auditing
and Assurance Standards Board, the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board or
other standards or authoritative guidance applicable to the task or engagement.
All references in the Code to legislation are references to those provisions as
amended from time to time.
NZ R1.9 In applying the requirements outlined in the Code, members shall be guided, not
merely by the words, but also by the spirit of the Code. The fact that particular
behaviour or conduct is not discussed within the Code, does not prevent it from
amounting to a breach of the Code.

14
 THE CODE

PART 1 – COMPLYING WITH THE CODE, FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND CONCEPTUAL

FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................. 16

Section 100 Complying With The Code ................................................................................ 16

Section 110 The Fundamental Principles.............................................................................. 19

Subsection 111 – Integrity ..................................................................................................... 20

Subsection 112 – Objectivity ................................................................................................. 20

Subsection 113 – Professional Competence And Due Care ................................................ 21

Subsection 114 – Confidentiality ........................................................................................... 21

Subsection 115 – Professional Behaviour ............................................................................ 24

Section 120 The Conceptual Framework .............................................................................. 25

15
 THE CODE

PART 1 – COMPLYING WITH THE CODE, FUNDAMENTAL

PRINCIPLES AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
SECTION 100
COMPLYING WITH THE CODE
Introduction
100.1 A distinguishing mark of the accountancy profession is its acceptance of the responsibility to
act in the public interest.

100.2 [Amended. Refer to NZ100.2]

NZ100.2 Confidence in the accountancy profession is a reason why businesses, governments and other
organisations involve members in a broad range of areas including financial and corporate
reporting, assurance and other professional activities. Members understand and acknowledge
that such confidence is based on skills and values that members bring to the professional activities
they undertake, including:

(a) Adherence to ethical principles and technical and professional standards;

(b) Use of business acumen;

(c) Application of expertise on technical and other matters; and

(d) Exercise of professional judgement.

The application of these skills and values enables members to provide advice or other output
that meets the purpose for which it was provided, and which can be relied upon by the intended
users of such output

100.3 [Amended. Refer to NZ100.3]

NZ100.3 The Code sets out high quality standards of ethical behaviour expected of members.

100.4 The Code establishes five fundamental principles to be complied with by all members. It also
includes a conceptual framework that sets out the approach to be taken to identify, evaluate and
address threats to compliance with those fundamental principles and, for audits and other
assurance engagements, threats to independence. The Code also applies the fundamental
principles and the conceptual framework to a range of facts and circumstances that members
might encounter, whether in business or in public practice.

Requirements and Application Material

100.5 A1 [Amended. Refer to NZ100.5 A1]
NZ100.5 A1 The requirements in the Code (including those in the New Zealand Scope and Application),
designated with the letter “R” and denoted in bold-type impose obligations.

100.5 A2 Application material, designated with the letter “A,” provides context, explanations, suggestions
for actions or matters to consider, illustrations and other guidance relevant to a proper
understanding of the Code. In particular, the application material is intended to help a member
to understand how to apply the conceptual framework to a particular set of circumstances and
to understand and comply with a specific requirement. While such application material does
not of itself impose a requirement, consideration of the material is necessary to the proper
application of the requirements of the Code, including application of the conceptual framework.

16
 THE CODE

R100.6 A member shall comply with the Code.

100.6 A1 Upholding the fundamental principles and compliance with the specific requirements of the
Code enable members to meet their responsibility to act in the public interest.

100.6 A2 Complying with the Code includes giving appropriate regard to the aim and intent of the specific
requirements.
100.6 A3 Compliance with the requirements of the Code does not mean that members will have always
met their responsibility to act in the public interest. There might be unusual or exceptional
circumstances in which a member believes that complying with a requirement or requirements
of the Code might not be in the public interest or would lead to a disproportionate outcome. In
those circumstances, the member is encouraged to consult with an appropriate body such as
a professional or regulatory body.
100.6 A4 In acting in the public interest, a member considers not only the preferences or requirements
of an individual client or employing organisation, but also the interests of other stakeholders
when performing professional activities.

R100.7 If there are circumstances where laws or regulations preclude a member from
complying with certain parts of the Code, those laws and regulations prevail, and the
member shall comply with all other parts of the Code.

100.7 A1 The principle of professional behaviour requires a member to comply with relevant laws and
regulations. Some jurisdictions might have provisions that differ from or go beyond those set
out in the Code. Members in those jurisdictions need to be aware of those differences and
comply with the more stringent provisions unless prohibited by law or regulation.

Breaches of the Code

R100.8 Paragraphs R400.80 to R400.89 and R900.50 to R900.55 (refer PES 1) address a breach
of International Independence Standards (New Zealand). A member who identifies a
breach of any other provision of the Code shall evaluate the significance of the breach
and its impact on the member's ability to comply with the fundamental principles. The
member shall also:

(a) Take whatever actions might be available, as soon as possible, to address the
consequences of the breach satisfactorily; and

(b) Determine whether to report the breach to the relevant parties.

100.8 A1 Relevant parties to whom such a breach might be reported include those who might have been
affected by it, a professional or regulatory body or an oversight authority.

Duty to Disclose Unethical Behaviour

NZ R100.9 Subject to R100.7, members have a professional duty to report unethical behaviour of
other members to NZICA. Any member who encounters or becomes aware of a matter
which provides reasonable grounds for suspecting defalcation, fraud, dishonesty or
other unethical behaviour by any other member shall make a report immediately to the
most senior executive of NZICA.
NZ100.9 A1 In circumstances where a member has made a report to NZICA, the member should be aware
that:

17
 THE CODE

(a) The information disclosed might form the basis of a complaint by NZICA, and in certain
circumstances the member who made the report might be requested and/or required to
participate in any disciplinary proceedings;

(b) The information disclosed, including the name and other information which might enable
identification of the member who has made the report, could be made available to the
member about whom the report relates pursuant to the Privacy Act 2020;

(c) In all situations where the member considers disclosing confidential information, the
member must consider:
(i) The interests of all parties who might be affected; and

(ii) The need to obtain legal advice and consult NZICA.

NZ R100.10 The duty to report shall extend to the member's own conduct. In the event of disciplinary
proceedings, the fact that a member has made such a report will count in the member's
favour.

Member in practice with non-members

NZ R100.11 Non-members who are permitted to practice with members, regardless of practice
structure, shall comply with this Code. Members who practise with non-members, as
principals, shall ensure that those non-members comply with this Code.

NZ R100.12 When there is a reference in this Code to "member" it shall also be deemed to include a
reference to a non-member partner or director, in so far as it is not inconsistent with the
NZICA Rules and this Code

Members' Responsibility for the Conduct of Others

NZ R100.13 A member shall take reasonable steps to ensure others do not carry out on the
member's behalf acts which if carried out by the member, would place the member in
breach of the NZICA Rules or this Code.

NZ100.13 A1 Members can be held responsible for the compliance with the Code of all persons associated
with the member, who are either under the member’s supervision or are the member’s
partners or fellow directors in a corporate practice.

18
 THE CODE

SECTION 110
THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
General
110.1 A1 [Amended. Refer to NZ110.1 A1]

NZ110.1 A1 There are five fundamental principles of ethics for members:

(a) Integrity – to be straightforward and honest in all professional and business relationships.

(b) Objectivity – to exercise professional or business judgment without being compromised

by:
(i) Bias;
(ii) Conflict of interest; or
(iii) Undue influence of, or undue reliance on, individuals, organisations, technology or
other factors.

(c) Professional Competence and Due Care – to:

(i) Attain and maintain professional knowledge and skill at the level required to ensure
that a client or employing organisation receives competent professional activities,
based on current technical and professional standards and relevant laws and
regulations; and

(ii) Act diligently and in accordance with applicable technical and professional
standards and relevant laws and regulations.

(d) Confidentiality – to respect the confidentiality of information acquired as a result of

professional and business relationships.

(e) Professional Behaviour – to:

(i) Comply with relevant laws and regulations;

(ii) Behave in a manner consistent with the profession’s responsibility to act in the
public interest in all professional and business activities and relationships; and

(iii) Avoid any conduct that the member knows or should know might discredit the
profession.

R110.2 A member shall comply with each of the fundamental principles.

110.2 A1 The fundamental principles of ethics establish the standard of behaviour expected of a member.
The conceptual framework establishes the approach which a member is required to apply in
complying with those fundamental principles. Subsections 111 to 115 set out requirements and
application material related to each of the fundamental principles.

110.2 A2 A member might face a situation in which complying with one fundamental principles conflicts
with complying with one or more other fundamental principles. In such a situation, the member
might consider consulting, on an anonymous basis if necessary, with:
• Others within the firm or employing organisation.

• Those charged with governance.

• A professional body.

19
 THE CODE

• A regulatory body.

• Legal counsel.
However, such consultation does not relieve the member from the responsibility to exercise
professional judgment to resolve the conflict or, if necessary, and unless prohibited by law or
regulation, disassociate from the matter creating the conflict.
110.2 A3 The member is encouraged to document the substance of the issue, the details of any
discussions, the decisions made and the rationale for those decisions.

SUBSECTION 111 – INTEGRITY

R111.1 A member shall comply with the principle of integrity, which requires a member to be
straightforward and honest in all professional and business relationships.

111.1 A1 Integrity involves fair dealing, truthfulness and having the strength of character to act appropriately,
even when facing pressure to do otherwise or when doing so might create potential adverse personal
or organsational consequences.

111.1 A2 Acting appropriately involves:

(a) Standing one’s ground when confronted by dilemmas and difficult situations; or

(b) Challenging others as and when circumstances warrant,

in a manner appropriate to the circumstances.

R111.2 A member shall not knowingly be associated with reports, returns, communications or
other information where the member believes that the information:

(a) Contains a materially false or misleading statement;

(b) Contains statements or information provided recklessly; or

(c) Omits or obscures required information where such omission or obscurity would
be misleading.

111.2 A1 If a member provides a modified report in respect of such a report, return, communication or
other information, the member is not in breach of paragraph R111.2.

R111.3 When a member becomes aware of having been associated with information described
in paragraph R111.2, the member shall take steps to be disassociated from that
information.

SUBSECTION 112 – OBJECTIVITY

R112.1 A member shall comply with the principle of objectivity, which requires a member to
exercise professional or business judgment without being compromised by:

(a) Bias;
(b) Conflict of interest; or
(c) Undue influence of, or undue reliance on, individuals, organisations, technology
or other factors.
R112.2 A member shall not undertake a professional activity if a circumstance or relationship
unduly influences the member’s professional judgment regarding that activity.

20
 THE CODE

SUBSECTION 113 – PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE AND DUE CARE

R113.1 [Amended. Refer to NZ R113.1]
NZ R113.1 A member shall comply with the principle of professional competence and due care,
which requires a member to:

(a) Attain and maintain professional knowledge and skills at the level required to
ensure that a client or employing organisation receives competent professional
activities, based on current technical and professional standards and relevant
laws and regulations; and
(b) Act diligently and in accordance with applicable technical and professional
standards and relevant laws and regulations.

113.1 A1 Serving clients and employing organisations with professional competence involves the
exercise of sound judgment in applying professional knowledge and skills.

113.1 A2 The knowledge and skills necessary for a professional activity vary depending on the nature of
the activity being undertaken. For example, in addition to the application of any technical
knowledge relevant to the professional activity, interpersonal, communication and
organisational skills facilitate the member’s interaction with entities and individuals with whom
the member interacts.

113.1 A3 Maintaining professional competence requires a member to have a continuing awareness and
understanding of technical, professional, business and technology-related developments
relevant to the professional activities undertaken by the member. Continuing professional
development enables a member to develop and maintain the capabilities to perform
competently within the professional environment.

113.1 A4 Diligence encompasses the responsibility to act in accordance with the requirements of an
assignment, carefully, thoroughly and on a timely basis.

NZ113.1 A4.1 Timeliness also extends to a member’s obligation to respond in a timely manner to NZICA.

R113.2 In complying with the principle of professional competence and due care, a member
shall take reasonable steps to ensure that those working in a professional capacity
under the member’s authority have appropriate training and supervision.

R113.3 Where appropriate, a member shall make clients, the employing organisation, or other
users of the member’s professional activities, aware of the limitations inherent in the
activities and explain the implications of those limitations.

SUBSECTION 114 – CONFIDENTIALITY

R114.1 A member shall comply with the principle of confidentiality, which requires a member to
respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of professional and
business relationships. A member shall:
(a) Be alert to the possibility of inadvertent disclosure, including in a social
environment, and particularly to a close business associate or an immediate or a
close family member;
(b) Maintain confidentiality of information within the firm or employing organisation;

21
 THE CODE

(c) Maintain confidentiality of information disclosed by a prospective client or

employing organisation; and

(d) Take reasonable steps to ensure that personnel under the member’s control, and
individuals from whom advice and assistance are obtained, comply with the
member’s duty of confidentiality
114.1 A1 Maintaining the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of professional and
business relationships involves the member taking appropriate action to protect the
confidentiality of such information in the course of its collection, use, transfer, storage or
retention, dissemination and lawful destruction.

R114.2 Subject to paragraph NZ R114.3, a member shall not:

(a) Disclose confidential information acquired in the course of professional and

business relationships;

(b) Use confidential information acquired in the course of professional and business
relationships for the advantage of the member, the firm, the employing
organisation or a third party;

(c) Use or disclose any confidential information, either acquired or received in the
course of a professional or business relationship, after that relationship has
ended; and

(d) Use or disclose information in respect of which the duty of confidentiality applies
notwithstanding that that information has become publicly available, whether
properly or improperly.

R114.3 [Amended. Refer to NZ R114.3]

NZ R114.3 As an exception to paragraph R114.2, a member may disclose or use confidential

information, or other information described in paragraph R114.2(d), where:

(a) There is a legal or professional duty or right to do so; or

(b) This is authorised by the client or any person with the authority to permit
disclosure or use of the confidential information , or other information described
in paragraph R114.2(d), and this is not prohibited by law or regulation.

114.3 A1 Confidentiality serves the public interest because it facilitates the free flow of information from
the member’s client or employing organisation to the member in the knowledge that the
information will not be disclosed to a third party. Nevertheless, the following are circumstances
where members might be required or have the duty or right to disclose confidential information:
(a) Disclosure is required by law or regulation, for example:

(i) Production of documents or other provision of evidence in the course of legal

proceedings; or
(ii) Disclosure to the appropriate public authorities of infringements of the law that come
to light; and

(b) There is a professional duty or right to disclose or use, when not prohibited by law or
regulation:

(i) To comply with the quality review of a professional body;

22
 THE CODE

(ii) To respond to an inquiry or investigation by a professional or regulatory body;

(iii) To protect the professional interests of a member in legal proceedings; or

(iv) To comply with technical and professional standards, including ethics
requirements.

NZ114.3A1.1 The circumstances in paragraph 114.3 A1 do not specifically address New Zealand legal and
regulatory requirements. A member considering disclosing or using confidential information
about a client or employing organisation without their consent is advised to first obtain legal
advice
114.3 A2 In deciding whether to disclose or use confidential information, factors to consider, depending
on the circumstances, include:

• Whether the interests of any parties, including third parties whose interests might be
affected, could be harmed if the client or employing organisation authorises the
disclosure or use of information by the member.

• Whether all the relevant information is known and substantiated, to the extent
practicable. Factors affecting the decision to disclose or use, the information, include:

o Unsubstantiated facts.

o Incomplete information.

o Unsubstantiated conclusions.

• The proposed means of communicating the information.

• Whether the parties to whom the information is to be provided or access is to be granted

are appropriate recipients.

• Any applicable law or regulation (including those governing privacy) in a jurisdiction

where disclosure might take place and, if different, the jurisdiction where the confidential
information originates.

114.3 A3 The circumstances in which a firm or employing organisation seeks authorisation to use or
disclose confidential information, include where the information is to be used for training
purposes, in the development of products or technology, in research or as source material for
industry or other benchmarking data or studies. Such authorisation might be general in its
application (for example, in relation to use of the information for internal training purposes or
quality enhancement initiatives). When obtaining the authorisation of the individual or entity that
provided such information for use in specific circumstances, relevant considerations to be
communicated (preferably in writing) might include:
• The nature of the information to be used or disclosed.

• The purpose for which the information is to be used or disclosed (for example,
technology development, research or benchmarking data or studies).
• The individual or entity who will undertake the activity for which the information is to be
used or disclosed.

• Whether the identity of the individual or entity that provided such information or any
individuals or entities to which such information relates will be identifiable from the output
of the activity for which the information is to be used or disclosed.
23
 THE CODE

R114.4 [Amended. Refer to NZ R114.4]

NZ R114.4 A member shall continue to comply with the principle of confidentiality even after the end
of the relationship between the member and a client or employing organisation. When
changing employment or acquiring a new client, the member is entitled to use prior
experience but shall not use or disclose any confidential information, or other
information described in paragraph R114.2(d), acquired or received in the course of a
professional or business relationship.

SUBSECTION 115 – PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIOUR

R115.1 A member shall comply with the principle of professional behaviour, which requires a
member to:

(a) Comply with relevant laws and regulations;

(b) Behave in a manner consistent with the profession’s responsibility to act in the
public interest in all professional activities and business relationships; and
(c) Avoid any conduct that the member knows or should know might discredit the
profession.

A member shall not knowingly engage in any business, occupation or activity that
impairs or might impair the integrity, objectivity or good reputation of the profession, and
as a result would be incompatible with the fundamental principles.

115.1 A1 Conduct that might discredit the profession includes conduct that a reasonable and informed
third party would be likely to conclude adversely affects the good reputation of the profession.

R115.2 When undertaking marketing or promotional activities, a member shall not bring the
profession into disrepute. A member shall be honest and truthful and shall not make:

(a) Exaggerated claims for the services offered by, or the qualifications or experience
of, the member; or

(b) Disparaging references or unsubstantiated comparisons to the work of others.

115.2 A1 If a member is in doubt about whether a form of advertising or marketing is appropriate, the
member is encouraged to consult with the relevant professional body.

NZ R115.3 A member shall act with courtesy and consideration.

24
 THE CODE

SECTION 120
THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Introduction
120.1 The circumstances in which members operate might create threats to compliance with the
fundamental principles. Section 120 sets out requirements and application material, including
a conceptual framework, to assist members in complying with the fundamental principles and
meeting their responsibility to act in the public interest. Such requirements and application
material accommodate the wide range of facts and circumstances, including the various
professional activities, interests and relationships, that create threats to compliance with the
fundamental principles. In addition, they deter members from concluding that a situation is
permitted solely because that situation is not specifically prohibited by the Code.
120.2 The conceptual framework specifies an approach for a member to:

(a) Identify threats to compliance with the fundamental principles;

(b) Evaluate the threats identified; and

(c) Address the threats by eliminating or reducing them to an acceptable level.

Requirements and Application Material

General

R120.3 The member shall apply the conceptual framework to identify, evaluate and address
threats to compliance with the fundamental principles set out in Section 110.

120.3 A1 Additional requirements and application material that are relevant to the application of the
conceptual framework are set out in:

(a) Part 2 – Members in Business;

(b) Part 3 – Members in Public Practice; and

(c) International Independence Standards (New Zealand) (refer PES 1), as follows:

(i) Part 4A – Independence for Audit and Review Engagements; and

(ii) Part 4B – Independence for Assurance Engagements Other than Audit and
Review Engagements.
R120.4 When dealing with an ethics issue, the member shall consider the context in which the
issue has arisen or might arise. Where an individual who is a member in public practice
is performing professional activities pursuant to the member's relationship with the
firm, whether as a contractor, employee or owner, the individual shall comply with the
provisions in Part 2 that apply to these circumstances.

R120.5 When applying the conceptual framework, the member shall:

(a) Have an inquiring mind;

(b) Exercise professional judgment; and

(c) Use the reasonable and informed third party test described in paragraph 120.5 A9.

25
 THE CODE

Having an Inquiring Mind

120.5 A1 An inquiring mind is a prerequisite to obtaining an understanding of known facts and

circumstances necessary for the proper application of the conceptual framework. Having an
inquiring mind involves:

(a) Considering the source, relevance and sufficiency of information obtained, taking into
account the nature, scope and outputs of the professional activity being undertaken; and

(b) Being open and alert to a need for further investigation or other action.

120.5 A2 When considering the source, relevance and sufficiency of information obtained, the member
might consider, amongst other matters, whether:

• New information has emerged or there have been changes in facts and circumstances.

• The information or its source might be influenced by bias or self-interest.

• There is a reason to be concerned that potentially relevant information might be missing

from the facts and circumstances known to the member.

• There is an inconsistency between the known facts and circumstances and the member’s
expectations.

• The information provides a reasonable basis on which to reach a conclusion.

• There might be other reasonable conclusions that could be reached from the information
obtained.

120.5 A3 [Amended. Refer to NZ120.5 A3]

NZ120.5 A3 Paragraph R120.5 requires all members to have an inquiring mind when identifying, evaluating
and addressing threats to the fundamental principles. This prerequisite for applying the
conceptual framework applies to all members regardless of the professional activity
undertaken. Under auditing, review and other assurance standards, including those issued by
the NZAuASB, members are also required to exercise professional scepticism, which includes
a critical assessment of evidence.

Exercise of Professional Judgment

120.5 A4 Professional judgment involves the application of relevant training, professional knowledge,
skill and experience commensurate with the facts and circumstances, taking into account the
nature and scope of the particular professional activities, and the interests and relationships
involved.

120.5 A5 Professional judgment is required when the member applies the conceptual framework in order
to make informed decisions about the courses of actions available, and to determine whether
such decisions are appropriate in the circumstances. In making this determination, the member
might consider matters such as whether:

• The member’s expertise and experience are sufficient to reach a conclusion.

• There is a need to consult with others with relevant expertise or experience.

• The member’s own preconception or bias might be affecting the member’s exercise of
professional judgment.

26
 THE CODE

120.5 A6 The circumstances in which members carry out professional activities and the factors involved
vary considerably in their range and complexity. The professional judgment exercised by
members might need to take into account the complexity arising from the compounding effect
of the interaction between, and changes in, elements of the facts and circumstances that are
uncertain and variables and assumptions that are interconnected or interdependent.
120.5 A7 Managing complexity involves:

• Making the firm or employing organisation and, if appropriate, relevant stakeholders

aware of the inherent uncertainties or difficulties arising from the facts and
circumstances. (Ref: Para. R113.3)

• Being alert to any developments or changes in the facts and circumstances and
assessing whether they might impact any judgments the member has made. (Ref: Para.
R120.5 to 120.5 A3, and R120.9 to 120.9 A2)

120.5 A8 Managing complexity might also involve:

• Analysing and investigating as relevant, any uncertain elements, the variables and
assumptions and how they are connected or interdependent.

• Using technology to analyse relevant data to inform the member’s judgment.

• Consulting with others, including experts, to ensure appropriate challenge and additional
input as part of the evaluation process.

Reasonable and Informed Third Party

120.5 A9 The reasonable and informed third party test is a consideration by the member about whether
the same conclusions would likely be reached by another party. Such consideration is made
from the perspective of a reasonable and informed third party, who weighs all the relevant facts
and circumstances that the member knows, or could reasonably be expected to know, at the
time the conclusions are made. The reasonable and informed third party does not need to be
a member, but would possess the relevant knowledge and experience to understand and
evaluate the appropriateness of the member’s conclusions in an impartial manner.

Identifying Threats

R120.6 The member shall identify threats to compliance with the fundamental principles.

120.6 A1 An understanding of the facts and circumstances, including any professional activities,
interests and relationships that might compromise compliance with the fundamental principles,
is a prerequisite to the member’s identification of threats to such compliance. The existence of
certain conditions, policies and procedures established by the profession, legislation,
regulation, the firm, or the employing organisation that can enhance the member acting
ethically might also help identify threats to compliance with the fundamental principles.
Paragraph 120.8 A2 includes general examples of such conditions, policies and procedures
which are also factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of threats.

