A

Seminar Report
on
Deepfake Detection
by
Mr. Kanawade Chaitanya Balasaheb
PRN NO: 72339591J

Under the guidance of

Ms. P. J. Patel

DEPARTMENT OF Artificial Intelligence & Data Science

Jawahar Education Society’s,
Institute of Technology, Management and Research, Nashik
Survey No. 48,
Govardhan, Gangapur Road, Nashik
Pin No.: 422 222

Savitribai Phule Pune University

Academic Year - 2025-2026
[Sem-V]
 CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that M r . Kanawade Chaitanya Balasaheb from Third Year

at the Department of Artificial Intelligence & Data Science in the academic
year 2025-2026 Sem –V as prescribed by the Savitribai Phule Pune University
has successfully completed his seminar work titled “Deepfake Detection” at
Jawahar Education Society’s, Institute of Technology, Management and Research,
Nashik.

Ms. P. J. Patel Ms. D. D. Survase Dr. M. V. Bhatkar

Seminar Guide Head of the Department Principal
Artificial Intelligence
& Data Science
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

It is my immense pleasure to work on this seminar “Deepfake Detection”. It is

only the blessing of my divine master which has prompted and mentally equipped
me to undergo the study of this seminar. .

I would like to thank Dr. M. V. Bhatkar, Principal, Jawahar Education of

Society’s Institute of Technology Management and Research for giving me such an
opportunity to develop practical knowledge about subject. I am also thankful to Ms.
D. D. Survase, Head of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science Department for her
valu- able encouragement at every phase of my seminar work and completion.

I offer my sincere thanks to my guide Ms. P. J. Patel, and our seminar coordinator
Ms. S. P. Baviskar who very affectionately encouraged me to work on the subject
and gave valuable guidance time to time. While preparing this seminar I am very
much thankful to her.

I am also grateful to entire staff of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science De-
partment for their kind co-operation which helped me in successful completion of
seminar..

Mr. Kanawade Chaitanya Balasaheb

PRN NO:72339591J
 ABSTRACT

Deepfake technology, a subset of artificial intelligence, has revolutionized digital

content creation by enabling the manipulation of audio, images, and video to pro-
duce highly realistic but fabricated media. While this technology has applications in
entertainment, marketing, and accessibility, it also poses significant risks, including
misinformation, identity theft, and cybercrime. This report explores the core con-
cepts, methodologies, and potential impact of deepfake technology, with a focus on
detection and prevention. We examine the underlying principles of generative mod-
els, such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and autoencoders, and their
role in creating realistic synthetic content. Key detection techniques, including facial
and audio forensics, temporal inconsistencies, and machine learning-based classi-
fiers, are analyzed in detail, highlighting their strengths and limitations.
The report also discusses the challenges and implications associated with deepfake
detection. On one hand, effective detection enhances digital trust, cybersecurity, and
content authenticity. On the other hand, deepfake technology evolves rapidly, posing
challenges in scalability, real-time detection, and adversarial attacks. Furthermore,
we investigate the legal and ethical landscape surrounding deepfakes, considering
both the opportunities for legitimate use and the risks of misuse. Governments and
organizations are striving to establish frameworks that balance innovation with pri-
vacy, security, and public safety. Finally, the report explores future trends in deep-
fake detection, including the integration of artificial intelligence, blockchain-based
verification, and improved forensic algorithms. As deepfake technology continues
to advance, robust detection methods will be critical to safeguarding trust in digi-
tal media.
Keywords: Deepfake Detection, Artificial Intelligence, Generative
Adversarial Networks, Media Forensics, Cybersecurity, Digital Trust
 CONTENT

1 – INTRODUCTION
1.1 Overview of Deepfake Technology
1.2 Historical Evolution of Deepfakes
1.3 Importance of Deepfake Detection
1.4 Key Characteristics of Deepfakes
1.5 Traditional Media vs. Deepfake Media

2 – CORE COMPONENTS OF DEEPFAKE

DETECTION
2.1 Machine Learning and Neural Networks
2.2 Neural Network Architecture for Deepfake Detection
2.3 Feature Extraction and Preprocessing
2.4 Datasets and Benchmarking
2.5 Multi-Modal Detection Approaches

3 – DEEPFAKE DETECTION SYSTEMS AND

SERVICES
3.1 Frame-Level and Video-Level Detection
3.2 Multi-Modal Detection Systems

4 – APPLICATIONS OF DEEPFAKE DETECTION

4.1 Image and Video Verification
4.2 Audio Authentication
4.3 Social Media Monitoring
4.4 Media Forensics and Legal Evidence
4.5 Cybersecurity and Fraud Prevention
4.6 Real-Time Streaming Verification
4.7 Gaming, Virtual Reality, and AI-Generated Content

5 – FUTURE SCOPE
5.1 Advanced Detection Techniques
5.2 Cross-Platform and Multi-Source Verification
5.3 Regulatory and Ethical Developments
5.4 Institutional Adoption and Integration

6 – CONCLUSION
 LIST OF FIGURES

Fig. no. Name of Figure Page no.

