GH 300
GH 300
https://www.DeepDumps.com
About DeepDumps
At DeepDumps, we finally had enough of the overpriced, paywall-ridden exam prep
industry. Our team of experienced IT professionals spent years navigating the
certification landscape, only to realize that most prep materials came with a price
tag bigger than the exam itself. We saw aspiring professionals spending more on
study guides than on rent, and frankly, it was ridiculous. So, we decided to change
the game. DeepDumps was born with one goal: to provide high-quality exam
preparation without draining your wallet.
With DeepDumps, you get expert-vetted study materials, real-world insights, and a
fair shot at success—without the financial headache..
Doubt Support
We have developed a very scalable solution using which we are able to solve 400+
doubts every single day with an average rating of 4.8 out of 5.
https://DeepDumps.com
Mail us on - [email protected]
Microsoft
(GH-300)
GitHub Copilot
Answer: B
Explanation:
Fairness, within the context of Microsoft's ethical AI principles, focuses directly on ensuring that AI systems
do not discriminate or exhibit bias against any individual or group of people. This principle is critical for
promoting equitable outcomes and preventing AI from perpetuating existing societal inequalities. It
addresses potential biases embedded in training data, algorithms, and deployment strategies. An AI system
designed with fairness in mind will strive to treat everyone equally, irrespective of their race, gender, religion,
or other protected characteristics.
Privacy and Security (A) is concerned with protecting personal data and ensuring the safety of AI systems
from malicious actors, but not primarily with equal treatment. Reliability and Safety (C) emphasizes the
dependable and secure functioning of AI, focusing on minimizing risks and unintended consequences.
Inclusiveness (D), while related, focuses on designing AI that is accessible and benefits a broad range of
people, including those with disabilities or who are otherwise marginalized. While Inclusiveness contributes to
fairness, it doesn't explicitly tackle the core principle of treating everyone equally. The core tenet of the
question specifically relates to "treating all people equally," aligning perfectly with the "Fairness" principle.
Fairness is about actively mitigating biases and ensuring just outcomes, making it the most pertinent answer
among the choices provided.
For further research on Microsoft's Ethical AI principles, refer to the following resources:
Answer: C
Explanation:
Minimizing bias requires a multi-faceted strategy that addresses the issue at every stage of the AI
development lifecycle. Option C covers the three most critical components:
Problem: AI models learn patterns from the data they are trained on. If the training data disproportionately
represents certain demographics or excludes others (e.g., lack of data for women, specific racial groups, or
non-English speakers), the resulting model will inherit and amplify those societal biases.
Solution: Use diverse, representative, and balanced datasets that accurately reflect the population or
scenarios the AI will interact with. This is the foundational step to prevent bias.
Problem: Traditional AI optimization focuses solely on metrics like "accuracy" or "error rate" across the entire
dataset. A highly "accurate" model can still be highly biased if its errors are concentrated among a specific
subgroup (e.g., better loan application approval prediction for one gender over another).
Solution: Use fairness metrics (like disparate impact, equal opportunity difference, or demographic parity) to
measure the model's performance specifically across sensitive subgroups. This forces developers to treat
fairness as a technical requirement alongside accuracy.
Problem: Bias can be subtle and difficult to detect through automated metrics alone, especially when it
concerns subjective real-world outcomes.
Solution: Incorporate human oversight and review, including domain experts, ethicists, and representatives
from the communities potentially affected by the AI. This ensures that the system is evaluated for real-world
harm and ethical implications before and after deployment.
A. Collect massive amounts of data for training: While large datasets are necessary for high performance, a
massive amount of biased data only results in a massive amount of bias. Size does not guarantee diversity or
fairness.
B. Focus on accuracy of the data: "Accuracy of the data" is vague. If it means data quality, that's important,
but data can be high-quality (accurate labels) and still be heavily biased (unrepresentative samples). The
focus needs to be on representativeness and diversity, not just quality.