120.6 A2 Threats to compliance with the fundamental principles might be created by a broad range of
facts and circumstances. It is not possible to define every situation that creates threats. In
addition, the nature of engagements and work assignments might differ and, consequently,
different types of threats might be created.

27
 THE CODE

120.6 A3 Threats to compliance with the fundamental principles fall into one or more of the following
categories:

(a) Self-interest threat – the threat that a financial or other interest will inappropriately
influence a member’s judgment or behaviour;
(b) Self-review threat – the threat that a member will not appropriately evaluate the results
of a previous judgment made, or an activity performed by the member, or by another
individual within the member’s firm or employing organisation, on which the member will
rely when forming a judgment as part of performing a current activity;
(c) Advocacy threat – the threat that a member will promote a client’s or employing
organisation’s position to the point that the member’s objectivity is compromised;
(d) Familiarity threat – the threat that due to a long or close relationship with a client, or
employing organisation, a member will be too sympathetic to their interests or too
accepting of their work; and
(e) Intimidation threat – the threat that a member will be deterred from acting objectively
because of actual or perceived pressures, including attempts to exercise undue influence
over the member.

120.6 A4 A circumstance might create more than one threat, and a threat might affect compliance with
more than one fundamental principle

Evaluating Threats

R120.7 When the member identifies a threat to compliance with the fundamental principles, the
member shall evaluate whether such a threat is at an acceptable level.

Acceptable Level

120.7 A1 An acceptable level is a level at which a member using the reasonable and informed third party
test would likely conclude that the member complies with the fundamental principles.

Factors Relevant in Evaluating the Level of Threats

120.8 A1 The consideration of qualitative as well as quantitative factors is relevant in the member’s
evaluation of threats, as is the combined effect of multiple threats, if applicable.

120.8 A2 The existence of conditions, policies and procedures described in paragraph 120.6 A1 might
also be factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of threats to compliance with
fundamental principles. Examples of such conditions, policies and procedures include:

• Corporate governance requirements.

• Educational, training and experience requirements for the profession.

• Effective complaint systems which enable the member and the general public to draw
attention to unethical behaviour.

• An explicitly stated duty to report breaches of ethics requirements.

• Professional or regulatory monitoring and disciplinary procedures.

28
 THE CODE

Consideration of New Information or Changes in Facts and Circumstances

R120.9 If the member becomes aware of new information or changes in facts and circumstances
that might impact whether a threat has been eliminated or reduced to an acceptable
level, the member shall re-evaluate and address that threat accordingly.

120.9 A1 Remaining alert throughout the professional activity assists the member in determining whether
new information has emerged or changes in facts and circumstances have occurred that:

(a) Impact the level of a threat; or

(b) Affect the member’s conclusions about whether safeguards applied continue to be
appropriate to address identified threats.

120.9 A2 If new information results in the identification of a new threat, the member is required to
evaluate and, as appropriate, address this threat. (Ref: Paras. R120.7 and R120.10).

Addressing Threats

R120.10 If the member determines that the identified threats to compliance with the fundamental
principles are not at an acceptable level, the member shall address the threats by
eliminating them or reducing them to an acceptable level. The member shall do so by:

(a) Eliminating the circumstances, including interests or relationships, that are

creating the threats;

(b) Applying safeguards, where available and capable of being applied, to reduce the
threats to an acceptable level; or

(c) Declining or ending the specific professional activity.

Actions to Eliminate Threats

120.10 A1 Depending on the facts and circumstances, a threat might be addressed by eliminating the
circumstance creating the threat. However, there are some situations in which threats can only
be addressed by declining or ending the specific professional activity. This is because the
circumstances that created the threats cannot be eliminated and safeguards are not capable
of being applied to reduce the threat to an acceptable level.

Safeguards

120.10 A2 Safeguards are actions, individually or in combination, that the member takes that effectively
reduce threats to compliance with the fundamental principles to an acceptable level.

Consideration of Significant Judgments Made and Overall Conclusions Reached

R120.11 The member shall form an overall conclusion about whether the actions that the member
takes, or intends to take, to address the threats created will eliminate those threats or
reduce them to an acceptable level. In forming the overall conclusion, the member shall:

(a) Review any significant judgments made or conclusions reached; and

(b) Use the reasonable and informed third party test.

29
 THE CODE

Other Considerations when Applying the Conceptual Framework

Bias
120.12 A1 Conscious or unconscious bias affects the exercise of professional judgement when
identifying, evaluating and addressing threats to compliance with the fundamental principles.

120.12 A2 Examples of potential bias to be aware of when exercising professional judgement include:
• Anchoring bias, which is a tendency to use an initial piece of information as an anchor
against which subsequent information is inadequately assessed.

• Automation bias, which is the tendency to favour output generated from automated
systems, even when human reasoning or contradictory information raises questions as
to whether such output is reliable or fit for purpose.

• Availability bias, which is a tendency to place more weight on events or experiences that
immediately come to mind or are readily available than those that are not.

• Confirmation bias, which is a tendency to place more weight on information that

corroborates an existing belief than information that contradicts or casts doubt on that
belief.

• Groupthink, which is a tendency for a group of individuals to discourage individual

creativity and responsibility and as a result reach a decision without critical reasoning or
consideration of alternatives.

• Overconfidence bias, which is a tendency to overestimate one’s own ability to make

accurate assessments of risk or other judgements or decisions.

• Representation bias, which is a tendency to base an understanding on a pattern of

experiences, events or beliefs that is assumed to be representative.

• Selective perception, which is a tendency for a person’s expectations to influence how

the person views a particular matter or person.

120.12 A3 Actions that might mitigate the effect of bias include:

• Seeking advice from experts to provide additional input.

• Consulting with others to ensure appropriate challenge as part of the evaluation process.

• Receiving training related to the identification of bias as part of professional development.

Organisational Culture
120.13 A1 The effective application of the conceptual framework by a member is enhanced when the
importance of ethical values that align with the fundamental principles and other provisions set
out in the Code is promoted through the internal culture of the member’s organisation.

120.13 A2 The promotion of an ethical culture within an organisation is most effective when:

(a) Leaders and those in management roles promote the importance of, and hold
themselves and others accountable for demonstrating the ethical values of the
organisation;

(b) Appropriate education and training programs, management processes, and performance
evaluation and reward criteria that promote an ethical culture are in place;

30
 THE CODE

(c) Effective policies and procedures are in place to encourage and protect those who report
actual or suspected illegal or unethical behaviour, including whistle-blowers; and

(d) The organisation adheres to ethical values in its dealings with third parties.

120.13 A3 Members are expected to:

(a) Encourage and promote an ethics-based culture in their organisation, taking into account
their position and seniority; and
(b) Exhibit ethical behavior in dealings with individuals with whom, and entities with which,
the members, the firm or the employing organisation has a professional or business
relationship.

Considerations for Audits, Reviews, Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements

Firm Culture

120.14.A1 Professional and Ethical Standard 3 (PES 3) Quality Management for Firms that Perform
Audits or Reviews of Financial Statements, or Other Assurance or Related Services
Engagements issued by the NZAuASB sets out requirements and application material relating
to firm culture in the context of a firm’s responsibilities to design, implement and operate a
system of quality management for audits or reviews of financial statements, or other assurance
or related services engagements.

Independence

120.15 A1 Members in public practice are required by International Independence Standards (New
Zealand) (refer PES 1) to be independent when performing audits, reviews, or other assurance
engagements. Independence is linked to the fundamental principles of objectivity and integrity.
It comprises:
(a) Independence of mind – the state of mind that permits the expression of a conclusion
without being affected by influences that compromise professional judgment, thereby
allowing an individual to act with integrity, and exercise objectivity and professional
scepticism.
(b) Independence in appearance – the avoidance of facts and circumstances that are so
significant that a reasonable and informed third party would be likely to conclude that a
firm’s or an audit, review or assurance team member’s integrity, objectivity or
professional scepticism has been compromised.

120.15 A2 International Independence Standards (New Zealand) (refer PES 1) set out requirements and
application material on how to apply the conceptual framework to maintain independence
when performing audits, reviews or other assurance engagements. Members and firms are
required to comply with these standards in order to be independent when conducting such
engagements. The conceptual framework to identify, evaluate and address threats to
compliance with the fundamental principles applies in the same way to compliance with
independence requirements. The categories of threats to compliance with the fundamental
principles described in paragraph 120.6 A3 are also the categories of threats to compliance
with independence requirements.

120.15 A3 Conditions, policies and procedures described in paragraphs 120.6 A1 and 120.8 A2 that might
assist in identifying and evaluating threats to compliance with the fundamental principles might
also be factors relevant to identifying and evaluating threats to independence. In the context

31
 THE CODE

of audits, reviews and other assurance engagements, a system of quality management

designed, implemented and operated by a firm in accordance with the quality management
standards issued by the NZAuASB is an example of such conditions, policies and procedures.

Professional Scepticism

120.16 A1 Under auditing, review and other assurance standards, including those issued by the New
Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, members in public practice are required to
exercise professional scepticism when planning and performing audits, reviews and other
assurance engagements. Professional scepticism and the fundamental principles that are
described in Section 110 are inter-related concepts.
120.16 A2 In an audit of financial statements, compliance with the fundamental principles, individually and
collectively, supports the exercise of professional scepticism, as shown in the following
examples:

• Integrity requires the member to be straightforward and honest. For example, the
member complies with the principle of integrity by:

o Being straightforward and honest when raising concerns about a position taken
by a client

o Pursuing inquiries about inconsistent information and seeking further audit

evidence to address concerns about statements that might be materially false or
misleading in order to make informed decisions about the appropriate course of
action in the circumstances.

o Having strength of character to act appropriately, even when facing pressure to

do otherwise or when doing so might create potential adverse personal or
organisational consequences. Acting appropriately involves:

(a) Standing one’s ground when confronted by dilemmas and difficult situations;
or

(b) Challenging others as and when circumstances warrant,

in a manner appropriate to the circumstances.

In doing so, the member demonstrates the critical assessment of audit evidence that
contributes to the exercise of professional scepticism.

• Objectivity requires the member to exercise professional or business judgment without

being compromised by:

(a) Bias:
(b) Conflict of interest; or

(c) Undue influence of, or undue reliance on, individuals, organisations, technology or
other factors.
• For example, the member complies with the principle of objectivity by:

(a) Recognising circumstances or relationships such as familiarity with the client, that
might compromise the member’s professional or business judgment; and

(b) Considering the impact of such circumstances and relationships on the member’s

32
 THE CODE

judgment when evaluating the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence

related to a matter material to the client's financial statements.

In doing so, the member behaves in a manner that contributes to the exercise of
professional scepticism.

• Professional competence and due care requires the member to have professional
knowledge and skill at the level required to ensure the provision of competent
professional service, and to act diligently in accordance with applicable standards, laws
and regulations. For example, the member complies with the principle of professional
competence and due care by:

(a) Applying knowledge that is relevant to a particular client’s industry and business
activities in order to properly identify risks of material misstatement;
(b) Designing and performing appropriate audit procedures; and

(c) Applying relevant knowledge when critically assessing whether audit evidence is
sufficient and appropriate in the circumstances.

In doing so, the member behaves in a manner that contributes to the exercise of
professional scepticism.

Considerations for Other Engagements

Firm Culture
NZ 120.17 A1 Professional Standard 1 (PS-1) Quality Management issued by NZICA sets out requirements
and application material relating to firm culture in the context of a firm’s responsibilities to
design, implement and operate a system of quality management for engagements, other than
audit, review or other assurance or related services engagements.
Independence
NZ R120.18 A firm performing professional services, other than audit, review or other assurance or
related services engagements, shall be independent where required by applicable
technical and professional standards and relevant laws and regulations, or when it is
otherwise appropriate to the engagement.

NZ120.18 A1 Independence is also important for certain other professional services, including (but not
limited to) certain insolvency engagements, independent business valuations, appraisal
reports under New Zealand Stock Exchange Listing Rules, and expert witness engagements.
NZ120.18 A2 The fundamental principles that the concept of independence is linked to and a description
of what independence comprises are set out at 120.15 A1.

NZ R120.19 A firm shall apply the conceptual framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate
and address threats to independence in relation to professional engagements, other
than audits, reviews, other assurance and related services engagements, where
required by applicable technical and professional standards and relevant laws and
regulations, or when it is otherwise appropriate to the engagement.

33
 THE CODE

PART 2 – MEMBERS IN BUSINESS (INCLUDING EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIPS OF MEMBERS

IN PUBLIC PRACTICE) ...................................................................................... 35

Section 200 Applying the Conceptual Framework – Members in Business ......................... 35

Section 210 Conflicts of Interest ........................................................................................... 40

Section 220 Preparation and Presentation of Information .................................................... 43

Section 230 Acting with Sufficient Expertise ......................................................................... 48

Section 240 Financial Interests, Compensation and Incentives Linked to Financial Reporting and Decision
Making .............................................................................................................. 49
Section 250 Inducements, Including Gifts and Hospitality .................................................... 51

Section 260 Responding to Non-Compliance with Laws and Regulations ........................... 56

Section 270 Pressure to Breach the Fundamental Principles .............................................. 64

34
 THE CODE

PART 2 – MEMBERS IN BUSINESS

SECTION 200
APPLYING THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK – MEMBERS IN BUSINESS
Introduction
200.1 This Part of the Code sets out requirements and application material for members in business
when applying the conceptual framework set out in Section 120. It does not describe all of the
facts and circumstances, including professional activities, interests and relationships, that
could be encountered by members in business, which create or might create threats to
compliance with the fundamental principles. Therefore, the conceptual framework requires
members in business to be alert for such facts and circumstances.
200.2 Investors, creditors, employing organisations and other sectors of the business community, as
well as governments and the general public, might rely on the work of members in business.
members in business might be solely or jointly responsible for the preparation and reporting of
financial and other information, on which both their employing organisations and third parties
might rely. They might also be responsible for providing effective financial management and
competent advice on a variety of business-related matters.

200.3 A member in business might be an employee, contractor, partner, director (executive or non-
executive), owner-manager, or volunteer of an employing organisation. The legal form of the
relationship of the member with the employing organisation has no bearing on the ethical
responsibilities placed on the member.

200.4 In this Part, the term “member” refers to:

(a) A member in business; and

(b) An individual who is a member in public practice when performing professional activities
pursuant to the member’s relationship with the member’s firm, whether as a contractor,
employee or owner. More information on when Part 2 is applicable to members in public
practice is set out in paragraphs R120.4, R300.5 and 300.5 A1.

Requirements and Application Material

General

R200.5 A member shall comply with the fundamental principles set out in Section 110 and apply
the conceptual framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address
threats to compliance with the fundamental principles.
200.5 A1 A member has a responsibility to further the legitimate objectives of the member’s employing
organisation. The Code does not seek to hinder members from fulfilling that responsibility, but
addresses circumstances in which compliance with the fundamental principles might be
compromised.

200.5 A2 Members may promote the position of the employing organisation when furthering the
legitimate goals and objectives of their employing organisation, provided that any statements
made are neither false nor misleading. Such actions usually would not create an advocacy
threat.

35
 THE CODE

200.5 A3 The more senior the position of a member, the greater will be the ability and opportunity to
access information, and to influence policies, decisions made and actions taken by others
involved with the employing organisation. To the extent that they are able to do so, taking into
account their position and seniority in the organisation, members are expected to encourage
and promote an ethics-based culture in the organisation and exhibit ethical behavior in dealings
with individuals with whom, and entities with which, the member or the employing organisation
has a professional or business relationship in accordance with paragraph 120.13 A3. Examples
of actions that might be taken include the introduction, implementation and oversight of:
• Ethics education and training programs.

• Management processes and performance evaluation and reward criteria that promote
an ethical culture.
• Ethics and whistle-blowing policies.

• Policies and procedures designed to prevent non-compliance with laws and regulations.

Identifying Threats

200.6 A1 Threats to compliance with the fundamental principles might be created by a broad range of
facts and circumstances. The categories of threats are described in paragraph 120.6 A3. The
following are examples of facts and circumstances within each of those categories that might
create threats for a member when undertaking a professional activity:

(a) Self-interest Threats

• A member holding a financial interest in, or receiving a loan or guarantee from,

the employing organisation.

• A member participating in incentive compensation arrangements offered by the

employing organisation.

• A member having access to corporate assets for personal use.

• A member being offered a gift or special treatment from a supplier of the

employing organisation.

(b) Self-review Threats

• A member determining the appropriate accounting treatment for a business

combination after performing the feasibility study supporting the purchase
decision.

(c) Advocacy Threats

• A member having the opportunity to manipulate information in a prospectus in

order to obtain favorable financing.

(d) Familiarity Threats

• A member being responsible for the financial reporting of the employing

organisation when an immediate or close family member employed by the

36
 THE CODE

organisation makes decisions that affect the financial reporting of the

organisation.

• A member having a long association with individuals influencing business

decisions.

(e) Intimidation Threats

• A member or immediate or close family member facing the threat of dismissal or
replacement over a disagreement about:

o The application of an accounting principle.

o The way in which financial information is to be reported.

• An individual attempting to influence the decision-making process of the member,

for example with regard to the awarding of contracts or the application of an
accounting principle.

Identifying Threats Associated with the Use of Technology

200.6 A2 The following are examples of facts and circumstances relating to the use of technology that
might create threats for a member when undertaking a professional activity:

• Self-interest Threats

o The data available might not be sufficient for the effective use of the technology.

o The technology might not be appropriate for the purpose for which it is to be used.

o The member might not have sufficient information and expertise, or access to an
expert with sufficient understanding, to use and explain the technology and its
appropriateness for the purpose intended.

(Ref: Para. 230.2).

• Self-review Threats

o The technology was designed or developed using the knowledge, expertise or

judgment of the member or employing organisation.

Evaluating Threats

200.7 A1 The conditions, policies and procedures described in paragraphs 120.6 A1 and 120.8 A2 might
impact the evaluation of whether a threat to compliance with the fundamental principles is at
an acceptable level.
200.7 A2 The member’s evaluation of the level of a threat is also impacted by the nature and scope of
the professional activity.

200.7 A3 The member’s evaluation of the level of a threat might be impacted by the work environment
within the employing organisation and its operating environment. For example:

• Leadership that stresses the importance of ethical behaviour and the expectation that
employees will act in an ethical manner.
• Policies and procedures to empower and encourage employees to communicate ethics
issues that concern them to senior levels of management without fear of retribution.

37
 THE CODE

• Policies and procedures to implement and monitor the quality of employee performance.

• Systems of corporate oversight or other oversight structures and strong internal controls.
• Recruitment procedures emphasising the importance of employing high calibre
competent personnel.

• Timely communication of policies and procedures, including any changes to them, to all
employees, and appropriate training and education on such policies and procedures.

• Ethics and code of conduct policies.

200.7 A4 The member’s evaluation of the level of a threat associated with the use of technology might
also be impacted by the work environment within the employing organisation and its operating
environment. For example:

• Level of corporate oversight and internal controls over the technology.

• Assessments of the quality and functionality of technology that are undertaken by a third-
party.

• Training that is provided regularly to all relevant employees so they obtain and maintain
the professional competence to sufficiently understand, use and explain the technology
and its appropriateness for the purpose intended.

200.7 A5 Members might consider obtaining legal advice where they believe that unethical behaviour or
actions by others have occurred, or will continue to occur, within the employing organisation.

Addressing Threats

200.8 A1 Sections 210 to 270 describe certain threats that might arise during the course of performing
professional activities and include examples of actions that might address such threats.

200.8 A2 In extreme situations, if the circumstances that created the threats cannot be eliminated and
safeguards are not available or capable of being applied to reduce the threat to an acceptable
level, it might be appropriate for a member to resign from the employing organisation.

Communicating with Those Charged with Governance

(after exhausting other appropriate actions that might address the threat - see sections 210 to 270 for
examples)

R200.9 When communicating with those charged with governance in accordance with the Code,
a member shall determine the appropriate individual(s) within the employing
organisation’s governance structure with whom to communicate. If the member
communicates with a subgroup of those charged with governance, the member shall
determine whether communication with all of those charged with governance is also
necessary so that they are adequately informed.

200.9 A1 In determining with whom to communicate, a member might consider:

(a) The nature and importance of the circumstances; and

(b) The matter to be communicated.

200.9 A2 Examples of a subgroup of those charged with governance include an audit committee or an
individual member of those charged with governance.

38
 THE CODE

R200.10 If a member communicates with individuals who have management responsibilities as

well as governance responsibilities, the member shall be satisfied that communication
with those individuals adequately informs all of those in a governance role with whom
the member would otherwise communicate.

200.10 A1 In some circumstances, all of those charged with governance are involved in managing the
employing organisation, for example, a small business where a single owner manages the
organisation and no one else has a governance role. In these cases, if matters are
communicated with individual(s) with management responsibilities, and those individual(s) also
have governance responsibilities, the member has satisfied the requirement to communicate
with those charged with governance.

39
 THE CODE

SECTION 210
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Introduction
210.1 Members are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
210.2 A conflict of interest creates threats to compliance with the principle of objectivity and might
create threats to compliance with the other fundamental principles. Such threats might be
created when:
(a) A member undertakes a professional activity related to a particular matter for two or more
parties whose interests with respect to that matter are in conflict; or

(b) The interest of a member with respect to a particular matter and the interests of a party
for whom the member undertakes a professional activity related to that matter are in
conflict.

A party might include an employing organisation, a vendor, a customer, a lender, a

shareholder, or another party.

210.3 This section sets out specific requirements and application material relevant to applying the
conceptual framework to conflicts of interest.

Requirements and Application Material

General

R210.4 A member shall not allow a conflict of interest to compromise professional or business
judgment.

210.4 A1 Examples of circumstances that might create a conflict of interest include:

• Serving in a management or governance position for two employing organisations and

acquiring confidential information from one organisation that might be used by the
member to the advantage or disadvantage of the other organisation.

• Undertaking a professional activity for each of two parties in a partnership, where both
parties are employing the member to assist them to dissolve their partnership.

• Preparing financial information for certain members of management of the member’s

employing organisation who are seeking to undertake a management buy-out.
• Being responsible for selecting a vendor for the employing organisation when an
immediate family member of the member might benefit financially from the transaction.

• Serving in a governance capacity in an employing organisation that is approving certain

investments for the company where one of those investments will increase the value of
the investment portfolio of the member or an immediate family member.
Conflict Identification
R210.5 A member shall take reasonable steps to identify circumstances that might create a
conflict of interest, and therefore a threat to compliance with one or more of the
fundamental principles. Such steps shall include identifying:

40
 THE CODE

(a) The nature of the relevant interests and relationships between the parties
involved; and

(b) The activity and its implication for relevant parties.

R210.6 A member shall remain alert to changes over time in the nature of the activities, interests
and relationships that might create a conflict of interest while performing a professional
activity.

Threats Created by Conflicts of Interest

210.7 A1 In general, the more direct the connection between the professional activity and the matter on
which the parties’ interests conflict, the more likely the level of the threat is not at an acceptable
level.

210.7 A2 An example of an action that might eliminate threats created by conflicts of interest is
withdrawing from the decision-making process related to the matter giving rise to the conflict
of interest.

210.7 A3 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address threats created by conflicts of interest
include:

• Restructuring or segregating certain responsibilities and duties.

• Obtaining appropriate oversight, for example, acting under the supervision of an

executive or non-executive director.

Disclosure and Consent

General

210.8 A1 [Amended. Refer to NZ210.8 A1]

NZ210.8 A1 It is generally necessary to:

(a) Disclose in writing the nature of the conflict of interest and how any threats created were
addressed to the relevant parties, including to the appropriate levels within the employing
organisation affected by a conflict; and

(b) Obtain consent in writing from the relevant parties for the member to undertake the
professional activity when safeguards are applied to address the threat.