1.5.1: Real vs Deepfake Media 8
2.1.1: Generative Adversarial Network 12
(GAN) Architecture
2.2.1: Autoencoder-Based Deepfake Gen- 13
eration
3.2.1: Deepfake Detection Workflow 15
4.7.1: Audio-Visual Deepfake Analysis 26
SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AI: Artificial Intelligence

GAN: Generative Adversarial Network
CNN : Convolutional Neural Network
LSTM: Long Short-Term Memory
RNN : Recurrent Neural Network
KYC: Know Your Customer (if relevant
for verification)
ML : Machine Learning
DL : Deep Learning
CV : Computer Vision
*: Asterisk
+: Plus Sign
AND : Ampersand
 CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION

Deepfake technology, powered by advancements in artificial intelligence, repre-

sents a transformative shift in how digital media is created, manipulated, and con-
sumed. By leveraging deep learning models such as Generative Adversarial Net-
works (GANs) and autoencoders, deepfakes allow highly realistic manipulation of
audio, images, and video content, making it increasingly difficult to distinguish au-
thentic media from fabricated content. While this technology has legitimate appli-
cations in entertainment, accessibility, and creative industries, it also introduces sig-
nificant risks, including misinformation, identity theft, political manipulation, and
cybersecurity threats. This chapter explores the origins, key concepts, and implica-
tions of deepfake technology, setting the stage for understanding the importance of
detection and mitigation strategies.

The digital media landscape is undergoing a fundamental transformation with the

rise of deepfakes, a technology that challenges conventional notions of authenticity
and trust. Deepfake detection aims to identify and prevent malicious manipulation
by analyzing visual, auditory, and behavioral cues in media content. Detection sys-
tems leverage advanced machine learning, computer vision, and audio forensics to
safeguard the integrity of digital media and protect individuals, organizations, and
society from the harmful consequences of deepfakes.
 1.1 Overview of Deepfake Technology
Key points include:

Deepfakes refer to synthetic media generated or manipulated using AI tech-

niques that can realistically alter or fabricate human faces, voices, and gestures.
Core technologies enabling deepfakes include GANs, autoencoders, and neural
rendering, which allow the generation of realistic media content without requir-
ing traditional filmmaking or editing tools. Deepfake detection focuses on iden-
tifying inconsistencies, artifacts, or abnormal patterns in media to distinguish
authentic content from synthetic content. The overarching goal is to ensure trust,
credibility, and accountability in the digital world.

1.2 Historical Evolution of Deepfakes

The concept of synthetic media predates modern deepfake technology, with early
experiments in digital image and video manipulation dating back to the 1990s.
The introduction of GANs in 2014 marked a pivotal advancement, enabling
AI systems to generate highly realistic images by pitting two neural networks
against each other—the generator creates fake content, while the discriminator
evaluates authenticity. The term “deepfake” emerged around 2017, when ma-
nipulated videos of public figures gained widespread attention. Since then, both
the creation and detection of deepfakes have advanced rapidly. Detection meth-
ods have evolved from simple frame-level analysis to sophisticated multi-modal
approaches that consider facial, audio, and temporal inconsistencies, as well as
leveraging large datasets and AI models for real-time verification.

1.3 Importance of Deepfake Detection

(a) Prevention of Misinformation: Identifying deepfakes helps curb the spread of

fake news, disinformation campaigns, and politically motivated content manip-
ulation.

(b) Identity Protection:Detection safeguards individuals from identity theft, imper-

sonation, and reputational damage.
 (c) Continuous Learning and Adaptability: AI systems learn and adapt continu-
ously from new data, unlike traditional analytics models, which require manual
updates and recalibration to incorporate new information.

(d) Digital Trust and Security: Organizations and media platforms rely on detec-
tion to ensure the credibility of content distributed online.

(e) Legal and Ethical Compliance: Effective detection tools support adherence to
laws and ethical standards related to privacy, consent, and intellectual property.

