For the data analysis, since our survey hasn’t been conducted yet, this table presents the
planned
statistical treatments we’ll use once data is gathered. Each statistical tool is aligned with our research
questions to make sure our analysis directly answers our objectives.
For Research Question 1, which focuses on the respondents’ demographic profile, we’ll use frequency
and percentage because these tools are appropriate for categorical data. They’ll help us clearly describe
characteristics like age, sex, education, and occupation.
For Research Question 2, which determines the comprehension level of CPR, we’ll apply the mean
and standard deviation to interpret their scores on knowledge, skills, and confidence. This allows us to
see the overall trend and variability in how well residents understand CPR.
Moving to Research Question 3, we’ll use a weighted mean and standard deviation to assess
comprehension based on factors such as prior CPR training, exposure to emergencies, and access to
community health programs. This helps us identify which experiences or exposures contribute most to
higher comprehension levels.
For Research Question 4, we’ll use a one-way ANOVA to test if there’s a significant relationship
between access to community programs and comprehension level, particularly when grouped according to
demographic profiles. This will tell us if certain groups benefit more or less from existing programs.
Lastly, for Research Question 5, we’ll use descriptive analysis to synthesize all findings and develop
evidence-based recommendations for enhancing existing community health programs related to CPR.
Overall, these statistical tools are chosen to ensure that our data analysis is systematic, accurate, and
capable of generating meaningful insights for community program improvement.”
RESEARCH DESIGN — DO NOT READ SCRIPT
“For our research design, we used a quantitative descriptive-correlational approach.
We chose this design because our goal is to measure and describe the residents’ comprehension
level about CPR — specifically their knowledge, skills, and confidence — and to explore how these
are related to their demographic factors and access to community health programs.
The quantitative design fits our study since we’ll be gathering numerical data through surveys,
allowing us to analyze patterns statistically.
Meanwhile, the descriptive-correlational aspect helps us determine not just the current level
of comprehension but also whether there’s a relationship between CPR understanding and
variables such as age, education, or prior training — without manipulating any conditions or
variables.
In short, this design allows us to present an accurate picture of the residents’ CPR comprehension
while also identifying which factors may influence it. The results can later serve as the foundation
for enhancing community health programs on CPR in Barangay Bagong Silangan.”
RQ4: So when your professor asks,
“Why did you choose those statistical tools?”
You can confidently answer:
“Because our study uses a quantitative descriptive-correlational design.
Frequency and percentage will describe categorical variables,
mean and standard deviation will determine comprehension levels,
and ANOVA or Pearson r will test the relationship between access to community
programs and comprehension level.
Finally, a descriptive summary will guide our recommendations for community
program enhancement.”