210.8 A2 Consent might be implied by a party’s conduct in circumstances where the member has
sufficient evidence to conclude that the parties know the circumstances at the outset and have
accepted the conflict of interest if they do not raise an objection to the existence of the conflict.

210.8 A3 If such disclosure or consent is not in writing, the member is encouraged to document:

(a) The nature of the circumstances giving rise to the conflict of interest;

(b) The safeguards applied to address the threats when applicable; and

(c) The consent obtained.

NZ210.8 A4 The member is encouraged to document all matters set-out in this section.

41
 THE CODE

Other Considerations

210.9 A1 When addressing a conflict of interest, the member is encouraged to seek guidance from within
the employing organisation or from others, such as a professional body, legal counsel or
another member. When making such disclosures or sharing information within the employing
organisation and seeking guidance of third parties, the principle of confidentiality applies.

42
 THE CODE

SECTION 220
PREPARATION AND PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION
Introduction
220.1 Members are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
220.2 Preparing or presenting information might create a self-interest, intimidation or other threats to
compliance with one or more of the fundamental principles. This section sets out specific
requirements and application material relevant to applying the conceptual framework in such
circumstances.

Requirements and Application Material

General

220.3 A1 Members at all levels in an employing organisation are involved in the preparation or
presentation of information both within and outside the organisation.

220.3 A2 Stakeholders to whom, or for whom, such information is prepared or presented, include:

• Management and those charged with governance.

• Investors and lenders or other creditors.

• Regulatory bodies.

This information might assist stakeholders in understanding and evaluating aspects of the
employing organisation’s state of affairs and in making decisions concerning the organisation.
Information can include financial and non-financial information that might be made public or
used for internal purposes.

Examples include:

• Operating and performance reports.

• Decision support analyses.

• Budgets and forecasts.

• Information provided to the internal and external auditors.

• Risk analyses.

• General and special purpose financial statements.

• Tax returns.
• Reports filed with regulatory bodies for legal and compliance purposes.

220.3 A3 For the purposes of this section, preparing or presenting information includes recording,
maintaining and approving information.
R220.4 When preparing or presenting information, a member shall:

(a) Prepare or present the information in accordance with a relevant reporting

framework, where applicable;

43
 THE CODE

(b) Prepare or present the information in a manner that is intended neither to mislead
nor to influence contractual or regulatory outcomes inappropriately;

(c) Exercise professional judgment to:

(i) Represent the facts accurately and completely in all material respects;

(ii) Describe clearly the true nature of business transactions or activities; and
(iii) Classify and record information in a timely and proper manner;

(d) Not omit anything with the intention of rendering the information misleading or of
influencing contractual or regulatory outcomes inappropriately;
(e) Avoid undue influence of, or undue reliance on, individuals, organisations or
technology; and

(f) Be aware of the risk of bias.

220.4 A1 An example of influencing a contractual or regulatory outcome inappropriately is using an

unrealistic estimate with the intention of avoiding violation of a contractual requirement such as
a debt covenant or of a regulatory requirement such as a capital requirement for a financial
institution.

Use of Discretion in Preparing or Presenting Information

R220.5 Preparing or presenting information might require the exercise of discretion in making
professional judgments. The member shall not exercise such discretion with the
intention of misleading others or influencing contractual or regulatory outcomes
inappropriately.

220.5 A1 Examples of ways in which discretion might be misused to achieve inappropriate outcomes
include:

• Determining estimates, for example, determining fair value estimates in order to

misrepresent profit or loss.

• Selecting or changing an accounting policy or method among two or more alternatives

permitted under the applicable financial reporting framework, for example, selecting a
policy for accounting for long-term contracts in order to misrepresent profit or loss.

• Determining the timing of transactions, for example, timing the sale of an asset near the
end of the fiscal year in order to mislead.
• Determining the structuring of transactions, for example, structuring financing
transactions in order to misrepresent assets and liabilities or classification of cash flows.

• Selecting disclosures, for example, omitting or obscuring information relating to financial

or operating risk in order to mislead.

R220.6 When performing professional activities, especially those that do not require
compliance with a relevant reporting framework, the member shall exercise professional
judgment to identify and consider:

(a) The purpose for which the information is to be used;

(b) The context within which it is given; and

44
 THE CODE

(c) The audience to whom it is addressed.

220.6 A1 For example, when preparing or presenting pro forma reports, budgets or forecasts, the
inclusion of relevant estimates, approximations and assumptions, where appropriate, would
enable those who might rely on such information to form their own judgments.

220.6 A2 The member might also consider clarifying the intended audience, context and purpose of the
information to be presented.

Using the Work of Others

R220.7 A member who intends to use the work of others whether internal or external to the
employing organisation, or other organisations shall exercise professional judgment to
determine the appropriate steps to take, if any, in order to fulfill the responsibilities set
out in paragraph R220.4.
220.7 A1 Factors to consider when a member intends to use the work of others include:

• The reputation and expertise of, and resources available to, the other individual or
organisation.

• Whether the other individual is subject to applicable professional and ethics standards.

Such information might be gained from prior association with, or from consulting others about,
the other individual or organisation.

Using the Output of Technology

R220.8 A member who intends to use the output of technology, whether that technology was
developed internally or provided by third parties, shall exercise professional judgment
to determine the appropriate steps to take, if any, in order to fulfill the responsibilities
set out in paragraph R220.4.

220.8 A1 Factors to consider when a member intends to use the output of technology include:

• The nature of the activity to be performed by the technology.

• The expected use of, or extent of reliance on, the output of the technology.

• Whether the member has the ability, or has access to an expert with the ability, to
understand, use and explain the technology and its appropriateness for the purpose
intended.

• Whether the technology used has been appropriately tested and evaluated for the
purpose intended.

• Prior experience with the technology and whether its use for specific purposes is
generally accepted.

• The employing organisation’s oversight of the design, development, implementation,

operation, maintenance, monitoring, updating or upgrading of the technology.

• The controls relating to the use of the technology, including procedures for authorising
user access to the technology and overseeing such use.

• The appropriateness of the inputs to the technology, including data and any related
decisions, and decisions made by individuals in the course of using the technology.

45
 THE CODE

Addressing Information that Is or Might be Misleading

R220.9 When the member knows or has reason to believe that the information with which the
member is associated is misleading, the member shall take appropriate actions to seek
to resolve the matter.

220.9 A1 Actions that might be appropriate include:

• Discussing concerns that the information is misleading with the member’s superior and/or
the appropriate level(s) of management within the member’s employing organisation or
those charged with governance, and requesting such individuals to take appropriate
action to resolve the matter. Such action might include:

o Having the information corrected.

o If the information has already been disclosed to the intended users, informing them
of the correct information.

• Consulting the policies and procedures of the employing organisation (for example, an
ethics or whistle-blowing policy) regarding how to address such matters internally.

220.9 A2 The member might determine that the employing organisation has not taken appropriate action.
If the member continues to have reason to believe that the information is misleading, the
following further actions might be appropriate provided that the member remains alert to the
principle of confidentiality:

• Consulting with:

o A relevant professional body.

o The internal or external auditor of the employing organisation.

o Legal counsel.

• Determining whether any requirements exist to communicate to:

o Third parties, including users of the information.

o Regulatory and oversight authorities.

R220.10 If after exhausting all feasible options, the member determines that appropriate action
has not been taken and there is reason to believe that the information is still misleading,
the member shall refuse to be or to remain associated with the information.

220.10 A1 In such circumstances, it might be appropriate for a member to resign from the employing
organisation.

Documentation

220.11 A1 [Amended. Refer to NZ220.10 A1]

NZ220.11 A1 The member is encouraged to document:

• The facts.

• The accounting principles or other relevant technical and professional standards

involved.

• The communications and parties with whom matters were discussed.

46
 THE CODE

• The courses of action considered.

• How the member attempted to address the matter(s).

Other Considerations

220.12 A1 Where threats to compliance with the fundamental principles relating to the preparation or
presentation of information arise from a financial interest, including compensation and
incentives linked to financial reporting and decision making, the requirements and application
material set out in Section 240 apply.

220.12 A2 Where the misleading information might involve non-compliance with laws and regulations, the
requirements and application material set out in Section 260 apply.

220.12 A3 Where threats to compliance with the fundamental principles relating to the preparation or
presentation of information arise from pressure, the requirements and application material set
out in Section 270 apply.

220.12 A4 When a member is considering using the work of others or the output of technology, a
consideration is whether the member is in a position within the employing organisation to obtain
information in relation to the factors necessary to determine whether such use is appropriate.

47
 THE CODE

SECTION 230
ACTING WITH SUFFICIENT EXPERTISE
Introduction
230.1 Members are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
230.2 Acting without sufficient expertise creates a self-interest threat to compliance with the principle
of professional competence and due care. This section sets out specific requirements and
application material relevant to applying the conceptual framework in such circumstances.

Requirements and Application Material

General

R230.3 A member shall not intentionally mislead an employing organisation as to the level of
expertise or experience possessed.

230.3 A1 The principle of professional competence and due care requires that a member only undertake
significant tasks for which the member has, or can obtain, sufficient training or experience.

230.3 A2 A self-interest threat to compliance with the principle of professional competence and due care
might be created if a member has:
• Insufficient time for performing or completing the relevant duties.
• Incomplete, restricted or otherwise inadequate information for performing the duties.
• Insufficient experience, training and/or education.
• Inadequate resources for the performance of the duties.

230.3 A3 Factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of such a threat include:
• The extent to which the member is working with others.
• The relative seniority of the member in the business.
• The level of supervision and review applied to the work.

230.3 A4 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address such a self-interest threat include:
• Obtaining assistance or training from someone with the necessary expertise.
• Ensuring that there is adequate time available for performing the relevant duties.

R230.4 If a threat to compliance with the principle of professional competence and due care
cannot be addressed, a member shall determine whether to decline to perform the duties
in question. If the member determines that declining is appropriate, the member shall
communicate the reasons.

Other Considerations
230.5 A1 The requirements and application material in Section 270 apply when a member is pressured
to act in a manner that might lead to a breach of the principle of professional competence and
due care.

48
 THE CODE

SECTION 240
FINANCIAL INTERESTS, COMPENSATION AND INCENTIVES LINKED TO FINANCIAL
REPORTING AND DECISION MAKING
Introduction
240.1 Members are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.

240.2 Having a financial interest, or knowing of a financial interest held by an immediate or close
family member might create a self-interest threat to compliance with the principles of objectivity
or confidentiality. This section sets out specific requirements and application material relevant
to applying the conceptual framework in such circumstances.

Requirements and Application Material

General

R240.3 A member shall not manipulate information or use confidential information for personal
gain or for the financial gain of others.

240.3 A1 Members might have financial interests or might know of financial interests of immediate or
close family members that, in certain circumstances, might create threats to compliance with
the fundamental principles. Financial interests include those arising from compensation or
incentive arrangements linked to financial reporting and decision making.

240.3 A2 Examples of circumstances that might create a self-interest threat include situations in which
the member or an immediate or close family member:

• Has a motive and opportunity to manipulate price-sensitive information in order to gain

financially.

• Holds a direct or indirect financial interest in the employing organisation and the value of
that financial interest might be directly affected by decisions made by the member.

• Is eligible for a profit-related bonus and the value of that bonus might be directly affected
by decisions made by the member.

• Holds, directly or indirectly, deferred bonus share rights or share options in the employing
organisation, the value of which might be affected by decisions made by the member.

• Participates in compensation arrangements which provide incentives to achieve targets

or to support efforts to maximise the value of the employing organisation’s shares. An
example of such an arrangement might be through participation in incentive plans which
are linked to certain performance conditions being met.
240.3 A3 Factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of such a threat include:

• The significance of the financial interest. What constitutes a significant financial interest
will depend on personal circumstances and the materiality of the financial interest to the
individual.

• Policies and procedures for a committee independent of management to determine the

level or form of senior management remuneration.

• In accordance with any internal policies, disclosure to those charged with governance

49
 THE CODE

of:

o All relevant interests.

o Any plans to exercise entitlements or trade in relevant shares.

• Internal and external audit procedures that are specific to address issues that give rise
to the financial interest.
240.3 A4 Threats created by compensation or incentive arrangements might be compounded by explicit
or implicit pressure from superiors or colleagues. See Section 270, Pressure to Breach the
Fundamental Principles.

50
 THE CODE

SECTION 250
INDUCEMENTS, INCLUDING GIFTS AND HOSPITALITY
Introduction
250.1 Members are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
250.2 Offering or accepting inducements might create a self-interest, familiarity or intimidation threat
to compliance with the fundamental principles, particularly the principles of integrity, objectivity
and professional behaviour.
250.3 This section sets out requirements and application material relevant to applying the conceptual
framework in relation to the offering and accepting of inducements when undertaking
professional activities that does not constitute non-compliance with laws and regulations. This
section also requires a member to comply with relevant laws and regulations when offering or
accepting inducements.

Requirements and Application Material

General

250.4 A1 An inducement is an object, situation, or action that is used as a means to influence another
individual’s behaviour, but not necessarily with the intent to improperly influence that
individual’s behaviour. inducements can range from minor acts of hospitality between business
colleagues to acts that result in non-compliance with laws and regulations. An inducement can
take many different forms, for example:

• Gifts.

• Hospitality.

• Entertainment.

• Political or charitable donations.

• Appeals to friendship and loyalty.

• Employment or other commercial opportunities.

• Preferential treatment, rights or privileges.

Inducements Prohibited by Laws and Regulations

R250.5 In many jurisdictions, there are laws and regulations, such as those related to bribery
and corruption, that prohibit the offering or accepting of inducements in certain
circumstances. The member shall obtain an understanding of relevant laws and
regulations and comply with them when the member encounters such circumstances.

Inducements Not Prohibited by Laws and Regulations

250.6 A1 The offering or accepting of inducements that is not prohibited by laws and regulations might
still create threats to compliance with the fundamental principles.

51
 THE CODE

Inducements with Intent to Improperly Influence Behaviour

R250.7 A member shall not offer, or encourage others to offer, any inducement that is made, or
which the member considers a reasonable and informed third party would be likely to
conclude is made, with the intent to improperly influence the behaviour of the recipient
or of another individual.
R250.8 A member shall not accept, or encourage others to accept, any inducement that the
member concludes is made, or considers a reasonable and informed third party would
be likely to conclude is made, with the intent to improperly influence the behaviour of
the recipient or of another individual.

250.9 A1 An inducement is considered as improperly influencing an individual’s behaviour if it causes

the individual to act in an unethical manner. Such improper influence can be directed either
towards the recipient or towards another individual who has some relationship with the
recipient. The fundamental principles are an appropriate frame of reference for a member in
considering what constitutes unethical behaviour on the part of the member and, if necessary
by analogy, other individuals.

250.9 A2 A breach of the fundamental principle of integrity arises when a member offers or accepts, or
encourages others to offer or accept, an inducement where the intent is to improperly influence
the behaviour of the recipient or of another individual.

250.9 A3 The determination of whether there is actual or perceived intent to improperly influence
behaviour requires the exercise of professional judgment. Relevant factors to consider might
include:

• The nature, frequency, value and cumulative effect of the inducement.

• Timing of when the inducement is offered relative to any action or decision that it might
influence.

• Whether the inducement is a customary or cultural practice in the circumstances, for

example, offering a gift on the occasion of a religious holiday or wedding.

• Whether the inducement is an ancillary part of a professional activity, for example,

offering or accepting lunch in connection with a business meeting.

• Whether the offer of the inducement is limited to an individual recipient or available to a

broader group. The broader group might be internal or external to the employing
organisation, such as other customers or vendors.

• The roles and positions of the individuals offering or being offered the inducement.
• Whether the member knows, or has reason to believe, that accepting the inducement
would breach the policies and procedures of the counterparty’s employing organisation.

• The degree of transparency with which the inducement is offered.

• Whether the inducement was required or requested by the recipient.

• The known previous behaviour or reputation of the offeror.

52
 THE CODE

Consideration of Further Actions

250.10 A1 If the member becomes aware of an inducement offered with actual or perceived intent to
improperly influence behaviour, threats to compliance with the fundamental principles might
still be created even if the requirements in paragraphs R250.7 and R250.8 are met.

250.10 A2 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address such threats include:
• Informing senior management or those charged with governance of the employing
organisation of the member or the offeror regarding the offer.

• Amending or terminating the business relationship with the offeror.

Inducements with No Intent to Improperly Influence Behaviour

250.11 A1 The requirements and application material set out in the conceptual framework apply when a
member has concluded there is no actual or perceived intent to improperly influence the
behaviour of the recipient or of another individual.

250.11 A2 If such an inducement is trivial and inconsequential, any threats created will be at an acceptable
level.

250.11 A3 Examples of circumstances where offering or accepting such an inducement might create
threats even if the member has concluded there is no actual or perceived intent to improperly
influence behaviour include:

• Self-interest threats

o A member is offered part-time employment by a vendor.

• Familiarity threats

o A member regularly takes a customer or supplier to sporting events.

• Intimidation threats

o A member accepts hospitality, the nature of which could be perceived to be

inappropriate were it to be publicly disclosed.

250.11 A4 Relevant factors in evaluating the level of such threats created by offering or accepting such
an inducement include the same factors set out in paragraph 250.9 A3 for determining intent.

250.11 A5 Examples of actions that might eliminate threats created by offering or accepting such an
inducement include:

• Declining or not offering the inducement.

• Transferring responsibility for any business-related decision involving the counterparty to
another individual who the member has no reason to believe would be, or would be
perceived to be, improperly influenced in making the decision.

250.11 A6 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address such threats created by offering or
accepting such an inducement include:

• Being transparent with senior management or those charged with governance of the
employing organisation of the member or of the counterparty about offering or accepting
an inducement.

53
 THE CODE

• Registering the inducement in a log maintained by the employing organisation of the

member or the counterparty.

• Having an appropriate reviewer, who is not otherwise involved in undertaking the

professional activity, review any work performed or decisions made by the member with
respect to the individual or organisation from which the member accepted the
inducement.

• Donating the inducement to charity after receipt and appropriately disclosing the
donation, for example, to those charged with governance or the individual who offered
the inducement.

• Reimbursing the cost of the inducement, such as hospitality, received.

• As soon as possible, returning the inducement, such as a gift, after it was initially
accepted.

Immediate or Close Family Members

R250.12 A member shall remain alert to potential threats to the member's compliance with the
fundamental principles created by the offering of an inducement:

(a) By an immediate or close family member of the member to a counterparty with

whom the member has a professional relationship; or

(b) To an immediate or close family member of the member by a counterparty with

whom the member has a professional relationship.

R250.13 Where the member becomes aware of an inducement being offered to or made by an
immediate or close family member and concludes there is intent to improperly influence
the behaviour of the member or of the counterparty, or considers a reasonable and
informed third party would be likely to conclude such intent exists, the member shall
advise the immediate or close family member not to offer or accept the inducement.

250.13 A1 The factors set out in paragraph 250.9 A3 are relevant in determining whether there is actual
or perceived intent to improperly influence the behaviour of the member or of the counterparty.
Another factor that is relevant is the nature or closeness of the relationship, between:

(a) The member and the immediate or close family member;

(b) The immediate or close family member and the counterparty; and
(c) The member and the counterparty.

For example, the offer of employment, outside of the normal recruitment process, to the spouse
of the member by a counterparty with whom the member is negotiating a significant contract
might indicate such intent.

250.13 A2 The application material in paragraph 250.10 A2 is also relevant in addressing threats that
might be created when there is actual or perceived intent to improperly influence the behaviour
of the member or of the counterparty even if the immediate or close family member has
followed the advice given pursuant to paragraph R250.13.

54
 THE CODE

Application of the Conceptual Framework

250.14 A1 Where the member becomes aware of an inducement offered in the circumstances addressed
in paragraph R250.12, threats to compliance with the fundamental principles might be created
where:

(a) The immediate or close family member offers or accepts the inducement contrary to the
advice of the member pursuant to paragraph R250.13; or

(b) The member does not have reason to believe an actual or perceived intent to improperly
influence the behaviour of the member or of the counterparty exists.
250.14 A2 The application material in paragraphs 250.11 A1 to 250.11 A6 is relevant for the purposes of
identifying, evaluating and addressing such threats. Factors that are relevant in evaluating the
level of threats in these circumstances also include the nature or closeness of the relationships
set out in paragraph 250.13 A1.

Other Considerations

250.15 A1 If a member is offered an inducement by the employing organisation relating to financial

interests, compensation and incentives linked to performance, the requirements and
application material set out in Section 240 apply.

250.15 A2 If a member encounters or is made aware of inducements that might result in non-compliance
or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations by other individuals working for or
under the direction of the employing organisation, the requirements and application material
set out in Section 260 apply.

250.15 A3 If a member faces pressure to offer or accept inducements that might create threats to
compliance with the fundamental principles, the requirements and application material set out
in Section 270 apply.

55
 THE CODE

SECTION 260
RESPONDING TO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS
Introduction
260.1 Members are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
260.2 A self-interest or intimidation threat to compliance with the principles of integrity and
professional behaviour is created when a member becomes aware of non-compliance or
suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations.
260.3 A member might encounter or be made aware of non-compliance or suspected non-compliance
in the course of carrying out professional activities. This section guides the member in
assessing the implications of the matter and the possible courses of action when responding
to non-compliance or suspected non-compliance with:

(a) Laws and regulations generally recognised to have a direct effect on the determination
of material amounts and disclosures in the employing organisation’s financial statements;
and

(b) Other laws and regulations that do not have a direct effect on the determination of the
amounts and disclosures in the employing organisation’s financial statements, but
compliance with which might be fundamental to the operating aspects of the employing
organisation’s business, to its ability to continue its business, or to avoid material penalties.

Objectives of the Member in Relation to Non-compliance with Laws and Regulations

260.4 A distinguishing mark of the accountancy profession is its acceptance of the responsibility to
act in the public interest. When responding to non-compliance or suspected non-compliance,
the objectives of the member are:

(a) To comply with the principles of integrity and professional behaviour;

(b) By alerting management or, where appropriate, those charged with governance of the
employing organisation, to seek to:

(i) Enable them to rectify, remediate or mitigate the consequences of the identified or
suspected non-compliance; or

(ii) Deter the non-compliance where it has not yet occurred; and
(c) To take such further action as appropriate in the public interest.

56
 THE CODE

Requirements and Application Material

General
260.5 A1 Non-compliance with laws and regulations (“non-compliance”) comprises acts of omission or
commission, intentional or unintentional, which are contrary to the prevailing laws or
regulations committed by the following parties:
(a) The member’s employing organisation;

(b) Those charged with governance of the employing organisation;

(c) Management of the employing organisation; or

(d) Other individuals working for or under the direction of the employing organisation.

260.5 A2 Examples of laws and regulations which this section addresses include those that deal with:

• Fraud, corruption and bribery.

• Money laundering, terrorist financing and proceeds of crime.

• Securities markets and trading.

• Banking and other financial products and services.

• Data protection.

• Tax and pension liabilities and payments.

• Environmental protection.

• Public health and safety.

260.5 A3 Non-compliance might result in fines, litigation or other consequences for the employing
organisation, potentially materially affecting its financial statements. Importantly, such non-
compliance might have wider public interest implications in terms of potentially substantial
harm to investors, creditors, employees or the general public. For the purposes of this section,
non-compliance that causes substantial harm is one that results in serious adverse
consequences to any of these parties in financial or non-financial terms. Examples include the
perpetration of a fraud resulting in significant financial losses to investors, and breaches of
environmental laws and regulations endangering the health or safety of employees or the
public.