D. Improve on the computational efficiency and speed: This relates solely to the performance and resource
utilization of the model, having no direct bearing on its ethical fairness or bias.
A. Ensuring code security prevents unauthorized access and potential data breaches.
B. Ensuring code security enables the AI system to handle larger datasets effectively.
C. Ensuring code security maintains the integrity of the AI system.
D. Ensuring code security supports the development of more advanced AI features.
Answer: A
Explanation:
While all options describe beneficial outcomes, A addresses the most immediate and critical function of
security: protection against malicious actors and data loss.
1. Unauthorized Access and Data Breaches (A): Insecure code creates vulnerabilities (like buffer
overflows or unvalidated inputs) that attackers can exploit. This allows them to gain control of the
system, steal sensitive training data (which often contains PII or proprietary information), or exfiltrate
the highly valuable model weights themselves. This is the core goal of cybersecurity.
2. Integrity (C): Option C, "maintains the integrity of the AI system," is also a very strong answer
because security protects the model's logic from being tampered with (e.g., via model poisoning).
However, A describes the mechanism (preventing unauthorized access) that leads to the result
(maintaining integrity) and is the more direct consequence of securing the codebase itself.
3. Other Options (B & D): These relate to performance, scalability, and feature development, which are
important but are not the primary goals of code security. Security enables trust and safety, while
optimization enables speed and scale.
A. By providing clear explanations about the types of content the AI is designed to filter and how it arrives at its
conclusion.
B. By relying on a well-regarded AI development company.
C. By regularly updating the AI filtering algorithm.
D. By focusing on user satisfaction with the content filtering
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is A because transparency in AI operations, especially for content filtering, requires clear
communication with users about how the system works. Providing explanations about the types of content the
AI targets and the reasoning behind its filtering decisions builds trust and allows users to understand and
potentially appeal decisions if they disagree. This transparency helps mitigate concerns about bias,
censorship, and errors in the AI's judgment. Options B, C, and D, while potentially contributing to a better-
performing AI, don't directly address the issue of transparency. Relying on a well-regarded company (B)
doesn't guarantee transparency. Regular updates (C) improve accuracy but don't necessarily inform users
about the process. Focusing on user satisfaction (D) measures outcomes but doesn't explain how those
outcomes are achieved. Transparency in AI is crucial for ethical AI development and deployment. Without it,
users are left in the dark about how their content is being treated and filtered, potentially leading to mistrust
and resentment. In social media context, if users understand filtering mechanism they can modify their
content accordingly, thus helping them communicate their ideas more efficiently.
Here are some authoritative links for further research on responsible AI and transparency:
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is D: Enhances the performance of the selected code by analyzing its runtime complexity.
The /optimize slash command in Visual Studio, when used with GitHub Copilot, is designed to identify potential
performance bottlenecks within a given code snippet. It goes beyond simple formatting or language
translation. Instead, it leverages Copilot's AI capabilities to analyze the code's algorithmic complexity and
suggest improvements that can lead to faster execution times and reduced resource consumption.
This analysis often involves identifying inefficient loops, redundant calculations, or suboptimal data
structures. Copilot then provides specific recommendations, such as suggesting the use of more efficient
algorithms, alternative data structures, or parallelization techniques, to optimize the code's performance. The
command focuses directly on improving the code's runtime efficiency. While better code formatting and
documentation can indirectly lead to maintainability and, therefore, indirectly better performance, the direct
effect of /optimize is performance enhancement through runtime complexity analysis.