1.4 Key Characteristics of Deepfakes

(a) Several defining traits distinguish deepfakes from authentic media

• Synthetic Realism:Generated content can appear nearly indistinguishable from

real media, leveraging advanced neural networks.

• Manipulability: Faces, voices, and gestures can be swapped, modified, or syn-

thesized to create entirely new media scenarios.

• Automation: AI models allow large-scale and rapid generation of fake content

with minimal human intervention.

Fig. 1.5.1 Traditional Media vs. Deepfake Media

• Summary:

– Understanding the contrast between authentic and deepfake media is essential for de-
tection and mitigation: • Centralized vs. AI-Generated Content: Traditional media
is produced under human supervision with verifiable sources. Deepfakes are gener-
ated automatically by AI systems, often without oversight. • Trust and Verification:
Traditional media relies on established journalistic or institutional trust. Deepfakes
undermine trust, requiring independent verification and detection methods.
 CHAPTER-2
CORE COMPONENTS OF DEEPFAKE
DETECTION

1. Machine Learning and Neural Networks

Machine learning, particularly deep learning, is the backbone of modern deepfake
detection. Detection models analyze patterns in images, videos, and audio to identify
inconsistencies indicative of synthetic content. Neural networks, such as Convolu-
tional Neural Networks (CNNs) for images and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs)
or Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks for temporal sequences, are widely
used to detect subtle artifacts, unnatural movements, and mismatched audio-visual
signals.
2. Neural Network Architecture for Deepfake Detection
Machine Learning Algorithms are at the core of AI applications in sports, enabling
systems to learn from data and make predictions or decisions without explicit pro-
gramming. In sports, supervised learning uses labeled datasets to train models for
tasks such as predicting game outcomes or player performance, while unsupervised
learning identifies hidden patterns in data, like clustering similar player stats.
3. Feature Extraction and Preprocessing
Feature extraction is a crucial step in deepfake detection. Raw media must be an-
alyzed to extract distinguishing features that reveal manipulation. Typical features
include:

Fig. 2.1.1 Example of Feature Extraction in a Deepfake Frame

4. Datasets and Benchmarking

Detection models require large, diverse datasets for training and evaluation. Pub-
licly available datasets such as FaceForensics++, Deepfake Detection Challenge 11
(DFDC), and Celeb-DF provide thousands of manipulated and authentic media sam-
ples. These datasets are essential for benchmarking detection algorithms and improv-
ing robustness against new deepfake generation techniques. Detection datasets are
 continuously updated to include novel manipulations, such as AI-generated voices,
full-body swaps, and synthetic gestures, ensuring that models remain effective against
evolving threats.
5. Multi-Modal Detection Approaches
Modern deepfake detection increasingly uses multi-modal approaches, analyzing
multiple data streams simultaneously, such as: • Visual Cues: Frame-level anal-
ysis of facial features, textures, and inconsistencies. • Audio Cues: Detection of
synthetic or misaligned speech patterns. • Behavioral Patterns: Analysis of gestures,
head movements, and micro expressions. By integrating multiple modalities, detec-
tion systems achieve higher accuracy and resilience against sophisticated deepfake
techniques.

Fig. 2.1.3 Oracle-Based Verification Flows

 CHAPTER-3
DEEPFAKE DETECTION SYSTEMS AND
SERVICES

The deepfake detection ecosystem is composed of various systems and services

that replicate or enhance traditional media verification methods using AI and decen-
tralized technologies. These systems form the backbone of the deepfake detection
field, providing users with tools to analyze, verify, and authenticate digital media
content across images, audio, and video. This chapter explores the main deepfake
detection systems, their functions, and how they differ from conventional verification
approaches.

3.1 Frame-Level and Video-Level Detection

(a) How It Works:

Deep learning models, such as CNNs for images and LSTMs for videos, are used to
detect subtle artifacts, including unnatural facial move- ments, texture irregularities,
and inconsistent lighting. Temporal anal- ysis ensures that sudden, unnatural changes
between frames are f lagged as potential manipulations.