R260.6 In some jurisdictions, there are legal or regulatory provisions governing how members
are required to address non-compliance or suspected non-compliance. These legal or
regulatory provisions might differ from or go beyond the provisions in this section.
When encountering such non-compliance or suspected non-compliance, the member
shall obtain an understanding of those legal or regulatory provisions and comply with
them, including:

(a) Any requirement to report the matter to an appropriate authority; and

(b) Any prohibition on alerting the relevant party.

260.6 A1 A prohibition on alerting the relevant party might arise, for example, pursuant to anti-money
laundering legislation.

57
 THE CODE

260.7 A1 This section applies regardless of the nature of the employing organisation, including whether
or not it is a public interest entity.

260.7 A2 A member who encounters or is made aware of matters that are clearly inconsequential is not
required to comply with this section. Whether a matter is clearly inconsequential is to be judged
with respect to its nature and its impact, financial or otherwise, on the employing organisation,
its stakeholders and the general public.

260.7 A3 This section does not address:

(a) Personal misconduct unrelated to the business activities of the employing organisation;
and

(b) Non-compliance by parties other than those specified in paragraph 260.5 A1.

The member might nevertheless find the guidance in this section helpful in considering how to
respond in these situations.

Responsibilities of the Employing Organisation’s Management and Those Charged with

Governance

260.8 A1 The employing organisation’s management, with the oversight of those charged with
governance, is responsible for ensuring that the employing organisation’s business activities
are conducted in accordance with laws and regulations. Management and those charged with
governance are also responsible for identifying and addressing any non-compliance by:

(a) The employing organisation;

(b) An individual charged with governance of the employing organisation;

(c) A member of management; or

(d) Other individuals working for or under the direction of the employing organisation.

Responsibilities of All Members

R260.9 If protocols and procedures exist within the member’s employing organisation to
address non-compliance or suspected non-compliance, the member shall consider
them in determining how to respond to such non-compliance.

260.9 A1 Many employing organisations have established protocols and procedures regarding how to
raise non-compliance or suspected non-compliance internally. These protocols and procedures
include, for example, an ethics policy or internal whistle-blowing mechanism. Such protocols
and procedures might allow matters to be reported anonymously through designated channels.

R260.10 Where a member becomes aware of a matter to which this section applies, the steps that
the member takes to comply with this section shall be taken on a timely basis. For the
purpose of taking timely steps, the member shall have regard to the nature of the matter
and the potential harm to the interests of the employing organisation, investors,
creditors, employees or the general public.

Responsibilities of Senior Members in Business

260.11 A1 Senior members in business (“senior members”) are directors, officers or senior employees
able to exert significant influence over, and make decisions regarding, the acquisition,

58
 THE CODE

deployment and control of the employing organisation’s human, financial, technological,

physical and intangible resources. There is a greater expectation for such individuals to take
whatever action is appropriate in the public interest to respond to non-compliance or suspected
non-compliance than other members within the employing organisation. This is because of
senior members’ roles, positions and spheres of influence within the employing organisation.

Obtaining an Understanding of the Matter

R260.12 If, in the course of carrying out professional activities, a senior member becomes aware
of information concerning non-compliance or suspected non-compliance, the member
shall obtain an understanding of the matter. This understanding shall include:

(a) The nature of the non-compliance or suspected non-compliance and the

circumstances in which it has occurred or might occur;
(b) The application of the relevant laws and regulations to the circumstances; and

(c) An assessment of the potential consequences to the employing organisation,

investors, creditors, employees or the wider public.

260.12 A1 A senior member is expected to apply knowledge and expertise, and exercise professional
judgment. However, the member is not expected to have a level of understanding of laws and
regulations greater than that which is required for the member’s role within the employing
organisation. Whether an act constitutes non-compliance is ultimately a matter to be
determined by a court or other appropriate adjudicative body.

260.12 A2 Depending on the nature and significance of the matter, the senior member might cause, or
take appropriate steps to cause, the matter to be investigated internally. The member might
also consult on a confidential basis with others within the employing organisation or a
professional body, or with legal counsel.

Addressing the Matter

R260.13 If the senior member identifies or suspects that non-compliance has occurred or might
occur, the member shall, subject to paragraph R260.9, discuss the matter with the
member's immediate superior, if any. If the member's immediate superior appears to be
involved in the matter, the member shall discuss the matter with the next higher level of
authority within the employing organisation.

260.13 A1 The purpose of the discussion is to enable a determination to be made as to how to address
the matter.

R260.14 The senior member shall also take appropriate steps to:
(a) Have the matter communicated to those charged with governance;

(b) Comply with applicable laws and regulations, including legal or regulatory
provisions governing the reporting of non-compliance or suspected non-
compliance to an appropriate authority;

(c) Have the consequences of the non-compliance or suspected non-compliance

rectified, remediated or mitigated;
(d) Reduce the risk of re-occurrence; and

59
 THE CODE

(e) Seek to deter the commission of the non-compliance if it has not yet occurred.

260.14 A1 The purpose of communicating the matter to those charged with governance is to obtain their
concurrence regarding appropriate actions to take to respond to the matter and to enable them
to fulfill their responsibilities.

260.14 A2 Some laws and regulations might stipulate a period within which reports of non-compliance or
suspected non-compliance are to be made to an appropriate authority.

R260.15 In addition to responding to the matter in accordance with the provisions of this section,
the senior member shall determine whether disclosure of the matter to the employing
organisation’s external auditor, if any, is needed.

260.15 A1 Such disclosure would be pursuant to the senior member’s duty or legal obligation to provide
all information necessary to enable the auditor to perform the audit.

Determining Whether Further Action Is Needed

R260.16 The senior member shall assess the appropriateness of the response of the member's
superiors, if any, and those charged with governance.

260.16 A1 Relevant factors to consider in assessing the appropriateness of the response of the senior
member’s superiors, if any, and those charged with governance include whether:

• The response is timely.

• They have taken or authorised appropriate action to seek to rectify, remediate or mitigate
the consequences of the non-compliance, or to avert the non-compliance if it has not yet
occurred.

• The matter has been disclosed to an appropriate authority where appropriate and, if so,
whether the disclosure appears adequate.

R260.17 In light of the response of the senior member's superiors, if any, and those charged with
governance, the member shall determine if further action is needed in the public interest.

260.17 A1 The determination of whether further action is needed, and the nature and extent of it, will
depend on various factors, including:

• The legal and regulatory framework.

• The urgency of the situation.

• The pervasiveness of the matter throughout the employing organisation.

• Whether the senior member continues to have confidence in the integrity of the member’s
superiors and those charged with governance.

• Whether the non-compliance or suspected non-compliance is likely to recur.

• Whether there is credible evidence of actual or potential substantial harm to the interests
of the employing organisation, investors, creditors, employees or the general public.

260.17 A2 Examples of circumstances that might cause the senior member no longer to have confidence
in the integrity of the member’s superiors and those charged with governance include situations
where:

60
 THE CODE

• The member suspects or has evidence of their involvement or intended involvement in

any non-compliance.

• Contrary to legal or regulatory requirements, they have not reported, or authorised the
reporting of, the matter to an appropriate authority within a reasonable period.

R260.18 The senior member shall exercise professional judgment in determining the need for,
and nature and extent of, further action. In making this determination, the member shall
take into account whether a reasonable and informed third party would be likely to
conclude that the member has acted appropriately in the public interest.
260.18 A1 Further action that the senior member might take includes:

• Informing the management of the parent entity of the matter if the employing organisation
is a member of a group.
• Disclosing the matter to an appropriate authority even when there is no legal or
regulatory requirement to do so.

• Resigning from the employing organisation.

260.18 A2 Resigning from the employing organisation is not a substitute for taking other actions that might
be needed to achieve the senior member’s objectives under this section. In some jurisdictions,
however, there might be limitations as to the further actions available to the member. In such
circumstances, resignation might be the only available course of action.

Seeking Advice

260.19 A1 As assessment of the matter might involve complex analysis and judgments, the senior
member might consider:

• Consulting internally.

• Obtaining legal advice to understand the member’s options and the professional or legal
implications of taking any particular course of action.

• Consulting on a confidential basis with a regulatory or professional body.

Determining Whether to Disclose the Matter to an Appropriate Authority

260.20 A1 Disclosure of the matter to an appropriate authority would be precluded if doing so would be
contrary to law or regulation. Otherwise, the purpose of making disclosure is to enable an
appropriate authority to cause the matter to be investigated and action to be taken in the public
interest.

260.20 A2 The determination of whether to make such a disclosure depends in particular on the nature
and extent of the actual or potential harm that is or might be caused by the matter to investors,
creditors, employees or the general public. For example, the senior member might determine
that disclosure of the matter to an appropriate authority is an appropriate course of action if:

• The employing organisation is engaged in bribery (for example, of local or foreign

government officials for purposes of securing large contracts).

• The employing organisation is regulated and the matter is of such significance as to

threaten its license to operate.

61
 THE CODE

• The employing organisation is listed on a securities exchange and the matter might result
in adverse consequences to the fair and orderly market in the employing organisation’s
securities or pose a systemic risk to the financial markets.

• It is likely that the employing organisation would sell products that are harmful to public
health or safety.
• The employing organisation is promoting a scheme to its clients to assist them in evading
taxes.

260.20 A3 The determination of whether to make such a disclosure will also depend on external factors
such as:

• Whether there is an appropriate authority that is able to receive the information, and
cause the matter to be investigated and action to be taken. The appropriate authority will
depend upon the nature of the matter. For example, the appropriate authority would be
a securities regulator in the case of fraudulent financial reporting or an environmental
protection agency in the case of a breach of environmental laws and regulations.

• Whether there exists robust and credible protection from civil, criminal or professional
liability or retaliation afforded by legislation or regulation, such as under whistle-blowing
legislation or regulation.

• Whether there are actual or potential threats to the physical safety of the senior member
or other individuals.

R260.21 If the senior member determines that disclosure of the matter to an appropriate authority
is an appropriate course of action in the circumstances, that disclosure is permitted
pursuant to paragraph NZ R114.3 of the Code. When making such disclosure, the
member shall act in good faith and exercise caution when making statements and
assertions.

Imminent Breach

R260.22 In exceptional circumstances, the senior member might become aware of actual or
intended conduct that the member has reason to believe would constitute an imminent
breach of a law or regulation that would cause substantial harm to investors, creditors,
employees or the general public. Having first considered whether it would be
appropriate to discuss the matter with management or those charged with governance
of the employing organisation, the member shall exercise professional judgment and
determine whether to disclose the matter immediately to an appropriate authority in
order to prevent or mitigate the consequences of such imminent breach. If disclosure is
made, that disclosure is permitted pursuant to paragraph NZ R114.3 of the Code.

Documentation

260.23 A1 In relation to non-compliance or suspected non-compliance that falls within the scope of this
section, the senior member is encouraged to have the following matters documented:

• The matter.
• The results of discussions with the member’s superiors, if any, and those charged with
governance and other parties.

62
 THE CODE

• How the member’s superiors, if any, and those charged with governance have responded
to the matter.

• The courses of action the member considered, the judgments made and the decisions
that were taken.

• How the member is satisfied that the member has fulfilled the responsibility set out in
paragraph R260.17.

Responsibilities of Members Other than Senior Members

R260.24 If, in the course of carrying out professional activities, a member becomes aware of
information concerning non-compliance or suspected non-compliance, the member
shall seek to obtain an understanding of the matter. This understanding shall include the
nature of the non-compliance or suspected non-compliance and the circumstances in
which it has occurred or might occur.

260.24 A1 The member is expected to apply knowledge and expertise, and exercise professional
judgment. However, the member is not expected to have a level of understanding of laws and
regulations greater than that which is required for the member’s role within the employing
organisation. Whether an act constitutes non-compliance is ultimately a matter to be
determined by a court or other appropriate adjudicative body.

260.24 A2 Depending on the nature and significance of the matter, the member might consult on a
confidential basis with others within the employing organisation or a professional body, or with
legal counsel.

R260.25 If the member identifies or suspects that non-compliance has occurred or might occur,
the member shall, subject to paragraph R260.9, inform an immediate superior to enable
the superior to take appropriate action. If the member's immediate superior appears to
be involved in the matter, the member shall inform the next higher level of authority
within the employing organisation.

R260.26 In exceptional circumstances, the member may determine that disclosure of the matter
to an appropriate authority is an appropriate course of action. If the member does so
pursuant to paragraphs 260.20 A2 and A3, that disclosure is permitted pursuant to
paragraph NZ R114.3 of the Code. When making such disclosure, the member shall act
in good faith and exercise caution when making statements and assertions.

Documentation

260.27 A1 In relation to non-compliance or suspected non-compliance that falls within the scope of this
section, the member is encouraged to have the following matters documented:
• The matter.

• The results of discussions with the member’s superior, management and, where
applicable, those charged with governance and other parties.
• How the member’s superior has responded to the matter.

• The courses of action the member considered, the judgments made and the decisions
that were taken.

63
 THE CODE

SECTION 270
PRESSURE TO BREACH THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
Introduction
270.1 Members are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
270.2 Pressure exerted on, or by, a member might create an intimidation or other threat to compliance
with one or more of the fundamental principles. This section sets out specific requirements and
application material relevant to applying the conceptual framework in such circumstances.

Requirements and Application Material

General

R270.3 A member shall not:

(a) Allow pressure from others to result in a breach of compliance with the
fundamental principles; or

(b) Place pressure on others that the member knows, or has reason to believe, would
result in the other individuals breaching the fundamental principles.

270.3 A1 A member might face pressure that creates threats to compliance with the fundamental
principles, for example an intimidation threat, when undertaking a professional activity.
Pressure might be explicit or implicit and might come from:

• Within the employing organisation, for example, from a colleague or superior.

• An external individual or organisation such as a vendor, customer or lender.

• Internal or external targets and expectations.

270.3 A2 [Amended. Refer to NZ270.3 A2]

NZ270.3 A2 Examples of pressure that might result in threats to compliance with the fundamental principles
include:

• Pressure related to conflicts of interest:

o Pressure from a family member bidding to act as a vendor to the member’s

employing organisation to select the family member over another prospective
vendor.

See also Section 210, Conflicts of Interest.

• Pressure to influence preparation or presentation of information:

o Pressure to report misleading financial results to meet investor, analyst or lender

expectations.
o Pressure from elected officials on public sector accountants to misrepresent
programs or projects to voters.

o Pressure from colleagues to misstate income, expenditure or rates of return to

bias decision-making on capital projects and acquisitions.

64
 THE CODE

o Pressure from superiors to approve or process expenditures that are not legitimate
business expenses.

o Pressure to suppress internal audit reports containing adverse findings.

See also Section 220, Preparation and Presentation of Information.

• Pressure to act without sufficient expertise or due care:

o Pressure from superiors to inappropriately reduce the extent of work performed.

o Pressure from superiors to perform a task without sufficient skills or training or

within unrealistic deadlines.
See also Section 230, Acting with Sufficient Expertise.

• Pressure related to financial interests:

o Pressure from superiors, colleagues or others, for example, those who might
benefit from participation in compensation or incentive arrangements to
manipulate performance indicators.

See also Section 240, Financial Interests, Compensation and Incentives Linked to
Financial Reporting and Decision Making.

• Pressure related to inducements:

o Pressure from others, either internal or external to the employing organisation, to

offer inducements to influence inappropriately the judgment or decision making
process of an individual or organisation.

o Pressure from colleagues to accept a bribe or other inducement, for example to

accept inappropriate gifts or entertainment from potential vendors in a bidding
process.

See also Section 250, Inducements, Including Gifts and Hospitality.

• Pressure related to non-compliance with laws and regulations:

o Pressure to structure a transaction to evade tax.

See also Section 260, Responding to Non-compliance with Laws and Regulations.

• Pressure related to level of fees

o Pressure exerted by a member on another member to provide professional

services at a fee level that does not allow for sufficient and appropriate resources
(including human, technological and intellectual resources) to perform the services
in accordance with appliable technical and professional standards and laws and
regulations.

See also Section 330, Fees and Other Types of Remuneration

270.3 A3 [Amended. Refer to NZ270.3 A3]

NZ270.3 A3 Factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of threats created by pressure include:
• The intent of the individual who is exerting the pressure and the nature and extent of the
pressure.

65
 THE CODE

• The application of laws, regulations, and technical and professional standards to the
circumstances.

• The culture and leadership of the employing organisation including the extent to which
they reflect or emphasise the importance of ethical behaviour and the expectation that
employees will act ethically. For example, a corporate culture that tolerates unethical
behaviour might increase the likelihood that the pressure would result in a threat to
compliance with the fundamental principles.

• Policies and procedures, if any, that the employing organisation has established, such
as ethics or human resources policies that address pressure.

270.3 A4 Discussing the circumstances creating the pressure and consulting with others about those
circumstances might assist the member to evaluate the level of the threat. Such discussion
and consultation, which requires being alert to the principle of confidentiality, might include:

• Discussing the matter with the individual who is exerting the pressure to seek to resolve
it.

• Discussing the matter with the member’s superior, if the superior is not the individual
exerting the pressure.

• Escalating the matter within the employing organisation, including when appropriate,
explaining any consequential risks to the organisation, for example with:

o Higher levels of management.

o Internal or external auditors.

o Those charged with governance.

• Disclosing the matter in line with the employing organisation’s policies, including ethics
and whistleblowing policies, using any established mechanism, such as a confidential
ethics hotline.

• Consulting with:

o A colleague, superior, human resources personnel, or another member;

o Relevant professional or regulatory bodies or industry associations; or

o Legal counsel.

270.3 A5 An example of an action that might eliminate threats created by pressure is the member’s
request for a restructure of, or segregation of, certain responsibilities and duties so that the
member is no longer involved with the individual or entity exerting the pressure.

Documentation
270.4 A1 The member is encouraged to document:

• The facts.

• The communications and parties with whom these matters were discussed.
• The courses of action considered.

66
 THE CODE

• How the matter was addressed.

67
 THE CODE

PART 3 – MEMBERS IN PUBLIC PRACTICE ..................................................................... 69

Section 300 Applying the Conceptual Framework – Members in Public Practice ................ 69
Section 310 Conflicts Of Interest .......................................................................................... 76

Section 320 Professional Appointments ............................................................................... 81

Section 321 Second Opinions ............................................................................................... 86

Section 325 Objectivity of an Engagement Quality Reviewer and Other Appropriate Reviewers 87

Section 330 Fees and Other Types Of Remuneration .......................................................... 90

Section 340 Inducements, Including Gifts And Hospitality .................................................... 93

Section 350 Custody of Client Assets ................................................................................... 98

Section 360 Responding to Non-Compliance with Laws And Regulations ........................... 99

68
 THE CODE

PART 3 – MEMBERS IN PUBLIC PRACTICE

SECTION 300
APPLYING THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK – MEMBERS IN PUBLIC PRACTICE
Introduction
300.1 This Part of the Code sets out requirements and application material for members in public
practice when applying the conceptual framework set out in Section 120. It does not describe
all of the facts and circumstances, including professional activities, interests and relationships,
that could be encountered by members in public practice, which create or might create threats
to compliance with the fundamental principles. Therefore, the conceptual framework requires
members in public practice to be alert for such facts and circumstances.
300.2 The requirements and application material that apply to members in public practice are set out
in:

• Part 3 – Members in Public Practice, Sections 300 to 399, which applies to all members
in public practice, whether they provide assurance services or not.

• International Independence Standards (New Zealand) (refer PES 1) as follows:

o Part 4A – Independence for Audit and Review Engagements, Sections 400 to 899,
which applies to members in public practice when performing audit and review
engagements.

o Part 4B – Independence for Assurance Engagements Other than Audit and

Review Engagements, Sections 900 to 999, which applies to members in public
practice when performing assurance engagements other than audit or review
engagements.

300.3 In this Part, the term “member” refers to individual members in public practice and their firms.

Requirements and Application Material

General

R300.4 A member shall comply with the fundamental principles set out in Section 110 and apply
the conceptual framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address
threats to compliance with the fundamental principles.

R300.5 When dealing with an ethics issue, the member shall consider the context in which the
issue has arisen or might arise. Where an individual who is a member in public practice
is performing professional activities pursuant to the member's relationship with the
firm, whether as a contractor, employee or owner, the individual shall comply with the
provisions in Part 2 that apply to these circumstances.

300.5 A1 Examples of situations in which the provisions in Part 2 apply to a member in public practice
include:

• Facing a conflict of interest when being responsible for selecting a vendor for the firm
when an immediate family member of the member might benefit financially from the
contract. The requirements and application material set out in Section 210 apply in
these circumstances.

69
 THE CODE

• Preparing or presenting financial information for the member’s client or firm. The
requirements and application material set out in Section 220 apply in these
circumstances.

• Being offered an inducement such as being regularly offered complimentary tickets to

attend sporting events by a supplier of the firm. The requirements and application
material set out in Section 250 apply in these circumstances.

• Facing pressure from an engagement partner to report chargeable hours inaccurately for
a client engagement. The requirements and application material set out in Section 270
apply in these circumstances.

300.5 A2 The more senior the position of a member, the greater will be the ability and opportunity to
access information, and to influence policies, decisions made and actions taken by others
involved with the firm. To the extent that they are able to do so, taking into account their position
and seniority in the firm, members are expected to encourage and promote an ethics-based
culture in the firm and exhibit ethical behavior in dealings with individuals with whom, and
entities with which, the member or the firm has a professional or business relationship in
accordance with paragraph 120.13 A3. Examples of actions that might be taken include the
introduction, implementation and oversight of:

• Ethics education and training programs.

• Firm processes and performance evaluation and reward criteria that promote an ethical
culture.

• Ethics and whistle-blowing policies.

• Policies and procedures designed to prevent non-compliance with laws and regulations.

Identifying Threats

300.6 A1 Threats to compliance with the fundamental principles might be created by a broad range of
facts and circumstances. The categories of threats are described in paragraph 120.6 A3. The
following are examples of facts and circumstances within each of those categories of threats
that might create threats for a member when undertaking a professional service:

(a) Self-interest Threats

• A member having a direct financial interest in a client.

• A member quoting a low fee to obtain a new engagement and the fee is so low
that it might be difficult to perform the professional service in accordance with
applicable technical and professional standards for that price.
• A member having a close business relationship with a client.

• A member having access to confidential information that might be used for

personal gain.
• A member discovering a significant error when evaluating the results of a previous
professional service performed by a member of the member’s firm.

70
 THE CODE

(b) Self-review Threats

• A member issuing an assurance report on the effectiveness of the operation of

financial systems after implementing the systems.

• A member having prepared the original data used to generate records that are the
subject matter of the assurance engagement.
(c) Advocacy Threats

• A member promoting the interests of, or shares in, a client.

• A member acting as an advocate on behalf of a client in litigation or disputes with

third parties.

• A member lobbying in favor of legislation on behalf of a client.

(d) Familiarity Threats

• A member having a close or immediate family member who is a director or officer

of the client.

• A director or officer of the client, or an employee in a position to exert significant

influence over the subject matter of the engagement, having recently served as
the engagement partner.

• An audit team member having a long association with the audit client.

• An individual who is being considered to serve as an appropriate reviewer, as a

safeguard to address a threat, having a close relationship with an individual who
performed the work.

(e) Intimidation Threats

• A member being threatened with dismissal from a client engagement or the firm
because of a disagreement about a professional matter.

• A member feeling pressured to agree with the judgment of a client because the
client has more expertise on the matter in question.

• A member being informed that a planned promotion will not occur unless the
member agrees with an inappropriate accounting treatment.

• A member having accepted a significant gift from a client and being threatened
that acceptance of this gift will be made public.