Cloud computing concepts support this explanation. Cloud environments often prioritize performance and
resource utilization. Optimized code reduces the consumption of CPU cycles, memory, and network bandwidth
in the cloud. A service like GitHub Copilot benefits cloud deployment by aiding developers in writing code that
efficiently utilizes the cloud resources, lowering costs and improving application responsiveness.While direct
documentation on /optimize for Visual Studio with GitHub Copilot might be sparse, searching for "GitHub
Copilot performance optimization" will yield resources relating to AI-assisted performance tuning.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Here's a detailed justification for why GitHub Copilot for Azure DevOps is the correct answer when an Azure
DevOps organization doesn't want a GitHub Enterprise license, along with supporting explanations and links:
The core requirement is to use GitHub Copilot within Azure DevOps without mandating a GitHub Enterprise
license. GitHub Copilot has different subscription plans catering to various user groups and environments.
GitHub Copilot Enterprise is specifically designed for organizations that are already using GitHub Enterprise
and require enterprise-level features like centralized policy management, enhanced security, and
organizational-wide insights. Because the question emphasizes avoiding a GitHub Enterprise license, this is
immediately unsuitable.
GitHub Copilot Individual is for individual developers and is tied to their personal GitHub accounts. It doesn't
directly integrate with Azure DevOps organizations or offer organizational control. So, even though it doesn't
require a GitHub Enterprise license, it's not the solution for an organization using Azure DevOps.
Copilot Teams is not an official product offered by GitHub. The primary GitHub Copilot subscriptions are
"Individual" and "Enterprise." This option is invalid.
GitHub Copilot for Azure DevOps (hypothetical) would ideally be designed specifically to integrate with
Azure DevOps organizations, potentially bypassing the need for a full GitHub Enterprise subscription. While
today, there is no "GitHub Copilot for Azure DevOps" subscription officially offered by GitHub. However, the
closest solution that satisfies the criteria and makes the most logical sense in the context of the multiple-
choice options provided is B. GitHub Copilot for Azure DevOps. The other options are invalid for the reasons
outlined above. The closest available solutions would be integrating a user's GitHub Copilot Individual license
for usage in their Azure DevOps work. However, there is no direct organizational integration.
Therefore, in the context of the question and the available choices, the hypothetical GitHub Copilot for Azure
DevOps is the most logical answer because it implies a version designed to work directly within an Azure
DevOps organization without necessitating a GitHub Enterprise license. While it's not currently a released
product, it's the option that best fulfills the scenario described in the question.
The "GitHub Copilot for Azure DevOps" option is currently a hypothetical scenario. While the provided
answer is the most fitting given the multiple-choice format, it's crucial to acknowledge that GitHub does not
currently offer a dedicated "GitHub Copilot for Azure DevOps" plan.
Alternatives: Instead of a direct "Copilot for Azure DevOps" plan, consider exploring these strategies:
Individual developers using Copilot Individual with their GitHub accounts can potentially integrate their work
into Azure DevOps projects, but this lacks centralized organizational management.
A workaround might involve building custom integrations or tools to bridge GitHub Copilot's suggestions into
the Azure DevOps environment. However, this requires significant development effort.
Future Developments: Microsoft continuously updates its services. Keep an eye on announcements related to
AI-powered developer tools and potential future integrations between GitHub Copilot and Azure DevOps.
Supporting Links (for general context, as a direct "Copilot for Azure DevOps" product link doesn't exist):
In summary, while "GitHub Copilot for Azure DevOps" is not a currently available product, it is the most fitting
and logical answer within the constraints of the question's multiple-choice options, as it implies a solution that
integrates Copilot with Azure DevOps without requiring a full GitHub Enterprise subscription.
Explanation:
GitHub Copilot Business policies are centrally managed at the organization level within GitHub. This allows
administrators to define and enforce usage restrictions, including limiting Copilot's access to specific
repositories, across the entire organization. This centralized approach simplifies management and ensures
consistency in policy application. Options A, B, and D do not align with the documented mechanisms for
managing GitHub Copilot Business policies organization-wide.
A copilot.policy file within each repository or in the .github repository would be ineffective because the GitHub
Copilot Business policies are applied at the organizational level through the GitHub platform's settings.