3.2 Multi-Modal Detection Systems

Multi-modal detection systems analyze multiple channels of informa- tion—such as
audio, visual, and textual content—to improve detection accuracy. These systems
are especially effective at catching sophisti- cated deepfakes that might bypass
single-modal detection.

i. How It Works:
cues: Frame-level facial feature analysis, blinking patterns, lip sync ac- curacy. o
Audio cues: Detection of synthetic speech, voice cloning, or misalignment with lip
movements. o Behavioral cues: Gesture, posture, and micro-expression
inconsistencies. • Popular Platforms: o Microsoft
 Fig. 3.1.1 Multi-Modal Detection Workflow

Video Authenticator: Combines visual and temporal analysis to detect manipulated

videos. o Amber Video: Uses AI to detect both visual and audio manipulations in
media. • Advantages: Multi-modal systems pro- vide higher accuracy, resilience
against adversarial attacks, and reduce false positives compared to single modality
approaches.
 CHAPTER-4
APPLICATIONS OF DEEPFAKE DETECTION

Deepfake detection has emerged as a critical technology in the digital media

landscape, providing a wide range of applications that extend far beyond sim-
ple media verification. By leveraging artificial intelligence, machine learning,
and forensic analysis, deepfake detection tools enable users to authenticate dig-
ital content, prevent misinformation, and maintain trust in media. This chapter
explores the most prominent applications of deepfake detection, including im-
age and video verification, audio authentication, social media monitoring, media
forensics, cybersecurity, and more.
A. Image and Video Verification
One of the most widely adopted applications of deepfake detection is the
verification of images and videos. Traditional verification relies on manual
inspection or third-party fact-checking, which can be slow and prone to error.
Deepfake detection platforms offer automated analysis, significantly improving
efficiency and accuracy.
i. How It Works
Detection models analyze visual cues such as facial landmarks, blink- ing patterns,
texture anomalies, and temporal inconsistencies across video frames. AI models
flag suspicious content and provide confi- dence scores indicating potential
manipulation. • Advantages: • Au- tomated verification: Reduces manual effort and
enables large-scale media analysis. • Global access: Can be applied to content from
any- where in the world. • Transparency: Models provide interpretable insights into
why content is f lagged. • Popular Tools/Platforms: 18 • FaceForensics++: Offers
datasets and detection models for identify- ing manipulated videos. • Microsoft
Video Authenticator: Analyzes images and videos for potential deepfake
manipulation.
4.2 Audio Authentication
Audio deepfakes, including synthetic voices and voice cloning, pose
 serious threats in fraud, identity theft, and misinformation. Detec- tion systems can
analyze audio streams for anomalies in pitch, ca- dence, and synchronization with
lip movements. • How It Works: Audio analysis models detect unnatural speech
patterns, mismatches between audio and video, and inconsistencies in frequency
or tone.
• Advantages: • Fraud prevention: Helps identify synthetic voices in calls, podcasts, or
speeches. • Cross-modal verification: Ensures au- dio aligns with corresponding
video content. • Popular Tools/Platforms:
• Resemblyzer: Detects cloned or synthetic voices using deep learn- ing
embeddings. • Deepware Scanner: Provides real-time audio and video
authentication.

4.3 Social Media Monitoring

Deepfake detection is widely used to monitor content on social me- dia platforms
to prevent the spread of misinformation. Automated systems scan posts, videos,
and images to identify manipulated con- tent before it reaches large audiences. 19
• How It Works: Detec- tion algorithms continuously scan social media feeds, flag
suspicious posts, and alert moderators or users. Platforms can combine AI mod-
els with human review for enhanced accuracy. • Benefits: • Early detection:
Prevents viral spread of misleading or harmful content.
Enhanced credibility: Maintains trust in social media platforms.
Popular Platforms: • Sensity AI: Provides media monitoring and deepfake threat
intelligence. • Deeptrace Labs: Monitors emerging deepfake threats across social
networks.

4.4 Media Forensics and Legal Evidence

Deepfake detection is critical in forensic investigations and legal contexts.

Verified content can serve as evidence in courts or com- pliance processes. • How
It Works: Forensic tools analyze metadata, frame-level inconsistencies, and digital
fingerprints to confirm the authenticity of media. Reports generated by detection
systems can
 be presented as expert evidence. • Advantages: • Legal validity: Ensures
manipulated content is identified and documented. • Trans- parency: Forensic
reports provide detailed explanations of findings.
Popular Platforms: • Truepic: Authenticates images and videos with metadata and
blockchain verification. • Amber Authenticate: Combines AI detection with media
verification for legal purposes.

4.5 Cybersecurity and Fraud Prevention

Deepfake detection is increasingly used in cybersecurity to prevent identity theft,

phishing attacks, and corporate fraud. Synthetic me- dia can be used to
impersonate executives or manipulate employees.
How It Works: Detection systems monitor incoming communica- tions and media
content, flagging suspicious manipulations for hu- man review. • Benefits: • Risk
mitigation: Reduces losses caused by social engineering attacks. • Employee
protection: Identifies fraud- ulent content targeting staff or customers. • Popular
Platforms: • Resemble AI: Monitors for voice phishing attacks using synthetic
audio detection. • Sensity AI: Tracks corporate and political deep- fake threats.

