0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views1 page

Network Simulators Comparison

The document compares various network simulation tools, detailing their licenses, supported platforms, installation footprints, strengths, and limitations. Tools include ns-2, ns-3, OMNeT++, QualNet, NetSim, GNS3, Mininet, Komondor, and SeQUeNCe, each with unique features and use cases. Key considerations include open-source vs. commercial licensing, compatibility, and specific application domains.

Uploaded by

elumalaigokul361
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views1 page

Network Simulators Comparison

The document compares various network simulation tools, detailing their licenses, supported platforms, installation footprints, strengths, and limitations. Tools include ns-2, ns-3, OMNeT++, QualNet, NetSim, GNS3, Mininet, Komondor, and SeQUeNCe, each with unique features and use cases. Key considerations include open-source vs. commercial licensing, compatibility, and specific application domains.

Uploaded by

elumalaigokul361
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Comparison of Network Simulation Tools

Tool / Simulator License / Availability


Supported OS / Platforms
Approx Install / Disk Footprint
Strengths / Use Cases Limitations / Caveats
ns-2 Open source (research/academic)
Unix/Linux, Windows via CygwinFew hundred
Large
MBlegacy
to ~1 GB
protocol library, visualization (NAM),
Outdated,
widelypoor
usedsupport
in research
for modern protocols, scalabi

ns-3 Open source (GPL)


Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, Windows
Several
via GB
WSLwith modulesModern
(~5 GBmodular
typical) design, Python bindings,
Steeper
activelearning
community
curve, heavy builds for very large n

Academic
OMNeT++Public License (free for academic), commercial
Linux, macOS,
OMNESTWindows
~396 MB base, larger withModular,
frameworks
GUI visualization, strong for
Commercial
custom protocols
use requires license, module compatibili

OverSim (OMNeT++ ext.) Open source (GPL/APL) Cross-platform via OMNeT++


Small overhead relative to OMNeT++
Focused on overlay / P2P networks
Dependent on OMNeT++, limited to overlay dom

QualNet Commercial Windows, Linux, Solaris, macOS


~500 MB+ depending on scenario
High-fidelity models, GUI, parallel simulation
Expensive license, closed source, less extensib

NetSim (Tetcos) Commercial Windows (64-bit)


Requires ~4 GB RAM, licensing serverWireless/protocol
overhead modeling, GUI support
Closed source, Windows-only, license cost

GNS3 Open source (GPL) Linux, macOS, Windows


Core lightweight, VMs consume
Router/switch
storage emulation, widely used forPerformance
training depends on host, VM complexit

Mininet Open source (BSD-style)Linux (VMs for Windows/macOS)


~1 GB compressed, ~2 GB uncompressed
Lightweight,
VM image
modular, supports SDN/OpenFlow
Smaller community, Linux dependency

Komondor Open source Linux (research environments) Lightweight footprint Efficient WLAN simulation for dense networks Domain-specific (WLAN only)

SeQUeNCe Open source (Python-based)


Cross-platform (Linux/macOS/Windows)
Lightweight Python package
Quantum + classical hybrid network simulation
Highly domain specific, small user base

You might also like