Utilizing GitHub Actions for applying these policies is also incorrect, as this isn't the designed method for
Copilot Business control. GitHub Actions can automate other aspects of repository management, but not the
central Copilot policies. Centralized control allows for easy updates and enforcement across all relevant
repositories. The organization settings provide the control plane for managing these features. This aligns with
the principles of centralized policy management common in cloud computing, where a single point of control
governs access and usage across an entire infrastructure.
Further Research:
Answer: BC
Explanation:
The GitHub Copilot REST API is divided into two main categories: Copilot User Management and Copilot
Metrics.
The REST API provides endpoints to manage who has access to a Copilot license (seat) within an organization.
List all GitHub Copilot seat assignments for an organization (B): This allows administrators to retrieve a list of
all users who currently have an active Copilot license assigned to them.
Other Actions: The API also allows for adding and removing users or teams from the Copilot subscription.
The REST API includes endpoints for Copilot metrics, allowing administrators to monitor adoption and activity.
Get a summary of GitHub Copilot usage for organization members (C): This allows administrators to retrieve
data for the last 100 days, including:
This provides a high-level summary of how the Copilot investment is being utilized.
A. View code suggestions for a specific user: The API provides metrics about usage (e.g., number of
completions accepted), but it does not allow for retrieving the actual content of code suggestions given to a
specific user. This is a privacy-sensitive area and is not exposed via the management API.
D. List of all unsubscribed GitHub Copilot members within an organization: The API focuses on the active seats
and usage metrics. While you can infer who is not assigned a seat by comparing the seat assignments list (B)
with the total organization member list, there is no single, dedicated API endpoint to list only "unsubscribed"
members.
Answer: C
A. Proposes changes for detected issues, suggesting corrections for syntax errors and programming mistakes.
B. Converts pseudocode into executable code, optimizing for readability and maintainability.
C. Generates new code snippets based on language syntax and best practices.
D. Initiates a code review with static analysis tools for security and logic errors.
Answer: A
Question: 11 Deep Dumps
Which GitHub Copilot pricing plans include features that exclude your GitHub Copilot data like usage, prompts,
and suggestions from default training GitHub Copilot? (Choose two.)
Answer: BD
Answer: AC
A.Knowledge bases
B.Chat
C.Inline suggestions
D.Pull request summaries
Answer: C
Explanation:
The Copilot feature that is available in all commercially supported IDEs (Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio,
JetBrains IDEs, etc.) is the foundational service:
C. Inline suggestions: This is the core, real-time code completion feature of Copilot. It is available as a
fundamental extension in all major supported IDEs for all Copilot plans (Individual, Business, and Enterprise).
B. Chat: Copilot Chat is widely available across major IDEs (VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs), but some
less commonly used supported IDEs, like Vim/Neovim, may not support the full chat interface, making it not
available in all commercially supported IDEs. The feature itself is included in Copilot Business/Enterprise.
A. Knowledge bases: The ability to chat with custom knowledge bases (using internal documentation) is a
specific feature of Copilot Enterprise that is accessed primarily through Copilot Chat or on GitHub.com. It's
not a standalone feature available in the basic inline suggestion interface of all IDEs.
D. Pull request summaries: This is a GitHub.com feature, not an IDE feature. The AI generates the summary
directly on the pull request page within the GitHub web interface for reviewers and is a key
administrative/workflow feature of Copilot Enterprise.
Answer: AB
A. The API can generate detailed reports on code quality improvements made by GitHub Copilot.
B. The API can track the number of code suggestions accepted and used in the organization.
C. The API can provide feedback on coding style and standards compliance.
D. The API can provide Copilot Chat specific suggestions acceptance metrics.
E. The API can refactor your code to improve productivity.
Answer: BD
A. Describe the project’s architecture → Use the copilot generate command → Accept the generated
suggestion.
B. Type out the code snippet → Use the copilot refine command to enhance it → Review the suggested
command.