Identifying Threats Associated with the Use of Technology

300.6 A2 The following are examples of facts and circumstances relating to the use of technology that
might create threats for a member when undertaking a professional activity:

• Self-interest Threats

o The data available might not be sufficient for the effective use of the technology.

o The technology might not be appropriate for the purpose for which it is to be used.

71
 THE CODE

o The member might not have sufficient information and expertise, or access to an
expert with sufficient understanding, to use and explain the technology and its
appropriateness for the purpose intended.

(Ref: Para. 230.2).

• Self-review Threats
o The technology was designed or developed using the knowledge, expertise or
judgment of the member or the firm.

Evaluating Threats
300.7 A1 The conditions, policies and procedures described in paragraph 120.6 A1 and 120.8 A2 might
impact the evaluation of whether a threat to compliance with the fundamental principles is at
an acceptable level. Such conditions, policies and procedures might relate to:

(a) The client and its operating environment; and

(b) The firm and its operating environment.

300.7 A2 The member’s evaluation of the level of a threat is also impacted by the nature and scope of
the professional service.

The Client and its Operating Environment

300.7 A3 The member’s evaluation of the level of a threat might be impacted by whether the client is:

(a) An audit client and whether the audit client is a public interest entity;

(b) An assurance client that is not an audit client; or

(c) A non-assurance client.

For example, providing a non-assurance service to an audit client that is a public interest entity
might be perceived to result in a higher level of threat to compliance with the principle of
objectivity with respect to the audit.

300.7 A4 The corporate governance structure, including the leadership of a client might promote
compliance with the fundamental principles. Accordingly, a member’s evaluation of the level of
a threat might also be impacted by a client’s operating environment. For example:

• The client requires appropriate individuals other than management to ratify or approve
the appointment of a firm to perform an engagement.

• The client has competent employees with experience and seniority to make managerial
decisions.

• The client has implemented internal procedures that facilitate objective choices in
tendering non-assurance engagements.
• The client has a corporate governance structure that provides appropriate oversight and
communications regarding the firm’s services.

72
 THE CODE

The Firm and its Operating Environment

300.7 A5 A member’s evaluation of the level of a threat might be impacted by the work environment
within the member’s firm and its operating environment. For example:

• Leadership of the firm that promotes compliance with the fundamental principles and
establishes the expectation that assurance team members will act in the public interest.
• Policies or procedures for establishing and monitoring compliance with the fundamental
principles by all personnel.

• Compensation, performance appraisal and disciplinary policies and procedures that

promote compliance with the fundamental principles.

• Management of the reliance on revenue received from a single client.

• The engagement partner having authority within the firm for decisions concerning
compliance with the fundamental principles, including any decisions about accepting or
providing services to a client.

• Educational, training and experience requirements.

• Processes to facilitate and address internal and external concerns or complaints.

300.7 A6 The member’s evaluation of the level of a threat associated with the use of technology might
also be impacted by the work environment within the member’s firm and its operating
environment. For example:

• Level of corporate oversight and internal controls over the technology.

• Assessments of the quality and functionality of technology that are undertaken by a third-
party.

• Training that is provided regularly to all relevant employees so they obtain and maintain
the professional competence to sufficiently understand, use and explain the technology
and its appropriateness for the purpose intended.

Consideration of New Information or Changes in Facts and Circumstances

300.7 A7 New information or changes in facts and circumstances might:

(a) Impact the level of a threat; or

(b) Affect the member’s conclusions about whether safeguards applied continue to address
identified threats as intended.
In these situations, actions that were already implemented as safeguards might no longer be
effective in addressing threats. Accordingly, the application of the conceptual framework
requires that the member re-evaluate and address the threats accordingly. (Ref: Paras. R120.9
and R120.10).

300.7 A8 Examples of new information or changes in facts and circumstances that might impact the level
of a threat include:
• When the scope of a professional service is expanded.

• When the client becomes a FMC reporting entity considered to have a higher level of
public accountability or acquires another business unit.

73
 THE CODE

• When the firm merges with another firm.

• When the member is jointly engaged by two clients and a dispute emerges between the
two clients.

• When there is a change in the member’s personal or immediate family relationships.

Addressing Threats
300.8 A1 Paragraphs R120.10 to 120.10 A2 set out requirements and application material for addressing
threats that are not at an acceptable level.

Examples of Safeguards
300.8 A2 Safeguards vary depending on the facts and circumstances. Examples of actions that in certain
circumstances might be safeguards to address threats include:

• Assigning additional time and qualified personnel to required tasks when an engagement
has been accepted might address a self-interest threat.

• Having an appropriate reviewer who was not a member of the team review the work
performed or advise as necessary might address a self-review threat.

• Using different partners and teams with separate reporting lines for the provision of non-
assurance services to an assurance client might address self-review, advocacy or
familiarity threats.

• Involving another firm to perform or re-perform part of the engagement might address
self-interest, self-review, advocacy, familiarity or intimidation threats.

• Disclosing to clients any referral fees or commission arrangements received for

recommending services or products might address a self-interest threat.

• Separating teams when dealing with matters of a confidential nature might address a
self-interest threat.

300.8 A3 The remaining sections of Part 3 and International Independence Standards (New Zealand)
(refer PES 1) describe certain threats that might arise during the course of performing
professional services and include examples of actions that might address threats.

Appropriate Reviewer

300.8 A4 An appropriate reviewer is a professional with the necessary knowledge, skills, experience and
authority to review, in an objective manner, the relevant work performed or service provided.
Such an individual might be a member.

Communicating with Those Charged with Governance

(after exhausting other appropriate actions that might address the threat - see sections 310 to 360 for
examples)

R300.9 When communicating with those charged with governance in accordance with the Code,
a member shall determine the appropriate individual(s) within the entity's governance
structure with whom to communicate. If the member communicates with a subgroup of
those charged with governance, the member shall determine whether communication

74
 THE CODE

with all of those charged with governance is also necessary so that they are adequately
informed.

300.9 A1 In determining with whom to communicate, a member might consider:

(a) The nature and importance of the circumstances; and

(b) The matter to be communicated.

300.9 A2 Examples of a subgroup of those charged with governance include an audit committee or an
individual member of those charged with governance.

R300.10 If a member communicates with individuals who have management responsibilities as

well as governance responsibilities, the member shall be satisfied that communication
with those individuals adequately informs all of those in a governance role with whom
the member would otherwise communicate.
300.10 A1 In some circumstances, all of those charged with governance are involved in managing the
entity, for example, a small business where a single owner manages the entity and no one else
has a governance role. In these cases, if matters are communicated to individual(s) with
management responsibilities, and those individual(s) also have governance responsibilities,
the member has satisfied the requirement to communicate with those charged with
governance.

75
 THE CODE

SECTION 310
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Introduction
310.1 Members are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
310.2 A conflict of interest creates threats to compliance with the principle of objectivity and might
create threats to compliance with the other fundamental principles. Such threats might be
created when:
(a) A member provides a professional service related to a particular matter for two or more
clients whose interests with respect to that matter are in conflict; or

(b) The interests of a member with respect to a particular matter and the interests of the
client for whom the member provides a professional service related to that matter are in
conflict.

310.3 This section sets out specific requirements and application material relevant to applying the
conceptual framework to conflicts of interest. When a member provides an audit, review or
other assurance service, independence is also required in accordance with International
Independence Standards (New Zealand) (refer PES 1).

Requirements and Application Material

General

R310.4 A member shall not allow a conflict of interest to compromise professional or business
judgment.

310.4 A1 Examples of circumstances that might create a conflict of interest include:

• Providing a transaction advisory service to a client seeking to acquire an audit client,

where the firm has obtained confidential information during the course of the audit that
might be relevant to the transaction.

• Providing advice to two clients at the same time where the clients are competing to
acquire the same company and the advice might be relevant to the parties’ competitive
positions.

• Providing services to a seller and a buyer in relation to the same transaction.

• Preparing valuations of assets for two parties who are in an adversarial position with
respect to the assets.

• Representing two clients in the same matter who are in a legal dispute with each other,
such as during divorce proceedings, or the dissolution of a partnership.

• In relation to a license agreement, providing an assurance report for a licensor on the

royalties due while advising the licensee on the amounts payable.
• Advising a client to invest in a business in which, for example, the spouse of the member
has a financial interest.

• Providing strategic advice to a client on its competitive position while having a joint

76
 THE CODE

venture or similar interest with a major competitor of the client.

• Advising a client on acquiring a business which the firm is also interested in acquiring.
• Advising a client on buying a product or service while having a royalty or commission
agreement with a potential seller of that product or service.

Conflict Identification
General

R310.5 Before accepting a new client relationship, engagement, or business relationship, a

member shall take reasonable steps to identify circumstances that might create a
conflict of interest, and therefore a threat to compliance with one or more of the
fundamental principles. Such steps shall include identifying:

(a) The nature of the relevant interests and relationships between the parties
involved; and

(b) The service and its implication for relevant parties.

310.5 A1 An effective conflict identification process assists a member when taking reasonable steps to
identify interests and relationships that might create an actual or potential conflict of interest,
both before determining whether to accept an engagement and throughout the engagement.
Such a process includes considering matters identified by external parties, for example clients
or potential clients. The earlier an actual or potential conflict of interest is identified, the greater
the likelihood of the member being able to address threats created by the conflict of interest.

310.5 A2 An effective process to identify actual or potential conflicts of interest will take into account
factors such as:

• The nature of the professional services provided.

• The size of the firm.

• The size and nature of the client base.

• The structure of the firm, for example, the number and geographic location of offices.

310.5 A3 More information on client acceptance is set out in Section 320, Professional Appointments.

Changes in Circumstances

R310.6 A member shall remain alert to changes over time in the nature of services, interests
and relationships that might create a conflict of interest while performing an
engagement.

310.6 A1 The nature of services, interests and relationships might change during the engagement. This
is particularly true when a member is asked to conduct an engagement in a situation that might
become adversarial, even though the parties who engage the member initially might not be
involved in a dispute.

Network Firms
R310.7 If the firm is a member of a network, a member shall consider conflicts of interest that
the member has reason to believe might exist or arise due to interests and relationships

77
 THE CODE

of a network firm.

310.7 A1 Factors to consider when identifying interests and relationships involving a network firm
include:

• The nature of the professional services provided.

• The clients served by the network.

• The geographic locations of all relevant parties.

Threats Created by Conflicts of Interest

310.8 A1 In general, the more direct the connection between the professional service and the matter on
which the parties’ interests conflict, the more likely the level of the threat is not at an acceptable
level.

310.8 A2 Factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of a threat created by a conflict of interest
include measures that prevent unauthorised disclosure of confidential information when
performing professional services related to a particular matter for two or more clients whose
interests with respect to that matter are in conflict. These measures include:

• The existence of separate practice areas for specialty functions within the firm, which
might act as a barrier to the passing of confidential client information between practice
areas.

• Policies and procedures to limit access to client files.

• Confidentiality agreements signed by personnel and partners of the firm.

• Separation of confidential information physically and electronically.

• Specific and dedicated training and communication.

310.8 A3 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address threats created by a conflict of interest
include:

• Having separate teams who are provided with clear policies and procedures on
maintaining confidentiality.

• Having an appropriate reviewer, who is not involved in providing the service or otherwise
affected by the conflict, review the work performed to assess whether the key judgments
and conclusions are appropriate.

Disclosure and Consent

General

R310.9 A member shall exercise professional judgment to determine whether the nature and
significance of a conflict of interest are such that specific disclosure and explicit
consent are necessary when addressing the threat created by the conflict of interest.

NZ R310.9.1 Where a member has a conflict of interest but can apply safeguards to eliminate the
threat or reduce it to an acceptable level, the member shall disclose, in writing, the
nature of the conflict of interest and the related safeguards, if any, to all clients or
potential clients affected by the conflict.

78
 THE CODE

NZ R310.9.2 When safeguards are required to reduce the threat to an acceptable level, the member
shall obtain, in writing, the client's consent to the member performing the professional
services.

310.9 A1 Factors to consider when determining whether specific disclosure and explicit consent are
necessary include:
• The circumstances creating the conflict of interest.

• The parties that might be affected.

• The nature of the issues that might arise.

• The potential for the particular matter to develop in an unexpected manner.

310.9 A2 Disclosure and consent might take different forms, for example:

• General disclosure to clients of circumstances where, as is common commercial

practice, the member does not provide professional services exclusively to any one client
(for example, in a particular professional service and market sector). This enables the
client to provide general consent accordingly. For example, a member might make
general disclosure in the standard terms and conditions for the engagement.

• Specific disclosure to affected clients of the circumstances of the particular conflict in

sufficient detail to enable the client to make an informed decision about the matter and
to provide explicit consent accordingly. Such disclosure might include a detailed
presentation of the circumstances and a comprehensive explanation of any planned
safeguards and the risks involved.

• [Deleted. Refer NZ R310.9.2]

310.9 A3 [Deleted. Refer NZ R310.9.1 and NZ R 310.9.2]

310.9 A4 [Deleted. Refer NZ R310.9.1 and NZ R310.9.2]

When Explicit Consent is Refused

R310.10 If a member has determined that explicit consent is necessary in accordance with
paragraph R310.9 and the client has refused to provide consent, the member shall
either:

(a) End or decline to perform professional services that would result in the conflict of
interest; or
(b) End relevant relationships or dispose of relevant interests to eliminate the threat
or reduce it to an acceptable level.

Confidentiality

General

R310.11 A member shall remain alert to the principle of confidentiality, including when making
disclosures or sharing information within the firm or network and seeking guidance
from third parties.

310.11 A1 Subsection 114 sets out requirements and application material relevant to situations that might
create a threat to compliance with the principle of confidentiality.

79
 THE CODE

When Disclosure to Obtain Consent would Breach Confidentiality

R310.12 [Deleted. Refer to NZ R310.12.1]

NZ R310.12.1 In those circumstances where adequate disclosure is not possible by reason of

constraints of confidentiality, the member shall end or decline from the relevant
engagement.

310.12 A1 [Deleted. Refer to NZ R310.12.1]

Documentation

R310.13 [Deleted. Refer to NZ310.14 A1]

NZ310.14 A1 The member is encouraged to document all matters set out in this section.

80
 THE CODE

SECTION 320
PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS
Introduction
320.1 Members are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
320.2 Acceptance of a new client relationship or changes in an existing engagement might create a
threat to compliance with one or more of the fundamental principles. This section sets out
specific requirements and application material relevant to applying the conceptual framework
in such circumstances.

Requirements and Application Material

Client and Engagement Acceptance

General

320.3 A1 Threats to compliance with the principles of integrity or professional behaviour might be
created, for example, from questionable issues associated with the client (its owners,
management or activities). Issues that, if known, might create such a threat include client
involvement in illegal activities, dishonesty, questionable financial reporting practices or other
unethical behaviour.

320.3 A2 Factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of such a threat include:

• Knowledge and understanding of the client, its owners, management and those charged
with governance and business activities.

• The client’s commitment to address the questionable issues, for example, through
improving corporate governance practices or internal controls.

320.3 A3 A self-interest threat to compliance with the principle of professional competence and due care
is created if the team does not possess, or cannot acquire, the competencies to perform the
professional services.

320.3 A4 [Amended. Refer to NZ320.3 A4]

NZ320.3 A4 Factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of such a threat include:

• An appropriate understanding of:

o The nature of the client’s business;

o The complexity of its operations;

o The requirements of the engagement; and

o The purpose, nature and scope of the work to be performed.

• Knowledge of relevant industries or subject matter.

• Experience with relevant regulatory or reporting requirements.

• Policies and procedures that the firm has implemented, as part of a system of quality
management in accordance with PES 3 or PS-1, as applicable, that respond to quality

81
 THE CODE

risks relating to the firm’s ability to perform the engagement in accordance with technical
and professional standards and applicable laws and regulations.

• The level of fees and the extent to which they have regard to the resources required,
taking into account the member’s commercial and market priorities.

320.3 A5 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address a self-interest threat include:
• Assigning sufficient engagement personnel with the necessary competencies.

• Agreeing on a realistic time frame for the performance of the engagement.

• Using experts where necessary.

Changes in a Professional Appointment

General

R320.4 A member shall determine whether there are any reasons for not accepting an
engagement when the member:

(a) Is asked by a potential client to replace another accountant;

(b) Considers tendering for an engagement held by another accountant; or

(c) Considers undertaking work that is complementary or additional to that of another

accountant.

320.4 A1 There might be reasons for not accepting an engagement. One such reason might be if a threat
created by the facts and circumstances cannot be addressed by applying safeguards. For
example, there might be a self-interest threat to compliance with the principle of professional
competence and due care if a member accepts the engagement before knowing all the relevant
facts.

320.4 A2 If a member is asked to undertake work that is complementary or additional to the work of an
existing or predecessor accountant, a self-interest threat to compliance with the principle of
professional competence and due care might be created, for example, as a result of incomplete
information.

320.4 A3 A factor that is relevant in evaluating the level of such a threat is whether tenders state that,
before accepting the engagement, contact with the existing or predecessor accountant will be
requested. This contact gives the proposed accountant the opportunity to inquire whether there
are any reasons why the engagement should not be accepted.
320.4 A4 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address such a self-interest threat include:

• Asking the existing or predecessor accountant to provide any known information of

which, in the existing or predecessor accountant’s opinion, the proposed accountant
needs to be aware before deciding whether to accept the engagement. For example,
inquiry might reveal previously undisclosed pertinent facts and might indicate
disagreements with the existing or predecessor accountant that might influence the
decision to accept the appointment.

• Obtaining information from other sources such as through inquiries of third parties or
background investigations regarding senior management or those charged with
governance of the client.

82
 THE CODE

Communicating with the Existing or Predecessor Accountant

NZ R320.5 A proposed accountant shall obtain the client’s permission, preferably in writing, to
initiate discussions with the existing or predecessor accountant.

320.5 A1 [Amended. Refer to NZ R320.5]

R320.6 If unable to communicate with the existing or predecessor accountant, the proposed
accountant shall take other reasonable steps to obtain information about any possible
threats.

Communicating with the Proposed Accountant

R320.7 When an existing or predecessor accountant is asked to respond to a communication
from a proposed accountant, the existing or predecessor accountant shall:

(a) Comply with relevant laws and regulations governing the request; and

(a) Provide any information honestly and unambiguously.

NZ R320.7.1 The existing accountant, on receipt of the communication enquiring about the matter
referred to in paragraph R320.4, shall promptly reply, preferably in writing, advising
whether there are professional reasons why the proposed accountant should not accept
the appointment.

NZ R320.7.2 The existing accountant shall promptly transfer the documents belonging to the client
whenever or however obtained, to the client or, where the client so instructs, to the
proposed accountant, and should advise the client accordingly, unless the existing
accountant has a legal right to withhold them, for example, when a valid lien for unpaid
fees exists.

320.7 A1 An existing or predecessor accountant is bound by confidentiality. Whether the existing or

predecessor accountant is permitted or required to discuss the affairs of a client with a
proposed accountant will depend on the nature of the engagement and:

(a) Whether the existing or predecessor accountant has permission from the client for the
discussion; and

(b) The legal and ethics requirements relating to such communications and disclosure,
which might vary by jurisdiction.

320.7 A2 Circumstances where a member is or might be required to disclose confidential information, or

when disclosure might be appropriate, are set out in paragraph 114.3 A1 of the Code.

Changes in Audit or Review Appointments

R320.8 In the case of an audit or review of financial statements, a member shall request the
existing or predecessor accountant to provide known information regarding any facts
or other information of which, in the existing or predecessor accountant’s opinion, the
proposed accountant needs to be aware before deciding whether to accept the
engagement. Except for the circumstances involving non-compliance or suspected non-
compliance with laws and regulations set out in paragraphs R360.21 and R360.22:

83
 THE CODE

(a) If the client consents to the existing or predecessor accountant disclosing any
such facts or other information, the existing or predecessor accountant shall
provide the information honestly and unambiguously; and

(b) If the client fails or refuses to grant the existing or predecessor accountant
permission to discuss the client’s affairs with the predecessor accountant, the
existing or predecessor accountant shall disclose this fact to the proposed
accountant, who shall carefully consider such failure or refusal when determining
whether to accept the appointment.

Client and Engagement Continuance

R320.9 For a recurring client engagement, a member shall periodically review whether to
continue with the engagement.
320.9 A1 Potential threats to compliance with the fundamental principles might be created after
acceptance which, had they been known earlier, would have caused the member to decline
the engagement. For example, a self-interest threat to compliance with the principle of integrity
might be created by improper earnings management or balance sheet valuations.

Using the Work of an Expert

R320.10 When a member intends to use the work of an expert in the course of undertaking a
professional activity, the member shall determine whether the use is appropriate for the
intended purpose.

320.10 A1 Factors to consider when a member intends to use the work of an expert include:

• The reputation and expertise of, and the resources available, to the expert.

• Whether the expert is subject to applicable professional and ethics standards.

Such information might be gained from prior association with, or from consulting others about, the expert.

Using the Output of Technology

R320.11 When a member intends to use the output of technology in the course of undertaking a
professional activity, the member shall determine whether the use is appropriate for the
intended purpose.

320.11 A1 Factors to consider when a member intends to use the output of technology include:

• The nature of the activity to be performed by the technology.

• The expected use of, or extent of reliance on, the output of the technology.

• Whether the member has the ability, or access to an expert with the ability, to understand,
use and explain the technology and its appropriateness for the purpose intended.

• Whether the technology used has been appropriately tested and evaluated for the
purpose intended.

• Prior experience with the technology and whether its use for specific purposes is
generally accepted.

84
 THE CODE

• The firm’s oversight of the design, development, implementation, operation,

maintenance, monitoring, updating or upgrading of the technology.

• The controls relating to the use of the technology, including procedures for authorising
user access to the technology and overseeing such use.

• The appropriateness of the inputs to the technology, including data and any related
decisions, and decisions made by individuals in the course of using the technology.

Other Considerations

320.12 A1 When a member is considering using the work of experts or the output of technology, a
consideration is whether the member is in a position within the firm to obtain information in
relation to the factors necessary to determine whether such use is appropriate.

85
 THE CODE

SECTION 321
SECOND OPINIONS
Introduction
321.1 Members are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
321.2 Providing a second opinion to an entity that is not an existing client might create a self-interest
or other threat to compliance with one or more of the fundamental principles. This section sets
out specific requirements and application material relevant to applying the conceptual
framework in such circumstances.

Requirements and Application Material

General

321.3 A1 A member might be asked to provide a second opinion on the application of accounting,
auditing, reporting or other standards or principles to (a) specific circumstances, or (b)
transactions by or on behalf of a company or an entity that is not an existing client. A threat, for
example, a self-interest threat to compliance with the principle of professional competence and
due care, might be created if the second opinion is not based on the same facts that the existing
or predecessor accountant had, or is based on inadequate evidence.

321.3 A2 A factor that is relevant in evaluating the level of such a self-interest threat is the circumstances
of the request and all the other available facts and assumptions relevant to the expression of
a professional judgment.

321.3 A3 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address such a self-interest threat include:

• With the client’s permission, obtaining information from the existing or predecessor
accountant.

• Describing the limitations surrounding any opinion in communications with the client.

• Providing the existing or predecessor accountant with a copy of the opinion.

When Permission to Communicate is Not Provided

R321.4 If an entity seeking a second opinion from a member will not permit the member to
communicate with the existing or predecessor accountant, the member shall determine
whether the member may provide the second opinion sought.

86
 THE CODE

SECTION 325
OBJECTIVITY OF AN ENGAGEMENT QUALITY REVIEWER AND OTHER
APPROPRIATE REVIEWERS
Introduction
325.1 Members are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.

325.2 Appointing an engagement quality reviewer who has involvement in the work being reviewed
or close relationships with those responsible for performing that work might create threats to
compliance with the principle of objectivity.