4.6 Real-Time Streaming Verification

Deepfake detection is now being applied to live video streams, such as news
broadcasts, video conferences, and online events. Real- time verification helps
prevent manipulation as it occurs. • How It Works: AI models process frames and
audio in real-time, detecting suspicious patterns and alerting users or moderators.
• Advantages:
Immediate response: Prevents live manipulation from spreading misinformation. •
Interactive applications: Supports live broadcast- ing, online meetings, and
streaming platforms. • Popular Platforms:
Amber Video: Provides real-time verification for streaming con- tent. 21 •
Microsoft Video Authenticator: Capable of analyzing live streams for deepfakes.
4.7 Gaming, Virtual Reality, and AI-Generated Content

Deepfake detection also has applications in virtual worlds, gaming, and AI

generated content. Detection tools ensure authenticity of avatars, in-game media,
and synthetic user-generated content.

Deepfake Detection in Virtual Media

How It Works: Systems analyze avatars, in-game video, and audio content for
anomalies or synthetic patterns. • Benefits: • Fair play: Prevents cheating or
impersonation in virtual environments. • Con- tent authenticity: Ensures user-
generated content is genuine and re- liable. • Popular Platforms: • Sensity AI:
Monitors synthetic content in virtual environments and gaming platforms. •
Deeptrace Labs: Provides detection for VR/AR applications.

Fig. 4.7.1 Deepfake Detection in Virtual Media

 CHAPTER-5
FUTURE SCOPE

As deepfake detection technology continues to advance, its future prospects are

vast and promising. The current detection ecosystem is rapidly evolving, with
continuous innovation in AI models, verifica- tion systems, and monitoring
tools. However, several critical developments need to occur for deep- fake
detection to realize its full potential. This chapter explores key areas where
deepfake detection is expected to expand, potential inno- vations, and challenges
that need to be addressed to shape the future of digital media authentication.
5.1 Advanced Detection Techniques

The future of deepfake detection will involve more sophisticated methods that go
beyond basic image or video analysis. Some ar- eas expected to grow include: •
Multi-Modal AI Systems: Future detection systems will increasingly integrate
visual, audio, and be- havioral data to provide more accurate verification of media.
Com- bining multiple modalities allows detection systems to catch sub- tle
manipulations that single-modal models might miss. • Real- Time Detection:
Advances in computational efficiency and stream- ing AI will allow live
verification of content during video confer- ences, broadcasts, or social media
streams, enabling immediate de- tection of manipulated media. • Explainable AI
(XAI): Future de- tection tools will incorporate explainability, providing
interpretable insights into why media is flagged as manipulated, increasing trust
among users and institutions.
5.2 Cross-Platform and Multi-Source Verification
Currently, many detection tools operate within specific platforms or ecosystems.
The next evolution involves seamless cross-platform
verification, allowing content to be authenticated across different social media
networks, streaming services, and digital repositories. verification, allowing
content to be authenticated across different social media networks, streaming
services, and digital repositories.
 Interoperable Detection Frameworks: Protocols will allow inte- gration between
detection tools, metadata analysis systems, and blockchain-based verification
services to ensure content authentic- ity regardless of the platform. • Decentralized
Verification Net- works: Similar to oracles in blockchain, decentralized
verification networks can provide distributed consensus on the authenticity of
media, reducing reliance on a single authority and increasing relia- bility.
5.3 Regulatory and Ethical Developments
Regulation and ethical standards will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of
deepfake detection. The rapid development of syn- thetic media has raised
concerns around privacy, misinformation, identity theft, and digital rights. •
Regulatory Standards: Govern- ments and international bodies are expected to
introduce guidelines for deepfake creation, usage, and detection, including
requirements for transparency and consent in AI-generated media. • Ethical AI
Frameworks: Organizations will adopt frameworks to ensure re- sponsible use of
detection technology, balancing privacy, free ex- pression, and security
considerations. Clear ethical guidelines will foster trust and wider adoption of
detection tools.
5.4 Institutional Adoption and Integration
While deepfake detection has largely been driven by researchers and tech
companies, institutional adoption is set to grow, particu- larly in media,
cybersecurity, and governmental sectors. • Integra- tion with Media and News
Organizations: Detection tools will be integrated into content verification pipelines
for newsrooms, stream- ing platforms, and social media companies to ensure
accuracy be- fore publication. • Enterprise Security and Compliance: Corpora-
tions will adopt detection systems to protect against identity fraud, corporate
impersonation, and cyber threats using synthetic media. Advanced monitoring and
alert systems will become part of stan- dard cybersecurity infrastructure. • AI-
Powered Legal Evidence:
Detection technologies will increasingly be recognized for legal and forensic
purposes, providing verified evidence in courts or reg- ulatory investigations. 26 •
As deepfake generation techniques con- tinue to evolve, the deepfake detection
ecosystem will need to inno- vate constantly. Future developments in multi modal
analysis, real- time verification, decentralized authentication, regulatory oversight,
and institutional integration will strengthen digital trust and help safeguard the
integrity of online media worldwide.
 CHAPTER-6
CONCLUSION