C. Write code comments → Press the suggestion shortcut → Select the best suggestion from the list.
D. Use ‘gh copilot suggest’ → Write the command you want → Select the best suggestion from the list.
Answer: D
Answer: DE
Answer: ABD
Answer: CD
Answer: B
A. Usage analytics
B. The default editor
C. The default execution confirmation
D. GitHub CLI subcommands
Answer: AC
A. compiled binaries
B. code snippets
C. design patterns
D. screenshots
E. documentation
Answer: BCE
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is D: N/A - Copilot Individual is a free service for all open source projects.
GitHub Copilot Individual offers free access to verified students, teachers, and maintainers of popular open-
source projects. The question suggests a payment scenario, which is incorrect when dealing with open-source
projects under these specific eligibility criteria. The GitHub Copilot Individual subscription model includes
paid plans for commercial use. However, GitHub provides free access for open source contributors to
encourage innovation and community participation. This is a strategic initiative to support the open-source
ecosystem, aligning with the broader principles of cloud computing where collaboration and community-
driven development are paramount. Paying for Copilot Individual while working on open-source projects under
eligibility is unnecessary, as the service is provided at no cost. The confusion likely arises from the existence
of paid plans for individuals and businesses not engaged in open-source development within the specified
eligibility parameters. Open source contributions are valued and promoted through resources like free access
to developer tools, thereby fostering a vibrant collaborative environment. Therefore, if a user qualifies as an
open-source maintainer, student or teacher, GitHub Copilot is freely available.
For further research, refer to the official GitHub Copilot documentation:
GitHub Copilot Pricing (While this page details paid plans, it's important to understand the context of who
pays)
GitHub Copilot Individual (Focus on the section discussing eligibility for free access)
Answer: D
Answer: D
A. GitHub Copilot always filters out deprecated elements to promote the use of current standards.
B. GitHub Copilot may suggest deprecated syntax or features if they are present in its training data.
C. GitHub Copilot rejects all prompts involving deprecated features to avoid compilation errors.
D. GitHub Copilot automatically updates deprecated features in its suggestions to the latest version.
Answer: B
Answer: BE
Answer: C
A. Code quality
B. Compatibility with user-specific settings
C. Performance benchmarking
D. Suggestions matching public code (optional based on settings)
Answer: AD
Answer: AB
A. Improves suggestions by considering both the prefix and suffix of the code, filling in the middle part more
accurately.
B. Restricts Copilot to use only external databases for generating code suggestions.
C. Allows Copilot to generate suggestions based only on the prefix of the code.
D. Ignores both the prefix and suffix of the code, focusing only on user comments for context.
Answer: A
Answer: AC
A. Information from the IDE like open tabs, cursor location, selected code.
B. All the code visible in the current IDE.
C. All the code in the current repository and any git submodules.
D. The open tabs in the IDE and the current folder of the terminal.
Answer: A
Answer: D
A. Implementing safeguards to detect and avoid suggesting verbatim snippets from public code
B. Filtering out suggestions that match code from public repositories
C. Using machine learning models trained only on private repositories
D. Reviewing and storing user-specific private repository data for future suggestions
Answer: AB
A. By sharing chat history with third-party services to improve integration and functionality.
B. By analyzing past chat interactions to identify common programming patterns and errors.
C. By logging chat history to monitor user activity and ensure compliance with coding standards.
D. By using chat history to offer personalized code snippets based on previous prompts.
Answer: D
Answer: D
A. Keep the prompt as short as possible, using single words or brief phrases.
B. Provide examples of expected input and output within the prompt.
C. Avoid mentioning the programming language to allow for more flexible suggestions.
D. Write the prompt in natural language without any programming language.
Answer: B
Thank you
Thank you for being so interested in the premium exam material.
I'm glad to hear that you found it informative and helpful.
But Wait
I wanted to let you know that there is more content available in the full version.
The full paper contains additional sections and information that you may find helpful,
and I encourage you to download it to get a more comprehensive and detailed view of
all the subject matter.