325.3 This section sets out specific application material relevant to applying the conceptual
framework in relation to the objectivity of an engagement quality reviewer.
325.4 An engagement quality reviewer is also an example of an appropriate reviewer as described
in paragraph 300.8 A4. Therefore, the application material in this section might apply in
circumstances where a member appoints an appropriate reviewer to review work performed
as a safeguard to address identified threats.

Requirements and Application Material

General

325.5 A1 [Amended. Refer to NZ325.5 A1]

NZ325.5 A1 Quality engagements are achieved through planning and performing engagements and
reporting on them in accordance with technical and professional standards and applicable laws
and regulations. For firms that perform audits or reviews of financial statements, or other
assurance or related services engagements, Professional and Ethical Standard 3 (PES 3)
Quality Management for Firms that Perform Audits or Reviews of Financial Statements, or
Other Assurance or Related Services Engagements issued by NZAuASB establishes the firm’s
responsibilities for its system of quality management and requires the firm to design and
implement responses to address quality risks related to engagements performance. Such
responses include establishing policies or procedures addressing engagement quality reviews
in accordance with Professional and Ethical Standard 4 (PES 4) Engagement Quality Reviews.
Similarly, for a firm that performs engagements that are not audits or reviews of financial
statements, or other assurance or related services engagements, Professional Standard 1 (PS-
1) Quality Management issued by NZICA establishes the firm’s responsibilities for its system
of quality management and requires the firm to design and implement policies and procedures
related to engagements performance. Such requirements include the firm considering whether
it should establish policies or procedures addressing engagement quality reviews for high-risk
engagements.

325.5 A2 An engagement quality reviewer is a partner, other individual in the firm, or an external
individual, appointed by the firm to perform the engagement quality review.

Identifying Threats
325.6 A1 [Amended. Refer to NZ325.6 A1]

87
 THE CODE

NZ325.6 A1 The following are examples of circumstances where threats to the objectivity of a member
appointed as an engagement quality reviewer might be created:

a) Self-interest threat

• Two engagement partners each serving as an engagement quality reviewer for

the other’s engagement.
b) Self-review threat

• A member serving as an engagement quality reviewer on an engagement after

previously serving as the engagement partner.
c) Familiarity threat

• A member serving as an engagement quality reviewer has a close relationship

with or is an immediate family member of another individual who is involved in
the engagement.

d) Intimidation threat

• A member serving as an engagement quality reviewer for an engagement has a

direct reporting line to the partner responsible for the engagement.

Evaluating Threats

325.7 A1 Factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of threats to the objectivity of an individual
appointed as an engagement quality reviewer include:

• The role and seniority of the individual.

• The nature of the individual’s relationship with others involved on the engagement.

• The length of time the individual was previously involved with the engagement and the
individual’s role.

• When the individual was last involved in the engagement prior to being appointed as
engagement quality reviewer and any subsequent relevant changes to the
circumstances of the engagement.

• The nature and complexity of issues that required significant judgment from the individual
in any previous involvement in the engagement.

Addressing Threats

325.8 A1 An example of an action that might eliminate an intimidation threat is reassigning reporting
responsibilities within the firm.

325.8 A2 An example of an action that might be a safeguard to address a self-review threat is

implementing a period of sufficient duration (a cooling-off period) before the individual who was
on the engagement is appointed as an engagement quality reviewer.

Cooling-off Period – Audits, Reviews, Other Assurance or Related Service Engagements

325.8 A3 Professional and Ethical Standard 4 (PES 4) Engagement Quality Reviews requires the firm to
establish policies or procedures that specify, as a condition for eligibility, a cooling-off period of
two years before the engagement partner can assume the role of engagement quality reviewer.

88
 THE CODE

This serves to enable compliance with the principle of objectivity and the consistent
performance of quality engagements.

325.8 A4 The cooling-off period required by Professional and Ethical Standard 4 (PES 4) Engagement
Quality Reviews is distinct from, and does not modify, the partner rotation requirements in
Section 540 (refer PES 1), which are designed to address threats to independence created by
long association with an audit client.

89
 THE CODE

SECTION 330
FEES AND OTHER TYPES OF REMUNERATION
Introduction
330.1 Members are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
330.2 The level and nature of fee and other remuneration arrangements might create a self-interest
threat to compliance with one or more of the fundamental principles. This section sets out
specific application material relevant to applying the conceptual framework in such
circumstances.

Application Material
Level of Fees

330.3 A1 [Amended. Refer to NZ330.3 A1]

NZ330.3.A1 The level of fees might impact a member’s ability to perform professional services in
accordance with applicable technical and professional standards and relevant laws and
regulations.

330.3 A2 [Amended. Refer to NZ330.3 A2]

NZ330.3 A2 A member might quote whatever fee is considered appropriate. Quoting a fee lower than
another accountant is not in itself unethical. However, the level of fees quoted creates a self-
interest threat to compliance with the principle of professional competence and due care if the
fee quoted is so low that it might be difficult to perform the engagement in accordance with
applicable technical and professional standards and relevant laws and regulations.

330.3 A3 Factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of such a threat include:

• Whether the client is aware of the terms of the engagement and, in particular, the basis
on which fees are determined and which professional services are covered.

• Whether the level of the fee is set by an independent third party such as a regulatory
body.

330.3 A4 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address such a self-interest threat include:

• Adjusting the level of fees or the scope of the engagement.

• Having an appropriate reviewer review the work performed.

Contingent Fees

330.4 A1 Contingent fees are used for certain types of non-assurance services. However, contingent
fees might create threats to compliance with the fundamental principles, particularly a self-
interest threat to compliance with the principle of objectivity, in certain circumstances.

330.4 A2 Factors that are relevant in evaluating the level of such threats include:

• The nature of the engagement.

• The range of possible fee amounts.

• The basis for determining the fee.

90
 THE CODE

• Disclosure to intended users of the work performed by the member and the basis of
remuneration.

• Quality management policies and procedures.

• Whether an independent third party is to review the outcome or result of the transaction.

• Whether the level of the fee is set by an independent third party such as a regulatory
body.

330.4 A3 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address such a self-interest threat include:

• Having an appropriate reviewer who was not involved in performing the non-assurance
service review the work performed by the member.

• Obtaining an advance written agreement with the client on the basis of remuneration.

NZ R330.4.1 A member shall not enter into a Contingent Fee arrangement or receive a Contingent
Fee where prohibited to do so by technical and professional standards or laws and
regulations.

330.4 A4 Requirements and application material related to contingent fees for services provided to audit
or review clients and other assurance clients are set out in International Independence
Standards (New Zealand) (refer PES 1).

Referral Fees or Commissions

330.5 A1 A self-interest threat to compliance with the principles of objectivity and professional
competence and due care is created if a member pays or receives a referral fee or receives a
commission relating to a client. Such referral fees or commissions include, for example:

• A fee paid to another member for the purposes of obtaining new client work when the
client continues as a client of the existing accountant but requires specialist services not
offered by that accountant.

• A fee received for referring a continuing client to another member or other expert where
the existing accountant does not provide the specific professional service required by the
client.

• A commission received from a third party (for example, a software vendor) in connection
with the sale of goods or services to a client.

330.5 A2 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address such a self-interest threat include:
• Obtaining an advance agreement from the client for commission arrangements in
connection with the sale by another party of goods or services to the client might address
a self-interest threat.

• Disclosing to clients any referral fees or commission arrangements paid to, or received
from, another member or third party for recommending services or products might
address a self-interest threat.
NZ R330.5.1 Subject to R330.5.2, a member who accepts or pays referral fees, commissions or other
similar benefits shall inform the client in writing of:

• The existence of the arrangement;

91
 THE CODE

• The identity of the other party or parties; and

• The method of calculation of the referral fee, commission or other similar benefit
accruing directly or indirectly to or from the member.

NZ R330.5.2 A member shall not accept or pay referral fees, commissions or other similar benefits
in connection with an assurance engagement.
NZ 330.5.2 A1 The receipt or payment of referral fees, commissions or other similar benefits in connection
with an assurance engagement creates a threat to independence that no safeguards could
reduce to an acceptable level.

Purchase or Sale of a Firm

330.6 A1 A member may purchase all or part of another firm on the basis that payments will be made to
individuals formerly owning the firm or to their heirs or estates. Such payments are not referral
fees or commissions for the purposes of this section.

92
 THE CODE

SECTION 340
INDUCEMENTS, INCLUDING GIFTS AND HOSPITALITY
Introduction
340.1 Members are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.

340.2 Offering or accepting inducements might create a self-interest, familiarity or intimidation threat
to compliance with the fundamental principles, particularly the principles of integrity, objectivity
and professional behaviour.

340.3 This section sets out requirements and application material relevant to applying the conceptual
framework in relation to the offering and accepting of inducements when performing
professional services that does not constitute non-compliance with laws and regulations. This
section also requires a member to comply with relevant laws and regulations when offering or
accepting inducements.

Requirements and Application Material

General
340.4 A1 An inducement is an object, situation, or action that is used as a means to influence another
individual’s behaviour, but not necessarily with the intent to improperly influence that
individual’s behaviour. Inducements can range from minor acts of hospitality between members
and existing or prospective clients to acts that result in non-compliance with laws and
regulations. An inducement can take many different forms, for example:

• Gifts.

• Hospitality.

• Entertainment.

• Political or charitable donations.

• Appeals to friendship and loyalty.

• Employment or other commercial opportunities.

• Preferential treatment, rights or privileges.

Inducements Prohibited by Laws and Regulations

R340.5 In many jurisdictions, there are laws and regulations, such as those related to bribery
and corruption, that prohibit the offering or accepting of inducements in certain
circumstances. The member shall obtain an understanding of relevant laws and
regulations and comply with them when the member encounters such circumstances.

Inducements Not Prohibited by Laws and Regulations

340.6 A1 The offering or accepting of inducements that is not prohibited by laws and regulations might
still create threats to compliance with the fundamental principles.

93
 THE CODE

Inducements with Intent to Improperly Influence Behaviour

R340.7 A member shall not offer, or encourage others to offer, any inducement that is made, or
which the member considers a reasonable and informed third party would be likely to
conclude is made, with the intent to improperly influence the behaviour of the recipient
or of another individual.
R340.8 A member shall not accept, or encourage others to accept, any inducement that the
member concludes is made, or considers a reasonable and informed third party would
be likely to conclude is made, with the intent to improperly influence the behaviour of
the recipient or of another individual.

340.9 A1 An inducement is considered as improperly influencing an individual’s behaviour if it causes

the individual to act in an unethical manner. Such improper influence can be directed either
towards the recipient or towards another individual who has some relationship with the
recipient. The fundamental principles are an appropriate frame of reference for a member in
considering what constitutes unethical behaviour on the part of the member and, if necessary
by analogy, other individuals.

340.9 A2 A breach of the fundamental principle of integrity arises when a member offers or accepts, or
encourages others to offer or accept, an inducement where the intent is to improperly influence
the behaviour of the recipient or of another individual.

340.9 A3 The determination of whether there is actual or perceived intent to improperly influence
behaviour requires the exercise of professional judgment. Relevant factors to consider might
include:

• The nature, frequency, value and cumulative effect of the inducement.

• Timing of when the inducement is offered relative to any action or decision that it might
influence.

• Whether the inducement is a customary or cultural practice in the circumstances, for

example, offering a gift on the occasion of a religious holiday or wedding.

• Whether the inducement is an ancillary part of a professional service, for example,

offering or accepting lunch in connection with a business meeting.

• Whether the offer of the inducement is limited to an individual recipient or available to a

broader group. The broader group might be internal or external to the firm, such as other
suppliers to the client.

• The roles and positions of the individuals at the firm or the client offering or being offered
the inducement.

• Whether the member knows, or has reason to believe, that accepting the inducement
would breach the policies and procedures of the client.

• The degree of transparency with which the inducement is offered.

• Whether the inducement was required or requested by the recipient.

• The known previous behaviour or reputation of the offeror.

94
 THE CODE

Consideration of Further Actions

340.10 A1 If the member becomes aware of an inducement offered with actual or perceived intent to
improperly influence behaviour, threats to compliance with the fundamental principles might
still be created even if the requirements in paragraphs R340.7 and R340.8 are met.

340.10 A2 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address such threats include:
• Informing senior management of the firm or those charged with governance of the client
regarding the offer.

• Amending or terminating the business relationship with the client.

Inducements with No Intent to Improperly Influence Behaviour

340.11 A1 The requirements and application material set out in the conceptual framework apply when a
member has concluded there is no actual or perceived intent to improperly influence the
behaviour of the recipient or of another individual.

340.11 A2 If such an inducement is trivial and inconsequential, any threats created will be at an acceptable
level.

340.11 A3 Examples of circumstances where offering or accepting such an inducement might create
threats even if the member has concluded there is no actual or perceived intent to improperly
influence behaviour include:

• Self-interest threats

o A member is offered hospitality from the prospective acquirer of a client while

providing corporate finance services to the client.

• Familiarity threats

o A member regularly takes an existing or prospective client to sporting events.

• Intimidation threats

o A member accepts hospitality from a client, the nature of which could be perceived
to be inappropriate were it to be publicly disclosed.

340.11 A4 Relevant factors in evaluating the level of such threats created by offering or accepting such
an inducement include the same factors set out in paragraph 340.9 A3 for determining intent.

340.11 A5 Examples of actions that might eliminate threats created by offering or accepting such an
inducement include:
• Declining or not offering the inducement.

• Transferring responsibility for the provision of any professional services to the client to
another individual who the member has no reason to believe would be, or would be
perceived to be, improperly influenced when providing the services.

340.11 A6 Examples of actions that might be safeguards to address such threats created by offering or
accepting such an inducement include:
• Being transparent with senior management of the firm or of the client about offering or
accepting an inducement.

95
 THE CODE

• Registering the inducement in a log monitored by senior management of the firm or

another individual responsible for the firm’s ethics compliance or maintained by the
client.

• Having an appropriate reviewer, who is not otherwise involved in providing the

professional service, review any work performed or decisions made by the member with
respect to the client from which the member accepted the inducement.

• Donating the inducement to charity after receipt and appropriately disclosing the
donation, for example, to a member of senior management of the firm or the individual
who offered the inducement.

• Reimbursing the cost of the inducement, such as hospitality, received.

• As soon as possible, returning the inducement, such as a gift, after it was initially
accepted.

Immediate or Close Family Members

R340.12 A member shall remain alert to potential threats to the member's compliance with the
fundamental principles created by the offering of an inducement:

(a) By an immediate or close family member of the member to an existing or

prospective client of the member.

(b) To an immediate or close family member of the member by an existing or

prospective client of the member.

R340.13 Where the member becomes aware of an inducement being offered to or made by an
immediate or close family member and concludes there is intent to improperly influence
the behaviour of the member or of an existing or prospective client of the member, or
considers a reasonable and informed third party would be likely to conclude such intent
exists, the member shall advise the immediate or close family member not to offer or
accept the inducement.

340.13 A1 The factors set out in paragraph 340.9 A3 are relevant in determining whether there is actual
or perceived intent to improperly influence the behaviour of the member or of the existing or
prospective client. Another factor that is relevant is the nature or closeness of the relationship,
between:

(a) The member and the immediate or close family member;

(b) The immediate or close family member and the existing or prospective client; and

(c) The member and the existing or prospective client.

For example, the offer of employment, outside of the normal recruitment process, to the spouse
of the member by a client for whom the member is providing a business valuation for a
prospective sale might indicate such intent.
340.13 A2 The application material in paragraph 340.10 A2 is also relevant in addressing threats that
might be created when there is actual or perceived intent to improperly influence the behaviour
of the member, or of the existing or prospective client even if the immediate or close family
member has followed the advice given pursuant to paragraph R340.13.

96
 THE CODE

Application of the Conceptual Framework

340.14 A1 Where the member becomes aware of an inducement offered in the circumstances addressed
in paragraph R340.12, threats to compliance with the fundamental principles might be created
where:

(a) The immediate or close family member offers or accepts the inducement contrary to the
advice of the member pursuant to paragraph R340.13; or

(b) The member does not have reason to believe an actual or perceived intent to improperly
influence the behaviour of the member or of the existing or prospective client exists.
340.14 A2 The application material in paragraphs 340.11 A1 to 340.11 A6 is relevant for the purposes of
identifying, evaluating and addressing such threats. Factors that are relevant in evaluating the
level of threats in these circumstances also include the nature or closeness of the relationships
set out in paragraph 340.13 A1.

Other Considerations

340.15 A1 If a member encounters or is made aware of inducements that might result in non-compliance
or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations by a client or individuals working for
or under the direction of the client, the requirements and application material in Section 360
apply.

340.15 A2 If a firm, network firm or an audit or review team member is being offered gifts or hospitality
from an audit or review client, the requirement and application material set out in Section 420
(refer PES 1) apply.

340.15 A3 If a firm or an assurance team member is being offered gifts or hospitality from an assurance
client, the requirement and application material set out in Section 906 (refer PES 1) apply.

97
 THE CODE

SECTION 350
CUSTODY OF CLIENT ASSETS
Introduction
350.1 Members are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
350.2 Holding client assets creates a self-interest or other threat to compliance with the principles of
professional behaviour and objectivity. This section sets out specific requirements and
application material relevant to applying the conceptual framework in such circumstances.

Requirements and Application Material

Before Taking Custody

R350.3 A member shall not assume custody of client money or other assets unless permitted
to do so by law and in accordance with any conditions under which such custody may
be taken.

R350.4 As part of client and engagement acceptance procedures related to assuming custody
of client money or assets, a member shall:

(a) Make inquiries about the source of the assets; and

(b) Consider related legal and regulatory obligations.

350.4 A1 Inquiries about the source of client assets might reveal, for example, that the assets were
derived from illegal activities, such as money laundering. In such circumstances, a threat would
be created and the provisions of Section 360 would apply.

After Taking Custody

R350.5 A member entrusted with money or other assets belonging to others shall:

(a) Comply with the laws and regulations relevant to holding and accounting for the
assets;

(b) Keep the assets separately from personal or firm assets;

(c) Use the assets only for the purpose for which they are intended; and

(d) Be ready at all times to account for the assets and any income, dividends, or gains
generated, to any individuals entitled to that accounting.

98
 THE CODE

SECTION 360
RESPONDING TO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS
Introduction
360.1 Members are required to comply with the fundamental principles and apply the conceptual
framework set out in Section 120 to identify, evaluate and address threats.
360.2 A self-interest or intimidation threat to compliance with the principles of integrity and
professional behaviour is created when a member becomes aware of non-compliance or
suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations.
360.3 A member might encounter or be made aware of non-compliance or suspected non-
compliance in the course of providing a professional service to a client. This section guides the
member in assessing the implications of the matter and the possible courses of action when
responding to non-compliance or suspected non-compliance with:

(a) Laws and regulations generally recognised to have a direct effect on the determination
of material amounts and disclosures in the client’s financial statements; and

(b) Other laws and regulations that do not have a direct effect on the determination of the
amounts and disclosures in the client’s financial statements, but compliance with which
might be fundamental to the operating aspects of the client’s business, to its ability to
continue its business, or to avoid material penalties.

Objectives of the Member in Relation to Non-compliance with Laws and Regulations

360.4 A distinguishing mark of the accountancy profession is its acceptance of the responsibility to
act in the public interest. When responding to non-compliance or suspected non-compliance,
the objectives of the member are:

(a) To comply with the principles of integrity and professional behaviour;

(b) By alerting management or, where appropriate, those charged with governance of the
client, to seek to:

(i) Enable them to rectify, remediate or mitigate the consequences of the identified or
suspected non-compliance; or

(ii) Deter the commission of the non-compliance where it has not yet occurred; and

(c) To take such further action as appropriate in the public interest.

Requirements and Application Material

General

360.5 A1 Non-compliance with laws and regulations (“non-compliance”) comprises acts of omission or
commission, intentional or unintentional, which are contrary to the prevailing laws or
regulations committed by the following parties:

(a) A client;
(b) Those charged with governance of a client;

(c) Management of a client; or

99
 THE CODE

(d) Other individuals working for or under the direction of a client.

360.5 A2 Examples of laws and regulations which this section addresses include those that deal with:
• Fraud, corruption and bribery.

• Money laundering, terrorist financing and proceeds of crime.

• Securities markets and trading.

• Banking and other financial products and services.

• Data protection.

• Tax and pension liabilities and payments.

• Environmental protection.

• Public health and safety.

360.5 A3 Non-compliance might result in fines, litigation or other consequences for the client, potentially
materially affecting its financial statements. Importantly, such non-compliance might have wider
public interest implications in terms of potentially substantial harm to investors, creditors,
employees or the general public. For the purposes of this section, an act that causes
substantial harm is one that results in serious adverse consequences to any of these parties
in financial or non-financial terms. Examples include the perpetration of a fraud resulting in
significant financial losses to investors, and breaches of environmental laws and regulations
endangering the health or safety of employees or the public.

R360.6 In some jurisdictions, there are legal or regulatory provisions governing how members
should address non-compliance or suspected non-compliance. These legal or
regulatory provisions might differ from or go beyond the provisions in this section.
When encountering such non-compliance or suspected non-compliance, the member
shall obtain an understanding of those legal or regulatory provisions and comply with
them, including:

(a) Any requirement to report the matter to an appropriate authority; and

(b) Any prohibition on alerting the client.

360.6 A1 A prohibition on alerting the client might arise, for example, pursuant to anti-money laundering
legislation.

360.7 A1 This section applies regardless of the nature of the client, including whether or not it is a public
interest entity.

360.7 A2 A member who encounters or is made aware of matters that are clearly inconsequential is not
required to comply with this section. Whether a matter is clearly inconsequential is to be judged
with respect to its nature and its impact, financial or otherwise, on the client, its stakeholders
and the general public.

360.7 A3 This section does not address:

(a) Personal misconduct unrelated to the business activities of the client; and

(b) Non-compliance by parties other than those specified in paragraph 360.5 A1. This
includes, for example, circumstances where a member has been engaged by a client to

100
 THE CODE

perform a due diligence assignment on a third party entity and the identified or suspected
non-compliance has been committed by that third-party.

The member might nevertheless find the guidance in this section helpful in considering how to
respond in these situations.

Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance

360.8 A1 Management, with the oversight of those charged with governance, is responsible for ensuring
that the client’s business activities are conducted in accordance with laws and regulations.
Management and those charged with governance are also responsible for identifying and
addressing any non-compliance by:

(a) The client;

(b) An individual charged with governance of the entity;

(c) A member of management; or

(d) Other individuals working for or under the direction of the client.

Responsibilities of All Members

R360.9 Where a member becomes aware of a matter to which this section applies, the steps that
the member takes to comply with this section shall be taken on a timely basis. In taking
timely steps, the member shall have regard to the nature of the matter and the potential
harm to the interests of the entity, investors, creditors, employees or the general public.

Audits and Reviews of Financial Statements

Refer to paragraphs R360.10 – R360.28A1 of the NZAuASB's Professional and Ethical Standard 1, Code
of Ethics for Assurance Practitioners (Including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand)
(PES 1).

Professional Services Other than Audits and Reviews of Financial Statements

Obtaining an Understanding of the Matter and Addressing It with Management and Those Charged with
Governance

R360.29 [Amended. Refer to NZ360.29]

NZ R360.29 If a member engaged to provide a professional service other than an audit or review of
financial statements becomes aware of information concerning non-compliance or
suspected non-compliance, the member shall seek to obtain an understanding of the
matter. This understanding shall include the nature of the non-compliance or suspected
non-compliance and the circumstances in which it has occurred or might be about to
occur.

360.29 A1 The member is expected to apply knowledge and expertise, and exercise professional
judgment. However, the member is not expected to have a level of understanding of laws and
regulations beyond that which is required for the professional service for which the member
was engaged. Whether an act constitutes actual non-compliance is ultimately a matter to be
determined by a court or other appropriate adjudicative body.