Deepfake detection is transforming the way digital media au- thenticity is

maintained, providing essential tools to safeguard trust in the information
ecosystem. By leveraging artificial intelligence, machine learning, and forensic 23
analysis, deepfake detection sys- tems enable the identification and mitigation of
manipulated au- dio, images, and video content, helping individuals,
organizations, and governments navigate the challenges posed by synthetic me-
dia. Throughout this report, we have explored the core components, systems,
applications, and benefits of deepfake detection technolo- gies. The key takeaway
from the rise of deepfake detection is its critical role in preserving digital trust and
media integrity. De- tection systems create opportunities for accurate verification,
en- abling content creators, journalists, and social media platforms to protect
audiences from misinformation, identity fraud, and mali- cious manipulation. By
combining automated analysis with cross verification methods, these systems make
it possible to authenti- cate digital content at scale, increasing transparency and
account- ability. However, deepfake detection faces significant challenges. Rapid
advancements in deepfake generation techniques make de- tection increasingly
complex, requiring continuous updates to AI models and datasets. High
computational demands and the need for real-time analysis also present scalability
issues. Additionally, adversarial attacks and subtle manipulations can bypass
detection systems, highlighting the importance of ongoing research and in-
novation in this field. In terms of impact on media and informa- tion systems,
deepfake detection acts both as a disruptor and a safeguard. It challenges the
traditional assumptions of content au- thenticity, forcing platforms, news
organizations, and individuals to adopt verification-first practices. At the same
time, it provides op- portunities for collaboration between technology providers,
media companies, and regulatory bodies to create an ecosystem that bal- ances
innovation with accountability. As deepfake detection tech- nologies continue to
evolve, they will play an increasingly vital role in ensuring the credibility, security,
and reliability of digital content worldwide.
 BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Deepfake Detection: A Survey • Reference: M. Afchar, V. Noz- ick, and S. Y.

Wang, ”Deepfake Detection: A Survey,” IEEE Ac- cess, vol. 8, pp. 158441–
158456, 2020. • Summary: This survey provides an overview of deepfake
detection techniques, categoriz- ing them based on the underlying methods and
discussing the chal- lenges in detecting synthetic media.

2. Deep Learning for Deepfake Detection • Reference: X. Zhang,

Y. Zhang, and Z. Liu, ”Deep Learning for Deepfake Detection: A Survey,”
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 30, no.
10, pp. 3412–3431, 2020. • Summary: The paper explores various deep learning
architectures employed in deepfake detection, highlighting their effectiveness and
limitations.

3. FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Im- ages • Reference:

F. R o¨ ssler, D. Cozzolino, L. Verdoliva, and M. Riess, ”FaceForensics++:
Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images,” IEEE Transactions on Information
Forensics and Secu- rity, vol. 15, pp. 1–1, 2020. • Summary: This study
introduces the FaceForensics++ dataset and benchmarks various methods for
detecting facial manipulations in videos.

4. DeepFake Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks • Reference: A.

Korshunov and S. Marcel, ”DeepFake Detection Us- ing Convolutional Neural
Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Infor- mation Forensics and Security, vol. 15,
pp. 1–1, 2020. • Sum- mary: The authors propose a method utilizing convolutional
neural networks to detect deepfake videos, demonstrating its efficacy on various
datasets.
5. A Survey on Deepfake Detection: From Traditional Methods to Deep
Learning • Reference: S. M. S. Islam, M. A. Hossain, and M. A. Rahman, ”A
Survey on Deepfake Detection: From Tra- ditional Methods to Deep Learning,”
IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 149632–149647, 2020. • Summary: This paper provides a
compre- hensive survey of deepfake detection techniques.