101
 THE CODE

360.29 A2 Depending on the nature and significance of the matter, the member might consult on a
confidential basis with others within the firm, a network firm or a professional body, or with legal
counsel.

R360.30 If the member identifies or suspects that non-compliance has occurred or might occur,
the member shall discuss the matter with the appropriate level of management. If the
member has access to those charged with governance, the member shall also discuss
the matter with them where appropriate.

360.30 A1 The purpose of the discussion is to clarify the member’s understanding of the facts and
circumstances relevant to the matter and its potential consequences. The discussion also
might prompt management or those charged with governance to investigate the matter.

360.30 A2 The appropriate level of management with whom to discuss the matter is a question of
professional judgment. Relevant factors to consider include:

• The nature and circumstances of the matter.

• The individuals actually or potentially involved.

• The likelihood of collusion.

• The potential consequences of the matter.

• Whether that level of management is able to investigate the matter and take appropriate
action.

Communicating the Matter to the Entity’s External Auditor or Assurance Practitioner

R360.31 [Amended. Refer to NZ R360.31]

NZ R360.31 If the member is performing a professional service other than an audit or review for:

(a) An audit or review client of the firm; or

(b) A component of an audit or review client of the firm,

the member shall communicate the non-compliance or suspected non-compliance

within the firm, unless prohibited from doing so by law or regulation. The
communication shall be made in accordance with the firm’s protocols or procedures. In
the absence of such protocols and procedures, it shall be made directly to the audit or
review engagement partner.

R360.32 [Amended. Refer to NZ R360.32]

NZ R360.32 If the member is performing a professional service other than an audit or review for:

(a) An audit or review client of a network firm; or

(b) A component of an audit or review client of a network firm,

the member shall consider whether to communicate the non-compliance or suspected

non-compliance to the network firm. Where the communication is made, it shall be made
in accordance with the network's protocols or procedures. In the absence of such
protocols and procedures, it shall be made directly to the audit or review engagement
partner.

R360.33 [Amended. Refer NZ R360.33]

102
 THE CODE

NZ R360.33 If the member is performing a professional service other than an audit or review for a
client that is not:

(a) An audit or review client of the firm or a network firm; or

(b) A component of an audit or review client of the firm or a network firm,

the member shall consider whether to communicate the non-compliance or suspected

non-compliance to the firm that is the client’s external assurance practitioner, if any.

Relevant Factors to Consider

360.34 A1 Factors relevant to considering the communication in accordance with paragraphs R360.31 to
R360.33 include:

• Whether doing so would be contrary to law or regulation.

• Whether there are restrictions about disclosure imposed by a regulatory agency or

prosecutor in an ongoing investigation into the non-compliance or suspected non-
compliance.

• Whether the purpose of the engagement is to investigate potential non-compliance within

the entity to enable it to take appropriate action.

• Whether management or those charged with governance have already informed the
entity’s external auditor about the matter.

• The likely materiality of the matter to the audit of the client’s financial statements or, where
the matter relates to a component of a group, its likely materiality to the audit of the group
financial statements.

Purpose of Communication

360.35 A1 In the circumstances addressed in paragraphs R360.31 to R360.33, the purpose of the
communication is to enable the audit engagement partner to be informed about the non-
compliance or suspected non-compliance and to determine whether and, if so, how to address
it in accordance with the provisions of this section.

Considering Whether Further Action Is Needed

R360.36 The member shall also consider whether further action is needed in the public interest.

360.36 A1 Whether further action is needed, and the nature and extent of it, will depend on factors such
as:
• The legal and regulatory framework.

• The appropriateness and timeliness of the response of management and, where

applicable, those charged with governance.
• The urgency of the situation.

• The involvement of management or those charged with governance in the matter.

• The likelihood of substantial harm to the interests of the client, investors, creditors,
employees or the general public.

360.36 A2 Further action by the member might include:

103
 THE CODE

• Disclosing the matter to an appropriate authority even when there is no legal or

regulatory requirement to do so.

• Withdrawing from the engagement and the professional relationship where permitted by
law or regulation.

360.36 A3 In considering whether to disclose to an appropriate authority, relevant factors to take into
account include:

• Whether doing so would be contrary to law or regulation.

• Whether there are restrictions about disclosure imposed by a regulatory agency or

prosecutor in an ongoing investigation into the non-compliance or suspected non-
compliance.

• Whether the purpose of the engagement is to investigate potential non-compliance within

the entity to enable it to take appropriate action.

R360.37 If the member determines that disclosure of the non-compliance or suspected non-
compliance to an appropriate authority is an appropriate course of action in the
circumstances, that disclosure is permitted pursuant to paragraph NZ R114.3 of the
Code. When making such disclosure, the member shall act in good faith and exercise
caution when making statements and assertions. The member shall also consider
whether it is appropriate to inform the client of the member's intentions before
disclosing the matter.

Imminent Breach

R360.38 In exceptional circumstances, the member might become aware of actual or intended
conduct that the member has reason to believe would constitute an imminent breach of
a law or regulation that would cause substantial harm to investors, creditors, employees
or the general public. Having first considered whether it would be appropriate to discuss
the matter with management or those charged with governance of the entity, the
member shall exercise professional judgment and determine whether to disclose the
matter immediately to an appropriate authority in order to prevent or mitigate the
consequences of such imminent breach of law or regulation. If disclosure is made, that
disclosure is permitted pursuant to paragraph NZ R114.3 of the Code.

Seeking Advice

360.39 A1 The member might consider:

• Consulting internally.
• Obtaining legal advice to understand the professional or legal implications of taking any
particular course of action.

• Consulting on a confidential basis with a regulatory or professional body.

Documentation

360.40 A1 In relation to non-compliance or suspected non-compliance that falls within the scope of this
section, the member is encouraged to document:

• The matter.

104
 THE CODE

• The results of discussion with management and, where applicable, those charged with
governance and other parties.

• How management and, where applicable, those charged with governance have
responded to the matter.

• The courses of action the member considered, the judgments made and the decisions
that were taken.

• How the member is satisfied that the member has fulfilled the responsibility set out in
paragraph R360.36.

105
 THE CODE

INTERNATIONAL INDEPENDENCE STANDARDS (NEW ZEALAND)

(PARTS 4A AND 4B)

PART 4A – INDEPENDENCE FOR AUDIT AND REVIEW

ENGAGEMENTS
Refer to Part 4A of the NZAuASB's Professional and Ethical Standard 1, International Code of Ethics for
Assurance Practitioners (including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) (PES 1).

PART 4B – INDEPENDENCE FOR ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS

OTHER THAN AUDIT AND REVIEW ENGAGEMENTS
Refer to Part 4B of the NZAuASB's Professional and Ethical Standard 1, International Code of Ethics for
Assurance Practitioners (including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) (PES 1).

106
 THE CODE

GLOSSARY, INCLUDING LISTS OF ABBREVIATIONS

In the Code of Ethics, the singular shall be construed as including the plural as well as the reverse, and the
terms below have the following meanings assigned to them.

In this Glossary, explanations of defined terms are shown in regular font; italics are used for explanations
of described terms which have a specific meaning in certain parts of the Code or for additional explanations
of defined terms. References are also provided to terms described in the Code.

Acceptable level A level at which a member using the reasonable and informed third party test
would likely conclude that the member complies with the fundamental
principles.

Advertising The communication to the public of information as to the services or skills

provided by members in public practice with a view to procuring professional
business.

Appropriate reviewer An appropriate reviewer is a professional with the necessary knowledge, skills,
experience and authority to review, in an objective manner, the relevant work
performed or service provided. Such an individual might be a member.

This term is described in paragraph 300.8 A4.

Assurance client The responsible party and also, in an attestation engagement, the party taking
responsibility for the subject matter information (who might be the same as the
responsible party).

Assurance engagement An engagement in which a member in public practice aims to obtain sufficient
appropriate evidence in order to express a conclusion designed to enhance the
degree of confidence of the intended users other than the responsible party
about the subject matter information (that is, the outcome of the measurement
or evaluation of an underlying subject matter against criteria).
(ISAE (NZ) 3000 (Revised) describes the elements and objectives of an
assurance engagement conducted under that Standard and Explanatory Guide
(EG) Au1 Overview of Auditing and Assurance Standards provides a general
description of assurance engagements to which International Standards on
Auditing (New Zealand) (ISAs (NZ)), International Standards on Review
Engagements (New Zealand) (ISREs (NZ)) New Zealand Standard on Review
Engagements (NZ SRE)) International Standards on Assurance Engagements
(New Zealand) (ISAEs (NZ)), and Standards on Assurance Engagements
(SAEs) apply.)
In Part 4B, the term ‘assurance engagement’ refers to assurance engagements
that are not audit or review engagements.

[NZ] Assurance A person or an organisation, whether in public practice, industry, commerce or

Practitioner the public sector, appointed or engaged to undertake assurance engagements
or related services.

107
 THE CODE

[NZ] Assurance Services Comprise of any assurance engagements performed by an assurance

practitioner.

Assurance team (a) All members of the engagement team for the assurance engagement;
(b) All others within, or engaged by, the firm who can directly influence the
outcome of the assurance engagement, including:

(i) Those who recommend the compensation of, or who provide direct
supervisory, management or other oversight of the assurance
engagement partner in connection with the performance of the
assurance engagement;

(ii) Those who provide consultation regarding technical or industry specific

issues, transactions or events for the assurance engagement; and

(iii) Those who perform an engagement quality review, or a review

consistent with the objective of an engagement quality review, for
the engagement.

Attestation engagement An assurance engagement in which a party other than the member in public
practice measures or evaluates the underlying subject matter against the criteria.
A party other than the member also often presents the resulting subject matter
information in a report or statement. In some cases, however, the subject matter
information may be presented by the member in the assurance report. In an
attestation engagement, the member’s conclusion addresses whether the subject
matter information is free from material misstatement. The member’s conclusion
may be phrased in terms of:

a) The underlying subject matter and the applicable criteria;

b) The subject matter information and the applicable criteria; or
c) A statement made by the appropriate party(ies).

[NZ] Audit Client An entity in respect of which a firm conducts an audit engagement. When the client
is a FMC reporting entity considered to have a higher level of public accountability,
audit client will always include its related entities. When the audit client is not a FMC
reporting entity considered to have a higher level of public accountability, audit
client includes those related entities over which the client has direct or indirect
control. (See also paragraph R 400.27 of PES 1)

In Part 4A, the term “audit client” applies equally to “review client”.

In the case of a group audit, see the definition of group audit client

Audit engagement A reasonable assurance engagement in which a member in public practice

expresses an opinion whether financial statements are prepared, in all material
respects (or give a true and fair view or are presented fairly, in all material respects),
in accordance with an applicable financial reporting framework, such as an
engagement conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing

108
 THE CODE

(New Zealand). This includes a Statutory Audit, which is an audit required by

legislation or other regulation.

Audit team (a) All members of the engagement team for the audit engagement;
(b) All others within, or engaged by, the firm who can directly influence the
outcome of the audit engagement, including:

(i) Those who recommend the compensation of, or who provide direct
supervisory, management or other oversight of the engagement
partner in connection with the performance of the audit engagement,
including those at all successively senior levels above the
engagement partner through to the individual who is the firm’s Senior
or Managing Partner (Chief Executive or equivalent);

(ii) Those who provide consultation regarding technical or industry-

specific issues, transactions or events for the engagement; and

(iii) Those who perform an engagement quality review, or a review

consistent with the objective of an engagement quality review for the
engagement; and

(c) Any other individuals within a network firm who can directly influence the
outcome of the audit engagement.
In Part 4A, the term “audit team” applies equally to “review team”. In the case of a
group audit, see the definition of group audit team.

Close family A parent, child or sibling who is not an immediate family member.

Component Refer to Glossary of PES 1

Component audit client Refer to Glossary of PES 1

Component auditor firm Refer to Glossary of PES 1

Conceptual framework This term is described in Section 120.

Confidential information Any information, data or other material in whatever form or medium (including
written, electronic, visual or oral) that is not publicly available.

Contingent fee A fee calculated on a predetermined basis relating to the outcome of a transaction
or the result of the services performed by the firm. A fee that is established by a
court or other public authority is not a contingent fee.

Cooling-off period Refer to Glossary of PES 1

Criteria In an assurance engagement, the benchmarks used to measure or evaluate the

underlying subject matter. The “applicable criteria” are the criteria used for the
particular engagement.

109
 THE CODE

Direct engagement Refer to Glossary of PES 1

Direct financial interest A financial interest:

(a) Owned directly by and under the control of an individual or entity (including
those managed on a discretionary basis by others); or

(b) Beneficially owned through a collective investment vehicle, estate, trust or

other intermediary over which the individual or entity has control, or the ability
to influence investment decisions.

Director or officer Those charged with the governance of an entity, or acting in an equivalent capacity,
regardless of their title, which might vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

Eligible audit Refer to Glossary of PES 1

engagement

Eligible assurance Refer to Glossary in PES 1

engagement

[NZ] Employing Any organisation in which or for which a member works as an employee,
organisation contractor, partner, director (executive or non-executive), owner, manager or
in a voluntary or honorary capacity.

Engagement partner The partner or other person in the firm who is responsible for the engagement
and its performance, and for the report that is issued on behalf of the firm, and
who, where required, has the appropriate authority from a professional, legal
or regulatory body12.

Engagement period Refer to Glossary in PES 1

(Audit and Review
Engagements)

Engagement period Refer to Glossary in PES 1

(Assurance
Engagements Other than
Audit and Review
Engagements)

Engagement quality An objective evaluation of the significant judgments made by the engagement team
review and the conclusions reached thereon, performed by the engagement quality
reviewer and completed on or before the issue of the engagement report(s).

Engagement quality A partner, other individual in firm, or an external individual, appointed by the firm to
reviewer perform the engagement quality review.

12 “Engagement Partner” should be read as referring to their public sector equivalents where relevant
110
 THE CODE

Engagement team All partners and staff performing the engagement, and any other individuals who
perform procedures on the engagement, excluding external experts and internal
auditors who provide direct assistance on the engagement.

In Part 4A, the term “engagement team” refers to individuals performing audit or
review procedures on the audit or review engagement, respectively. This term is
further described in paragraph 400.9.

ISA (NZ) 220 (Revised) provides further guidance on the definition of engagement
team in the context of an audit of financial statements.
ISA (NZ) 620 defines an auditor’s expert as an individual or organisation
possessing expertise in a field other than accounting or auditing, whose work in
that field is used by the auditor to assist the auditor in obtaining sufficient
appropriate audit evidence. ISA (NZ) 620 deals with the auditor’s responsibilities
relating to the work of such experts.

ISA (NZ) 610 (Revised 2013) deals with the auditor’s responsibilities if using the
work of internal auditors, including using internal auditors to provide direct
assistance on the audit engagement.

In Part 4B, the term “engagement team” refers to individuals performing assurance
procedures on the assurance engagement.

Existing accountant An accountant in public practice currently holding an audit appointment or

carrying out accounting, tax, consulting or similar professional services for a
client.

External expert An individual (who is not a partner or a member of the professional staff,
including temporary staff, of the firm or a network firm) or organisation
possessing skills, knowledge and experience in a field other than accounting or
auditing, whose work in that field is used to assist the member in obtaining
sufficient appropriate evidence.

Financial interest An interest in an equity or other security, debenture, loan or other debt instrument
of an entity, including rights and obligations to acquire such an interest and
derivatives directly related to such interest.

Financial statements A structured representation of historical financial information, including related

notes, intended to communicate an entity’s economic resources or obligations at a
point in time or the changes therein for a period of time in accordance with a
financial reporting framework. The related notes ordinarily comprise a summary of
significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. The term can
relate to a complete set of financial statements, but it can also refer to a single
financial statement, for example, a balance sheet, or a statement of revenues and
expenses, and related explanatory notes.

This term does not refer to specific elements, accounts or items of a financial
statement.

111
 THE CODE

Financial statements on In the case of a single entity, the financial statements of that entity. In the case
which the firm will of consolidated financial statements, also referred to as group financial
express an opinion statements, the consolidated financial statements.

[NZ] Firm (a) A sole practitioner, partnership or corporation undertaking professional

services;

(b) An entity that controls such parties, through ownership, management or

other means; and

(c) An entity controlled by such parties, through ownership, management or

other means.
Paragraphs 400.4 and 900.3 of PES 1 explain how the word “firm” is used to
address the responsibility of members and firms for compliance with Parts 4A
and 4B, respectively.

[NZ] FMC reporting entity A FMC reporting entity, or class of FMC reporting entity that is considered to have
considered to have a a higher level of public accountability than other FMC reporting entities:
higher level of public
• under section 461K of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013; or
accountability
• by notice issued by the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) under section
461L(1)(a) of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.

Fundamental principles This term is described in paragraph 110.1 A1. Each of the fundamental principles
is, in turn, described in the following paragraphs:

Integrity R111.1

Objectivity R112.1

Professional competence and due care R113.1

Confidentiality R114.1 to R114.3

Professional behaviour R115.1

Group Refer to Glossary in PES 1

Group audit Refer to Glossary in PES 1

[NZ] Group audit client Refer to Glossary in PES 1

Group auditor firm Refer to Glossary in PES 1

Group audit team Refer to Glossary in PES 1

Group engagement Refer to Glossary in PES 1

partner

Group financial Refer to Glossary in PES 1

statements

112
 THE CODE

Historical financial Information expressed in financial terms in relation to a particular entity, derived
information primarily from that entity’s accounting system, about economic events occurring in
past time periods or about economic conditions or circumstances at points in time
in the past.

Immediate family A spouse (or equivalent) or dependent.

Independence Independence comprises:

(a) Independence of mind – the state of mind that permits the expression of
a conclusion without being affected by influences that compromise
professional judgment, thereby allowing an individual to act with integrity,
and exercise objectivity and professional skepticism.

(b) Independence in appearance – the avoidance of facts and circumstances

that are so significant that a reasonable and informed third party would
be likely to conclude that a firm’s, or an audit or assurance team
member’s, integrity, objectivity or professional skepticism has been
compromised.

As set out in paragraphs 400.5 and 900.4, references to an individual or firm

being “independent” means that the individual or firm has complied with Parts
4A and 4B, as applicable.

Indirect financial interest A financial interest beneficially owned through a collective investment vehicle,
estate, trust or other intermediary over which the individual or entity has no
control or ability to influence investment decisions.

Inducement An object, situation, or action that is used as a means to influence another

individual’s behaviour, but not necessarily with the intent to improperly influence
that individual’s behaviour.
Inducements can range from minor acts of hospitality between business
colleagues (for members in business), or between members and existing or
prospective clients (for members in public practice), to acts that result in non-
compliance with laws and regulations. An inducement can take many different
forms, for example:

• Gifts.
• Hospitality.

• Entertainment.

• Political or charitable donations.

• Appeals to friendship and loyalty.

• Employment or other commercial opportunities.

• Preferential treatment, rights or privileges

113
 THE CODE

Key audit partner The engagement partner, the individual responsible for the engagement quality
review, and other audit partners, if any, on the engagement team who make key
decisions or judgments on significant matters with respect to the audit of the
financial statements on which the firm will express an opinion. Depending upon the
circumstances and the role of the individuals on the audit, “other audit partners”
might include, for example, engagement partners for certain components in a
group audit such as significant subsidiaries or divisions.

May This term is used in the Code to denote permission to take a particular action
in certain circumstances, including as an exception to a requirement. It is not
used to denote possibility.

[NZ] Member An individual who is a member of the New Zealand Institute of Chartered
Accountants in accordance with the New Zealand Institute of Chartered
Accountants Rules.

In Part 1, the term “member” refers to individual members in business and to

members in public practice and their firms.

In Part 2, the term “member” refers to members in business.

In Parts 3, 4A and 4B, the term “member” refers to members in public practice and
their firms.

[NZ] Member in business A member working in areas such as commerce, industry, service, the public
sector, education, the not-for-profit sector, or in regulatory or professional
bodies, who might be an employee, contractor, partner, director (executive or
non-executive), owner-manager or volunteer.

[NZ] Member in public A member, irrespective of membership designation or functional classification

practice (for example, audit, tax or consulting) in a firm that provides professional
services or otherwise provides professional services to the public.

The term “member in public practice” is also used to refer to a firm of members
in public practice.

Might This term is used in the Code to denote the possibility of a matter arising, an
event occurring or a course of action being taken. The term does not ascribe
any particular level of possibility or likelihood when used in conjunction with a
threat, as the evaluation of the level of a threat depends on the facts and
circumstances of any particular matter, event or course of action.

114
 THE CODE

Network A larger structure:

(a) That is aimed at co-operation; and

(b) That is clearly aimed at profit or cost sharing or shares common
ownership, control or management, common quality management
policies and procedures, common business strategy, the use of a
common brand-name, or a significant part of professional resources.

Network firm A firm or entity that belongs to a network.

For further information, see paragraphs 400.50 A1 to 400.54 A1.

Non-compliance with Non-compliance with laws and regulations (“non-compliance”) comprises acts
laws and regulations of omission or commission, intentional or unintentional, which are contrary to
the prevailing laws or regulations committed by the following parties:
(Members in Business)
(a) The member’s employing organisation;

(b) Those charged with governance of the employing organisation;

(c) Management of the employing organisation; or

(d) Other individuals working for or under the direction of the employing
organisation.

This term is described in paragraph 260.5 A1.

Non-compliance with Non-compliance with laws and regulations (“non-compliance”) comprises acts
laws and regulations of omission or commission, intentional or unintentional, which are contrary to
the prevailing laws or regulations committed by the following parties:
(Members in Public
Practice) (a) A client;

(b) Those charged with governance of a client;

(c) Management of a client; or

(d) Other individuals working for or under the direction of a client.

This term is described in paragraph 360.5 A1.

[NZ] Offer document Refer to Glossary in PES 1

Office A distinct sub-group, whether organized on geographical or practice lines.

Predecessor accountant An accountant in public practice who most recently held an audit appointment
or carried out accounting, tax, consulting or similar professional services for a
client, where there is no existing accountant.

[NZ] Principal A person having a direct or indirect ownership interest in a practice entity and a
governance role in that same structure in the nature of a shareholder and
director of a company, a partner of a partnership, a person with the power of
appointment of trustees, or a trustee in respect of a trust.

115
 THE CODE

Professional accountant [Deleted]

Professional accountant [Deleted]

in business

Professional accountant [Deleted]

in public practice

Professional activity An activity requiring accountancy or related skills undertaken by a member,

including accounting, auditing, tax, management consulting, and financial
management.

Professional body Includes New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants and Chartered
Accountants Australia and New Zealand.

Professional judgement Professional judgement involves the application of relevant training,

professional knowledge, skill and experience commensurate with the facts and
circumstances, taking into account the nature and scope of the particular
professional activities, and the interests and relationships involved.

This term is described in paragraph 120.5 A4.

Professional services Professional activities performed for clients.

Proposed accountant An accountant in public practice who is considering accepting an audit

appointment or an engagement to perform accounting, tax, consulting or similar
professional services for a prospective client (or in some cases, an existing
client).

[NZ] Public interest The collective well-being of the community and institutions the profession
serves

[NZ] Public interest entity For the purposes of Part 4A, an entity is a public interest entity when it falls
within any of the following categories:

a) A publicly traded entity;

b) An entity one of whose main functions is to take deposits from the public;
c) An entity one of whose main functions is to provide insurance to the public;
or
d) An entity specified as such by law, regulation or professional standards to
meet the purpose described in paragraph 400.10 (refer PES 1).

The Code provides for the categories to be more explicitly defined or added to
as described in paragraphs 400.18 A1 and 400.18 A2 (refer PES 1).
Notwithstanding (a)-(d) above, an entity that meets the Tier 1 criteria in
accordance with XRB A113 and is not eligible to report in accordance with the
accounting requirements of another tier is a public interest entity.

13 XRB A1, Application of the Accounting Standards Framework

116
 THE CODE

Publicly traded entity An entity that issues financial instruments that are transferrable and traded
through a publicly accessible market mechanism, including through listing on a
stock exchange.

A listed issuer as defined by relevant securities law or regulation is an example

of a publicly traded entity.

Reasonable and The reasonable and informed third party test is a consideration by the member
informed third party about whether the same conclusions would likely be reached by another party.
Such consideration is made from the perspective of a reasonable and informed
Reasonable and
third party, who weighs all the relevant facts and circumstances that the
informed third party test
member knows, or could reasonably be expected to know, at the time that the
conclusions are made. The reasonable and informed third party does not need
to be a member, but would possess the relevant knowledge and experience to
understand and evaluate the appropriateness of the member’s conclusions in
an impartial manner.

These terms are described in paragraph R120.5 A9.

Related entity An entity that has any of the following relationships with the client:

(a) An entity that has direct or indirect control over the client if the client is
material to such entity;

(b) An entity with a direct financial interest in the client if that entity has
significant influence over the client and the interest in the client is material
to such entity;

(c) An entity over which the client has direct or indirect control;

(d) An entity in which the client, or an entity related to the client under (c)
above, has a direct financial interest that gives it significant influence over
such entity and the interest is material to the client and its related entity
in (c); and

(e) An entity which is under common control with the client (a “sister entity”)
if the sister entity and the client are both material to the entity that controls
both the client and sister entity.

[NZ] Related services Services to perform agreed upon procedures or other non-assurance work that
may ordinarily be carried out by an assurance practitioner as prescribed by the
External Reporting Board or the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Board.

Responsible party In an assurance engagement, the party responsible for the underlying subject
matter.

Review client An entity in respect of which a firm conducts a review engagement.

Review engagement An assurance engagement, conducted in accordance with International Standards

on Review Engagements (New Zealand) 2400 or New Zealand Standard on
Review Engagements 2410 or equivalent, in which a member in public practice

117
 THE CODE

expresses a conclusion on whether, on the basis of the procedures which do not

provide all the evidence that would be required in an audit, anything has come to
the member’s attention that causes the member to believe that the financial
statements are not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with an
applicable financial reporting framework.

Review team (a) All members of the engagement team for the review engagement; and
(b) All others within, or engaged by, the firm who can directly influence the
outcome of the review engagement, including:

(i) Those who recommend the compensation of, or who provide direct
supervisory, management or other oversight of the engagement
partner in connection with the performance of the review
engagement, including those at all successively senior levels above
the engagement partner through to the individual who is the firm’s
Senior or Managing Partner (Chief Executive or equivalent);
(ii) Those who provide consultation regarding technical or industry-
specific issues, transactions or events for the engagement; and

(iii) Those who perform an engagement quality review, or a review

consistent with the objective of an engagement quality review, for the
engagement; and

(c) Any other individuals within a network firm who can directly influence the
outcome of the review engagement.

Safeguards Safeguards are actions, individually or in combination, that the member takes
that effectively reduce threats to compliance with the fundamental principles to
an acceptable level.

This term is described in paragraph 120.10 A2.

[NZ] Senior member in Senior members in business are directors, officers or senior employees able to
business exert significant influence over, and make decisions regarding, the acquisition,
deployment and control of the employing organisation’s human, financial,
technological, physical and intangible resources.

This term is described in paragraph 260.11 A1.

Substantial harm This term is described in paragraphs 260.5 A3 and 360.5 A3.

Special purpose financial Financial statements prepared in accordance with a financial reporting
statements framework designed to meet the financial information needs of specified users.

Subject matter The outcome of the measurement or evalution of the underlying subject matter
information against the criteria, i.e., the information that results from applying the criteria to
the underlying subject matter.

118
 THE CODE

[NZ] Technical and The standards issued by the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants,
professional standards the External Reporting Board, the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance
Standards Board, the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board and any other
standards or authoritative guidance applicable to the task or engagement.

Those charged with The person(s) or organisation(s) (for example, a corporate trustee) with
governance responsibility for overseeing the strategic direction of the entity and obligations
related to the accountability of the entity. This includes overseeing the financial
reporting process. For some entities in some jurisdictions, those charged with
governance might include management personnel, for example, executive
members of a governance board of a private or public sector entity, or an owner-
manager.

Threats This term is described in paragraph 120.6 A3 and includes the following
categories:

Self interest 120.6 A3(a)

Self-review 120.6 A3(b)

Advocacy 120.6 A3(c)

Familiarity 120.6 A3(d)

Intimidation 120.6 A3(e)

Time-on period Refer to Glossary in PES 1

Underlying subject The phenomenom that is measured or evaluated by applying criteria

matter

119
 THE CODE

EFFECTIVE DATE

• The revised Code will be effective as of 15 December 2024.

WITHDRAWAL OF EXTANT CODE

• This Code of Ethics supersedes the extant Code of Ethics (effective 15 December 2022).

120
 CONFORMITY STATEMENTS

CONFORMITY WITH INTERNATIONAL PRONOUNCEMENTS

____________________________________________________________________________________

This conformity statement accompanies but is not part of this Code of Ethics; it is given for information
purposes only.

The Code of Ethics is based on the Final Pronouncement International Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants (including International Independence Standards) issued by the International Ethics
Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) in April 2018. It also includes the Final Pronouncement
Revisions to the Code Pertaining to the Offering and Accepting of Inducements issued by IESBA in July
2018 (IESBA Code), the Final Pronouncement Revisions to Part 4B of the Code to Reflect Terms and
Concepts Used in International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3000 (Revised), published by IFAC
in January 2020, the Final Pronouncement Revisions to the Code to Promote the Role and Mindset
Expected of Professional Accountants, published by IFAC in October 2020, the Final Pronouncement
Revisions to the Code Addressing the Objectivity of an Engagement Quality Reviewer and Other
Appropriate Reviewers, published by IFAC in January 2021, the Final Pronouncement Revisions to the
Non-Assurance Services Provisions of the Code, published by IFAC in April 2021, the Final
Pronouncement Revisions to the Fee-related Provisions of the Code, published by IFAC in April 2021, the
Final Pronouncement Quality Management-related Conforming Amendments to the Code, published by
IFAC in April 2022, the Final Pronouncement Revisions to the Definitions of Listed Entity and Public
Interest Entity, published by IFAC in April 2022, the Final Pronouncement Revisions to the Code Relating
to the Definition of Engagement Team and Group Audits, published by IFAC in February 2023, and the
Final Pronouncement Technology-related Provisions of the Code, published by IFAC in April 2023.

The principles and requirements of this Code of Ethics and the IESBA Code are consistent except for the
following:

• The addition of New Zealand Notice of Legal Status, Preface and Scope and Application sections
in this Code of Ethics;
• The addition of paragraphs and definitions prefixed as NZ in this Code of Ethics;
• Requirement paragraphs in this Code of Ethics are in bold-type font
• This Code of Ethics generally refers to members whereas the IESBA Code refers to professional
accountants;
• The additional definitions in this Code of Ethics are of assurance practitioner, assurance services,
employing organisation, FMC reporting entity considered to have a higher level of public
accountability, professional body, principal, public interest, related services and technical and
professional standards. Inclusion of this later definition has resulted in consequential
amendments NZ100.2, NZ110.1 A1, NZ R113.1, NZ 220.10 A1, NZ270.3 A3, NZ330.3 A1 and
NZ330.3 A2;
• This Code of Ethics tailors the following IESBA defined terms to the New Zealand environment:
audit client, firm and public interest entity;
• Paragraph NZ100.5 A1NZ110_6A1 clarifies that the meaning of the letter “R” applies to the New
Zealand scope and application.
• Paragraphs NZ R100.9 - NZ R100.10 establish a duty for members to report unethical behaviour
of other members or themselves to the most senior executive of the New Zealand Institute of
Chartered Accountants;
• Paragraphs NZ R100.11 - NZ100.13 A1 establish a responsibility for members over the conduct
of non-member partners or directors, and others under the supervision of the member;
• The principle of timeliness in paragraph 113.1 A4 is extended in NZ113.1 A4.1 to members'
obligation to respond to the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants;

121
 CONFORMITY STATEMENTS

• Paragraph NZ R114.3 in this Code of Ethics clarifies that the exceptions to complying with
paragraph R114.2 extend to situations described in paragraph R114.2(d).
• Paragraph NZ114.3 A1.1 recommends that members obtain legal advice if considering disclosing
confidential information.
• Paragraph NZ R114.4 in this Code of Ethics clarifies that the prohibition extends to situations
described in paragraph R114.2(d).
• Paragraph NZ R115.3 requires a member to act with courtesy and consideration.
• Paragraph NZ120.17 A1 outlines firm culture guidance material for non-assurance engagements;
• Paragraphs NZ R120.18 – NZ R120.19 outline independence requirements for non-assurance
engagements;
• Paragraphs NZ210.8 A1, NZ210.8 A4 and NZ310.14 A1 encourage members to document
matters relating to conflicts of interest;
• Paragraphs NZ R310.9.1 - NZ R310.9.2 require the member in public practice to disclose, in
writing, the nature of the conflict of interest and the related safeguards applied to reduce it to an
acceptable level, to all clients or potential clients affected by the conflict. It also requires the
member in public practice to obtain, in writing, the clients consent to perform the professional
services when safeguards are applied. The IESBA Code states that disclosure is generally
necessary;
• Paragraph NZ R310.12.1 requires a member in public practice to disengage from the relevant
engagement if adequate disclosure to the client of a conflict of interest is restricted as a result of
confidentiality requirements. The IESBA Code allows the engagement to proceed in limited
circumstances;
• As a consequence of the inclusion of paragraphs NZ R310.9.1 - NZ R310.9.2 and NZ R310.12.1
in this Code of Ethics, IESBA paragraphs 310.9 A3, 310.9 A4, R310.12 - R310.13 and the third
bullet point of paragraph 310.9 A2 have been deleted from this Code of Ethics;
• Paragraph NZ R320.5 clarifies that client permission is required before initiating discussions with
existing accountant or predecessor accountant
• Paragraphs NZ R320.7.1 - NZ R320.7.2 provide additional requirements for existing accountants
regarding enquiries from proposed accountants and transfer of records;
• Paragraph NZ R330.4.1: prohibits members from entering into a contingent fee arrangement or
receiving a contingent fee where they are prohibited by technical and professional standards or
laws and regulations;
• Paragraph NZ R330.5.1: requires certain information to be disclosed to clients in respect to the
receipt or payment of referral fees, commissions or similar benefits
• Paragraphs NZ R330.5.2 - NZ330.5.2 A1 provide that assurance practitioners shall not accept an
engagement if the practitioner receives a referral fee or commission;
• Paragraphs R360.10 - 360.28 A1 are cross-referenced to PES 1 as issued by the NZAuASB.
Refer to PES 1 to see how these paragraphs differ to the IESBA Code;
• Paragraphs NZ R360.29 and NZ R360.31 - NZ R360.33 have been tailored to the NZ
environment to be consistent with PES 1 as issued by the NZAuASB;
• Parts 4A and 4B are cross-referenced to PES 1 as issued by the NZAuASB. Refer to PES 1
issued by the NZAuASB to see how Parts 4A and 4B differ to the IESBA Code; and
• As a result of these cross-references to PES 1, this Code of Ethics excludes the IESBA
definitions of audit; audit report; component; component audit client; component auditor firm;
cooling-off period; eligible audit engagement; direct engagement; eligible assurance engagement;
engagement period (audit and review engagements); engagement period (assurance
engagements other than audit and review engagements); group; group audit; group audit client;
group audit firm; group audit team; group engagement partner; group financial statements; time-
on period.

122
 CONFORMITY STATEMENTS

CONFORMITY WITH NATIONAL PRONOUNCEMENTS

______________________________________________________________________

This conformity statement accompanies but is not part of this Code of Ethics; it is given for information
purposes only.

This is a comparison between Professional and Ethical Standard 1, International Code of Ethics for
Assurance Practitioners (including International Independence Standards) (New Zealand) (PES 1) issued
by the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (NZAuASB) and this Code of Ethics. This
Code of Ethics has a broader scope but has the same requirements where the codes overlap.

An overview of the key differences between PES 1 and this Code of Ethics are as follows:

• The addition of a New Zealand Notice of Legal Status in this Code of Ethics.
• The addition of different Preface and Scope and Application sections.
• Requirement paragraphs in this Code of Ethics are in bold-type font
• The term “member” in this Code of Ethics has been amended to " assurance practitioner" in
PES 1;
• References to certain terms such as “professional services" in this Code of Ethics have been
amended to terms such as “assurance services" in PES 1 to reflect PES 1’s narrower scope, as
appropriate;
• Part 2 relating to members in business in this Code of Ethics has been renamed “assurance
practitioners performing professional activities pursuant to their relationship with the firm” in PES
1. Consequential amendments have also been made to paragraph 300.5 A1 in PES 1;
• This Code of Ethics includes a definition of “technical and professional standards” and resulting
consequential amendments NZ100.2, NZ110.1 A1, NZ R113.1, NZ 220.10 A1, NZ270.3 A3,
NZ330.3 A1 and NZ330.3 A2. PES 1 replaces references to this term with the words “standards
issued by the External Reporting Board, the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards
Board and the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board” to reflect its narrower scope. This
Code of Ethics also includes an additional definitions of employing organization, principal,
professional body, and related services;
• This Code of Ethics tailors the IESBA definition of firm. PES 1 does not include this tailoring;
• Paragraph NZ100.5 A1 in this Code of Ethics clarifies that the meaning of the letter “R” applies to
the New Zealand scope and application;
• Paragraphs NZ R100.9–NZ R100.10 in this Code of Ethics establish a duty for members to report
unethical behaviour of other members or themselves to the most senior executive of the New
Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants;
• Paragraphs NZ R100.11–NZ100.13 A1 in this Code of Ethics establish a responsibility for
members over the conduct of non-member partners or directors, and others under the
supervision of the member;
• The principle of timeliness in paragraph 113.1 A4 in this Code of Ethics is extended in NZ113.1
A4.1 to members' obligation to respond to the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants;
• Paragraph NZ R114.3 in this Code of Ethics clarifies that the exceptions to complying with
paragraph R114.2 extend to situations described in paragraph R114.2(d);
• Paragraph NZ R114.4 in this Code of Ethics clarifies that the prohibition extends to situations
described in paragraph R114.2(d).
• Paragraph NZ R115.3 in this Code of Ethics requires a member to act with courtesy and
consideration;

123
 CONFORMITY STATEMENTS

• Paragraph NZ120.17 A1 in this Code of Ethics outlines firm culture guidance material for non-
assurance engagements;
• Paragraphs NZ R120.18 – NZ R120.19 in this Code of Ethics outline independence requirements
for non-assurance engagements;
• Paragraphs NZ210.8 A1, NZ210.8 A4 and NZ310.14 A1 in this Code of Ethics encourage
members to document matters relating to conflicts of interest;
• The third bullet point of paragraph 310.9 A2 has also been deleted from this Code of Ethics.
• Paragraph NZ R320.5 in this Code of Ethics clarifies that client permission is required before
initiating discussions with existing accountant or predecessor accountant. PES 1 retains IESBA
paragraph 320.5 A1;
• Paragraphs NZ R320.7.1–NZ R320.7.2 in this Code of Ethics provide additional requirements for
existing accountants regarding enquiries from proposed accountants and transfer of records;
• Section 321 Second Opinions, dealing with situations where a member in public practice provides
a second opinion on the application of accounting principles has been excluded from PES 1;
• Paragraph NZ R330.4.1 in this Code of Ethics prohibits members entering into a contingent fee
arrangement or receiving a contingent fee where they are prohibited by technical and
professional standards or laws and regulations;
• Paragraph NZ R 330.5.1 in this Code of Ethics requires certain information to be disclosed to
clients in respect to the receipt or payment of referral fees, commissions or similar benefits;
• Paragraphs NZ R330.5.2 - NZ330.5.2 A1 in this Code of Ethics are labelled NZ R330.5.1 -
NZ330.5.1 A1 in PES 1; and
• As Paragraphs NZ R360.10 - 360.28 A1 and Parts 4A and 4B are cross-referenced in this Code
of Ethics to PES 1, this Code of Ethics excludes the definitions of audit; audit report; component;
component audit client; component auditor firm; cooling-off period; direct engagement; eligible
audit engagement; eligible assurance engagement; engagement period (audit and review
engagements); engagement period (assurance engagements other than audit and review
engagements); group; group audit client; group audit; group audit firm; group audit team; group
engagement partner; group financial statements; [NZ] offer document; and time-on period.

124
 CONFORMITY STATEMENTS

CONFORMITY WITH AUSTRALIAN PRONOUNCEMENTS

____________________________________________________________________________________

This conformity statement accompanies but is not part of this Code of Ethics; it is given for information
purposes only.

This is a comparison between APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including
Independence Standards) (APES110) issued by the Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards
Board (APESB) and this Code of Ethics.

An overview of the key differences between APES110 and this Code of Ethics are as follows:

• The addition of a New Zealand Notice of Legal Status and Preface in this Code of Ethics.
• The addition of different Scope and Application sections, in this Code of Ethics and APES 110, as
applicable.
• The addition of paragraphs and definitions prefixed as NZ or AUST, as applicable.
• The additional definitions in this Code of Ethics are of assurance practitioner, assurance services,
employing organisation, FMC reporting entity considered to have a higher level of public
accountability, principal, professional body, public interest, related services and technical and
professional standards. Inclusion of this later definition has resulted in consequential
amendments NZ100.2, NZ110.1 A1, NZ R113.1, NZ 220.10 A1, NZ270.3 A3, NZ330.3 A1, and
NZ330.3 A2.
• The additional definitions in APES 110 are of AASB, administration; AuASB, auditing and
assurance standards, Australian accounting standards; professional bodies, professional
standards.
• This Code of Ethics tailors the following IESBA defined terms to the New Zealand environment:
assurance team, audit client, firm and public interest entity.
• APES110 tailors the following IESBA defined terms to the Australian environment: engagement
team.
• Paragraph NZ100.5 A1 in this Code of Ethics clarifies that the meaning of the letter “R” applies to
the New Zealand scope and application section.
• Paragraphs NZ R100.9 - NZ R100.10 in this Code of Ethics establish a duty for members to
report unethical behaviour of other members or themselves to the most senior executive of the
New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants.
• Paragraphs NZ R100.11 - NZ100.13 A1 in this Code of Ethics establish a responsibility for
members in relation to the conduct of non- member partners or directors, and others under the
supervision of the member.
• In this Code of Ethics, the principle of timeliness in paragraph 113.1 A4 is extended in NZ113.1
A4.1 to members' obligation to respond to the New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants.
• APES 110 clarifies the conditions when information subject to R114.2 can be disclosed by
amending paragraph R114.3 to include the words “or information in respect of which the duty of
confidentiality applies” (and become an AUST paragraph). This Code of Ethics provides this
same clarification but by adding the words “or other information described in paragraph
R114.2(d)” to paragraph NZ R114.3.
• Paragraph NZ R114.4 in this Code of Ethics clarifies that the prohibition extends to situations
described in paragraph R114.2(d).

125
 CONFORMITY STATEMENTS

• Paragraph NZ R115.3 of this Code of Ethics requires a member to behave professionally at all
times.
• Paragraph NZ120.17 A1 in this Code of Ethics outlines firm culture guidance material for non-
assurance engagements.
• Paragraphs NZ R120.18 - NZ R120.19 in this Code of Ethics outline independence requirements
for non-assurance engagements. There are no corresponding provisions in APES110.
• APES 110 makes footnote reference to applicable Australian standards and legislation at
paragraphs 120.12 A2, 200.5 A3, 260.9 A1, 350.2, R360.6, 360.21 A1 and 360.25 A3.
• Paragraphs NZ210.8 A1, NZ210.8 A4 and NZ310.14 A1 in this Code of Ethics encourage
members to document matters relating to conflicts of interest;
• Paragraph AUST R220.9.1 in APES 110 requires certain actions where a member is not satisfied
that financial statements are presented in accordance with applicable Australian accounting
standards. An equivalent NZ paragraph has not been included in this Code of Ethics because the
paragraph’s intent is adequately covered by other revised IESBA paragraphs in section 220.
• Paragraphs NZ R310.9.1 - NZ R310.9.2 in this Code of Ethics require a member in public practice
to disclose, in writing, the nature of the conflict of interest and the related safeguards applied to
reduce it to an acceptable level, to all clients or potential clients affected by the conflict. It also
requires the member in public practice to obtain, in writing, the client’s consent to perform the
professional services when safeguards are applied. These paragraphs are consistent with PES 1.
• Paragraph NZ R310.12.1 in this Code of Ethics requires a member in public practice to disengage
from the relevant engagement if adequate disclosure to the client of a conflict of interest is
restricted as a result of confidentiality requirements. This paragraph is consistent with PES 1.
• As a consequence of the inclusion of paragraphs NZ R310.9.1 - NZ R310.9.2 and NZ R310.12.1
in this Code of Ethics, IESBA paragraphs 310.9 A3, 310.9 A4 and R310.12 - R310.13 and the
third bullet point of paragraph 310.9 A2 have been deleted from this Code of Ethics. These
paragraphs have been retained in APES 110.
• Paragraph AUST 320.2.1 in APES110 states that the requirements of section 320 also apply
where a member in public practice is replacing or being replaced by an accountant who is not a
member. In this Code of Ethics, this issue is addressed by reference to accountant rather than
member in the definition of the existing accountant, proposed accountant and predecessor
accountant.
• Paragraph NZ R320.5 in this Code of Ethics clarifies that client permission is required before
initiating discussions with the existing accountant or predecessor accountant. APES 110 retains
IESBA paragraph 320.5 A1
• Paragraphs NZ R320.7.1-NZ R320.7.2 in this Code of Ethics provide additional guidance for
existing accountants regarding enquiries from proposed accountants and transfer of records.
• Paragraph 325.8 A4 has been omitted from APES110 for reasons specific to the Australian
environment. The paragraph’s inclusion in this standard is consistent with PES 1.
• Paragraphs NZ R330.5.1 - NZ R330.5.2 A1 in this Code of Ethics deal with both the payment and
receipt of referral fees, commissions and similar payments whereas the equivalent provisions in
APES110 deal only with receipts.
• Paragraphs 300.8 A2, 310.8 A3, and 320.3 A3 of APES 110 retain references to “engagement
team” rather than updated references to “team”.
• Paragraphs R360.10 - 360.28 A1 in this Code of Ethics are cross-referenced to PES 1. Refer to
PES 1 to see how these paragraphs differ to the IESBA Code and APES110.
• Paragraphs NZ R360.29 and NZ R360.31 - NZ R360.33 have been tailored to the NZ
environment to be consistent with PES 1.
• Parts 4A and 4B in this Code of Ethics are cross-referenced to PES 1. Refer to PES 1 to see how
Parts 4A and 4B differ to the IESBA Code and APES110.

126
 CONFORMITY STATEMENTS

• As a result of these cross-references to PES 1 in this Code of Ethics, this Code of Ethics
excludes the IESBA definitions of audit; audit report; component; component audit client;
component auditor firm; cooling-off period; direct engagement; eligible audit engagement; eligible
assurance engagement; engagement period (audit and review engagements); engagement
period (assurance engagements other than audit and review engagements); group; group audit;
group audit client; group audit firm; group audit team; group engagement partner; group financial
statements; and time-on period. These definitions remain in APES110.

127